Topic: DOGS: protective or a liability?
+Anonymous A — 2.7 years ago #63,490
I bet that if you give a dog the right drugs, it's going to attack it's owner.
+Anonymous B — 2.7 years ago, 39 minutes later[T] [B] #637,646
Dogs are just pets, nothing else
+Anonymous C — 2.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #637,647
@previous (B)
Sure but what about all these stories of those pets disfiguring or even killing people? Do you think the layed back police is going to check a dog for drugs in it's blood?
·Anonymous C — 2.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #637,648
@previous (C)
My bad, I'm op
+Anonymous D — 2.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #637,670
Why would they bother with all that? If these people have dog attack inducing drugs, I'm sure they have easier ways to knock off their victim.
+Anonymous E — 2.7 years ago, 5 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #637,678
@previous (D)
Forensically, getting a dog to attack and kill their owner is less likely to be traced to the individual who instigated it than if the person does the killing themselves.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
+Anonymous F — 2.7 years ago, 9 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #637,689
@637,647 (C)
Those cases are always pitbull attacks.
+Anonymous G — 2.7 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #637,705
@previous (F)
Yeah, nobody is going to be surprised
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.