Topic: Planning rendering
+Anonymous A — 3 months ago #68,575
Refraction, reflection, translucency, pen paper, no 3d?+Anonymous B — 3 months ago, 13 hours later[T] [B] #679,607
> You can't post images on your first 5 posts. Please ensure you have cookies enabled if you get this often.
Lurk for at least 60 seconds before posting your first reply.
bump
Lurk for at least 60 seconds before posting your first reply.
bump
·Anonymous B — 3 months ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #679,610
fukin heyuri
+yostraz — 3 months ago, 4 days later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #679,707
those are some pretty cool doodles
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous A (OP) — 3 months ago, 8 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #679,708
+Anonymous D — 3 months ago, 3 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #679,709
@679,707 (yostraz)
See, this @previous (A) is the problem with OP. Clearly he has a bit of talent, but all he does is ask about shortcuts to being a master. Instead of seeking feedback on his current work, he dismisses it all as garbage out-of-hand.
See, this @previous (A) is the problem with OP. Clearly he has a bit of talent, but all he does is ask about shortcuts to being a master. Instead of seeking feedback on his current work, he dismisses it all as garbage out-of-hand.
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
+Anonymous E — 3 months ago, 15 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #679,713
@previous (D)
Calling a properly published book,though may not, and the content inside it, or perhaps, it being actual real established in logic solution garbage, is also quite ill. it may not, be properly described, but any possibility to its structure, is not, dismissive of any of your "masterful" criticism either.
As said, perhaps one, like you or i, is to be, more,fukin patient, i suppose.
and as i said of mine, it's not special nor constructive, and nor it is in any of kimjunggi's explanation, nor does KJG's presentation any look like some Tate-while critiques to everyone's or anyone's work. just, alot of, non-work count, of solutions, foundations, and, formulas, maybe. Crutch-may-not, but you could say, my feelings, do not quite lied, much like yours.
also, in my case, it is less dauntless, but i suppose, one too confident, like you, may not measure too much in favour of your own, credibility. Afterall, less dauntless, too, though wrong, just, safely...wrong.
Calling a properly published book,though may not, and the content inside it, or perhaps, it being actual real established in logic solution garbage, is also quite ill. it may not, be properly described, but any possibility to its structure, is not, dismissive of any of your "masterful" criticism either.
As said, perhaps one, like you or i, is to be, more,fukin patient, i suppose.
and as i said of mine, it's not special nor constructive, and nor it is in any of kimjunggi's explanation, nor does KJG's presentation any look like some Tate-while critiques to everyone's or anyone's work. just, alot of, non-work count, of solutions, foundations, and, formulas, maybe. Crutch-may-not, but you could say, my feelings, do not quite lied, much like yours.
also, in my case, it is less dauntless, but i suppose, one too confident, like you, may not measure too much in favour of your own, credibility. Afterall, less dauntless, too, though wrong, just, safely...wrong.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 3 months ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #679,734
...yea that's a textdump