Topic: People who stick up for faggots
+Anonymous A — 1.9 year ago #64,460
Are so stupid
+Anonymous B — 1.9 year ago, 12 hours later[T] [B] #648,065
I don't think it's right for you to rape men in the ass just because they're gay.
It isn't stupid, it's a basic respect of human rights.
You scream "STOP STICCKING UP FOR FAGGOTS THEYRE FAGGOTS I CAN RAPE THEIR ASSHOLES YOU ARE STUPID" and it means nothing.
I live in a world where I respect consent and the right of someone not to be anally raped by a mentally unhinged sex maniac is fundamental to me.
So call me stupid, I will not let you try to rape young men in the asshole sir.
It isn't stupid, it's a basic respect of human rights.
You scream "STOP STICCKING UP FOR FAGGOTS THEYRE FAGGOTS I CAN RAPE THEIR ASSHOLES YOU ARE STUPID" and it means nothing.
I live in a world where I respect consent and the right of someone not to be anally raped by a mentally unhinged sex maniac is fundamental to me.
So call me stupid, I will not let you try to rape young men in the asshole sir.
+Anonymous C — 1.9 year ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #648,079
hun... your a bigot+Anonymous D — 1.9 year ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #648,080
People aren’t standing up for you and you’re a massive faggot, OP.
+Anonymous E — 1.9 year ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #648,105
People that see homosexuality as some sort of moral failing are stupid. Especially because they are unable to defend their position without resorting to some kind of superstition or religious reason for their hate. Just say it grosses you out and admit you are using your freedom to be a shitty person.
·Anonymous C — 1.9 year ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #648,106
@previous (E)
Homosexuality throws off the balance in social systems. a 50/50 population split is best managed with monogamous relationships.
Gay democrats are already promoting hypergamy and polygamy, creating an unstable incel population. add in lesbians, and now there's an inevitable outcome, because all behavior is guided by natural selection.
The social fabric tears, it's biology and a scientific approach to understanding political conflicts. That has nothing to do with what the bible says, or just a "gross" feeling. Homosexuals damage that fabric.
Why else do so many societies, the world over, throughout history have this aversion? Today Russia bans LGBT propaganda, as does China. Latin America has very strict cultural norms. In Africa they adopted Christian sexual ethics enthusiastically, and punish lgbt without shame. Do I need to mention the arab world? LOL.
It only has some acceptedness in the western hegemonic core because they have stolen resources to entertain themselves, and they can afford sexpat trips. Most of the planet agrees on this, even though they can't agree on anything else.
Homosexuality throws off the balance in social systems. a 50/50 population split is best managed with monogamous relationships.
Gay democrats are already promoting hypergamy and polygamy, creating an unstable incel population. add in lesbians, and now there's an inevitable outcome, because all behavior is guided by natural selection.
The social fabric tears, it's biology and a scientific approach to understanding political conflicts. That has nothing to do with what the bible says, or just a "gross" feeling. Homosexuals damage that fabric.
Why else do so many societies, the world over, throughout history have this aversion? Today Russia bans LGBT propaganda, as does China. Latin America has very strict cultural norms. In Africa they adopted Christian sexual ethics enthusiastically, and punish lgbt without shame. Do I need to mention the arab world? LOL.
It only has some acceptedness in the western hegemonic core because they have stolen resources to entertain themselves, and they can afford sexpat trips. Most of the planet agrees on this, even though they can't agree on anything else.
+Anonymous F — 1.9 year ago, 1 week later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,415
Why are people so pressed about the gays? They can't reproduce what are you worried about?
+Anonymous G — 1.9 year ago, 5 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,420
@previous (F)
Exactly. OP probably got rejected for hitting on a girl in a creepy manner and she used the "I'm a lesbian" excuse and he's too dumb to realize he was being a creep so he projects his frustration on gay people.
Exactly. OP probably got rejected for hitting on a girl in a creepy manner and she used the "I'm a lesbian" excuse and he's too dumb to realize he was being a creep so he projects his frustration on gay people.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
+Anonymous H — 1.9 year ago, 1 day later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,441
@648,415 (F)
They can still do artificial insemination and for the daring have sex on top of a lesbian to where the semen drips down onto their vagina.
They can still reproduce, they're not sterile.
@648,106 (C)
Oh look, honey, it's a massive faggot retard.
They can still do artificial insemination and for the daring have sex on top of a lesbian to where the semen drips down onto their vagina.
They can still reproduce, they're not sterile.
@648,106 (C)
Oh look, honey, it's a massive faggot retard.
·Anonymous C — 1.9 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,442
@previous (H)
Artificial insemination is obsolete. The synthetic uterus and designer genetics is quickly replacing inefficient traditional biobirths.
Artificial insemination is obsolete. The synthetic uterus and designer genetics is quickly replacing inefficient traditional biobirths.
·Anonymous H — 1.9 year ago, 2 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,444
@previous (C)
> The synthetic uterus and designer genetics is quickly replacing inefficient traditional biobirths.
Cool! Now show me the evidence that you didn't just pull this out of your asshole.
> The synthetic uterus and designer genetics is quickly replacing inefficient traditional biobirths.
Cool! Now show me the evidence that you didn't just pull this out of your asshole.
·Anonymous C — 1.9 year ago, 13 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,447
@previous (H)
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/09/29/1080538/everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-wombs/
https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/09/29/1080538/everything-you-need-to-know-about-artificial-wombs/
·Anonymous H — 1.9 year ago, 8 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,449
@previous (C)
> the goal is to save the preemies not replace the uterus
And how does this replace artificial insemination again?
Also, where is the proof of the designer genetics?
> the goal is to save the preemies not replace the uterus
And how does this replace artificial insemination again?
Also, where is the proof of the designer genetics?
·Anonymous C — 1.9 year ago, 49 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #648,451
@previous (H)
They start with a womb for premature births, and as it advances they can grow the baby more and more without a human host. It's already been done start-to-finish with a lamb. The restriction here is regulations and ethics committees, nothing technical besides enough data to get it approved.
Gene edited babies is already a thing: https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a42790400/crispr-babies-where-are-they-now-first-gene-edited-children/
They start with a womb for premature births, and as it advances they can grow the baby more and more without a human host. It's already been done start-to-finish with a lamb. The restriction here is regulations and ethics committees, nothing technical besides enough data to get it approved.
Gene edited babies is already a thing: https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a42790400/crispr-babies-where-are-they-now-first-gene-edited-children/
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.