Topic: Fuck men (No not literally)
+Anonymous A — 1.1 year ago #66,185
I'm seeing way too much "white knightism" with some you of motherfuckers man.There are no "bros before hoes" nor is there an actual brotherhood. We throw each other under the bus under the false pretense of morality. You cannot claim to be bros with someone but the going gets though you quit on them like a fucking faggot. nah, I'm not sorry but fuck men in general. Fuck of all you who had a friend with problems and you abandoned them when they needed you the most. Fuck all of you for being "friends" for 10 years yet throw it away over a woman and fuck you for your using your friends as a scapegoat to dunk on in some random board you're trying to impress. If I had to give advice to my son. It's try to make friends with women instead of men. Because chances are a woman would be more loyal whether as a friend or a partner than a guy.
+Anonymous B — 1.1 year ago, 2 hours later[T] [B] #660,550
I'm sorry that you met bifags (guys who say they're gay until they're about just to later cheat on you with a girl)
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1.1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,551
@previous (B)
I know it sounds like its about me but it aint it's an observation ive seen IRL and to an extent online.
I know it sounds like its about me but it aint it's an observation ive seen IRL and to an extent online.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1.1 year ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,552
The only time Ive seen men having an actual camaraderie is in the military(if any). Since your only comfort is a gun and a war buddy. but outside of that you're either a stepping stone or an obstacle. it get 100 times worse when you throw a woman in the mix because we'll get really stupid real fast. Suddenly we become jesters to court favor over a woman and at the expense of others. I imagine this why usually if a man settles down and has a wife, he'll prefer her company over any other person. The whole hanging out with the boys is bullshit and usually single losers that any chance if they can get away with having a gf, you'll almost never see them again. Women might have their problems and hangups, they ain't perfect but in my experience I'd rather listen to a woman talk about her day than to hear a another bozo mother fucker tell me "my brother" yet we barley speak, we dont hang out or we never had any meaningful bond. Like I said fuck men.
+Chuffed !3qyf8DDj3w — 1.1 year ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,560
Alternate angle: I've had single buds that never registered that there are new priorities. After I got married and had a kid, I still had the old crew calling drunk at 2am to videogame or get DnD groups together... etc. Flattered to be considered worthy to party, but my family is trying to sleep and I can't keep vanishing for 11 hours at a time.
My kid is priority 1 - it's harsh but the old roving band of monkeys need to sort their own problems out now!
My kid is priority 1 - it's harsh but the old roving band of monkeys need to sort their own problems out now!
+Anonymous D — 1.1 year ago, 10 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,616
Perhaps your anger stems from loneliness if you feel abandoned by your peers but it doesn't make sense to get this worked up by the lives of others. Envy is sadness about not having the perceived good of another. The pair bond where two become one flesh makes sense cos it is naturally the best way to rear offspring, as a team. The desire for this is inborn in every human, and in its absence one tends to seek the acceptance of others. The superficial form utilitarian 'bonds' so avoid them, they will always be users. What is organic is real and actions always speak louder than words. If I treat others the way I wish to be treated, I don't have anything to be angry about. It seems an irrational waste of time and resources.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1.1 year ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,640
@660,560 (Chuffed !3qyf8DDj3w)
But that's being a family man. I wouldn't fault a family man who can't always make time for friends and I'd even go as far as to say that im sure there's moments where you have free time but perhaps you'd still wanna spend it with the wife and/or kids. That's a valid and normal life. It's the other guys that I've seen that have not of those things but have friends yet when the opportunity for a come up arises sudden;y you're left at the wayside for reasons unknown.
But that's being a family man. I wouldn't fault a family man who can't always make time for friends and I'd even go as far as to say that im sure there's moments where you have free time but perhaps you'd still wanna spend it with the wife and/or kids. That's a valid and normal life. It's the other guys that I've seen that have not of those things but have friends yet when the opportunity for a come up arises sudden;y you're left at the wayside for reasons unknown.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 1.1 year ago, 18 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,653
@660,616 (D)
> Perhaps your anger stems from loneliness if you feel abandoned by your peers but it doesn't make sense to get this worked up by the lives of others. Envy is sadness about not having the perceived good of another. The pair bond where two become one flesh makes sense cos it is naturally the best way to rear offspring, as a team. The desire for this is inborn in every human, and in its absence one tends to seek the acceptance of others. The superficial form utilitarian 'bonds' so avoid them, they will always be users. What is organic is real and actions always speak louder than words. If I treat others the way I wish to be treated, I don't have anything to be angry about. It seems an irrational waste of time and resources.
My anger doesn't from loneliness or feeling abandoned by peers. as far i'm concerned my personal life really has nothing to do with my rant. It's simply observation that i've made that somehow reminded me of what I should do to avoid those particular pitfalls and how I would conduct myself in a social setting. The maxim "treat others the way I wish to be treated" doesn't always apply in most scenarios due to human nature. However to address the anger portion of your statement the best example I could come up with is the Seth rogen/James franco situation. You cannot claim to friends with someone for years and then over a controversy you drop them in order to save face. Take what you will with that example. perhaps to someone like you it might be a "waste of resources and energy" and you're not wrong.
However, to me it's more of principle. friends come and go this I know. But if you're calling me drunkenly at 2am talking about "I love you man. You're my brother for life" then proceed to flak like a fucker just because I committed some transgression to save your ass then no the maxim "treat others the way I wish to be treated" doesn't mean much. it's better to be lonely than with bad company. or rather "treating others the way you wish to be treated" doesn't always warrant loyalty. Outside of the two become one flesh to create an offspring I'm incline to agree with you with regards to the superficial form utilitarian 'bonds'. This is part of why I often end up leaving group chats or dont really go to meetup groups.
> Perhaps your anger stems from loneliness if you feel abandoned by your peers but it doesn't make sense to get this worked up by the lives of others. Envy is sadness about not having the perceived good of another. The pair bond where two become one flesh makes sense cos it is naturally the best way to rear offspring, as a team. The desire for this is inborn in every human, and in its absence one tends to seek the acceptance of others. The superficial form utilitarian 'bonds' so avoid them, they will always be users. What is organic is real and actions always speak louder than words. If I treat others the way I wish to be treated, I don't have anything to be angry about. It seems an irrational waste of time and resources.
My anger doesn't from loneliness or feeling abandoned by peers. as far i'm concerned my personal life really has nothing to do with my rant. It's simply observation that i've made that somehow reminded me of what I should do to avoid those particular pitfalls and how I would conduct myself in a social setting. The maxim "treat others the way I wish to be treated" doesn't always apply in most scenarios due to human nature. However to address the anger portion of your statement the best example I could come up with is the Seth rogen/James franco situation. You cannot claim to friends with someone for years and then over a controversy you drop them in order to save face. Take what you will with that example. perhaps to someone like you it might be a "waste of resources and energy" and you're not wrong.
However, to me it's more of principle. friends come and go this I know. But if you're calling me drunkenly at 2am talking about "I love you man. You're my brother for life" then proceed to flak like a fucker just because I committed some transgression to save your ass then no the maxim "treat others the way I wish to be treated" doesn't mean much. it's better to be lonely than with bad company. or rather "treating others the way you wish to be treated" doesn't always warrant loyalty. Outside of the two become one flesh to create an offspring I'm incline to agree with you with regards to the superficial form utilitarian 'bonds'. This is part of why I often end up leaving group chats or dont really go to meetup groups.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
·Anonymous D — 1.1 year ago, 22 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,656
@previous (A)
I don't know who those celebrities are, I've never paid much attention. Expecting loyalty is also a foreign concept to me. What I mean is, if one wishes respect it must be given and earned in return. The same goes for trust. Loyalty to/from a wife is part of that responsibility, but even within families it can be difficult to maintain friendship, particularly these days when so many pledge loyalty to influencers who get rich by stressing their followers out but this is a pattern made possible by terrible leadership and an internet epidemic of malignant narcissism. Mental illness can be contagious so I choose who I associate with carefully, gradually over an extended period of time.
I don't know who those celebrities are, I've never paid much attention. Expecting loyalty is also a foreign concept to me. What I mean is, if one wishes respect it must be given and earned in return. The same goes for trust. Loyalty to/from a wife is part of that responsibility, but even within families it can be difficult to maintain friendship, particularly these days when so many pledge loyalty to influencers who get rich by stressing their followers out but this is a pattern made possible by terrible leadership and an internet epidemic of malignant narcissism. Mental illness can be contagious so I choose who I associate with carefully, gradually over an extended period of time.
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 1.1 year ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #660,680
trust no one with a penis
·Anonymous D — 1.1 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #660,698
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.