Topic: Heroine
+Anonymous A — 1.6 year ago #64,599
Hey Anion, who is your favourite heroines? Mine is the three cave warrioress!+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 1.6 year ago, 42 minutes later[T] [B] #649,046
I don't really know comic book stuff very well but I think I saw the last 10 minutes of Captain Marvel on TV once.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
+TJ — 1.6 year ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #649,048
I don't do hard drugs.
+Anonymous D — 1.6 year ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #649,059
Jade from Beyond Good and Evil
+Anonymous E — 1.5 year ago, 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #649,962
Frieren, elf-mage.
+396474 — 1.5 year ago, 10 hours later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #649,967
Thundercats!
+Anonymous G — 1.5 year ago, 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #649,973
+Anonymous H — 1.5 year ago, 1 hour later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #649,976
Why not her?+Anonymous I — 1.5 year ago, 10 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #649,978
heroin > heroine
·Anonymous E — 1.5 year ago, 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #649,985
My fave korean kunt+Anonymous J — 1.4 year ago, 6 days later, 1 month after the original post[T] [B] #650,203
MODESTY BLAISE By Peter O'Donnell & Neville Colvin
CHUCK : "WE BROUGHT ALONG TWO SUB-MACHINE GUNS HEAD BACK TO THE ISLAND, LOIS."
LOIS : "THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO HEAR"
CHUCK : "BUT IF MODESTY AND WILLIE ARE ENGAGED WITH THE OPPOSITION, WE DON'T GET UNDER THEIR FEET."
LOIS : "I AGREE, CHUCK - THEY HAVE THEIR OWN RHYTHM."
ON THE ISLAND
MODESTY : "TAKE HIM, WILLIE - NEXT ONE'S MINE. I WON'T USE THE GUN - ONE SHOT WOULD WARN THEM ALL."
CHUCK : "WE BROUGHT ALONG TWO SUB-MACHINE GUNS HEAD BACK TO THE ISLAND, LOIS."
LOIS : "THAT'S WHAT I WANTED TO HEAR"
CHUCK : "BUT IF MODESTY AND WILLIE ARE ENGAGED WITH THE OPPOSITION, WE DON'T GET UNDER THEIR FEET."
LOIS : "I AGREE, CHUCK - THEY HAVE THEIR OWN RHYTHM."
ON THE ISLAND
MODESTY : "TAKE HIM, WILLIE - NEXT ONE'S MINE. I WON'T USE THE GUN - ONE SHOT WOULD WARN THEM ALL."
·Anonymous E — 1.4 year ago, 3 weeks later, 2 months after the original post[T] [B] #650,887
Female Fruit-picker is my heroin of choice.·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 1.4 year ago, 7 hours later, 2 months after the original post[T] [B] #650,894
·Anonymous E — 1.4 year ago, 6 days later, 2 months after the original post[T] [B] #651,147
+Anonymous K — 1.1 year ago, 3 months later, 5 months after the original post[T] [B] #654,994
Beast Boudoir ! : http://www.lol-porn.com/gallery/danielle-beaulieu-beast-boudoir.html
+Anonymous L — 1.1 year ago, 5 hours later, 5 months after the original post[T] [B] #655,004
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 1.1 year ago, 15 hours later, 5 months after the original post[T] [B] #655,033
+Anonymous M — 10 months ago, 2 months later, 8 months after the original post[T] [B] #658,159
Medieval female knight!+Anonymous N — 6 months ago, 3 months later, 11 months after the original post[T] [B] #668,984
I recommended Ms Marvel!+Anonymous O — 6 months ago, 1 week later, 1 year after the original post[T] [B] #670,529
Ms Marvel : "I'm feeling frisky tonight and was wondering if I could show you my new super power I've been working on?If it helps your decision making, know that I'll be fully exposed about it." 😂
+Anonymous P — 5 months ago, 1 month later, 1.1 year after the original post[T] [B] #673,588
FLASH GORDON DAN SCHKADEGALO : "WHILE I WAS WATCHING THE SKIES, IT SEEMS DALE ARDEN ESCAPED HER MANACLES...
...AND MANUALLY OPENED THE SIDE HATCH.
BY THE TIME I TURNED TO SEE WHAT HAD HAPPENED...
...HE WAS THERE."
FLASH GORDON : "HI. NICE FLYING."
GALO : "IMPOSSIBLE OR NOT."
·Anonymous E — 4 months ago, 1 week later, 1.2 year after the original post[T] [B] #673,956
Diamond is Unbreakable edition> News
New! Emma Frost Trailer: youtu.be/OpOhyN4zYQY [Embed]
New! Season 2: Hellfire Gala | Krakoa Welcomes You April 11!: youtu.be/thyG51IdChc [Embed]
New! Season 2 Battle Pass: Flower of Krakoa is here with ten stunning costumes: youtu.be/XvzLYaiiUrA [Embed]
New! Dev Vision 5: youtu.be/LOuv0tO_aLI [Embed]
New! Season 2 Balance notes:
https://www.marvelrivals.com/balancepost/20250401/41667_1223995.html
New! Star-Lord's King of Spartax skin: https://bsky.app/profile/marvelrivalsglobal.bsky.social/post/3llz3keinx22c
New! Emma Frost's X-Revolution skin: https://bsky.app/profile/marvelrivalsglobal.bsky.social/post/3llyop2qias2e
New! Scarlet Witch's Chaos Gown free skin: https://bsky.app/profile/marvelrivalsglobal.bsky.social/post/3llwwpwswfc2n
New! Hawkeye Ronin and Thor Lord of Asgard skins: https://bsky.app/profile/marvelrivalsglobal.bsky.social/post/3llon7aeu5c2r
New! Venom Symbiote Boogie emote for April Fools: https://bsky.app/profile/marvelrivalsglobal.bsky.social/post/3llh3e62z422x
New! Moon Knight Fist of Vengeance and Black Panther Thrice-Cursed King skins: https://bsky.app/profile/marvelrivalsglobal.bsky.social/post/3ll4zi6asb22m
> Links
Website: https://marvelrivals.com/
Hero Hot List: https://marvelrivals.com/heroes_data/
Guides, tips, tricks and news: https://marvelrivals.gg/
Tier-List, Player and Hero Statistics: https://rivalstracker.com
Latest patch notes: https://www.marvelrivals.com/balancepost/20250401/41667_1223995.html
Previously on /mrg/: >>
@668,984 (N)
@670,529 (O)
Brie Cheese-wheel Larson ruined Captain/Ms Marvel
·Anonymous E — 4 months ago, 23 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[T] [B] #673,974
Hi Timmy,
How are you? I hope that you and Mia are healthy. All the best to you two.
How are you? I hope that you and Mia are healthy. All the best to you two.
·Anonymous E — 4 months ago, 21 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[T] [B] #673,984
How is ERB?
+Anonymous Q — 4 months ago, 15 hours later, 1.2 year after the original post[T] [B] #673,992
Juriiiiii
+Anonymous R — 4 months ago, 5 days later, 1.2 year after the original post[T] [B] #674,162
JENNIFER PARKER
Yes, women do belong in frontline combat roles
The Ukraine war has been called the bloodiest conflict since World War II. As of July 2024, 10,000 women were serving in frontline combat roles. Try telling them - from the safety of an Australian lounge room - they don't belong there. But that's exactly what the now disendorsed Liberal candidate for Whitlam, Benjamin Britton, did last week when he doubled down on his claim that women didn't belong in combat.
The idea of women in combat is not new - it dates back centuries. That this topic has re-entered mainstream political debate is dangerous and damaging. It risks undermining the morale of our defence force and stoking a culture war at precisely the moment we should be focused on enhancing capability.
National security is a bipartisan priority, with both sides acknowledging the strategic uncertainty Australia faces - war in Europe, instability in the Middle East and China's assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. Yet instead of strengthening our defence capability, recent political discourse risks undermining it. The resurfacing of comments from Britton - calling for the removal of women from combat roles to "fix the military" and a 2018 interview in which opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie claimed the "fighting DNA" of close combat units was "best preserved when exclusively male" do exactly that.
It's important to clarify what combat roles actually entail. These are positions that engage directly with enemy forces - traditionally found on warships, in fighter aircraft and on the battlefield. But as the character of war has evolved across the five domains - land, sea, air, cyber and space- so too has the nature of combat. The lines are increasingly blurred, exemplified by growing recognition of drone operators as combat roles. Today, defining a combat role is far less clear-cut than it once was. Which only reinforces how ludicrous it is to exclude 50 per cent of the Australian population from these roles.
Australia's journey towards fully integrating women has been a long one. Women have proudly supported Australian military operations since the Boer War in 1899. In 1990, the chief of navy lifted restrictions on women serving at sea, with Royal Australian Navy women deploying in frontline roles during the Gulf War aboard HMAS Westralia. By 1998, the navy allowed women to serve on submarines.
In 1992, most Australian Defence Force roles were opened to women, with only a few exceptions remaining - clearance divers, combat engineers, infantry, artillery, airfield defence and special forces. In 1992 the Royal Australian Air Force opened fighter pilot roles to women, though up-take has been slow because of cultural barriers rather than capability. Yet even before that, in 1990, female RAAF pilots were already flying C-130s in combat-related roles, and by 2000 women were serving as navigators in Australia's F-Ill strike aircraft.
While admittedly the nature of conflict across the domains is different, these are combat roles where women's lives are on the line and the sacrifices are just as real. The journey towards the inclusion of women in land combat roles in Australia has been slower. While ADF women have made key contributions to peacekeeping missions since the 1990s, it wasn't until 2011 that the formal ban on women serving in land combat roles was lifted-extended to special forces roles in 2014.
This was despite the first woman earning her commando green beret as early as 1981 and women serving as combat medics alongside special forces in Afghanistan before the policy change. But what of Britton's specific comments? Setting aside his apparent misunderstanding of the broad range of combat roles, he expressed concern "women's hips".
It's true that studies in Australia and Britain have found that body armour designed for men can have adverse physical impacts on women. But these same studies conclude that such issues can be resolved through improved design. It's not a reduction in protection, just a redesign to fit the body it's intended for.
And what about the success rates of women in these physically arduous roles? In 2018, the director of workforce strategy for the army told a parliamentary committee that attrition rates for women in combat roles were broadly the same as those for men.
Likewise, the proportion of applicants, male and female, who fail to meet the physical employment standards for these roles shows no significant gender difference.
As for the so-called fighting DNA of close combat units - I've never served in land combat - it's an experience that deserves the respect of a grateful nation. But based on my operational experience, from service at sea during the second Gulf War to chasing armed drug smugglers in the Caribbean, I can say this: the fighting DNA of a warship is strengthened, not weakened, by diversity of all kinds - including gender.
Australia faces the real prospect of conflict in our region. Faux culture wars such as this serve only to distract from the serious task of preparing our defence force for the challenges ahead.
Jennifer Parker is an adjunct fellow in naval studies at UNSW Canberra.
Yes, women do belong in frontline combat roles
The Ukraine war has been called the bloodiest conflict since World War II. As of July 2024, 10,000 women were serving in frontline combat roles. Try telling them - from the safety of an Australian lounge room - they don't belong there. But that's exactly what the now disendorsed Liberal candidate for Whitlam, Benjamin Britton, did last week when he doubled down on his claim that women didn't belong in combat.
The idea of women in combat is not new - it dates back centuries. That this topic has re-entered mainstream political debate is dangerous and damaging. It risks undermining the morale of our defence force and stoking a culture war at precisely the moment we should be focused on enhancing capability.
National security is a bipartisan priority, with both sides acknowledging the strategic uncertainty Australia faces - war in Europe, instability in the Middle East and China's assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific. Yet instead of strengthening our defence capability, recent political discourse risks undermining it. The resurfacing of comments from Britton - calling for the removal of women from combat roles to "fix the military" and a 2018 interview in which opposition defence spokesman Andrew Hastie claimed the "fighting DNA" of close combat units was "best preserved when exclusively male" do exactly that.
It's important to clarify what combat roles actually entail. These are positions that engage directly with enemy forces - traditionally found on warships, in fighter aircraft and on the battlefield. But as the character of war has evolved across the five domains - land, sea, air, cyber and space- so too has the nature of combat. The lines are increasingly blurred, exemplified by growing recognition of drone operators as combat roles. Today, defining a combat role is far less clear-cut than it once was. Which only reinforces how ludicrous it is to exclude 50 per cent of the Australian population from these roles.
Australia's journey towards fully integrating women has been a long one. Women have proudly supported Australian military operations since the Boer War in 1899. In 1990, the chief of navy lifted restrictions on women serving at sea, with Royal Australian Navy women deploying in frontline roles during the Gulf War aboard HMAS Westralia. By 1998, the navy allowed women to serve on submarines.
In 1992, most Australian Defence Force roles were opened to women, with only a few exceptions remaining - clearance divers, combat engineers, infantry, artillery, airfield defence and special forces. In 1992 the Royal Australian Air Force opened fighter pilot roles to women, though up-take has been slow because of cultural barriers rather than capability. Yet even before that, in 1990, female RAAF pilots were already flying C-130s in combat-related roles, and by 2000 women were serving as navigators in Australia's F-Ill strike aircraft.
While admittedly the nature of conflict across the domains is different, these are combat roles where women's lives are on the line and the sacrifices are just as real. The journey towards the inclusion of women in land combat roles in Australia has been slower. While ADF women have made key contributions to peacekeeping missions since the 1990s, it wasn't until 2011 that the formal ban on women serving in land combat roles was lifted-extended to special forces roles in 2014.
This was despite the first woman earning her commando green beret as early as 1981 and women serving as combat medics alongside special forces in Afghanistan before the policy change. But what of Britton's specific comments? Setting aside his apparent misunderstanding of the broad range of combat roles, he expressed concern "women's hips".
It's true that studies in Australia and Britain have found that body armour designed for men can have adverse physical impacts on women. But these same studies conclude that such issues can be resolved through improved design. It's not a reduction in protection, just a redesign to fit the body it's intended for.
And what about the success rates of women in these physically arduous roles? In 2018, the director of workforce strategy for the army told a parliamentary committee that attrition rates for women in combat roles were broadly the same as those for men.
Likewise, the proportion of applicants, male and female, who fail to meet the physical employment standards for these roles shows no significant gender difference.
As for the so-called fighting DNA of close combat units - I've never served in land combat - it's an experience that deserves the respect of a grateful nation. But based on my operational experience, from service at sea during the second Gulf War to chasing armed drug smugglers in the Caribbean, I can say this: the fighting DNA of a warship is strengthened, not weakened, by diversity of all kinds - including gender.
Australia faces the real prospect of conflict in our region. Faux culture wars such as this serve only to distract from the serious task of preparing our defence force for the challenges ahead.
Jennifer Parker is an adjunct fellow in naval studies at UNSW Canberra.
+Anonymous S — 2 months ago, 2 months later, 1.4 year after the original post[T] [B] #675,393
Heroin? *snort*+Harley !wkzLdZkDQA — 2 months ago, 15 hours later, 1.4 year after the original post[T] [B] #675,418
Bdhshshsh
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 2 months ago, 9 hours later, 1.4 year after the original post[T] [B] #675,425
+Anonymous U — 2 months ago, 4 hours later, 1.4 year after the original post[T] [B] #675,429
@649,973 (G)
Haven't seen this chick in like 20 years. Growing up I had a folder full of naked chicks that I'd jerk off to, there were a bunch of her in that folder. Man, takes me back, wish I still had that folder.
Haven't seen this chick in like 20 years. Growing up I had a folder full of naked chicks that I'd jerk off to, there were a bunch of her in that folder. Man, takes me back, wish I still had that folder.
+Anonymous V — 5 days ago, 2 months later, 1.5 year after the original post[T] [B] #676,360
SHINY NEW WING A LOOK AT DRAKAN'S PLAYSTATION 2 SEQUEL
While Drakan: Order Of The Flame wasn't a mega-hit, it was successful enough to warrant a sequel which was released exclusively on the PlayStation 2. "Psygnosis was owned by Sony Europe and was run fairly autonomously at the time. They were free to of do what they wanted, so launching on PC wasn't a big deal. But by the time Drakan finished up, Sony was getting more involved in what Psygnosis was doing and they wanted to focus on Playstation exclusive. The PS2 was on the horizon and Sony was very interested in us building a Drakan game exclusively for the system. We felt like this was a great opportunity to launch on this next-gen console. The result, subtitled The Ancients' Gates, was released in the summer of 2002 and was very similar to its predecessor: lots of melee combat, lots of flying on Arokh. The graphics were significantly improved, Rynn was now allowed to cast magic, there was a larger world, simplified combat and even experience point system that led to a skill tree In short, it's a really good game that also received mostly good ratings But unfortunately, it also wasn't that big a success, which meant the end of the series according to Alan. "Sales expectations for first-party game on the PS2 were high. Ancients" Gates underperformed those sales expectations and so the franchise sort of died." We feel this is a real shame, as the series showed great potential.