Topic: ppl ik hospitalized after the jab lol
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 5 years ago #58,581
umm lemme see..1..2....3..4
okay 4 ppl in the city so far that only i know of
3rd is dead
4th may die
okay 4 ppl in the city so far that only i know of
3rd is dead
4th may die
+Kimble !!aAnZjs6Upl — 5 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #606,287
·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc (OP) — 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #606,288
shrug
+Anonymous C — 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #606,289
@previous (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
They shown politicians and celebrities on the news here getting their vaccs...showing how 'safe' it is.
And not one of the fools knows what will happen in five years.
They shown politicians and celebrities on the news here getting their vaccs...showing how 'safe' it is.
And not one of the fools knows what will happen in five years.
+Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,298
I got both Moderna vaccines. Got a fever for a few hours after the second one, otherwise no other symptoms. Same with several coworkers, family members, and friends. All doing fine.
Strange how that worked out, isn't it?
Strange how that worked out, isn't it?
+Anonymous E — 5 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,300
+chill dog !!heHjtrQ7i2 — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,307
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,310
@previous (chill dog !!heHjtrQ7i2)
As you should. Are you in the US? If so, Kroger offers it. That's where I got mine.
As you should. Are you in the US? If so, Kroger offers it. That's where I got mine.
·chill dog !!heHjtrQ7i2 — 5 years ago, 42 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,311
+Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 41 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,316
@606,298 (D)
Plenty of people are DEAD after taking drugs that were deemed SAFE after doing clinical trials as per FDA Protocal...for even longer than the covid vaccs have been scrutinized. Then they had to take those drugs off the market.
I guess you were to dumb to have notices that when it has happened again and again and again.
Roll of the dice with possible terrible odds to take the vaccs.
Plenty of people are DEAD after taking drugs that were deemed SAFE after doing clinical trials as per FDA Protocal...for even longer than the covid vaccs have been scrutinized. Then they had to take those drugs off the market.
I guess you were to dumb to have notices that when it has happened again and again and again.
Roll of the dice with possible terrible odds to take the vaccs.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 40 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,317
@previous (G)
The fact that you refuse to acknowledge is that the vaccine has already been proven to be safe, and its side effects are still better than the lasting lung and neurological damage COVID infection brings. And that's assuming you don't die from the infection.
> Roll of the dice with possible terrible odds to take the vaccs.
Lol that's just complete, unadulterated bullshit. The people who have died from the vaccine were already very very ill to begin with or severely immunocompromised. And on top of that the death rate of the vaccine is miniscule. It's still a vast majority that survive the vaccine just like getting a flu shot.
You're a pussy and you believe everything your Fox news anchor throws at you. Grow some balls and form opinions on your own.
The fact that you refuse to acknowledge is that the vaccine has already been proven to be safe, and its side effects are still better than the lasting lung and neurological damage COVID infection brings. And that's assuming you don't die from the infection.
> Roll of the dice with possible terrible odds to take the vaccs.
Lol that's just complete, unadulterated bullshit. The people who have died from the vaccine were already very very ill to begin with or severely immunocompromised. And on top of that the death rate of the vaccine is miniscule. It's still a vast majority that survive the vaccine just like getting a flu shot.
You're a pussy and you believe everything your Fox news anchor throws at you. Grow some balls and form opinions on your own.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,318
@606,316 (G)
Over 285 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 24, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,863 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
Over 285 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through May 24, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 4,863 reports of death (0.0017%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html
·Anonymous C — 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,341
@606,317 (D)
@previous (D)
Did you knot understand what the fuck I just said?
Ther is over a dozen drugs that killed people and Pharma had to outlaw them. The number of death had to add up over time before they realized they were killing people.
There were clinical trials on these drugs and nobody died when they hit the market.
The FDA had approved them as safe.
THEN.. after some period of time...a year or two or three...The Government became aware that there were a large number of deaths resulting from these drugs and outlawed them.
So...you keep saying the vaccs are safe now because six months have gone by and everything seems ok, right?
Well...THAT'S what they thought about the drugs I referred to above...until two or three years later.
As these experimental vaccs have only been given for a few months there is no guarantee that they are safe 5 years into the future.
The thing is...if covid were killing everyone regardless of irrespective if any parameters then it would maybe be prudent to take the vaccine quickly...BUT if theres only a 2% chance you might be in danger of more than a mild headache and some sniffles-
You ARE taking a reckless gamble unnecessarily by taking in an experimental vaccine (drug) into your body.
Surely you are smarter than your replies portray you as.
@previous (D)
Did you knot understand what the fuck I just said?
Ther is over a dozen drugs that killed people and Pharma had to outlaw them. The number of death had to add up over time before they realized they were killing people.
There were clinical trials on these drugs and nobody died when they hit the market.
The FDA had approved them as safe.
THEN.. after some period of time...a year or two or three...The Government became aware that there were a large number of deaths resulting from these drugs and outlawed them.
So...you keep saying the vaccs are safe now because six months have gone by and everything seems ok, right?
Well...THAT'S what they thought about the drugs I referred to above...until two or three years later.
As these experimental vaccs have only been given for a few months there is no guarantee that they are safe 5 years into the future.
The thing is...if covid were killing everyone regardless of irrespective if any parameters then it would maybe be prudent to take the vaccine quickly...BUT if theres only a 2% chance you might be in danger of more than a mild headache and some sniffles-
You ARE taking a reckless gamble unnecessarily by taking in an experimental vaccine (drug) into your body.
Surely you are smarter than your replies portray you as.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,342
@previous (C)
> Ther is over a dozen drugs that killed people and Pharma had to outlaw them. The number of death had to add up over time before they realized they were killing people.
What you're saying here is that there's no way you would know either. Yet you conveniently are confident in saying it does present bad odds in terms of mortality risk. You're defeating yourself with this argument. But I wouldn't expect you to realize that.
> So...you keep saying the vaccs are safe now because six months have gone by and everything seems ok, right?
> Well...THAT'S what they thought about the drugs I referred to above...until two or three years later.
That's also what they say about drugs that haven't had concerning mortality rates, dumbass. This isn't proof of anything.
> As these experimental vaccs have only been given for a few months there is no guarantee that they are safe 5 years into the future.
The guarantee is that you're safe from COVID infection. Each vaccine has been proven to protect from severe infection in the ballpark of high 90%.
Even if you survive a COVID infection, it destroys your lungs and brain tissue. The vaccine ensures that doesn't happen, and this has already been 100% proven in labs and on people for about a year now.
> The thing is...if covid were killing everyone regardless of irrespective if any parameters then it would maybe be prudent to take the vaccine quickly...BUT if theres only a 2% chance you might be in danger of more than a mild headache and some sniffles-
> You ARE taking a reckless gamble unnecessarily by taking in an experimental vaccine (drug) into your body.
You're working under false assumptions. You don't just get the sniffles from COVID. That could be the only symptom you exhibit immediately and during infection, but again, it demolishes you in the longterm as well. Look up post-COVID syndrome.
It isn't like this is a new virus. It's only a new varient. Coronavirus has been studied for a long-ass time, far before it became a pandemic concern. Learn how to research and maybe think about replying after that. You won't make yourself look so objectively, confidently retarded next time.
> Ther is over a dozen drugs that killed people and Pharma had to outlaw them. The number of death had to add up over time before they realized they were killing people.
What you're saying here is that there's no way you would know either. Yet you conveniently are confident in saying it does present bad odds in terms of mortality risk. You're defeating yourself with this argument. But I wouldn't expect you to realize that.
> So...you keep saying the vaccs are safe now because six months have gone by and everything seems ok, right?
> Well...THAT'S what they thought about the drugs I referred to above...until two or three years later.
That's also what they say about drugs that haven't had concerning mortality rates, dumbass. This isn't proof of anything.
> As these experimental vaccs have only been given for a few months there is no guarantee that they are safe 5 years into the future.
The guarantee is that you're safe from COVID infection. Each vaccine has been proven to protect from severe infection in the ballpark of high 90%.
Even if you survive a COVID infection, it destroys your lungs and brain tissue. The vaccine ensures that doesn't happen, and this has already been 100% proven in labs and on people for about a year now.
> The thing is...if covid were killing everyone regardless of irrespective if any parameters then it would maybe be prudent to take the vaccine quickly...BUT if theres only a 2% chance you might be in danger of more than a mild headache and some sniffles-
> You ARE taking a reckless gamble unnecessarily by taking in an experimental vaccine (drug) into your body.
You're working under false assumptions. You don't just get the sniffles from COVID. That could be the only symptom you exhibit immediately and during infection, but again, it demolishes you in the longterm as well. Look up post-COVID syndrome.
It isn't like this is a new virus. It's only a new varient. Coronavirus has been studied for a long-ass time, far before it became a pandemic concern. Learn how to research and maybe think about replying after that. You won't make yourself look so objectively, confidently retarded next time.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,343
@606,341 (C)
Also fun fact: I work in a relevant field and see the effects COVID has on decedents on a daily basis. It's slowed down since vaccines have been released, but is still a very concerning issue. And people like you are the reason it remains an issue.
Also fun fact: I work in a relevant field and see the effects COVID has on decedents on a daily basis. It's slowed down since vaccines have been released, but is still a very concerning issue. And people like you are the reason it remains an issue.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,345
@previous (D)
Why take an unproven drug if there is virtually no good reason?
Its ignorant to assume it's safe in the first few months..as many FDA approved drugs have been shown to appear promising and then revealed as killers.
Only sheep enticed by politicians and celebrities on TV saying it's totally safe would fall for such craziness.
Not me.
Why take an unproven drug if there is virtually no good reason?
Its ignorant to assume it's safe in the first few months..as many FDA approved drugs have been shown to appear promising and then revealed as killers.
Only sheep enticed by politicians and celebrities on TV saying it's totally safe would fall for such craziness.
Not me.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,347
@previous (G)
> Why take an unproven drug if there is virtually no good reason?
You tell me. I didn't take an unproven drug. I took a proven drug.
> Its ignorant to assume it's safe in the first few months..as many FDA approved drugs have been shown to appear promising and then revealed as killers.
Refer to my reply above.
> Only sheep enticed by politicians and celebrities on TV saying it's totally safe would fall for such craziness.
> Not me.
Lol. The irony is that you actually are the one falling for political persuasion. I didn't take it just because I'm liberal. But I can almost guarantee you're refusing because you're anti-liberal and it's what you're told to do if you don't agree with liberal politics.
That's the thing with you guys. You actually spew irony in every argument, accusing of cult behavior, accusing others of being sheep, flipping your own logic in hopes to prove the other "side" wrong. When there is science and expertise to back up your point, I'll start listening to your arguments. Until then, I have no respect for you and will never take you seriously. Nor should anyone.
> Why take an unproven drug if there is virtually no good reason?
You tell me. I didn't take an unproven drug. I took a proven drug.
> Its ignorant to assume it's safe in the first few months..as many FDA approved drugs have been shown to appear promising and then revealed as killers.
Refer to my reply above.
> Only sheep enticed by politicians and celebrities on TV saying it's totally safe would fall for such craziness.
> Not me.
Lol. The irony is that you actually are the one falling for political persuasion. I didn't take it just because I'm liberal. But I can almost guarantee you're refusing because you're anti-liberal and it's what you're told to do if you don't agree with liberal politics.
That's the thing with you guys. You actually spew irony in every argument, accusing of cult behavior, accusing others of being sheep, flipping your own logic in hopes to prove the other "side" wrong. When there is science and expertise to back up your point, I'll start listening to your arguments. Until then, I have no respect for you and will never take you seriously. Nor should anyone.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,348
@previous (D)
I am being irrational because I caution against accepting a politicians shamelessly telling you completely cluelessly that a drug being totally safe after six months of trials,
Ok, sheep. You do what you think is best.
lol
I am being irrational because I caution against accepting a politicians shamelessly telling you completely cluelessly that a drug being totally safe after six months of trials,
Ok, sheep. You do what you think is best.
lol
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,349
@previous (G)
> caution
> not protecting yourself/others against widespread virus
Pick one. Again - ironic.
> caution
> not protecting yourself/others against widespread virus
Pick one. Again - ironic.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 24 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,355
@previous (D)
> not protecting yourself/others against widespread virus
A wide spread virus which only kills 3% of people who are already close to dying.
Ok.
> not protecting yourself/others against widespread virus
A wide spread virus which only kills 3% of people who are already close to dying.
Ok.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,357
FRAUD!!
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,366
@606,355 (G)
> only kills 3% of people who are already close to dying.
Citation needed.
1. 3% is enormous in regards to overall population of mankind.
2. If you had read my reply above (apparently you didn't), you'd know death isn't the only thing to fear from COVID.
3. I've personally dealt with patients who were previously healthy and had no comorbidities who succumbed to COVID. You're talking out of your ass and it's showing.
> only kills 3% of people who are already close to dying.
Citation needed.
1. 3% is enormous in regards to overall population of mankind.
2. If you had read my reply above (apparently you didn't), you'd know death isn't the only thing to fear from COVID.
3. I've personally dealt with patients who were previously healthy and had no comorbidities who succumbed to COVID. You're talking out of your ass and it's showing.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,382
@previous (D)
Stfu pussy. You're a goddamn liar. I will mix an epic cocktail with your mom's urine, bitch.
Stfu pussy. You're a goddamn liar. I will mix an epic cocktail with your mom's urine, bitch.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,387
@previous (G)
> You're a goddamn liar.
Damn, you got me dead to rights. What a great argument you have there.
/s
> You're a goddamn liar.
Damn, you got me dead to rights. What a great argument you have there.
/s
+Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,393
ITT: Bert gets bested by a more knowledgeable party.·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,395
How truly tragic it is that so many people were dumb enough be vaccine suckers. That takes a special kind of stupid.
·Anonymous D — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #606,397
How truly tragic is it that so many people were dumb enough to be anti-vaccine suckers. That takes a special kind of stupid.
+Anonymous I — 4.5 years ago, 5 months later, 5 months after the original post[T] [B] #622,414
How now...dumb sheep.
·ducky !MwWb.dJjRc (OP) — 4.5 years ago, 8 hours later, 5 months after the original post[T] [B] #622,428
i have died from not taking vaccine
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.