Topic: Fag of the Month

+Anonymous A — 4.8 years ago #59,336

"So you can't prove it.

Thanks, that'll be all."

+Anonymous B — 4.8 years ago, 11 minutes later[T] [B] #610,570

Anonymous A killed himself after being sodomised by a horse.

Search for his name and home town on Google to see the obituary.

+Anonymous C — 4.8 years ago, 35 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #610,573

pedobert has been A N G E R E D

+Anonymous D — 4.8 years ago, 5 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #610,604

+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,660

@OP
> "So you can't prove it.
>
> Thanks, that'll be all."

I'm not the guy who's writing that now, but I did coin this response (one of many I originated on these boards). It was my retort to people who demanded to see proof of God's existence but were too lazy to make the effort to actually read the stuff I suggested they read. It's amusing to me to see that Syntax's death is following a very similar trajectory (I'll admit to being the guy who started the whole "Google his full name and town" thing, but I'm not the one who has since run away with it).

·Whore's a plenty (OP) — 4.8 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,714

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Fag

+Anonymous F — 4.8 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,720

@610,660 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)

tldr fag

+Anonymous G — 4.8 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,722

@610,660 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Thanks, that'll be all."
>
> I'm not the guy who's writing that now, but I did coin this response (one of many I originated on these boards).
No you didn't. I did. You copied me, as you've done with other phrases, such as "You're not very bright, are you." (which you repeatedly screw up by ending with a question mark).

Incidentally, it's supposed to be:
"Thanks. That'll be all."

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,736

@previous (G)
> "You're not very bright, are you."

Ah yes, another of my classics! You're butchering it though, there shouldn't be a comma (flows better) and there needs to be a question mark at the end. The recipient is made to feel more of a buffoon if he feels it's a question that's actually being asked of him. There's great subtlety to my art you know (no question mark there because I'm telling you the situation and showing you I'm uninterested in a response).

Have a blessed day, friend!

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.8 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,750

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)

Not all fags are Priests. But all Priests are fags.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #610,761

@previous (A)
> Not all fags are Priests. But all Priests are fags.

Demonstrably untrue.

+Anonymous H — 4.8 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,773

@610,736 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Agree with G - a rhetorical question does not require a question mark.

> There's great subtlety to my art you know
No, not really. You think this because you're not very bright, are you (no question mark there because I'm telling you the situation and showing you I'm uninterested in a response).

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,774

@previous (H)
> Agree with G

Never a wise choice.

> - a rhetorical question does not require a question mark.

What I wrote:

> it's a question that's actually being asked of him.

Which is the polar opposite of your...

> rhetorical question.

You're not very bright are you? ;)

·Anonymous H — 4.8 years ago, 15 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,865

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
What I wrote:
> a rhetorical question does not require a question mark.

What you (nonsensically) assumed I was talking about:
> a question that's actually being asked of him.

What I was actually talking about:
> You're not very bright, are you (a rhetorical question which does not require a question mark).

This is very poor by your usual standards, Dave. Turns out you're not very bright after all, are you.

+Anonymous I — 4.8 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,868

Fatality.

+Anonymous J — 4.8 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,869

@610,865 (H)
Assuming you're not Anon G (are you?) then it looks like it's you that has gotten mixed up here. Dave was also talking about "you're not very bright are you". His point was it's not rhetorical when he uses it.

+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,901

@610,865 (H)
> What I wrote:
> > a rhetorical question does not require a question mark.
>
> What you (nonsensically) assumed I was talking about:
> > a question that's actually being asked of him.
>
> What I was actually talking about:
> > You're not very bright, are you (a rhetorical question which does not require a question mark).
>
> This is very poor by your usual standards, Dave. Turns out you're not very bright after all, are you.

Were you dropped as a child?

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,902

@610,869 (J)
> Assuming you're not Anon G (are you?) then it looks like it's you that has gotten mixed up here. Dave was also talking about "you're not very bright are you". His point was it's not rhetorical when he uses it.

Either English isn't his first language or else he was drunk off his ass when he wrote that. Or it could be both I suppose.

·Anonymous H — 4.8 years ago, 13 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,931

@610,901 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Oh, you want more? OK. Happy to keep playing. :))

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Either English isn't his first language or else he was drunk off his ass when he wrote that. Or it could be both I suppose.
Or it could be neither? (Question mark because it's a non-rhetorical subjunctive... which you're now going to Google hastily to see if that's actually a thing)

> Dave was also talking about "you're not very bright are you". His point was it's not rhetorical when he uses it.
Oh, really? Hmm, I didn't get that. I thought he was talking about the phrase + question mark - "a question that's actually being asked of him". See, my point was it's rhetorical when I use it.

There's great subtlety to my art you know (no question mark there because I'm telling you the situation and showing you I'm uninterested in a response).

·Anonymous C — 4.8 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,933

@previous (H)
Why are you letting trolls get to you this drastically?

·Anonymous H — 4.8 years ago, 43 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,935

@previous (C)
> Why are you letting trolls get to you this drastically?
I'm not though. I'm having a nice little chat with Dave here.

Why do you care so much?

·Anonymous J — 4.8 years ago, 13 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,938

@610,931 (H)
> > Dave was also talking about "you're not very bright are you". His point was it's not rhetorical when he uses it.
> Oh, really? Hmm, I didn't get that.

Evidently.

+test — 4.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,943

·Anonymous C — 4.8 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,959

@610,935 (H)
Nice deflection.

Stop letting trolls get to you this drastically. It's only a backwater forum.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,961

@previous (C)
You seem upset.

·Anonymous C — 4.8 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,963

@previous (A)
Okay, pedobert.

·Anonymous G — 4.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,970

@610,935 (H)
> I'm having a nice little chat with Dave here.
It is impossible to have a "nice little chat" with Dave or anybody else here.

@610,959 (C)
> Stop letting trolls get to you this drastically. It's only a backwater forum.
Does this upset you? You seem troubled.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 24 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,971

@610,931 (H)
So yes, you were dropped as a child. Ok thanks, that'll be all.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 4.8 years ago, 38 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,972

@610,938 (J)
> > > Dave was also talking about "you're not very bright are you". His point was it's not rhetorical when he uses it.
> > Oh, really? Hmm, I didn't get that.
>
> Evidently.

English not his first language status: confirmed.

·Anonymous C — 4.8 years ago, 46 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #610,977

@610,970 (G)
So more trolls trolling trolls.

Thanks. That'll be all.

·Anonymous G — 4.8 years ago, 12 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #611,004

@610,971 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> "Ok thanks, that'll be all."
Incorrect.

@previous (C)
> "Thanks. That'll be all."
Correct.

·Anonymous H — 4.8 years ago, 5 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #611,015

@610,972 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> English not his first language status: confirmed.
Agreed. Anon J clearly cannot detect sarcasm. Never mind, Anon J. You'll get the hang of it eventually if you keep practising.

@610,970 (G)
> It is impossible to have a "nice little chat" with Dave or anybody else here.
Difficult, but not impossible. He does have a habit of dropping strange, nonsensical little insults from time to time (e.g. @610,971 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)) but apart from that he's quite amicable.

(Edited 11 seconds later.)

·Anonymous C — 4.8 years ago, 49 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #611,016

@611,004 (G)
Yup. That's what I said alright.

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan