Notice: Home alone tonight?
Topic: I really miss Eco.
+Anonymous A — 5 years ago #58,190
I wish he could have cleaned up his act.
He could have really been something.
Also, speak ill of the dead and I'll motherfucking curbstomp you.
+Syntax — 5 years ago, 20 minutes later[T] [B] #603,799

Eco LoLoL He made it clear he was going out as a Druggie of an overdose and he sure did. He was at least Hetro but damn those Ugly as all fuck women he showed us pics of - Yikes so filled up with drugs his GF's looked more like ugly men so perhaps he was also in the closet like Bert.
Bert stopped working years ago and became a full tyme bum Marinating his Liver with Booze and is trying hard to get Cancer of the Lungs and Colon by Smoking Tobacco
The good news is that soon he will enhance Undertakers and Grave diggers wallets.
+Anonymous C — 5 years ago, 49 seconds later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #603,800
@OP
Fuck that drugged up cunt. Glad he is gone.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #603,802
@603,799 (Syntax)
Fuck you, you fucking creepy cunt.
+Syntax — 5 years ago, 17 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #603,808
+Hymen Buster 3000 — 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #603,811
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
>
"This" could be referring to anything.
+Anonymous F — 5 years ago, 55 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #603,812
@previous (Hymen Buster 3000)
No, it reads exactly as read. Did you see the entire thread? No? I did.
+Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 57 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #603,815
@603,811 (Hymen Buster 3000)
Do some research on context clues. Having that basic reading skill will show you the following:
> Maybe if her mother actually loved her instead of being a drug addict this (molestation of Grover's niece enacted by Grover) would have never happened.
Better luck next time.
+Anonymous H — 5 years ago, 44 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #603,817
@603,799 (Syntax)
You horrible piece of shit.
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 5 years ago, 10 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #603,823
me too!
+Kimble !!aAnZjs6Upl — 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #603,824
@OP
Kimble extends his deepest and most sincere condolences for your loss.
+Anonymous K — 5 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,843
@603,815 (G)
> Do some research on context clues. Having that basic reading skill will show you the following:
>
> > Maybe if her mother actually loved her instead of being a drug addict this (molestation of Grover's niece enacted by Grover) would have never happened.
>
> Better luck next time.
No, that's now what he meant.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,846
@previous (K)
The topic of discussion in the screencap was Grover molesting his niece. So him circling back to "this" happening was him circling back to the topic - ie him molesting his niece.
Also, thanks for deleting the image, mods. Here's another one for ya.
+Anonymous L — 5 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,863
Eco is worm food now
+Anonymous M — 5 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,885
@603,815 (G)
> > this would never have happened.
"this" was referring to an incident culminating in her being taken away by child protection services.
- somebody who also read the entire thread and has satisfactory reading & comprehension skills.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,912
@previous (M)
Nice pedo defense.
The proof is in the post. It doesn't make sense to switch topics back and forth between one reply. Use your brain, pedo sympathizer.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,914
@603,885 (M)
Also, it appears you didn't actually read the topic. That incident you refer to was never discussed in the thread until Grover initially brought it up in the screencapped reply.
See:
https://tinychan.net/topic/54736#reply_578209
Next time you claim to read an entire thread, you should probably read the entire thread. Context clues actually do point to an admission of guilt from Grover, even when reading the entire thread.
+Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,916
@previous (G)
> Next time you claim to read an entire thread, you should probably read the entire thread.
And you should probably follow your own advice:
https://tinychan.net/topic/54736#reply_578216 ·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,917
@previous (N)
It's easy to deny and lie after being called out. Are you normally this trusting of pedos?
(Edited 55 seconds later.)
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,918
@previous (G)
Are you normally this obsessed with seeing pedophilia everywhere?
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,919
@previous (N)
There's a difference between obsession and highlighting shit people.
It seems you're trying
very hard to fight for this guy. If I didn't know any better, I'd say you're either Grover himself, or someone who is ironically obsessed with him and his reputation.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,920
@previous (G)
> There's a difference between obsession and highlighting shit people.
And you're in column A.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,921
@previous (N)
Nice projection.
·Kimble !!aAnZjs6Upl — 5 years ago, 38 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,922

Kimble is repulsed by ALL acts of pedophilia including those people that condone such acts on this forum. Shame on you all.
+Anonymous O — 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,925
ill piss on his grave
·Anonymous M — 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,935
@603,914 (G)
> That incident you refer to was never discussed in the thread.
If you had been paying attention, fuckface, you'd have seen he told us about it previously. It's obvious to anybody with half a brain that's what he was referring to.
Agree with Anon N - you see pedophilia and "pedo defense" everywhere because you're obsessed with the subject.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,941
@previous (M)
Imagine being enraged about a pedophile getting caught.
You've got some red flags,anon M/N.
·Anonymous M — 5 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,964
@previous (G)
> Imagine being enraged about a pedophile getting caught.
Are you even listening to yourself? You so want the world you imagine to be true. Poor pedo-obsessed fool.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,967
@603,941 (G)
Do you ever ask yourself what you'd be doing with your life if you weren't pretending to see pedophilia everywhere just so you can post about the subject?
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,985
@603,964 (M)
@previous (N)
Nice rageposts. Keep defending pedophilia, gentlemen. Should paint some red flags for ya in the future.
If you already read the screencap and the original thread and are still convinced there was no admission of guilt, you're truly beyond help. Either that or you're a pedo yourselves. I'll stop exercising your pedo defenses now. :)
(Edited 27 seconds later.)
+Anonymous P — 5 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #603,999
@previous (G)
> If you already read the screencap and the original thread and are still convinced there was no admission of guilt, you're truly beyond help. Either that or you're a pedo yourselves.
Ironic, since all you have achieved in this thread is demonstrate an alarmingly persistent obsession with the topic of pedophilia. Are you sure you're not projecting a little?
I think anybody who has read this thread and is convinced there is no evidence of Anon G's pedo fixation is truly beyond help.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,000
@previous (P)
Nice pedo defense. Also nice UID change.
Your trollery reads like Merrin's does. In which case it now makes sense that your pro-pedophilia arguments are rampant in this thread.
Have a good day, Merrin! It was fun utterly defeating you and your 2 other UID's.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 44 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,004
@previous (G)
I really hope a mod comes along and confirms what an embarrassment you've just made of yourself by posting this.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 36 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,005
@previous (N)
The mods already deleted the screenshot before. I fully anticipate them being against me lol.
Which I can somewhat understand if it's anti-spam/crowd control (even though that'd be reaching as I haven't spammed but it's their website so whatever).
You seem pretty upset, Merrin. Maybe you should take a breather.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,006
@previous (G)
> The mods already deleted the screenshot before.
Yes I remember you crying about it. The sooner you ask yourself why they deleted it the sooner you'll realize what an idiot you're making of yourself.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,009
@previous (N)
Nice pedo defense.
·Anonymous P — 5 years ago, 5 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,016
@604,000 (G)
> pedo defense
> pro-pedophilia arguments
@previous (G)
> pedo defense
I rest my case. (see
@603,999 (P) > > an alarmingly persistent obsession with the topic of pedophilia)
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 10 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,049
@previous (P)
> Nice pedo defense. +Anonymous Q — 5 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,052
It's concerning how many kiddie diddlers are opposing anti pedophilia in here.
10/10 thread
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,053
Oh dear, Anon G has broken out the sock puppet accounts. We've destroyed him badly this time.
·Anonymous Q — 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,054
@previous (N)
You think I'm G because I recognize that kiddie diddling is bad?
That's fairly concerning.
Edit: also petty lol
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 45 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,056
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,057
You 'two' sure like to "lol" a lot and use the exact same phrases don't you?
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 18 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,058
@previous (N)
So does the entirety of the internet.
You should keep showing us how paranoid you are, though.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,060
He's having a full-on meltdown right now.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,061
@previous (N)
Am I? I hadn't noticed. You're awfully afraid of citing me now. Did I intimidate you somehow?
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 37 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,063
Oh dear, out come the edits, his language is starting to collapse through his rage. I'm starting to feel a little cruel continuing to upset him like this.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,064
@previous (N)
Still afraid of citing directly, huh? Sorry to have hurt you this strongly, anon. I only wish to oppose the plight of pedophilia.
I'll include an edit so you can rage about it again. :)
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
·Anonymous Q — 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,067
@604,057 (N)
@604,060 (N)
@604,063 (N)
You
really got triggered over this whole "don't diddle kids" thing. You sure you don't have an internalized problem?
Inb4 "G is angrily replying as Q again!", although I do enjoy it when people angrily assume I'm the first guy for agreeing with them LOL.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,071
@previous (Q)
I'll let you pose as me anytime, good sir.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,073
Oh dear he's gone full-on psychotic break now. Both UIDs at once!
·Anonymous Q — 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,074
@previous (N)
I genuinely can't wait for the mods to confirm he and I are different users. That's going to be hilarious.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,075
@604,064 (G)
> I only wish to oppose the plight of pedophilia.
Incidentally this is a good place to finish since my game of ignoring you has led to you getting so upset you've exposed yourself. You "wish to oppose the plight of pedophilia" do you? Fucking sick bastard. Who in their right mind "opposes" pedophilia's "plight"?
Game, set and match, Anon G exposed as a defender of pedophilia. Let it be henceforth known that madaboutGrover is a projecting nonce.
So, so easy. Thank you and good night.
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,076
@604,074 (Q)
Sorry for using you like that but it was the quickest way to trick him into admitting what he is. You were just a pawn. You can go now.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 39 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,081
@604,075 (N)
> plight - a dangerous, difficult, or otherwise unfortunate situation.
I am opposing the dangerous, difficult, or otherwise unfortunate situation that is the disgusting cravings Grover has towards children.
But now we know that you don't know simple words such as "plight". You really are a stupid pedophile, aren't you?
·Anonymous N — 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,082
HAHAHAHA that's the best he could attempt to walk it back! Hey retard, do this: go up to a English-speaking cop and say "I oppose the plight of pedophilia". Then let us know how much your bail is.
What a mess I've made of you. Later nonce, I got what I came for: "I oppose the plight of pedophilia" - madaboutGrover. Screencapped it for future use. My work here is done. I dismiss you.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,084
@previous (N)
See ya, Merrin. It's been fun making you flail over your disgusting habits. :)
·Anonymous P — 5 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,085
@previous (G)
> Everybody is Merrin. ·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,086
@previous (P)
Welcome back, Merrin! You gonna continue defending pedophilia under this UID now?
+Anonymous R — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,093
@604,064 (G)
> I only wish to oppose the plight of pedophilia.
I don't think this sentence means what you think it means.
·Anonymous Q — 5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,094
@604,076 (N)
Say what you want. You (and G and myself) know full well that you dug yourself quite a sizable hole in this thread and you're playing it off desperately. It was truly very entertaining though, so I thank you for the value in that.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,095
@604,093 (R)
> plight - a dangerous, difficult, or otherwise unfortunate situation.
> I am opposing the dangerous, difficult, or otherwise unfortunate situation that is the disgusting cravings Grover has towards children.
I could have also worded it as "plight
that is pedophilia".
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
·Anonymous R — 5 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,096
@previous (G)
That would have made you sound slightly less of a pedophile, yes.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,097
@previous (R)
Or, you know, the fact that I've been opposing pedophilia throughout this entire thread. Really common sense at that point.
+Anonymous S — 5 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,133
@603,808 (Syntax)·Anonymous P — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,138
@604,097 (G)
> Or, you know, the fact that I've been obsessing over pedophilia throughout this entire thread.(Edited 10 seconds later.)
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,139
@previous (P)
Still mad about your defeat, huh?
·Anonymous P — 5 years ago, 33 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,140
@previous (G)
> Still mad about your defeat, huh?
Still under the delusion that every poster taking delight in trolling your ass all the way across the river and back is the same person?
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 24 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,142
@previous (P)
Still mad about your defeat, huh?
·Anonymous P — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,144
@previous (G)
> Still mad about your defeat, huh?
Still under the delusion that every poster taking delight in trolling your ass all the way across the river and back is the same person, huh?
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,162
@previous (P)
Still mad about your defeat, huh?
·Anonymous M — 5 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,176
Looks like the madspammer is back!
You are one weird, fucked up individual, Anon G. Don't get too mad now.
·Anonymous R — 5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,177
@previous (M)
> Looks like the madspammer is back!
>
> You are one weird, fucked up individual, Anon G. Don't get too mad now.
I had a feeling it was him too. Guy's weird as fuck.
·Anonymous G — 5 years ago, 13 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,178
@604,176 (M)
Weird trolling tactic, but I'll take it. Entertain me further, pls.
·Anonymous O — 5 years ago, 1 day later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #604,213
fuckin faggot
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.