Topic: Leading the revolution against republicanism
+Anonymous A — 10 months ago #66,379
Monarchy is the most natural form of government. Revolutions against monarchy always result in worse societies. Just look at what happened in America and Russia. They both had revolutions against monarchy. In America, they replaced monarchy with democracy, and now they have a dangerous crime ridden third world country where mass shootings are commonplace. Russia had a revolution against monarchy too. They replaced monarchy with a communist dictatorship where millions starved to death. Clearly there is no viable alternative to monarchy. When people with impure blood are in charge of a society, chaos ensues. The divine right of the sovereign monarch chosen by God is more sacred than the whims of the masses. We need to lead the revolution against republicanism. Social status should not be determined by either the state under a socialist economy or by corporations under a capitalist economy. Class should be based on birthright. The aristocracy chosen by the creator of the universe is more fit to rule than the lesser classes. And it is for their own benefit!
+Anonymous B — 10 months ago, 1 hour later[T] [B] #661,639
Both systems are authoritarian, and the same natural forces lead to power consolidating into an oligarchy of nobles.
Democracy and communism pretend to be different, but only to deflect responsibility from the elites pulling the strings. Democracy means they have a mandate, and you can't hold them responsible because they were elected by the people. Under communism, you must excuse anything they do because it's on behalf of the working class.
Old fashioned monarchy didn't have this protection. A bad law, or corruption meant all the blame fell on the same person- and they would accumulate that for the decades of their reign. This is inconvenient, because something is always bothering the people and as it builds up it delegitimizes the government and adds more PR work. New forms of government redirect that attention to a rotating group of individuals, while the government itself and the real people in power avoid getting their hands dirty.
Democracy and communism pretend to be different, but only to deflect responsibility from the elites pulling the strings. Democracy means they have a mandate, and you can't hold them responsible because they were elected by the people. Under communism, you must excuse anything they do because it's on behalf of the working class.
Old fashioned monarchy didn't have this protection. A bad law, or corruption meant all the blame fell on the same person- and they would accumulate that for the decades of their reign. This is inconvenient, because something is always bothering the people and as it builds up it delegitimizes the government and adds more PR work. New forms of government redirect that attention to a rotating group of individuals, while the government itself and the real people in power avoid getting their hands dirty.
+Anonymous C — 10 months ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #661,642
@previous (B)
I love how you gave a real response to something I said as a joke. Although oddly enough, what you said is kinda valid. I’m not even a monarchist but that’s legitimately a decent argument.
I love how you gave a real response to something I said as a joke. Although oddly enough, what you said is kinda valid. I’m not even a monarchist but that’s legitimately a decent argument.
+Anonymous D — 10 months ago, 7 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #661,662
+Anonymous E — 10 months ago, 8 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #661,702
+Anonymous F — 10 months ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #661,704
+Anonymous G — 10 months ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #661,713
Europeans are still barbaric. The only difference is they’re savages with money now. That’s why they’re currently at war with themselves.
+Anonymous H — 10 months ago, 15 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #661,774
