Topic: Trump keeps saying he is protecting women.
+Anonymous A — 6 months ago #67,675
Yet all he is doing is targeting trans women while neglecting actual threats to women. For every falsely accused “man in a dress,” there is a fucking rapist and abuser getting away Scott-free. Or getting a light prison sentence.
Women are in fear of men. Cis men. Not trans men, not trans women. Cis fucking men.
Go fuck yourselves.
+Anonymous B — 6 months ago, 37 minutes later[T] [B] #671,708
@OP
Women aren’t afraid of men, women are afraid of men who are creeps. Donald Trump was found guilty of rape, now he’s the president. Forget his opinions on other men, what about who he is himself?
·Anonymous B — 6 months ago, 37 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #671,709
Can a rapist protect women? Can a rapist protect anybody?
+Anonymous C — 6 months ago, 13 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #671,713
@OP
Consider this. Any guy can put on a wig and pretend to be Tran. Then walk into the girls showers with a boner.
+Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #671,715
@previous (C)
Statistically, trans women are more likely to be victims of violence than the other way around.
·Anonymous C — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #671,716
@previous (D)
I believe most straight teen boys think about looking at nakkid girls in the shower. As a pretend Tran they can.
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 44 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #671,717
@previous (C)
Would a straight guy pretend to be a woman and pretend to like men?
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 58 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #671,718
And how come people only complain about trans women? Trans men exist too. Women aren’t just asexual.
·Anonymous C — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,719
@671,717 (D)
> Would a straight guy pretend to be a woman and pretend to like men?
WTF? Makes no sense to me.
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,720
@previous (C)
In college, there were some trans students in my classes. It’s not like a guy could just put on a wig one day and then nobody would notice. They would generally wear feminine clothing every single day. If a straight guy wanted to try and fake that in order to peep at women, he’d ruin his chances of ever getting a girlfriend because everybody would think he’s gay.
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,721
Also, idk what you did in the locker rooms in high school. My mom said girls actually showered when she was in high school, so maybe it’s just a female thing. But when I was in high school, in the boys locker rooms, we’d change our pants, would change our shirt, would keep our underwear on, never look at each other, and never shower. Was I drenched in sweat for the rest of the day? Yes. But did I care? No. Because as men we are ashamed of our bodies and this is the sacrifice that must be made to not be a weirdo.
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,722
[redacted as off topic]
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
+Anonymous E — 6 months ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,723
That little bitch needs to resign
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,724
@previous (E)
He’s a 78 year old man who literally owns a golf course in Florida. You know how many 78 year old men would kill to be able to get to live on a golf course in Florida? Unfortunately his grandiose narcissism prevents him from going out gracefully. He’s gotta bitch until the very end.
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
·Anonymous E — 6 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,725
@previous (D)
Fucking hell can't he just shitpost instead!?!?
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,726
@671,724 (D)
He literally has an 5.3% chance of dying within the next year of his life due to his age. (I did the rough calculations, based on his age he has about a 20% chance of death in the next 4 years based on age alone and nothing else.)
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/table4c6.html ·Anonymous C — 6 months ago, 59 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,727
@671,720 (D)
> In college, there were some trans students in my classes. It’s not like a guy could just put on a wig one day and then nobody would notice. They would generally wear feminine clothing every single day. If a straight guy wanted to try and fake that in order to peep at women, he’d ruin his chances of ever getting a girlfriend because everybody would think he’s gay.
> because everybody would think he’s gay
That makes ZERO sense. Given he is with nakkid women he will have a Boner. No way would anyone call him call.
·Anonymous D — 6 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #671,728
Based on my age I have a 0.14% chance of dying this year which gives me about a 0.6% chance of dying in the next 4 years.
+Anonymous F — 6 months ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,007
+Anonymous G — 6 months ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,008
@previous (F)
Let's be clear first. There's no “democratic America”. America is a full-fledged Oligarchy. Having 2 far-right parties and allowing the common folk to vote every 4 years in prearranged guys approved by the oligarchy is the bare minimum requisite for pretending to be a democracy. Americans have an ultra liberal party disputing against a f@ csccist one and are dumb enough to call that a “left vs. right” dispute.
That said, as a non USA citizen, it amazes me the fact that f@ s c1st-party supporters uses to build their whole worldview over moral or satanic panic instead of analyzing the real world, and that's why they fail at everything other than promoting suffering.
In the real world, are trans people a problem? No.
Are trans people the usual rapists and child abusers? No.
But trans people are so few, they are so WEIRD, so socially excluded, that their only alternative to live in society in this f** capitalist society is making their lives revolve around sexuality. So they are perfect to be blamed for every issue caused by “normal people”… by themselves.
Conservatives points their fingers to trans people because it's too uncomfortable to admit that the real danger for their children is dad, mom's boyfriend, dad's best friend, that kind neighbor that treats everyone so well..... in fact, I know more than one conservative mom that hates trans people for being “dangerous” to women and children, but ignored their own kids when they let them know that someone close was abusing them.
+Anonymous H — 6 months ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,010
@672,007 (F)
You look at other guys dicks when they’re taking a shit?
·Anonymous H — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,011
@672,008 (G)
Honestly, as a dude myself, it’s actually really simple why people don’t like trans women. People don’t like trans men either but people hate trans women a lot more specifically. The reason is because in our culture, masculinity is seen as superior to femininity, and a man being feminine is seen as degrading while a woman being more masculine is seen as empowering. For example: when women started wearing pants, that was a feminist thing and they got away with it. When men started wearing dresses on the other hand, they get called pedos…
+Anonymous I — 6 months ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,012
@672,010 (H)
How else does a closeted homosexual indulge themselves without leaving a paper/digital trail?
·Anonymous H — 6 months ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,014
Also, idk how it works if you’re a woman, but at least if you’re a man, there is a general unspoken rule that weakness isn’t tolerated. If you show weakness everybody (including women sometimes), will instantly try to exploit it. So since people see women as weak, if a man behaves like a woman or looks like a woman, people see that as a man being weak, and feel the need to exploit that. Most men aren’t dangerous, if you look into it, there are statistics on this, the majority of adults have never been in a fight in their life. Most people aren’t violent, including most men. Men who are violent though don’t just victimize one person though, which is how you can end up with a situation where you can have a society where the majority of men aren’t criminals but the majority of women are scared of a minority of men. There are a couple reasons for this: culture and psychopathy. The genes associated with psychopathy are sex linked, so a man is more likely to be a psychopath than a woman is. But a woman can still be a psychopath and most men aren’t psychopaths, but that accounts for a lot of the crime men commit since a lot of men in prison are actually undiagnosed psychopaths. But there’s also a cultural component, the cultural norm of masculinity being associated with dominance and strength and the cultural norms of preying on weakness makes it easier for someone who’s male who doesn’t naturally feel empathy to be socially accepted and even successful. A lot of men who are police officers or politicians or billionaires are psychopaths, because it gets rewarded in our society. As long as someone isn’t so violent they get themselves into legal trouble, it can actually be a beneficial trait to not feel empathy.
·Anonymous H — 6 months ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #672,015
@previous (H)
It’s a tangent, but I think that’s also one of the things people who support the death penalty never think about. Yeah it might be good to kill the psychopaths, but who’s going to be excited to be the one getting paid to kill people all day? Probably somebody who has the exact same motivations and lack of empathy as all the serial killers they’re killing. Some people think it wouldn’t affect them and they’re not a psychopath and they’d just stand up for "the right thing" and not care. But you can easily enough find videos of guys who aren’t psychopaths crying about how traumatized they are from executing people who said they were innocent. Then if you look into comparisons between the number of American military veterans who die by suicide compared to the number who die in combat, whatever justifications or rationalizations people have, normal people can’t really kill someone even if they know or think that it’s right without negative mental consequences because empathy is instinctual. But then for people who are psychopaths they just don’t care because they can’t care, even if they know it’s morally wrong, and they don’t learn from their mistakes.
(Edited 58 seconds later.)
+Anonymous J — 6 months ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #672,088
@previous (H)
The people who adamantly support the death penalty are like the ones who incited the crowd to shout "crucify him" with regard to that innocent man, and this rigidity precludes the impartiality necessary to determine guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. These psychopaths belong to the 'throwaway culture' which condemns and dehumanizes their perceived enemies of a 'culture of death', but if they were self-aware they wouldn't be psychopaths, I guess. As long as someone else has to do the dirty work, a hired hitman, this allows them to somehow appease what's left of conscience or they remain in willful ignorance of conscience since it is dead in them.