Notice: Welcome to
TinyChan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have
set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can
restore your ID. The use of this site requires cookies to be enabled; please cease browsing this site if you don't consent.
Topic: Mao Famines
+Anonymous A — 1 year ago #66,470
I’ve heard people cite the statistic before that "Mao killed 60 million people." It turns out that’s due to a famine between the years of 1959 to 1961 which resulted in 15 to 55 million deaths (depending on the source). So okay, that sounds like a lot of deaths. But at the same time, in 1960, China had a population of 650 million. If 15 million people died in the famine, that’s 2.3% of China’s population. If 55 million people died in the famine, that’s 8.5% of China’s population. That seems like kind of a big difference. You’re talking about 2% vs almost 10%.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1 year ago, 3 minutes later[T] [B] #662,220
If Mao killed 60 million people through famine, by the same logic you could say Trump killed a million Americans through disease. And I’m not saying that to defend Mao, I’m actually just insulting Trump. And that is the entire reason I brought this up.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1 year ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,221
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1 year ago, 38 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,222
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1 year ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,223
@previous (A)
Tbh Mike Tyson might legitimately be the only man on Earth who loves Donald Trump and Mao Zedong at the same time. And you know what? Nobody is brave enough to tell him otherwise.
+Anonymous B — 1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #662,226
@662,220 (A)
If Trump killed a million people (he didn't), that would still have been less than 0,1% of America's population. His numbers would literally be irrelevant next to Mao's. Trump could well be called a saint. Although I'm against his canonisation.
But once again, your argument is terrible, if only because you decided to tie it to numbers and percentages. If you simply said "killing people bad", that would've been much more consistent.
+Anonymous C — 1 year ago, 10 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,300
@previous (B)
1 million out of 330 million is actually 0.3% and 0.3% is not less than 0.1% so you’re actually wrong.
·Anonymous B — 1 year ago, 42 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,310
@previous (C)
You're right. My whole argument stood on a math error. Quite a shameful showing.
+Anonymous D — 1 year ago, 59 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #662,336
@previous (B)
> You're right. My whole argument stood on a math error. Quite a shameful showing.
The power of communism.
https://youtu.be/q1TzLJ-6QKg Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.