Topic: Johnny Depp is going to win his trial.

+Anonymous A — 4 years ago #62,066

And prove why this country needs male guardianship laws!!!

A woman should never speak out. It is not her place.

+Anonymous B — 4 years ago, 5 hours later[T] [B] #627,351

you are a piece of shit!!

+Anonymous C — 4 years ago, 13 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #627,362

> Johnny Depp is going to win his trial.

He lost a similar trial in England. Why would he win in America?

+Anonymous D — 4 years ago, 4 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #627,374

@previous (C)

The circumstances are different.

+Dead !Pool..v42s — 4 years ago, 9 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #627,375

@627,362 (C)
Did she shit in his bed? Lol

+Anonymous F — 4 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #627,381

@627,362 (C)
The British are fags.

+Anonymous G — 4 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #627,388

@627,374 (D)

> The circumstances are different.

What circumstances, exactly?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #627,413

@previous (G)

More evidence that Amber is an abuser, you moron.

(Edited 9 seconds later.)

+Dr. PhD !q73styMLC. — 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #627,417

@previous (A)

You sound a bit cross.

·Anonymous D — 4 years ago, 13 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,434

@627,388 (G)

The British lawsuit was over whether a newspaper could legally call Depp a "wife beater". It was ruled that he had himself engaged in abuse.

This lawsuit is over whether Depp was libelled in his ex wife's article in which she portrayed herself as an innocent victim to a heartless abuser.

·Dr. PhD !q73styMLC. — 4 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,446

@previous (D)

Okay, Bobby2Comix.

·Anonymous D — 4 years ago, 17 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,512

@previous (Dr. PhD !q73styMLC.)

Try again, faggot

·Dr. PhD !q73styMLC. — 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,516

@previous (D)

Nice madpost, Bobby2Comix.

·Anonymous D — 4 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,524

@previous (Dr. PhD !q73styMLC.)

Try again, faggot

·Dr. PhD !q73styMLC. — 4 years ago, 5 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,532

@previous (D)

Okay, Bobby2Comix.

+Anonymous I — 4 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,537

@627,413 (A)

Is Johnny Depp suing Amber Heard for abusing him?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,538

@previous (I)
The official term is defamation, but essentially yeah, and it was already revealed during the trial that Amber Heard is an abusive little cunt and it hasn't been the full six weeks yet.

·Anonymous D — 4 years ago, 13 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,606

@627,532 (Dr. PhD !q73styMLC.)

You couldn't be any more wrong and autistic LMAO

+Anonymous J — 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,610

@627,538 (A)

> The official term is defamation, but essentially yeah

Defamation and abuse are two different things.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4 years ago, 10 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,640

@previous (J)

Err, not really.

·Anonymous F — 4 years ago, 1 day later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #627,729

@627,362 (C)
Because the British are shit tards.

+Anonymous K — 4 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #627,792

@627,640 (A)

> Err, not really.

Care to explain?

+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 4 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #627,817

@previous (K)
abuse can be done privately.

·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 4 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #627,818

oh, who am i replying to

@627,640 (A)
one has to be public the other doesnt . the fuck even.

·Anonymous F — 4 years ago, 3 days later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #627,985

@627,817 (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
Would you be willing to do this for cash?

·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 4 years ago, 3 days later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #628,075

@previous (F)
no

+Anonymous M — 4 years ago, 1 day later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #628,148

@627,537 (I)
For FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS!

She is soon to be waitressing at Waffle House.

·Anonymous M — 4 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #628,155

·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 4 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #628,176

syntax?

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan