Topic: When you have the Truth on your side

+Anonymous A — 4.9 years ago #58,659

Winning is easy.
Nobody falls for the total shit that gossiping faggots make up.

+Anonymous B — 4.9 years ago, 46 minutes later[T] [B] #606,733

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republican-presidencies-have-91x-the-convictions-rate_b_5a3d5406e4b0df0de8b064e5

+Anonymous C — 4.9 years ago, 7 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #606,734

+Anonymous D — 4.9 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #606,738

@606,733 (B)
Nope

·Anonymous B — 4.9 years ago, 5 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,748

@previous (D)
Yep. It's all verifiable facts.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.9 years ago, 43 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,753

@previous (B)
Like you imagine its verified the election was legit. Pffffft.

+Anonymous E — 4.9 years ago, 27 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,754

nope. easier to win with lies

·Anonymous B — 4.9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,755

@606,753 (A)
It's actually a matter of public record. So yes, it's verifiable.

Also, can you prove there was widespread election fraud substantial enough to flip the results? As far as I'm aware, the professionals have already dug into this and confirmed it was not the case. But please, feel free to prove me wrong if you can.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,758

@previous (B)
Dumbass said what?!

+Anonymous F — 4.9 years ago, 5 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,763

@previous (A)
They said you cannot add 2+2
They can and you cannot.

·Anonymous B — 4.9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,766

@606,758 (A)
So you can't prove me wrong. Thanks, that'll be all.

+Anonymous G — 4.9 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,767

@previous (B)
With his 8th grade education what did you expect.

·Anonymous B — 4.9 years ago, 23 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,768

@previous (G)
> what did you expect

Exactly what occurred. I just enjoy making him dig.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.9 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,786

@previous (B)
Pffffft?

lol

Not bothering with a debate with a dweeb...waste of time...ie; casting pearls to swine.

I genuinely pity foolish sheep who have no clue.

(Edited 16 seconds later.)

·Anonymous B — 4.9 years ago, 52 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,787

@previous (A)
> I genuinely pity foolish sheep who have no clue.

You must pity yourself a great deal, then.

+Anonymous H — 4.9 years ago, 52 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,788

@606,786 (A)
Swine; That would be your Mother.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 4.9 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,790

@previous (H)
Nice retarded remark.

·Anonymous F — 4.9 years ago, 32 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,818

@606,733 (B)
> https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republican-presidencies-have-91x-the-convictions-rate_b_5a3d5406e4b0df0de8b064e5

LOL

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan