Topic: Black people
+Anonymous A — 10 months ago #66,485
Something I don’t really like about being a black person is that all the extremist ideologies belong to other races even though blacks are the most hated. Jews have Zionism, whites have Nazism, the Japanese have killing themselves by flying planes into stuff to prove a point, the Arabs also have killing themselves by flying planes into stuff to prove a point, but people swear it’s different. Why don’t black people have any cool ideologies like other races? The most racist black guy I was able to find back in history was Idi Amin. He gave all the Asians living in Uganda a notice that they had to leave the country. So he deported 80,000 Indians from Uganda and then killed 100,000 to 500,000 people depending on the source. Hitler killed 6 million. Idi Amin never even got around to execute his pans of sending suicide paratroopers to Israel. Nobody cares about Idi Amin, he’s not well known. If black people are going to stand up for our race, how are we supposed to do it without some form of violent political extremism? All the other races have it. Nobody thinks black people are violent, that’s why we get taken advantage of, because we’re so peaceful.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 5 minutes later[T] [B] #662,302
The thing that irritates me about white people, is white people say everybody did stuff, except it isn’t true. White people are constantly shooting up schools in America. Black people hardly ever do that. We only kill people when somebody owes us money. We don’t just go into a store in a white neighborhood and start shooting at white people. But white people have been so violent, they dropped two nuclear bombs on Japan, burned Tokyo, enslaved all the Africans, genocidal the native Americans, and they are so successful and rich. Japan is a rich nation because they killed Chinese people and raped Koreans. How are black people ever supposed to be as successful as Europe if we are more peaceful than they are? Even when whites complain about blacks invading Europe, blacks invading Europe are just moving there peacefully. When Europeans came to Africa, they came with guns and shot at people. Why can’t Africans do the same? Why can’t we go to Europe in boats with guns and start shooting at white people and enslaving them and taking all their stuff? I feel like that’s the only real solution to the worlds problems.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,303
Really I think if an African country dropped a couple nukes on Europe, they would start respecting us more as a race. That’s why Asians look up to Europeans. It’s better to be feared than it is to be loved, because when someone loves you, they might change their mind. If someone is afraid of you, they can’t change their mind. That’s why violence is so beautiful. Cruelty creates peace and prosperity. Violence is the solution.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 10 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,306
And I mean, whites say blacks are violent as a way to bully us, but everyone knows it’s not true. The people who say this know that it’s not true. If we were truly violent, nobody would feel safe criticizing us. Yet whites love to scream about how much they hate us and how much we are unworthy of their respect like bastard misbehaved mentally challenged smelly children who have been spoiled and undisciplined their entire life. America conquered Japan by setting the Japanese on fire, now they love America. If Africans set a million whites on fire, the rest would love us. You can earn admiration, but if they never truly wanted the best for you in the first place, any "respect" will be so thin it will be lost at the tiniest mistake. If I point a gun to your head, you’ll love me no matter what I do. Unconditional affection is a much better position to be in. That’s what Europeans have right now. That’s why white majority nations need nuclear weapons. Because if they didn’t have them they know what the rest of the world would do to them.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,308
And whites tell us not to speak because it makes them feel guilty, but whites say their right to insult us so important that it comes from god and they’re willing to die to protect it. Some things are worse than death though. If they don’t want to fear death, we should give them something else to fear. If you can’t burn in hell maybe you can burn right here on earth.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 7 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,309
There have even been studies done on animals. If you take baby animals away from their mother and you give them a fake puppet mother, they will love a mother who hurts them sometimes more than a mother who never hurts them. You have to hurt people to make them love you. It’s a part of nature. A caring parent will punish you to stop you from making mistakes. A parent who always loves you doesn’t love you enough to stop you from hurting yourself. America has been a caring parent to the world, we burn civilians sometimes, but it’s to teach other cultures the values of democracy. It’s necessary to wield sin to uphold virtue. But the rule of law makes this impossible. The rule of law exists to maintain the current global order with whites on top. America is the law. And the law rules. Everyone must obey the morality of "do not kill" except the rule maker. All democracies are subservient.
+Anonymous B — 10 months ago, 9 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,311
I don't like your argument. Black people haven't hurt others on a massive scale simply because they haven't held power over people of different races. When they do have it they're well capable of commiting horrible acts. You gave a good example: Idi Amin. I'll give you another example of a black extremist: Forbes Burnham. Socialist that allied with the CIA to oppress and kill Indians in Guyana.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 2 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,312
There’s a reason why no African nation has veto power in the UN. The United States wanted to create a world order rigged against the African continent. Nothing the United States or European powers in general have ever done has benefited blacks.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 2 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,313
@662,311 (B)
> I don't like your argument. Black people haven't hurt others on a massive scale simply because they haven't held power over people of different races. When they do have it they're well capable of commiting horrible acts. You gave a good example: Idi Amin. I'll give you another example of a black extremist: Forbes Burnham. Socialist that allied with the CIA to oppress and kill Indians in Guyana.
The "argument" I’m making isn’t supposed to be a genuine argument. Mainly I’m just pointing out hypocrisy by showing how crazy it sounds if you make things equivalent. Europeans literally did set parts of the world on fire and they literally do say it was justified because it got certain people to accept European values. I’m just saying, well what if Africans did the same thing, wouldn’t that sound insane? And it does, because it is.
> I don't like your argument. Black people haven't hurt others on a massive scale simply because they haven't held power over people of different races. When they do have it they're well capable of commiting horrible acts. You gave a good example: Idi Amin. I'll give you another example of a black extremist: Forbes Burnham. Socialist that allied with the CIA to oppress and kill Indians in Guyana.
The "argument" I’m making isn’t supposed to be a genuine argument. Mainly I’m just pointing out hypocrisy by showing how crazy it sounds if you make things equivalent. Europeans literally did set parts of the world on fire and they literally do say it was justified because it got certain people to accept European values. I’m just saying, well what if Africans did the same thing, wouldn’t that sound insane? And it does, because it is.
+Anonymous C — 10 months ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,314
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 15 seconds later, 42 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,315
Like if you say "why don’t Africans do what Europeans did" everybody acts like you’re crazy. But if somebody says what Europeans did was fine people are like, "well yeah that’s normal."
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 3 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,316
The whole thing about "you have to hurt people to get them to love you," that actually comes from Europeans. Heinrich Himmler said, "The greatest political weapon is the weapon of terror. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us, but we do not ask for their love, only for their fear." They were pretty open about it. But then Nazis who hate blacks criticize blacks for being violent and it’s like… man what if we said the stuff you say?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 2 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,317
@previous (A)
Tbh a lot of people who think like Nazis don’t call themselves Nazis, but there are a lot of people who say stuff real casually that don’t realize I consider them to be Nazis for what they’re saying.
Tbh a lot of people who think like Nazis don’t call themselves Nazis, but there are a lot of people who say stuff real casually that don’t realize I consider them to be Nazis for what they’re saying.
·Anonymous B — 10 months ago, 53 seconds later, 48 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,318
@662,312 (A)
> There’s a reason why no African nation has veto power in the UN.
Maybe because only five nations have it representing the balance of power after World War Two?
You don't seriously believe that black leaders would use their veto powers wisely, do you? In fact most of the controversial decisions of the UN Security Council are already blocked by either the American or the Chinorussian camp so I don't think it would make that big of a difference.
> There’s a reason why no African nation has veto power in the UN.
Maybe because only five nations have it representing the balance of power after World War Two?
You don't seriously believe that black leaders would use their veto powers wisely, do you? In fact most of the controversial decisions of the UN Security Council are already blocked by either the American or the Chinorussian camp so I don't think it would make that big of a difference.
·Anonymous C — 10 months ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,319
Cringing servile fear and genuine respect are two very different things.
True strength comes from the knowing that the only thing we really have control over in this life is our response in the face of adversity.
True strength comes from the knowing that the only thing we really have control over in this life is our response in the face of adversity.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 4 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,320
@662,318 (B)
> > There’s a reason why no African nation has veto power in the UN.
> Maybe because only five nations have it representing the balance of power after World War Two?
> You don't seriously believe that black leaders would use their veto powers wisely, do you? In fact most of the controversial decisions of the UN Security Council are already blocked by either the American or the Chinorussian camp so I don't think it would make that big of a difference.
World War Two was 80 years ago. Why should we put a pause on the balance of power in the world? Back during World War Two, European nations still had colonial empires. Also for the record, I think basically any African nation would make better decisions on behalf of Europeans than Russia would. They’ve been openly threatening to nuke Europe recently.
> > There’s a reason why no African nation has veto power in the UN.
> Maybe because only five nations have it representing the balance of power after World War Two?
> You don't seriously believe that black leaders would use their veto powers wisely, do you? In fact most of the controversial decisions of the UN Security Council are already blocked by either the American or the Chinorussian camp so I don't think it would make that big of a difference.
World War Two was 80 years ago. Why should we put a pause on the balance of power in the world? Back during World War Two, European nations still had colonial empires. Also for the record, I think basically any African nation would make better decisions on behalf of Europeans than Russia would. They’ve been openly threatening to nuke Europe recently.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #662,321
Certain people in the west sometimes have a view that Russia is just misunderstood or something. The Russian government literally just casually showered an animated video of a Russian nuclear missile striking Florida as an example to demonstrate how one of their weapons systems works. And that was before they invaded Ukraine the second time. The Russians are real causal with their desire to destroy America. I don’t know how anybody in the west could possibly believe that Russia has their best interests in mind at all.
https://youtu.be/VlEaec2d6AA
https://youtu.be/VlEaec2d6AA
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #662,323
Like saying that a nation that literally put bounties on American soldiers would make better decisions for the west than African nations is borderline insane.
·Anonymous B — 10 months ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #662,328
@662,320 (A)
> Why should we put a pause on the balance of power in the world?
Great question. Maybe it's because those that have power don't want to share it?
And you seem to have a very warped idea of what the UN Security Council does. They don't legislate on internal matters of states.
Anyways, UN reform has been on the agenda for ages, but it's not just African nations that want a seat. South Americans want too. Other Europeans. Arabs, India. Why should any African nation get a seat before Indonesia, which is more populous than all of them?
> Why should we put a pause on the balance of power in the world?
Great question. Maybe it's because those that have power don't want to share it?
And you seem to have a very warped idea of what the UN Security Council does. They don't legislate on internal matters of states.
Anyways, UN reform has been on the agenda for ages, but it's not just African nations that want a seat. South Americans want too. Other Europeans. Arabs, India. Why should any African nation get a seat before Indonesia, which is more populous than all of them?
+Anonymous D — 10 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #662,333
·Anonymous D — 10 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #662,334
@662,328 (B)
Also you make it seem like Indonesia is huge compared to any African nation. Nigeria has 223 million people and Indonesia has 277 million people. Indonesia has a larger population than Nigeria, but you make it seem as if the difference is much larger than it actually is. Also Russia has a population of 143 million people, France has a population of 68 million people, and the UK also has a population of 68 million people. So by that logic, since Nigeria is larger than France and the UK combined, if we are going by population, how does what you said make sense? Additionally, Nigeria has a birth rate of 5.14 children per women, while Indonesia has a birth rate of 2.15 children per women, so it’s debatable how much longer Indonesia will have more people than Nigeria.
Also you make it seem like Indonesia is huge compared to any African nation. Nigeria has 223 million people and Indonesia has 277 million people. Indonesia has a larger population than Nigeria, but you make it seem as if the difference is much larger than it actually is. Also Russia has a population of 143 million people, France has a population of 68 million people, and the UK also has a population of 68 million people. So by that logic, since Nigeria is larger than France and the UK combined, if we are going by population, how does what you said make sense? Additionally, Nigeria has a birth rate of 5.14 children per women, while Indonesia has a birth rate of 2.15 children per women, so it’s debatable how much longer Indonesia will have more people than Nigeria.
·Anonymous D — 10 months ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #662,335
@662,328 (B)
Like you could make the same argument that Nigeria is bigger than any European nation, because it is. So why should any European nation get a seat before Nigeria?
Like you could make the same argument that Nigeria is bigger than any European nation, because it is. So why should any European nation get a seat before Nigeria?
+Anonymous E — 10 months ago, 16 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,437
> Hitler killed 6 millionNo he didn't. Also kek at your last line after a bunch of blacks tortured a family in NC. Bottom line is they are simply incapable of higher thought when their community destroys black thinkers in elementary school. Your problem is the black community itself and not muh evil whitey who feeds and clothes you with their tax dollars.
+Anonymous F — 10 months ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,439
I'm not sure if OP is trying to bait.
Um... ignorance is bliss, don't think too much about problems, who cares about what has happened in the past if newer generations won't pass it on, etc.
Um... ignorance is bliss, don't think too much about problems, who cares about what has happened in the past if newer generations won't pass it on, etc.
+Anonymous G — 10 months ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,440
@previous (F)
> I'm not sure if OP is trying to bait.
> Um... ignorance is bliss, don't think too much about problems, who cares about what has happened in the past if newer generations won't pass it on, etc.
nah its not bait. Its legit and at this point Im all for it.
> I'm not sure if OP is trying to bait.
> Um... ignorance is bliss, don't think too much about problems, who cares about what has happened in the past if newer generations won't pass it on, etc.
nah its not bait. Its legit and at this point Im all for it.
·Anonymous G — 10 months ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,441
A lot of valid points you've made op. Sadly I think the reality is that most black people are either too passive or ridiculously uneducated to be able to summon that kind of ideology. I also share the sentiment in that if black people started adopting literally the ideologies, tactics and rhetoric that white ppl have used for years then we see a very different earth. In fact thats something that most white americans and europeans are afraid of. that someday black people will realize they too can simply "manifest destiny" by "the grace of god" and start enslaving whites and systemically ensure that for years on on end that white people will never have power and control. and even if whites were to be freed, black ppl will remain at the top of status quo by ensuring they have generational wealth and privileges.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous G — 10 months ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,442
This is part of why white Americans will say things like "just let it go" or "I had nothing to do with what my ancestors did" and "but I earned this/im not racist"
Black people need to stop preaching bullshit and go pillage and take shit from everyone, if they talk shit and criticize then deny deny and deny like they do.
Black people need to stop preaching bullshit and go pillage and take shit from everyone, if they talk shit and criticize then deny deny and deny like they do.
·Anonymous C — 10 months ago, 39 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,444
The reason why they say "I had nothing to do with it" is partly because they feel threatened when anyone 'outside' speaks of their history and identity. It's also legacy bigotry, fed by hollywood stereotyping, to erase peoples history. This is so it can be rewritten by the rulers, and it's the same pattern used by everyone from Antiochus IV Epiphanes to the Romans to today, only each technological advance has made it easier for them. Being a Roman citizen meant higher status and more opportunities but it took more time and effort. Now all they need is for you to turn on and tune in. There's a reason why they say those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am9BqZ6eA5c
You don't have to become like them when there's a better way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu9928h4hBs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am9BqZ6eA5c
You don't have to become like them when there's a better way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mu9928h4hBs
+Anonymous H — 10 months ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,465
@662,437 (E)
If you feel scared, then why are you talking? And if you don’t feel scared, then why are you complaining? Clearly you’re fine and black people aren’t a threat to you, so let us say whatever we wanna say and do whatever we wanna do. Since you’re superior you’re just gonna win anyway. It shouldn’t bother you if we start a war. Just chill out bro. It’s not a big deal.
If you feel scared, then why are you talking? And if you don’t feel scared, then why are you complaining? Clearly you’re fine and black people aren’t a threat to you, so let us say whatever we wanna say and do whatever we wanna do. Since you’re superior you’re just gonna win anyway. It shouldn’t bother you if we start a war. Just chill out bro. It’s not a big deal.
+Anonymous I — 10 months ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,471
I don't quite understand. You want to be an extremist?
·Anonymous C — 10 months ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,476
@previous (I)
I think they're conducting a presentation on how law enforcement is using AI assimilation to not only monitor but more easily control neurotypicals.
I think they're conducting a presentation on how law enforcement is using AI assimilation to not only monitor but more easily control neurotypicals.
·Anonymous H — 10 months ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,481
@662,471 (I)
> I don't quite understand. You want to be an extremist?
What’s explained doesn’t need to be understood.
> I don't quite understand. You want to be an extremist?
What’s explained doesn’t need to be understood.
·Anonymous H — 10 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,482
·Anonymous I — 10 months ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,484
So you want blacks to be superior to other races without blacks actually accomplishing anything that's meaningfully superior to other races? Have I got it? Is that right?
+Anonymous J — 10 months ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,485
·Anonymous J — 10 months ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,486
@662,484 (I)
All I’m saying is:
- the upper and lower kingdoms of Egypt were unified in 3150 BC
- The great pyramid was built in 2600 BC
- The last woolly mammoth population went extinct on Wrangel Island in 2000 BC
- Rome was founded in 753 BC
- Germany was unified in 1871
All I’m saying is:
- the upper and lower kingdoms of Egypt were unified in 3150 BC
- The great pyramid was built in 2600 BC
- The last woolly mammoth population went extinct on Wrangel Island in 2000 BC
- Rome was founded in 753 BC
- Germany was unified in 1871
·Anonymous I — 10 months ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,488
I really have no idea what's going on here.
·Anonymous J — 10 months ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,489
·Anonymous J — 10 months ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #662,499
@662,486 (J)
> All I’m saying is:
>
> - the upper and lower kingdoms of Egypt were unified in 3150 BC
>
> - The great pyramid was built in 2600 BC
>
> - The last woolly mammoth population went extinct on Wrangel Island in 2000 BC
>
> - Rome was founded in 753 BC
>
> - Germany was unified in 1871
Also I should mention, China is pretty old, but hear it from Mr. China himself.
https://youtu.be/J0fABpNxLLc
> All I’m saying is:
>
> - the upper and lower kingdoms of Egypt were unified in 3150 BC
>
> - The great pyramid was built in 2600 BC
>
> - The last woolly mammoth population went extinct on Wrangel Island in 2000 BC
>
> - Rome was founded in 753 BC
>
> - Germany was unified in 1871
Also I should mention, China is pretty old, but hear it from Mr. China himself.
https://youtu.be/J0fABpNxLLc