Topic: I find it interesting how "Catherine" is essentially a shtick now.
+La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI — 1.5 year ago #64,919
It doesn't even feel like it's a reflection of myself anymore due to the various amounts of sockpuppetry occurring.
I know technically my current name and tripcode is a reflection of that, but I am working on a different name to finally distance myself from it.
This tripcode is staying as I wanted to make sure it references my previous name, much like my original tripcode references my first moniker here "Girl."
But still, how the fuck did "Catherine" become a shtick for Matt, Dave, or perhaps even myself?
I know technically my current name and tripcode is a reflection of that, but I am working on a different name to finally distance myself from it.
This tripcode is staying as I wanted to make sure it references my previous name, much like my original tripcode references my first moniker here "Girl."
But still, how the fuck did "Catherine" become a shtick for Matt, Dave, or perhaps even myself?
+Anonymous B — 1.5 year ago, 16 minutes later[T] [B] #651,367
+Anonymous C — 1.5 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #651,368
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 1.5 year ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,372
Girl was you? Damn, how did I not know that? Or did I just forget it because it was so long ago...? I always assumed TGirl was because you're trans.
·La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) — 1.5 year ago, 31 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,373
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Nope. lol 'T' was purely coincidental. I went with it for that reason though.
The 'Y' at the end was also coincidental, but I'm surprised no anons connected it to the Y chromosome yet.
Nope. lol 'T' was purely coincidental. I went with it for that reason though.
The 'Y' at the end was also coincidental, but I'm surprised no anons connected it to the Y chromosome yet.
+Anonymous E — 1.5 year ago, 9 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,378
No one cares sir.
+Anonymous F — 1.5 year ago, 53 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,379
@651,373 (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
> The 'Y' at the end was also coincidental, but I'm surprised no anons connected it to the Y chromosome yet.
You refused to acknowledge Genes as necessary to define sexual identity.
> The 'Y' at the end was also coincidental, but I'm surprised no anons connected it to the Y chromosome yet.
You refused to acknowledge Genes as necessary to define sexual identity.
·La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) — 1.5 year ago, 26 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,380
@previous (F)
They're really not. Scientific evidences have already separated 'gender identity' from 'biological sex' and according to Google, there is currently debates among scientists about what biological sex entails.
Either way, I don't really give a fuck. I just trust the method and not obsessed over it like most angry anons here.
They're really not. Scientific evidences have already separated 'gender identity' from 'biological sex' and according to Google, there is currently debates among scientists about what biological sex entails.
Either way, I don't really give a fuck. I just trust the method and not obsessed over it like most angry anons here.
·Anonymous F — 1.5 year ago, 10 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,381
@previous (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
It's not really fair for you to assume we anons are angry over your assumed identity. Yes I find it strange and odd. Angry? Never.
It's not really fair for you to assume we anons are angry over your assumed identity. Yes I find it strange and odd. Angry? Never.
·Anonymous B — 1.5 year ago, 14 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,382
·Anonymous F — 1.5 year ago, 11 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,383
·Anonymous B — 1.5 year ago, 8 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #651,384
@651,373 (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
are you really gonna expect anons to perceive two occurances of complete random happenstance that may or may not be meaningful to faggot #2689932578632246? when you yourself admit that it is junk data?
are you really gonna expect anons to perceive two occurances of complete random happenstance that may or may not be meaningful to faggot #2689932578632246? when you yourself admit that it is junk data?
·La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI (OP) — 1.5 year ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #651,405
@previous (B)
They associated the 'T' with something when that was junk data.
@651,381 (F)
What else do you call them? There was a reason why they earned that name back on Minichan.
@651,382 (B)
Are you Dave?
They associated the 'T' with something when that was junk data.
@651,381 (F)
What else do you call them? There was a reason why they earned that name back on Minichan.
@651,382 (B)
Are you Dave?
·Anonymous F — 1.5 year ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #651,413
@previous (La Reina Catalina !j0siCathyI)
> What else do you call them? There was a reason why they earned that name back on Minichan.
I do not understand your question re what I said.
> What else do you call them? There was a reason why they earned that name back on Minichan.
I do not understand your question re what I said.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.