Topic: His Holiness Pope Francis says sex is a beautiful thing.
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 2.7 years ago #63,580
This is for all you people in here who claim Catholic priests and bishops are asexual prudes...
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/sex-beautiful-thing-pope-says-171155802.html
https://uk.news.yahoo.com/sex-beautiful-thing-pope-says-171155802.html
+Anonymous B — 2.7 years ago, 2 hours later[T] [B] #638,473
@OP> This is for all you people in here who claim Catholic priests and bishops are asexual prudes...
>
> https://uk.news.yahoo.com/sex-beautiful-thing-pope-says-171155802.html
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
> This is for all you people in here who claim Catholic priests and bishops are asexual prudes...
OF COURSE CATHOLIC PRIESTS ARE NOT NOT NOT "Asexual Prudes" The Pedophile Catholic Church exists in total to RAPE AND ABUSE YOUNG CHILDREN TO THE MAXIMUM
Nearly 200 members of the Catholic clergy and administrators were outed as sexual predators after a new 463-page report exposed years of abuse and cover-up attempts. Investigators sifted through hundreds of thousands of documents all the way back to the 1940s to uncover sexual abuse allegations against Catholic institutions in Baltimore. Maryland Attorney General Anthony G Brown called the release of the report a "day of reckoning" for all those involved.
Baltimore church scandal: Catholic priest sex abuse laid bare in ...
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/...
‘Staggering’ extent of Baltimore Catholic Church sex abuse laid bare in damning report The Maryland Attorney General’s Office has publicly released a redacted version of an …
Report details 'staggering' church sex abuse in Maryland
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/maryland-ag...
The Baltimore archdiocese says it has paid more than $13.2 million for care and compensation for 301 abuse victims since the 1980s, including $6.8 million toward 105 …
The Catholic Church's Latest Scandal Is Really Strange - The Atlantic
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/08/...
The Pillar claimed that signals from both homosexual and heterosexual hookup apps going back to 2018 could be traced to “more than 10” Newark rectories and clerical residences, …
Baltimore’s Catholic Church sexually abused at least 600 children …
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/maryland-ag...
By David K. Li and Corky Siemaszko. Maryland's top prosecutor accused Catholic Church officials in Baltimore on Wednesday of engaging in a yearslong cover-up of the sexual …
Catholic church sex abuse scandal in the light of eternity
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/gracecoloredglasses/...
Catholic church sex abuse scandal in the light of eternity. The Associated Press reported this morning (Thursday, April 6): More than 150 Catholic priests and others associated …
What the latest church scandal teaches about the Catholic right
https://news.yahoo.com/latest-church-scandal-teaches-catholic-170716984.html
The latest sex scandal in the Catholic Church alleges that a prominent priest, Monsignor Jeffrey Burrell, used the gay hookup app Grindr to habitually violate his vow of celibacy …
Almost 1,700 priests and clergy charged with sex abuse are …
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/religion/nearly-1-700...
Nearly 1,700 priests and other clergy members that the Roman Catholic Church considers credibly accused of child sexual abuse are living under the radar with little to no oversight …
Catholic Church scandal: Church spent $10.6 million on lobbyists …
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/catholic-church...
Catholic Church spent $10.6 million to lobby against legislation that would benefit victims of child sex abuse. A new report released Tuesday reveals that, over the past eight years, the …
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+Eat Shit and Die Pedo Merrin — 2.7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,474
A child's bowel movement flies into Merrin's mouth and when it flies back out moments later, the child is gone. What's happened?
I'll give the answer later in the week if nobody gets it.
I'll give the answer later in the week if nobody gets it.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 2.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,475
·Anonymous B — 2.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,476
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Pell was acquitted. Try reading your own 'sources' once in a while ;)
What does Pell have to do with the References I gave You and Everyone else?
After two trials, an appeal, and more than 400 days in prison, Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic clergyman, Pedophile Cardinal George Pell, was acquitted of his crimes by the High Court of Australia.
The Trial & Acquittal of George Pell | Gilshenan & Luton
www.gnl.com.au/articles/2020/may/george-pell-case/
rocedural history
Pell was committed for trial in relation to five sexual offences committed on two 13-year-old choirboys in late 1996 and early 1997. At that time, Pell
was the recently appointed Archbishop of Melbourne. The boys are anonymised in the judgment as ‘A’ and ‘B’. It was alleged that on the first occasion Pell
came across the boys in the priests’ sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral in East Melbourne after performing Sunday solemn Mass.
A and B had slipped away from the procession and located a bottle of altar wine. After rebuking the boys, Archbishop Pell, still fully robed, allegedly exposed his penis
and committed various sexual acts upon A and B. The most serious act involved receiving fellatio from A. A also alleged there was a second incident at least a month later.
On that occasion, after the procession following Sunday Mass, Archbishop Pell, again fully robed, allegedly pushed A against a wall of the sacristy corridor
and squeezed his genitals.
"In our system of criminal justice, it is juries that are charged with determining the facts and, ultimately, guilt or non-guilt.
And juries (at least up to recent times) had the advantage of seeing the witnesses give their evidence in court, as opposed to reading the evidence in the trial transcript."
NOTE: The High Court in Pell did not question the correctness of the original trial. The Court also did not derogate from Hayne J’s
subsequent observation in Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; (2007) 230 CLR 559 at that asking whether it was ‘open’ to the jury to be satisfied of guilt involves asking
‘whether the jury must as distinct from might’
The close appellate scrutiny given to the case comes at a time when criminal justice systems in this country are struggling to strike the right balance – between the
expectations of victims and their supporters and the rights of the accused – in trials of child sexual offences.
Of critical importance is the high court affirmed the original jury's conclusion and conviction of Pell.
The Court did, however, emphasise the very different functions of juries and appeal courts. It is the province of the jury to assess ‘the weight to be accorded to a witness’ evidence by reference to the manner in which it was given’ (at [38]). Jurors strive to reach unanimous decisions after sharing their subjective assessments of witnesses, a process that
doesnot conform to the appellate jurisdiction. An appeal court should observe this ‘functional or “constitutional” demarcation’, otherwise trial by jury would become trial by
an appeal court (at [37]-[38]).'''
Editors Note: The Bottom Line by the high court.
The upshot
"The High Court has reaffirmed the particular responsibility of juries in assessing the weight of evidence by reference to witness demeanour. It has sought to constrain
the function of appellate courts, so that criminal appeals do not become trials by appeal court. However, the judgment also implicitly warns against placing
too much weight on highly subjective demeanour-based judgments and demonstrates the exacting nature of the criminal standard of proof.
An appeal court must consider for itself whether the evidence as a whole was capable of excluding a reasonable doubt as to guilt.
The Fucking Real Bottom Line turns out to be - The HIGH COURT Affirmed Pells GUILT as found by the original Jury. They were ruling on the Appeals Court upholding the conviction
and overturned the Appeals Court Ruling which ends up letting Pell go on a TECHNICALITY
Pell as found GUILTY of all charges, walked free on a Court TECHNICALITY.
> Pell was acquitted. Try reading your own 'sources' once in a while ;)
What does Pell have to do with the References I gave You and Everyone else?
After two trials, an appeal, and more than 400 days in prison, Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic clergyman, Pedophile Cardinal George Pell, was acquitted of his crimes by the High Court of Australia.
The Trial & Acquittal of George Pell | Gilshenan & Luton
www.gnl.com.au/articles/2020/may/george-pell-case/
rocedural history
Pell was committed for trial in relation to five sexual offences committed on two 13-year-old choirboys in late 1996 and early 1997. At that time, Pell
was the recently appointed Archbishop of Melbourne. The boys are anonymised in the judgment as ‘A’ and ‘B’. It was alleged that on the first occasion Pell
came across the boys in the priests’ sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral in East Melbourne after performing Sunday solemn Mass.
A and B had slipped away from the procession and located a bottle of altar wine. After rebuking the boys, Archbishop Pell, still fully robed, allegedly exposed his penis
and committed various sexual acts upon A and B. The most serious act involved receiving fellatio from A. A also alleged there was a second incident at least a month later.
On that occasion, after the procession following Sunday Mass, Archbishop Pell, again fully robed, allegedly pushed A against a wall of the sacristy corridor
and squeezed his genitals.
"In our system of criminal justice, it is juries that are charged with determining the facts and, ultimately, guilt or non-guilt.
And juries (at least up to recent times) had the advantage of seeing the witnesses give their evidence in court, as opposed to reading the evidence in the trial transcript."
NOTE: The High Court in Pell did not question the correctness of the original trial. The Court also did not derogate from Hayne J’s
subsequent observation in Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; (2007) 230 CLR 559 at that asking whether it was ‘open’ to the jury to be satisfied of guilt involves asking
‘whether the jury must as distinct from might’
The close appellate scrutiny given to the case comes at a time when criminal justice systems in this country are struggling to strike the right balance – between the
expectations of victims and their supporters and the rights of the accused – in trials of child sexual offences.
Of critical importance is the high court affirmed the original jury's conclusion and conviction of Pell.
The Court did, however, emphasise the very different functions of juries and appeal courts. It is the province of the jury to assess ‘the weight to be accorded to a witness’ evidence by reference to the manner in which it was given’ (at [38]). Jurors strive to reach unanimous decisions after sharing their subjective assessments of witnesses, a process that
doesnot conform to the appellate jurisdiction. An appeal court should observe this ‘functional or “constitutional” demarcation’, otherwise trial by jury would become trial by
an appeal court (at [37]-[38]).'''
Editors Note: The Bottom Line by the high court.
The upshot
"The High Court has reaffirmed the particular responsibility of juries in assessing the weight of evidence by reference to witness demeanour. It has sought to constrain
the function of appellate courts, so that criminal appeals do not become trials by appeal court. However, the judgment also implicitly warns against placing
too much weight on highly subjective demeanour-based judgments and demonstrates the exacting nature of the criminal standard of proof.
An appeal court must consider for itself whether the evidence as a whole was capable of excluding a reasonable doubt as to guilt.
The Fucking Real Bottom Line turns out to be - The HIGH COURT Affirmed Pells GUILT as found by the original Jury. They were ruling on the Appeals Court upholding the conviction
and overturned the Appeals Court Ruling which ends up letting Pell go on a TECHNICALITY
Pell as found GUILTY of all charges, walked free on a Court TECHNICALITY.
+Anonymous D — 2.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,477
I'm sure he thinks sex is a beautiful thing. Cause he's playing with the boys all day.
https://youtu.be/Fcpc7TQxlNs
https://youtu.be/Fcpc7TQxlNs
+ !dF.2uOrLPs — 2.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,480
@previous (D)
> I'm sure he thinks sex is a beautiful thing. Cause he's playing with the boys all day.
>
> https://youtu.be/Fcpc7TQxlNs [play]
Apparently it's a rare thing to find a Catholic Priest, who is not a pedophile.
> I'm sure he thinks sex is a beautiful thing. Cause he's playing with the boys all day.
>
> https://youtu.be/Fcpc7TQxlNs [play]
Apparently it's a rare thing to find a Catholic Priest, who is not a pedophile.
·Anonymous D — 2.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,482
· !dF.2uOrLPs — 2.7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,484
@previous (D)
> Have there ever been a priest who was just gay and not a pedo?
Of course and only by some weird accident. As Merrin said "Priests" are sexual beings. Sex including masturbation has always been forbidden by the church hierarchy. The Church's history of being anti science, would not acknowledge basic human biology. So the need for sexual gratification which is inherent in all animals was of course held as unnatural by the ignorant church hierarchy.
Priests driven by their biological needs. So often turned to the only "Hole" available which so often ends up as little boys mouths and anus's. The church encourages this by allowing all Priests to be forgiven to infinity for any sexual abuse of children. Just a very quick and simple confession. Now available on line. Any one is free to murder as many people as they want too. Just confess to pedo Merrin, and you end up guilt free.
> Have there ever been a priest who was just gay and not a pedo?
Of course and only by some weird accident. As Merrin said "Priests" are sexual beings. Sex including masturbation has always been forbidden by the church hierarchy. The Church's history of being anti science, would not acknowledge basic human biology. So the need for sexual gratification which is inherent in all animals was of course held as unnatural by the ignorant church hierarchy.
Priests driven by their biological needs. So often turned to the only "Hole" available which so often ends up as little boys mouths and anus's. The church encourages this by allowing all Priests to be forgiven to infinity for any sexual abuse of children. Just a very quick and simple confession. Now available on line. Any one is free to murder as many people as they want too. Just confess to pedo Merrin, and you end up guilt free.
(Edited 26 seconds later.)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 2.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,486
@638,476 (B)
> Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic clergyman, Cardinal George Pell, was acquitted by the High Court of Australia
Your own words. Thanks, that'll be all :)
> Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic clergyman, Cardinal George Pell, was acquitted by the High Court of Australia
Your own words. Thanks, that'll be all :)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 2.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,487
@638,484 (!dF.2uOrLPs)
> Sex including masturbation has always been forbidden by the church hierarchy.
False. His Holiness the Pope expressly condoned masturbation, per the link in the OP:
"To express yourself sexually is a richness. So anything that detracts from real sexual expression lessens you and depletes this richness," he said, referring to masturbation"
> Sex including masturbation has always been forbidden by the church hierarchy.
False. His Holiness the Pope expressly condoned masturbation, per the link in the OP:
"To express yourself sexually is a richness. So anything that detracts from real sexual expression lessens you and depletes this richness," he said, referring to masturbation"
+Pazuzu — 2.7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,489
+Anonymous G — 2.7 years ago, 43 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,490
Lets not being bring up the fact that The Pope enjoys daily creampies with eight year old boys.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
·Anonymous B — 2.7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,491
@638,486 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)> > Australia’s highest-ranking Catholic clergyman, Cardinal George Pell, was acquitted by the High Court of Australia
>
> Your own words. Thanks, that'll be all :)
My words? I provided the link - You apparently need your eyes cleaned. Probably the result of feces expelled from little boy's anus, you were fucking again.
And a reminder - The Pope aka Pedophile Provider Pope Francis. He had his OWN Independent investigation into Pell. The moment that wacky court in Australia on a slim technicality, set aside the conviction of Pell. Pope Francis shut down his own independent investigation. No doubt the Pope told Pell to say 3 hail Mary's in forgiveness to Pell, because even a lowly bottom of the barrel Priest can do the same and set Scot free any murder-rapist- any and all crimes as any criminal of any kind is absolved of all crimes with the wave of a Priests hands.
Nor did you even bother to comment on
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
Catholic Church rocked by new scandal as 199 members of the clergy outed as sex predators
A new report said priests and administrators of the Catholic Church presented themselves as "protectors" to their victims and justified the abuse as "God's will".
https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1755519/catholic-church-maryland-sex-predators-list-dxus Thu, Apr 6, 2023 | UPDATED: 10:33, Thu, Apr 6, 2023
·Anonymous B — 2.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,492
@638,487 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Sex including masturbation has always been forbidden by the church hierarchy.
>
> False. His Holiness the Pope expressly condoned masturbation, per the link in the OP:
>
> "To express yourself sexually is a richness. So anything that detracts from real sexual expression lessens you and depletes this richness," he said, referring to masturbation"
ONE FUCKING POPE OUT OF 266 POPES all of a sudden out of Now where now says Jacking Off is OK. 265 OTHER POPES FORBID IT - Pope is under pressure re the Massive Priest, Bishops, Archbishops, Cardinals and Popes who have committed Child Rapes and or have helped other members of the Pedophile Catholic Church get away with crimes against Children - Add all the Nuns that have performed abortions and even killed the Moms and buried them along with fully grown children. My Memory says, even the Pope recently apologized to Canada for the massive burial grounds where the Church stole native American children from the parents just so the Church could abuse them.
> > Sex including masturbation has always been forbidden by the church hierarchy.
>
> False. His Holiness the Pope expressly condoned masturbation, per the link in the OP:
>
> "To express yourself sexually is a richness. So anything that detracts from real sexual expression lessens you and depletes this richness," he said, referring to masturbation"
ONE FUCKING POPE OUT OF 266 POPES all of a sudden out of Now where now says Jacking Off is OK. 265 OTHER POPES FORBID IT - Pope is under pressure re the Massive Priest, Bishops, Archbishops, Cardinals and Popes who have committed Child Rapes and or have helped other members of the Pedophile Catholic Church get away with crimes against Children - Add all the Nuns that have performed abortions and even killed the Moms and buried them along with fully grown children. My Memory says, even the Pope recently apologized to Canada for the massive burial grounds where the Church stole native American children from the parents just so the Church could abuse them.
+Anonymous H — 2.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,493
@638,490 (G)
> Lets not being bring up the fact that The Pope enjoys daily creampies with eight year old boys.
The Pope did say he was going to do something about the massive pedo problem in the church. He spoke with forked tongue, because clearly the Pope is Impotent when it comes to solving sexual abuse inside his own church.
> Lets not being bring up the fact that The Pope enjoys daily creampies with eight year old boys.
The Pope did say he was going to do something about the massive pedo problem in the church. He spoke with forked tongue, because clearly the Pope is Impotent when it comes to solving sexual abuse inside his own church.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 2.7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,495
@638,492 (B)
> ONE POPE
How many did you need? His Holiness Pope Francis is Christ's current bishop on earth. It is his authority alone to condone masturbation.
> ONE POPE
How many did you need? His Holiness Pope Francis is Christ's current bishop on earth. It is his authority alone to condone masturbation.
+Anonymous I — 2.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,496
@638,486 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Strange how Anon B is utterly obsessed with little boys, isn't it?
Strange how Anon B is utterly obsessed with little boys, isn't it?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 2.7 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #638,500
@previous (I)
> Strange how Anon B is utterly obsessed with little boys, isn't it?
Very. But then, there's an awful lot of projection goes on among these faux-outraged pedo-obsessed sickos.
> Strange how Anon B is utterly obsessed with little boys, isn't it?
Very. But then, there's an awful lot of projection goes on among these faux-outraged pedo-obsessed sickos.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.