Topic: Absolute free speech
+Anonymous A — 6 months ago #67,752
I believe in absolute freedom of speech and that everyone has the right to speak their mind and that there should be no consequences for speech no matter what people say.
Now I will exercise my right to absolute freedom of speech:
I don’t believe in absolute freedom of speech, I think people should be censored, and that some ideas and ideologies should be banned because they’re dangerous for society. It should be illegal to spread false information and say things which are harmful to society. I do not believe that people have the right to say or to think or to believe whatever they want.
Now I will exercise my right to absolute freedom of speech:
I don’t believe in absolute freedom of speech, I think people should be censored, and that some ideas and ideologies should be banned because they’re dangerous for society. It should be illegal to spread false information and say things which are harmful to society. I do not believe that people have the right to say or to think or to believe whatever they want.
+Anonymous B — 5 months ago, 21 hours later[T] [B] #672,260
There will always be consequences for speech. Absolute free speech would imply said consequences would be legal as well. Henceforth, I approve of this.
Now go ahead and say the hard 'R,' @OPenis, because once you do I will make sure you are rightfully beaten within an inch of your life. I'll even say it with you.
Now go ahead and say the hard 'R,' @OPenis, because once you do I will make sure you are rightfully beaten within an inch of your life. I'll even say it with you.
+Anonymous C — 5 months ago, 32 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #672,264
+Anonymous D — 5 months ago, 1 minute later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #672,265
Your belief violates the principle of non-contradiction. This train of illogic is parallel to the that of maga cult. Are you maga cult? If so, try to understand that technocrats want government subsidized monopolies for central planning instead of the people under the former Constitutional Republic making decisions. Also, the trade war is indefensible since the means of production doesn't exist to 'bring back jobs' and it's driving away foreign investment. It won't save money 'in the long run', it will just take us a long time to dig out of a depression.
+Anonymous E — 5 months ago, 45 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #672,266
·Anonymous E — 5 months ago, 37 seconds later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #672,267
·Anonymous D — 5 months ago, 21 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #672,271
@672,266 (E)
I know, but since I don't start topics I work with what's there.
Hehe.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPQZ8Fl_HTQ
I know, but since I don't start topics I work with what's there.
Hehe.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPQZ8Fl_HTQ
·Anonymous C — 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,273
+Almarjo — 5 months ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #672,340
Free speech is natural law. Natural law surpasses anything man-made especially god.
To demand no consequence is entitlement at it's purity.
To demand no consequence is entitlement at it's purity.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+Anonymous G — 5 months ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #672,447
> everyone has the right to speak their mind ok
> and that there should be no consequences for speech no matter what people say.
nope
+Anonymous H — 5 months ago, 6 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #672,448
@672,340 (Almarjo)
Natural law isn’t real. In nature, there are no laws. In the jungle, if you wanna kill a dude because he was talking shit, ain’t nobody gonna stop you.
Natural law isn’t real. In nature, there are no laws. In the jungle, if you wanna kill a dude because he was talking shit, ain’t nobody gonna stop you.
+Anonymous I — 5 months ago, 22 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #672,485
Boyle's law and Charles's law preceded the kenetic theory of Bernoulli's principle, which is observable in the fireplace but necessarily controlled for manufacturing purposes. Since the U.S. failed educating a few generations, and with the trade war shrinking our manufacturing base, I guess further gutting education is considered a necessary evil since there won't be as many manufacturing jobs to fill.
·Anonymous I — 5 months ago, 2 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #672,500
Faraday’s law of induction was essential to Einstein developing the theory of relativity. The technoligarchs weren't essential for anything except amassing wealth but government subsides and contracts cost taxpayers, so I propose the old govt efficiency office inspectors gen be brought back. Defunding technoligarchs would save the taxpayer enough to pay off the national debt.