Topic: I've realised why there are so many shitty posts here
+Anon — 5.9 years ago #56,065
The people who write them want to shut down tinychan by scaring away normal posters until the owner of tinychan turns it off because it's full of crap.
·Anon (OP) — 5.9 years ago, 9 minutes later[T] [B] #587,410
https://tinychan.net/topic/56052 is the perfect example. It obviously took some time to write that crap.
+Anonymous B — 5.9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #587,411
@previous (Anon)
You read that? You need a brain transplant.
+Anonymous C — 5.9 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #587,412
OP
I have had this suspicion since the past three or four months. I'm convinced now that I know I'm not the only one.
+Anonymous D — 5.9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #587,413
@OP
@previous (C)
Maybe the two of you might post interesting topics.
·Anon (OP) — 5.9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #587,414
@587,411 (B)
> You read that? You need a brain transplant.
I skimmed it. Obviously I'm not going to read crap, but it seems like someone actually put some time and effort into writing it.
+Anonymous E — 5.9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #587,415
no this forum is just shit and shit begets shit
if there were any potential good posters or posts you tards scared them off
+Anonymous F — 5.9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #587,416
@previous (E)
What positive contribution have you made here?
I tried something. Not many takers, but at least I tried.
+Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,417
I've tried as well. After the Bert vs Trucker battle died down, this place went downhill fast.
+Mrs. Curry — 5.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,419
Why?
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,420
Perhaps I should return to the forum? I'll consider making a poll to gauge how much interest there is in seeing my return. I shall respect the result.
+Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,421
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Perhaps I should return
You just did
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,422
@previous (J)
I mean full-time, as it were. Currently I check in every once in a while to survey its lamentable demise (and dear oh dear, what HAS become of this once-thriving forum??). I'm offering to grace the board with my former regular presence.
+Anonymous K — 5.9 years ago, 56 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,423
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Pedophile fake priest.
Eat shit and die.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 39 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,424
@587,422 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I agree this site is shit, but your presence would not somehow unshitify it. I
would say you would only make it worse, but this place is already at rock bottom. So do whatever you'd like, it isn't gonna change anything.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,425
@587,423 (K)
> Pedophile
Please respect On's wishes and keep this obsession of yours off this forum.
> fake priest.
I'm not "fake". I really am a priest.
> Eat sh*t and die.
No :)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,426
@587,424 (J)
> I agree this site is sh*t
Regrettably so.
> this place is already at rock bottom.
Indeed. How on earth did a once-fine forum end up like this?
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,427
@587,420 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I shall respect the result.
Yeah, right. You never have before.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,428
@previous (G)
> > I shall respect the result.
>
> Yeah, right. You never have before.
I have always respected the results of polls.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,434
@587,426 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> How on earth did a once-fine forum end up like this?
Pretty obvious. Most of the good users left. Now it's pedos and anons. And pedo anons.
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #587,435
@587,428 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Bullshit. When you first came here as TG (before turning into a fake priest), the poll was against you being here, but yet you stayed anyway, ignoring your "I will respect the poll" result.
+Anonymous L — 5.9 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,436
@previous (G)
True. He is consistent about being dishonest.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,438
@587,435 (G)
> Bullsh*t.
Not at all.
> When you first came here as TG (before turning into a fake priest)
It's not "fake". I really am a priest.
> the poll was against you being here, but yet you stayed anyway, ignoring your "I will respect the poll" result.
That poll was declared null and void after Syntax was proven to have spammed it with votes.
Have a blessed day, my child.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,439
@587,434 (J)
> > How on earth did a once-fine forum end up like this?
>
> Pretty obvious. Most of the good users left.
Indeed. I think that the only good users remaining from the old days are myself and my good friend On, and we barely ever visit here these days.
> Now it's pedos and anons. And pedo anons.
Regrettable. I wonder why that is the case.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,440
@587,436 (L)
> True. He is consistent about being dishonest.
On the contrary. I have never told a mistruth.
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,441
@587,438 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> That poll was declared null and void after Syntax was proven to have spammed it with votes.
Can you prove this happened?
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,442
@587,439 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Neither you nor On are good users. On used to be before he somehow got a powertrip from this unimpressive modship. I would say the only good ones who stick around are Morbid and Ducky. And Trucker occasionally.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,443
@587,441 (G)
> > That poll was declared null and void after Syntax was proven to have spammed it with votes.
>
> Can you prove this happened?
Yes. Hence the phrase "was proven to have spammed it". You're not very bright are you?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,444
@587,442 (J)
> Neither you nor On are good users.
Patently false.
> On used to be before he somehow got a powertrip from this unimpressive modship.
Oh, you're that guy who kept getting told by On to stop your endless posts about *that* subject aren't you? LOL :)
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,445
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Nope. But now I'm curious; What do you think white-knighting on this forum will get you?
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,446
@587,443 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Yes. Hence the phrase "was proven to have spammed it".
So you can't provide proof? Thanks. That will be all.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,447
@previous (G)
Inb4 TG2Merrin accuses us of being the same person.
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,448
@previous (J)
Yea, no doubt. He can prove we are the same person, but can't prove syntax rigged the poll. Go figure.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,449
@previous (G)
Merrin operates on convenience. Even if it means he has to lie to himself to convince his ego he's winning.
Not gonna lie, I appreciate the entertainment value in his methods.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,450
@587,445 (J)
> Nope. But now I'm curious; What do you think white-knighting on this forum will get you?
And I am equally curious: whom exactly do you think is being 'white-knighted' here?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,451
@587,446 (G)
> > Yes. Hence the phrase "was proven to have spammed it".
>
> So you can provide proof?
Of course! Just ask, my child.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,452
@587,450 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You didn't answer my question, but I'll answer yours regardless. You're very clearly white-knighting On in this case.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,453
@previous (J)
On certainly seems to have got under your skin! What on earth did he do to upset you like this? As far as I know he never banned you for your posts.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,454
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
So you're going to continue beating around the bush? I can play this game too!
(Edited 9 seconds later.)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,455
@previous (J)
> So you're going to continue beating around the bush? I can play this game too!
So you can't answer what On has done to upset you so much? Ok thanks, that'll be all :)
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,456
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
So you can't answer what you aim to get out of white-knighting On? Ok thanks, that'll be all :)
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,457
@587,451 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> No, I can't prove it, so I'll continue to pretend I can while pretending to be a priest.
Finally, a true confession.
+Anonymous M — 5.9 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #587,478
@587,439 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Now it's pedos and anons. And pedo anons.
> Regrettable. I wonder why that is the case.
Oh you. You know very well that you like to imagine you're the reason.
·Anon (OP) — 5.9 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,489
This as well is what's driving away normal people
https://tinychan.net/topic/56057·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,490
@587,478 (M)
> > > Now it's pedos and anons. And pedo anons.
> > Regrettable. I wonder why that is the case.
> Oh you. You know very well that you like to imagine you're the reason.
Oh for heaven's sake, not this ludicrous theory again. You're suggesting that I invented a Catholic priest persona in other to provoke the deviants on here into unleashing their sick posts under the guise of virtue-signalling, thus flooding the forum with disturbing p-word fantasies, driving away normal users, and reducing Tinychan to a barren wasteland of a forum.
That is an absurd suggestion. I am a real priest.
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 46 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,491
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I invented a Catholic priest persona
Nice self confession.
+Anonymous N — 5.9 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,492
@previous (G)
Agree truly a nice confession.
Not complete because he does not admit to pedophilia.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,493
@previous (N)
> pedophilia.
Kindly respect On's wishes and take your obsession with this subject elsewhere.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 33 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,494
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
There you go white-knighting again :)
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,496
@previous (J)
Well, On is a male, and males are TGs choice of victims.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 50 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,497
@previous (G)
I'd be inclined to agree with this if On were underaged.
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,498
@587,492 (N)
True. Very true. But we all know he won't confess to that unless we were Catholic.
+Anonymous O — 5.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,499
@587,497 (J)
@587,496 (G)
This double act you too have going on is weird.
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,500
@previous (O)
Two people sharing an opinion is weird to you? Are your opinions commonly only held by yourself? That doesn't bode well.
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,501
@587,497 (J)
> I'd be inclined to agree with this if On were underaged.
Yea, I didn't think about the underage part. Maybe TG decided it was time to go the legal age limit?
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,502
@587,499 (O)
See
@587,500 (J)
Opinions are free, and Anon J and myself are expressing them.
+Anonymous P — 5.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,506
suck my dick
·Anonymous M — 5.9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,507
@587,490 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> You're suggesting...
Absolutely. You also claimed it was your life ambition to ruin this site in this fashion. Oh you scamp, you.
·Anonymous O — 5.9 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,508
@previous (M)
> > You're suggesting...
> Absolutely. You also claimed it was your life ambition to ruin this site in this fashion. Oh you scamp, you.
I thought you sounded familiar...
http://minichan.org/topic/100371#reply_1132329 ·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.9 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,516
@587,507 (M)
> life ambition
Life Ambition Guy!!!! You're a long way from MC, pardner ;)
·Anonymous G — 5.9 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,524
@587,506 (P)
> suck my dick
Talk to TG/Merrin, he loves sucking dick.
·Anonymous M — 5.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,525
@587,516 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Why do I have to be that poster? Why can't I just be somebody who's quoting him/her?
·Anonymous J — 5.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,527
@previous (M)
Because everyone who would dare oppose Merrin can only be one inferior person. It wouldn't ever make sense that multiple people with logical ideologies would stand up to that guy.
/s
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
·Anonymous M — 5.9 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,542
@previous (J)
> Because everyone who would dare oppose Merrin can only be one inferior person. It wouldn't ever make sense that multiple people with logical ideologies would stand up to that guy.
Oh yeah, true. Is that person you or me by the way?
+Anonymous Q — 5.9 years ago, 2 days later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #587,603
@previous (M)
> > Because everyone who would dare oppose Merrin can only be one inferior person. It wouldn't ever make sense that multiple people with logical ideologies would stand up to that guy.
> Oh yeah, true. Is that person you or me by the way?
That would be me. Merrin, you clot.
+Anonymous R — 5.9 years ago, 4 days later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #587,717
> >1
That human nature, dude!
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.