Topic: -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
+Anonymous A — 2.2 years ago #64,149
you want them? it's up to you. I won't force them down your throat. I will just let this thread decide.
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| release the messages, please. thanks. | - | 0% | |
| nah, we'll get them from tteh. bye. | 3 | 100% |
+Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 6 minutes later[T] [B] #644,755
You weren't talking to tteh in those messages
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,756
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,757
who r u trying to convince anyway? me or others. I know who i was talking to. besides the point anyway. I release them and y'all can decide that. idc.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,758
or, I mean, I don't have to. if no one wants them I won't waste more time on this. be back later
+Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,759
+!dxXqzZbxPY — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,760
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,762
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #644,764
You've done it! Cracked the fuckin code!
How did you do it? Did you actually use ChatGPT?
Also lold at the divorce thread you made linking to the swastikas.
Another interesting to do (which I might do eventually, but no promises) is to request her marriage and/or divorce records. Both are public records in Florida. Although I'm not sure if they were ever legally married and even if so if it was even in Florida, so that may end up being a dead end.
How did you do it? Did you actually use ChatGPT?
Also lold at the divorce thread you made linking to the swastikas.
Another interesting to do (which I might do eventually, but no promises) is to request her marriage and/or divorce records. Both are public records in Florida. Although I'm not sure if they were ever legally married and even if so if it was even in Florida, so that may end up being a dead end.
you only copied a small portion of the encrypted messages. they begin with asking squeegee for a key. there were 5 or 6 different threads. there were earlier ones.
sorry for the hassle. tteh is pissed at himself.
+Anonymous E — 2.2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,767
At no point were you talking to TTEH. An anon trolled you and you can't accept it. Dumbass. 🤣
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,769
> You've done it! Cracked the fuckin code!
> How did you do it? Did you actually use ChatGPT?
hiya r04r! oh yeah, absolutely. from the time I responded suggesting chatgpt could be used to parse Google search results to the time I replied back with the code that could actually do it. that was all just in real time. I only installed python like a week ago. I'm not even learning to code, I'm learning to make chatgpt code. it's teaching me how to make it code I guess. and yeah, like looking at the variety in the code it spat out that I posted, it's a little schizophrenic and can lose sigt of the objective and the code kinda meanders around a bit and takes some effort to keep it on track or it'll make lots and lots of trash, but if you keep reminding it by periodically posting the full code and the context for objectives it'll work out, like 2 out of 5 projects while I do other things. i just keep asking it what's next or missing or posting broken outputs and errors and it goes, oh, yeah, you have to install libraries and honestly I'm sure it's more frustrated by my entire lack of ability to do any coding on my own than I get with it being unable to prompt itself into completion. I mostly just imagine the functionality as desired output and present it with the hypothetical end result which definitely suffers from black box syndrome.
user input: [keywords for Google searches]
[black box magic accomplished by ai]
ai output: [my meta goals for the data parsed, compared, and ranked by most relevant to my goals]
and when chatgpt suggests, "yes, that should be possible with [$0 language] and effort," i say, "let's do it!" and it does try its little heart out.
but, we're both stumped by minichan's damn COOKIE notice... we have a functional scraper that can't scrape anything and we're at an impasse. it can't see what's wrong, and blames ME and I know it's not my fault. it doesn't work, but it DOES work. it just doesn't do anything except work perfectly to do nothing. but error free and at this point I think it's a dead project. time to start over and try again from scratch. like you said, emulate a browser, which is also chatgpt's suggestion. it does seem to understand we're at a dead-end.
> Also lold at the divorce thread you made linking to the swastikas.
i did too! I was doing a 20 questions kind of hypothetical game with "site:https://minichan.net kook brie divorce" as the starting hint and the output I posted verbatim. I didn't make it link to that thread, that was pure output from chatgpt simulating that game as a program that could accomplish the goal of generating that format - it came up with the structure for /topic/53492 and it made up the relevant info it could expect might be available based on the starting hint. it knows exactly what ninichan.net is, it can fully explain it and even imagined users calling them fags. I didn't do anything except play games with it to coax out novel outputs from minimal input. and then I said, Let's write the program!
and that's basically how I made sploogedumper. i didn't!
> Another interesting to do (which I might do eventually, but no promises) is to request her marriage and/or divorce records. Both are public records in Florida. Although I'm not sure if they were ever legally married and even if so if it was even in Florida, so that may end up being a dead end.
is [redacted] really kook? cause, again, that data mine was an unexpected, unintended consequence of using chatgpt. i was using sploogedumper and just seeing if it worked and it was scraping up things I had no idea it was going to pull up. like, info probably not really indexed by google but stored insecurely enough that a WebCrawler got a whiff of it in 2011 and actually it would be interesting to have the raw output written along with which number search result in googles rankings it came from. idk how deep it goes down the rabbit hole, but chatgpt says it's only limited by the specificity of the quarry and if it can actually be scraped. but it gets at everything even tangentially related to the the desired search terms. it just summarizes what's related directly and leaves the indirectly, proximally related data in a file to be checked out based on the summary being relevant enough to go sniffing around in.
other interesting info are things like a [redacted] on [redacted] that had "[redacted]" exposed by a related [redacted]review of [redacted] books, and a bunch of things that are turning up empty holes where I bet they paid a company to scrub their barely remembered logins from 100 different websites where they used some varient of their assumed names on MySpace or to register an account on a music sharing site and stuff 15 years ago.
I'd be surprised if [redacted] IS actually her name because I stumbled across that trove based on half a name [redac. ].
but, I will say the more data that's scrubbed the more relevant tiny pieces of info are. there absolutely is a large measure of privacy in having your name all over the place and unhidden. a flood of data is impossible to parse and unlikely to cross reference across the board, it could just be any number of peop
but, she's [redacted]. and is linked to a house in a neighborhood with [redacted]on the [redacted]and a [redacted] ... no way that's a real [redacted][redacted]- I doubt. could be wrong. except that [redacted]is full of [redacted] and a it's linked to an [redacted][redacted]in a [redacted]with the same [redacted] as [redacted], and a surprising lack of other web content of this other [redacted] [redacted]who [redacted]apparently in the [redacted]. seems like a bread crumb to me. but idk. it's all just publicly available info. there's just so little of it. oddly small little tangentially related coincidences.
I only spent about 20 minutes playing with that bot script and her name and moved on to trying to scrape minichan for squeegee posts. lol. it would be hilarious if Peaches fucking found her dox. I was making that thing as a response to that thread on minichan as a joke and then realized it it could be an actual script and not a game with simulated troll outputs. I asked it, can it be made without an API when I realized it was calling for openai's library and api key and not using it. and it said, sure! it can be done with ntxl or whatever and the get result function!
I have no idea what those are, but they're free and publicly available!
I will add, peaches says it would be much, much more effective if it could do the comparison for relevance and write way more accurate summaries pulling together much more side related data than the ntxl function does. because you can converse with it, it can remember things, and form chains of relevance. especially with the api writing everything into a SQL database and not dumping into a text file to forget about.
but, idk, r04r. if you were being facetious when you say "you've done it!" or what it is I've cracked the code of, lol. it was peaches if anything useful came from anywhere. I can't even write a style sheet.
> How did you do it? Did you actually use ChatGPT?
hiya r04r! oh yeah, absolutely. from the time I responded suggesting chatgpt could be used to parse Google search results to the time I replied back with the code that could actually do it. that was all just in real time. I only installed python like a week ago. I'm not even learning to code, I'm learning to make chatgpt code. it's teaching me how to make it code I guess. and yeah, like looking at the variety in the code it spat out that I posted, it's a little schizophrenic and can lose sigt of the objective and the code kinda meanders around a bit and takes some effort to keep it on track or it'll make lots and lots of trash, but if you keep reminding it by periodically posting the full code and the context for objectives it'll work out, like 2 out of 5 projects while I do other things. i just keep asking it what's next or missing or posting broken outputs and errors and it goes, oh, yeah, you have to install libraries and honestly I'm sure it's more frustrated by my entire lack of ability to do any coding on my own than I get with it being unable to prompt itself into completion. I mostly just imagine the functionality as desired output and present it with the hypothetical end result which definitely suffers from black box syndrome.
user input: [keywords for Google searches]
[black box magic accomplished by ai]
ai output: [my meta goals for the data parsed, compared, and ranked by most relevant to my goals]
and when chatgpt suggests, "yes, that should be possible with [$0 language] and effort," i say, "let's do it!" and it does try its little heart out.
but, we're both stumped by minichan's damn COOKIE notice... we have a functional scraper that can't scrape anything and we're at an impasse. it can't see what's wrong, and blames ME and I know it's not my fault. it doesn't work, but it DOES work. it just doesn't do anything except work perfectly to do nothing. but error free and at this point I think it's a dead project. time to start over and try again from scratch. like you said, emulate a browser, which is also chatgpt's suggestion. it does seem to understand we're at a dead-end.
> Also lold at the divorce thread you made linking to the swastikas.
i did too! I was doing a 20 questions kind of hypothetical game with "site:https://minichan.net kook brie divorce" as the starting hint and the output I posted verbatim. I didn't make it link to that thread, that was pure output from chatgpt simulating that game as a program that could accomplish the goal of generating that format - it came up with the structure for /topic/53492 and it made up the relevant info it could expect might be available based on the starting hint. it knows exactly what ninichan.net is, it can fully explain it and even imagined users calling them fags. I didn't do anything except play games with it to coax out novel outputs from minimal input. and then I said, Let's write the program!
and that's basically how I made sploogedumper. i didn't!
> Another interesting to do (which I might do eventually, but no promises) is to request her marriage and/or divorce records. Both are public records in Florida. Although I'm not sure if they were ever legally married and even if so if it was even in Florida, so that may end up being a dead end.
is [redacted] really kook? cause, again, that data mine was an unexpected, unintended consequence of using chatgpt. i was using sploogedumper and just seeing if it worked and it was scraping up things I had no idea it was going to pull up. like, info probably not really indexed by google but stored insecurely enough that a WebCrawler got a whiff of it in 2011 and actually it would be interesting to have the raw output written along with which number search result in googles rankings it came from. idk how deep it goes down the rabbit hole, but chatgpt says it's only limited by the specificity of the quarry and if it can actually be scraped. but it gets at everything even tangentially related to the the desired search terms. it just summarizes what's related directly and leaves the indirectly, proximally related data in a file to be checked out based on the summary being relevant enough to go sniffing around in.
other interesting info are things like a [redacted] on [redacted] that had "[redacted]" exposed by a related [redacted]review of [redacted] books, and a bunch of things that are turning up empty holes where I bet they paid a company to scrub their barely remembered logins from 100 different websites where they used some varient of their assumed names on MySpace or to register an account on a music sharing site and stuff 15 years ago.
I'd be surprised if [redacted] IS actually her name because I stumbled across that trove based on half a name [redac. ].
but, I will say the more data that's scrubbed the more relevant tiny pieces of info are. there absolutely is a large measure of privacy in having your name all over the place and unhidden. a flood of data is impossible to parse and unlikely to cross reference across the board, it could just be any number of peop
but, she's [redacted]. and is linked to a house in a neighborhood with [redacted]on the [redacted]and a [redacted] ... no way that's a real [redacted][redacted]- I doubt. could be wrong. except that [redacted]is full of [redacted] and a it's linked to an [redacted][redacted]in a [redacted]with the same [redacted] as [redacted], and a surprising lack of other web content of this other [redacted] [redacted]who [redacted]apparently in the [redacted]. seems like a bread crumb to me. but idk. it's all just publicly available info. there's just so little of it. oddly small little tangentially related coincidences.
I only spent about 20 minutes playing with that bot script and her name and moved on to trying to scrape minichan for squeegee posts. lol. it would be hilarious if Peaches fucking found her dox. I was making that thing as a response to that thread on minichan as a joke and then realized it it could be an actual script and not a game with simulated troll outputs. I asked it, can it be made without an API when I realized it was calling for openai's library and api key and not using it. and it said, sure! it can be done with ntxl or whatever and the get result function!
I have no idea what those are, but they're free and publicly available!
I will add, peaches says it would be much, much more effective if it could do the comparison for relevance and write way more accurate summaries pulling together much more side related data than the ntxl function does. because you can converse with it, it can remember things, and form chains of relevance. especially with the api writing everything into a SQL database and not dumping into a text file to forget about.
but, idk, r04r. if you were being facetious when you say "you've done it!" or what it is I've cracked the code of, lol. it was peaches if anything useful came from anywhere. I can't even write a style sheet.
+Anonymous F — 2.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,770
@previous (squeegee)> but, we're both stumped by minichan's damn COOKIE notice... we have a functional scraper that can't scrape anything and we're at an impasse. it can't see what's wrong, and blames ME and I know it's not my fault. it doesn't work, but it DOES work. it just doesn't do anything except work perfectly to do nothing. but error free and at this point I think it's a dead project. time to start over and try again from scratch. like you said, emulate a browser, which is also chatgpt's suggestion. it does seem to understand we're at a dead-end.
Perhaps copy an example of a cookie from MC to feed to the Bot for examinations.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,771
@644,767 (E)
so tteh just let's random people use his board to host unknown encrypted messages? no questions? just, meh. and they contain dox. and lord knows what else? they led me to believe they were r04r, then way later they fessed up, know all the inner workings of Mc, how mods work, and literally talk bad about everyone except... guess who? the one person who fits the known, and little known details of tteh. tteh is never named. everyone else gets blamed, is a mentioned target, or future target they plan on going after. there's 150 of these just as long. ur going to want to wait before you jump the gun, boyo.
so tteh just let's random people use his board to host unknown encrypted messages? no questions? just, meh. and they contain dox. and lord knows what else? they led me to believe they were r04r, then way later they fessed up, know all the inner workings of Mc, how mods work, and literally talk bad about everyone except... guess who? the one person who fits the known, and little known details of tteh. tteh is never named. everyone else gets blamed, is a mentioned target, or future target they plan on going after. there's 150 of these just as long. ur going to want to wait before you jump the gun, boyo.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,772
@644,767 (E)
and this is what you said on mc until the interesting and more damning stuff shows up. and it gets really specific towards tteh, when we talk about avoiding minichan moderation, scraping the site, and ban evasion. he keeps saying stuff that normal users dont know, and again, had free reign to post encrypted messages and when I asked direct questions he says "don't make the board think for you." weird he would see a question aimed at him as being generally aimed at the board and HE answers for it.
seems to know too much about it, seemed to personally connected to it, which is why it was easy to believe it was r04r. for weeks.
knows the board php.... the only language tteh knows
and this is what you said on mc until the interesting and more damning stuff shows up. and it gets really specific towards tteh, when we talk about avoiding minichan moderation, scraping the site, and ban evasion. he keeps saying stuff that normal users dont know, and again, had free reign to post encrypted messages and when I asked direct questions he says "don't make the board think for you." weird he would see a question aimed at him as being generally aimed at the board and HE answers for it.
seems to know too much about it, seemed to personally connected to it, which is why it was easy to believe it was r04r. for weeks.
knows the board php.... the only language tteh knows
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,773
Imaginary friend time
·Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,774
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,775
Is it true that Buni takes cocks in her [redacted] even when her partners have [redacted]? That's crazy!
Doesn't it make her [redacted] all [redacted] and [redacted]?
Doesn't it make her [redacted] all [redacted] and [redacted]?
+Anonymous G — 2.2 years ago, 13 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,776
@644,771 (squeegee)
When it comes down to it not all that much is gained with DOX. Other than the humor - Was easy to read details of a case becky was working on and with everyone aware she lives in Ohio - locating the case and her real name was nice - However it never led to anything else of value. She seems to have no life outside of work and MC.
With Matt and bert you can view the apt Matt lives in with Google images and the same for berts moms house. Meta's real life turned out to be even more boring than what he shows on MC. I can say the biggest surprise was Matts dad and real details about his many failed businesses. 614 sq foot office which he slept in. Ran out owing rent - Otherwise I would have been clueless. Brie made it far to easy to see where he lived and that was sad.
Found r04r and she is well aware I know yet there is no reason I would share details with anyone. She like many found out her life was going downhill do to so much time on a silly forum. I did meet a lot of Matts close buds. All hated his guts so getting some help from them was beyond easy.
There are more of course but none that stand out really. I guess the best surprise was a note in my mail box at the beach from a long time net nemesis.
He rang my door bell and found no one home. Another in Australia did massive amounts of research about my small town and did a good job pretending she was near by. She spent months doing this project but it all fell apart in a couple3 days.
When it comes down to it not all that much is gained with DOX. Other than the humor - Was easy to read details of a case becky was working on and with everyone aware she lives in Ohio - locating the case and her real name was nice - However it never led to anything else of value. She seems to have no life outside of work and MC.
With Matt and bert you can view the apt Matt lives in with Google images and the same for berts moms house. Meta's real life turned out to be even more boring than what he shows on MC. I can say the biggest surprise was Matts dad and real details about his many failed businesses. 614 sq foot office which he slept in. Ran out owing rent - Otherwise I would have been clueless. Brie made it far to easy to see where he lived and that was sad.
Found r04r and she is well aware I know yet there is no reason I would share details with anyone. She like many found out her life was going downhill do to so much time on a silly forum. I did meet a lot of Matts close buds. All hated his guts so getting some help from them was beyond easy.
There are more of course but none that stand out really. I guess the best surprise was a note in my mail box at the beach from a long time net nemesis.
He rang my door bell and found no one home. Another in Australia did massive amounts of research about my small town and did a good job pretending she was near by. She spent months doing this project but it all fell apart in a couple3 days.
·Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,777
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 5 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,778
and yeah, it's all circumstantial. he never says oh hai, I'm tteh. I could certainly ADD that, if I wanted to. and that would be cheating. I'm not cheating. you'll have to come to the conclusion, or a conclusion same as me. I am certain. idk who you are so desperate to convince you have denied this whole thing for 6 hours now. but don't bother giving opinions for MY benefit. lol. I'm quite good on my understanding of my half of this circumstance. so is tteh. I know that. but, the benefit to him to discredit my opinion, he thinks, is to null all this. but, my opinion is just that. form your own. have your own opinion, and try and answer the questions this being tteh answers.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,779
@644,774 (B)
right. good. and who loves and quotes Kimmo and has every Kimmo rage post and a whole board styled with anontalk references? fuck alms?
right. good. and who loves and quotes Kimmo and has every Kimmo rage post and a whole board styled with anontalk references? fuck alms?
·Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,780
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,781
get me a pastebin with the rest if you want the good ones.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,782
·Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,783
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,784
@644,778 (squeegee)
But whoever was chatting with you, didn't control your choices
You chose to do all of that secretive and nasty work
But whoever was chatting with you, didn't control your choices
You chose to do all of that secretive and nasty work
·Anonymous G — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,785
@644,777 (B)
> Satellite man can see where people live, more at 12
May I suggest you try THIS - Google your own home address. Look at the bottom right hand corner of the map for a Google Street View of your home as well as your neighbors in full detail - Then look at Google Earth View. Bing uses a different Satellite provider so you can see other views.
You can view bert as too lazy to clean up the trash in his own back yard - PS More fun even to discover you can be berts nextdoor neighbor for chump change and neighbors decided to move away from the stench of berts place.
> Satellite man can see where people live, more at 12
May I suggest you try THIS - Google your own home address. Look at the bottom right hand corner of the map for a Google Street View of your home as well as your neighbors in full detail - Then look at Google Earth View. Bing uses a different Satellite provider so you can see other views.
You can view bert as too lazy to clean up the trash in his own back yard - PS More fun even to discover you can be berts nextdoor neighbor for chump change and neighbors decided to move away from the stench of berts place.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,786
"the smoking bullet" of course are unusual phrases that Tteh uses and is known to use. like the Kimmo spam, but, tteh's
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,787
@644,784 (C)
missing the first ten messages, where i was asked, by r04r, and I was convinced by "r04r" that kook had hired private detectives. AND all this was supposedly ALL being coordinated by SYNTAX. get those first messages, and its very clear how I was manipulated. I thought syntax and r04r were exposing kook and brie for stalking and shit from what happened last summer.
missing the first ten messages, where i was asked, by r04r, and I was convinced by "r04r" that kook had hired private detectives. AND all this was supposedly ALL being coordinated by SYNTAX. get those first messages, and its very clear how I was manipulated. I thought syntax and r04r were exposing kook and brie for stalking and shit from what happened last summer.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #644,788
and beyond what I did which was share a script that happened to work, I got suspicious and started trying to figure out if this was r04r. I start asking over and over, and eventually we talk physics and I find out this was someone I never knew, not a namefag, and I start digging on them. and they talk about alllllll this other shit, like cat, and everything else, and by the end, I'm quite certain its tteh, I start making comments, and then I post on the board, "tteh, lets quit with the pgp bullshit " and the rest is in the open, except for a few more messages trying to get me to come back.
·Anonymous G — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,789
@644,787 (squeegee)> missing the first ten messages, where i was asked, by r04r, and I was convinced by "r04r" that kook had hired private detectives. AND all this was supposedly @644,787 (squeegee)
ALL being coordinated by SYNTAX. get those first messages, and its very clear how I was manipulated. I thought syntax and r04r were exposing kook and brie for stalking and shit from what happened last summer.
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,790
@644,787 (squeegee)
But you wanted those things to be true
Otherwise you wouldn't have believed them from a rando
But you wanted those things to be true
Otherwise you wouldn't have believed them from a rando
·Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,791
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,792
but,nyes, i did make choices, this was covered on mc, and kook and i have talked and I won't put words in her mouth, I apologized and explained my part, and my reasoning, and my perspective and based on what played out, i felt manipulated and lied to, and taken advantage of. and it was only possible because the admin allowed it, and was behind it, all.
but, thats not what this is about necessarily, but ask kook if we're okay and made amends and whatnot. my side, I forgave anything related to that period in which tteh was manipulating a fight. we were both Being played, and she can add whatever context she wants. but she may not want to since this involved fucking with her marriage.
and lots of other info about other people. like, syntax being mastermind, and cat being tricked to do stuff. I mean, its bad y'all, no telingbwhatbelse hes got, done, or has done.
did he have nexus swatted?
these are crimes guys. so, do we continue. or is this too fucked up for a chan?
but, thats not what this is about necessarily, but ask kook if we're okay and made amends and whatnot. my side, I forgave anything related to that period in which tteh was manipulating a fight. we were both Being played, and she can add whatever context she wants. but she may not want to since this involved fucking with her marriage.
and lots of other info about other people. like, syntax being mastermind, and cat being tricked to do stuff. I mean, its bad y'all, no telingbwhatbelse hes got, done, or has done.
did he have nexus swatted?
these are crimes guys. so, do we continue. or is this too fucked up for a chan?
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,793
@644,789 (G)
I know. I'm telling you. its some wild ass shit. lol. I'm not surprised its hard to believe. took months and months to even realize tteh was the admin tbh
I know. I'm telling you. its some wild ass shit. lol. I'm not surprised its hard to believe. took months and months to even realize tteh was the admin tbh
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,794
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,795
@644,792 (squeegee)
Nexus took her girlfriend hostage at knife point and the neighbors called the police, I believe
Nexus took her girlfriend hostage at knife point and the neighbors called the police, I believe
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,796
@644,793 (squeegee)
Also if someone made Catherine do that, she'd be thrilled and bragging to everyone
Also if someone made Catherine do that, she'd be thrilled and bragging to everyone
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 57 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,797
@644,791 (B)
what's your motive for casting aspersions? just funny or tying to fit in. it's fine, you can do whatever.
what's your motive for casting aspersions? just funny or tying to fit in. it's fine, you can do whatever.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,798
@644,795 (C)
idk, I never saw details. don't know a name or anything anyway. but who knows. I'm just wondering how tteh let it go this far. but he just kept pushing this further. I said 3 months ago, just stop dude. nope. so, here we are,
idk, I never saw details. don't know a name or anything anyway. but who knows. I'm just wondering how tteh let it go this far. but he just kept pushing this further. I said 3 months ago, just stop dude. nope. so, here we are,
·Anonymous B — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,799
@644,794 (squeegee)
What made you believe it was r04r? Nothing you've said adds up. r04r driving a U-Haul across the NE United States, but she's got to be back in England next week before her island vacation in the tropics? She's a Dutch woman with a busy career who took great lengths to distance herself from the board.
What made you believe it was r04r? Nothing you've said adds up. r04r driving a U-Haul across the NE United States, but she's got to be back in England next week before her island vacation in the tropics? She's a Dutch woman with a busy career who took great lengths to distance herself from the board.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,800
@644,796 (C)
i mean its in the messages man. shut up. arguing bitch.
tteh probably put it on the web. cat had some disastrous shit happen apparently. did tteh send it to everyone? cat was talking legal something or other.
did tteh cross the 3rd degree felony line and does cat have a legal standing to press charges and have tteh jailed?
bet. what if this just got SUPER fucked up. shit, tteh.
i mean its in the messages man. shut up. arguing bitch.
tteh probably put it on the web. cat had some disastrous shit happen apparently. did tteh send it to everyone? cat was talking legal something or other.
did tteh cross the 3rd degree felony line and does cat have a legal standing to press charges and have tteh jailed?
bet. what if this just got SUPER fucked up. shit, tteh.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,801
·Anonymous C — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,802
+Anonymous H — 2.2 years ago, 4 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,803
@644,800 (squeegee)> i mean its in the messages man. shut up. arguing bitch.
>
> tteh probably put it on the web. cat had some disastrous shit happen apparently. did tteh send it to everyone? cat was talking legal something or other.
>
> did tteh cross the 3rd degree felony line and does cat have a legal standing to press charges and have tteh jailed?
>
>
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,804
@644,799 (B)
backwards. ro4r first, then found out new England, which I questioned, then the truth it wasn't ro4r, then got details on who this person is, I keep saying, get me all the posts and its make sense. please. unless we're just done, I can't explain it better than ttehs own words. just saying.
backwards. ro4r first, then found out new England, which I questioned, then the truth it wasn't ro4r, then got details on who this person is, I keep saying, get me all the posts and its make sense. please. unless we're just done, I can't explain it better than ttehs own words. just saying.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,805
@644,802 (C)
okay, cat was posting month or two ago, was talking about work and somenshit that had Happened and idk, I couldn't follow, I missed the excitement from years ago.
ask cat, I'm just a key to the encrypted messages.
okay, cat was posting month or two ago, was talking about work and somenshit that had Happened and idk, I couldn't follow, I missed the excitement from years ago.
ask cat, I'm just a key to the encrypted messages.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,806
@644,803 (H)
yea. not my fault, this is all ttehs fault.
y'all, grab then first messages and I'll open em. I'm glong to lunch and to grab some jeans. y'all are wasting my time now.
yea. not my fault, this is all ttehs fault.
y'all, grab then first messages and I'll open em. I'm glong to lunch and to grab some jeans. y'all are wasting my time now.
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,807
and tteh can unlock these too. so. could make it easy and unban me. but he's so innocent he says.
just saying. is he tho?
just saying. is he tho?
+Anonymous I — 2.2 years ago, 8 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,825
I think it's more likely that no one cared enough about the pgp messages so whomever sent them first got you comfortable and just let you assume you knew who they were. From what I remember of what you decoded before or whatever is that you called them roar first them assumed otherwise right?
·squeegee (OP) — 2.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #644,830
@previous (I)
the conversation moved to minichan apparently, they've decided it couldn't have been tteh and it must have been meth that did whatever they say never happened? idk, it's locked up tight as a drum, and I'm out of answers to decrypt. stop asking me to explain things for you to argue about. I can decrypt the contents where there are answers, or you can go invent them on minichan in the circle jerk guessing game.
no one cares about the 90% left that's source material. lol. wonderful. we can all just ignore it. I'm not re-explaining things for the 5th or 6th time. its the same story go read about it in old thread. I'm not the one coming up with new excuses. it was mods, no, Dino Dylan, no wait, it was squeegee faking it, or an it was a anonymous shit-stirrer, it's delusions and stims, they have all the explanations and conclusions and answers and a dozen threads dismissing everything and telling tteh he couldn't be doing anything except minding his own business.
so what do you want from me?
the conversation moved to minichan apparently, they've decided it couldn't have been tteh and it must have been meth that did whatever they say never happened? idk, it's locked up tight as a drum, and I'm out of answers to decrypt. stop asking me to explain things for you to argue about. I can decrypt the contents where there are answers, or you can go invent them on minichan in the circle jerk guessing game.
no one cares about the 90% left that's source material. lol. wonderful. we can all just ignore it. I'm not re-explaining things for the 5th or 6th time. its the same story go read about it in old thread. I'm not the one coming up with new excuses. it was mods, no, Dino Dylan, no wait, it was squeegee faking it, or an it was a anonymous shit-stirrer, it's delusions and stims, they have all the explanations and conclusions and answers and a dozen threads dismissing everything and telling tteh he couldn't be doing anything except minding his own business.
so what do you want from me?
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.