Topic: The Black Plaugue disappeared without a vaccine.
+Anonymous A — 5.1 years ago #58,034
Let that sink in.
+Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later[T] [B] #602,931
> The most popular theory of how the plague ended is through the implementation of quarantines. The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary, while those who could afford to do so would leave the more densely populated areas and live in greater isolation.
Lol. So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus.
Let that sink in.
Lol. So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus.
Let that sink in.
+Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,933
is this a real
is this a fantasy
is this a fantasy
+Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,935
@602,931 (B)
Except, you absolute simpleton, they implemented quarantines for sick people, which is the correct way to do it. Quarantining people who aren't infected is moronic. Let that sink in.
Except, you absolute simpleton, they implemented quarantines for sick people, which is the correct way to do it. Quarantining people who aren't infected is moronic. Let that sink in.
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,944
@previous (D)
I see you didn't read my argument before blindly/angrily smashing your keys to form this garbage reply.
> The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary
Read even 20 words next time and maybe you won't make yourself look like an absolute retard.
I see you didn't read my argument before blindly/angrily smashing your keys to form this garbage reply.
> The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary
Read even 20 words next time and maybe you won't make yourself look like an absolute retard.
+Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,946
@602,935 (D)
Interesting fact: the plague only died out in England after the great fire of London. The majority of modern historians agree that the disease had to be burnt out of existence.
Interesting fact: the plague only died out in England after the great fire of London. The majority of modern historians agree that the disease had to be burnt out of existence.
·Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 46 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,947
·Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,951
@602,944 (B)
Except it wasn't your argument, you utter twat-waffle. It was a quotation which you obviously failed to understand, because you stupidly think the current plan to reduce covid infections has been to implement quarantine as it should be done, as opposed to how it actually is being done - isolate everybody regardless of whether or not they are sick. lol, what a dingus.
@602,946 (E)
> Interesting fact: the plague only died out in England after the great fire of London. The majority of modern historians agree that the disease had to be burnt out of existence.
Yes, that is the primary reason for the end of the plague in England. Otherwise it was simply the natural progress of the disease, which like any other, followed a logistics curve.
> Yes, he's not very bright, is he?
Oh it's you... carry on muddling your merry way through life then.
Except it wasn't your argument, you utter twat-waffle. It was a quotation which you obviously failed to understand, because you stupidly think the current plan to reduce covid infections has been to implement quarantine as it should be done, as opposed to how it actually is being done - isolate everybody regardless of whether or not they are sick. lol, what a dingus.
@602,946 (E)
> Interesting fact: the plague only died out in England after the great fire of London. The majority of modern historians agree that the disease had to be burnt out of existence.
Yes, that is the primary reason for the end of the plague in England. Otherwise it was simply the natural progress of the disease, which like any other, followed a logistics curve.
> Yes, he's not very bright, is he?
Oh it's you... carry on muddling your merry way through life then.
+Anonymous F — 5.1 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,958
@OP> Let that sink in.
Typical Garbage from a Human Rat without an education - Of course NO Vaccine
1346 to 1353. It is the most fatal pandemic recorded in human history, causing the death of 75–200 million people
A Bacteria that is easily treatable today so NO Vaccine and it was self contained by people staying home in QUARATINE to keep their BODY FEALS away from non infected people.
Last major outbreak was in London
1666, the great outbreak ended. The Great Fire of London, which happened on 2-6 September 1666, may have helped end the outbreak by killing many of the rats and fleas who were spreading the plague.
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,969
@602,951 (D)
> Except it wasn't your argument.
Who are you to decide what isn't and is my argument, retard? Whether or not it's quoted from a separate source, it's the argument I agree with.
> because you stupidly think the current plan to reduce covid infections has been to implement quarantine as it should be done
Did I say that was the current plan? You're really failing to read/comprehend such basic things in this thread. It's interesting to see.
You really are a spectacular idiot.
> Except it wasn't your argument.
Who are you to decide what isn't and is my argument, retard? Whether or not it's quoted from a separate source, it's the argument I agree with.
> because you stupidly think the current plan to reduce covid infections has been to implement quarantine as it should be done
Did I say that was the current plan? You're really failing to read/comprehend such basic things in this thread. It's interesting to see.
You really are a spectacular idiot.
+Anonymous G — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,974
@previous (B)
> Did I say that was the current plan?
you kind of did tbh:
> > So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus.
this "other protocol" is what?
> Did I say that was the current plan?
you kind of did tbh:
> > So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus.
this "other protocol" is what?
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,980
@previous (G)
> you kind of did tbh
You should totally quote where I said that. Protip: I didn't.
> this "other protocol" is what?
Out of the 2 in discussion, there would be vaccinating and quarantining. Please tell me I don't need to hold your hand to comprehend simple sentences, bud. The "other protocol" that they used to help eradicate the plague would be quarantining, as is clearly stated above.
You good now, little guy? Or are you still struggling with basic reading comprehension?
> you kind of did tbh
You should totally quote where I said that. Protip: I didn't.
> this "other protocol" is what?
Out of the 2 in discussion, there would be vaccinating and quarantining. Please tell me I don't need to hold your hand to comprehend simple sentences, bud. The "other protocol" that they used to help eradicate the plague would be quarantining, as is clearly stated above.
You good now, little guy? Or are you still struggling with basic reading comprehension?
+Anonymous H — 5.1 years ago, 22 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,981
I hope Bert and Syntax gets Covid soon.
+Anonymous I — 5.1 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,001
After killing most of Europe, yes
·Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,003
@602,980 (B)
> Out of the 2 in discussion, there would be vaccinating and quarantining. Please tell me I don't need to hold your hand to comprehend simple sentences, bud. The "other protocol" that they used to help eradicate the plague would be quarantining, as is clearly stated above.
LOL! You still don't get it. You actually think the "quarantining" going on in 2021 with respect to covid is precisely the same protocol as the one used in 17th century England for the plague.
My God you are thick.
@602,974 (G)
> > Did I say that was the current plan?
> you kind of did tbh:
> > > So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus.
Yes, exactly. This guy gets it.
Clue: The other protocol that all sane, mature, rational people heavily oppose is the idiotic notion of segregating people who are not sick or have had the vaccine. This is not the same as quarantining, you tonsil.
> Out of the 2 in discussion, there would be vaccinating and quarantining. Please tell me I don't need to hold your hand to comprehend simple sentences, bud. The "other protocol" that they used to help eradicate the plague would be quarantining, as is clearly stated above.
LOL! You still don't get it. You actually think the "quarantining" going on in 2021 with respect to covid is precisely the same protocol as the one used in 17th century England for the plague.
My God you are thick.
@602,974 (G)
> > Did I say that was the current plan?
> you kind of did tbh:
> > > So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus.
Yes, exactly. This guy gets it.
Clue: The other protocol that all sane, mature, rational people heavily oppose is the idiotic notion of segregating people who are not sick or have had the vaccine. This is not the same as quarantining, you tonsil.
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,009
@previous (D)
> You actually think the "quarantining" going on in 2021 with respect to covid is precisely the same protocol as the one used in 17th century England for the plague.
Lol. I literally never said this or even hinted at it. You might actually be a real retard. You should quote where I say this. I dare you.
Just to speed up the process that is your struggles in critical thinking, my comments have been talking about the plague when I reference "the virus". Simple context clues would have helped you, but you clearly are lacking severely in several departments.
> You actually think the "quarantining" going on in 2021 with respect to covid is precisely the same protocol as the one used in 17th century England for the plague.
Lol. I literally never said this or even hinted at it. You might actually be a real retard. You should quote where I say this. I dare you.
Just to speed up the process that is your struggles in critical thinking, my comments have been talking about the plague when I reference "the virus". Simple context clues would have helped you, but you clearly are lacking severely in several departments.
(Edited 9 minutes later.)
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,012
@603,003 (D)
> The other protocol that all sane, mature, rational people heavily oppose is the idiotic notion of segregating people who are not sick or have had the vaccine.
And this is the point when I emphasize that during the Plague, people who weren't sick still quarantined in their homes/away from public places. Basic reading comprehension goes a long way when trying to form arguments. Who would'a thunk?
See:
> The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary, while those who could afford to do so would leave the more densely populated areas and live in greater isolation.
> The other protocol that all sane, mature, rational people heavily oppose is the idiotic notion of segregating people who are not sick or have had the vaccine.
And this is the point when I emphasize that during the Plague, people who weren't sick still quarantined in their homes/away from public places. Basic reading comprehension goes a long way when trying to form arguments. Who would'a thunk?
See:
> The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary, while those who could afford to do so would leave the more densely populated areas and live in greater isolation.
(Edited 43 seconds later.)
·Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,017
@603,009 (B)
> > You actually think the "quarantining" going on in 2021 with respect to covid is precisely the same protocol as the one used in 17th century England for the plague.
>
> Lol. I literally never said this or even hinted at it. You might actually be a real retard. You should quote where I say this. I dare you.
>
> Just to speed up the process that is your struggles in critical thinking, my comments have been talking about the plague when I reference "the virus". Simple context clues would have helped you, but you clearly are lacking severely in several departments.
@previous (B)
> > The other protocol that all sane, mature, rational people heavily oppose is the idiotic notion of segregating people who are not sick or have had the vaccine.
>
> And this is the point when I emphasize that during the Plague, people who weren't sick still quarantined in their homes/away from public places. Basic reading comprehension goes a long way when trying to form arguments. Who would'a thunk?
>
> See:
> > The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary, while those who could afford to do so would leave the more densely populated areas and live in greater isolation.
Dude, just quit while you're behind. This desperate attempt to back-pedal out of the cul-de-sac you've trapped yourself in is making you look like an even bigger banana.
> > You actually think the "quarantining" going on in 2021 with respect to covid is precisely the same protocol as the one used in 17th century England for the plague.
>
> Lol. I literally never said this or even hinted at it. You might actually be a real retard. You should quote where I say this. I dare you.
>
> Just to speed up the process that is your struggles in critical thinking, my comments have been talking about the plague when I reference "the virus". Simple context clues would have helped you, but you clearly are lacking severely in several departments.
@previous (B)
> > The other protocol that all sane, mature, rational people heavily oppose is the idiotic notion of segregating people who are not sick or have had the vaccine.
>
> And this is the point when I emphasize that during the Plague, people who weren't sick still quarantined in their homes/away from public places. Basic reading comprehension goes a long way when trying to form arguments. Who would'a thunk?
>
> See:
> > The uninfected would typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary, while those who could afford to do so would leave the more densely populated areas and live in greater isolation.
Dude, just quit while you're behind. This desperate attempt to back-pedal out of the cul-de-sac you've trapped yourself in is making you look like an even bigger banana.
·Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,018
how about just try my thread
https://tinychan.net/topic/58051
https://tinychan.net/topic/58051
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,023
@603,017 (D)
That irony, though.
> This desperate attempt to backpedal
Usually if the user is explaining the same exact point throughout the entire thread, it's impossible that they've backpedaled.
Glad to see you've completely dropped your argument for the sake of empty insults, though. Come back if you actually think of a worthwhile retort. I'll be waiting.
That irony, though.
> This desperate attempt to backpedal
Usually if the user is explaining the same exact point throughout the entire thread, it's impossible that they've backpedaled.
Glad to see you've completely dropped your argument for the sake of empty insults, though. Come back if you actually think of a worthwhile retort. I'll be waiting.
·Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,025
·Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,037
@603,023 (B)
Sigh, you poor simple fool. Let's break it down, shall we:
You said: "So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus."
By the "other protocol", you meant quarantining, which you admitted here: "The "other protocol" that they used to help eradicate the plague would be quarantining, as is clearly stated above."
By the phrase "that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose" you are implying that the OP (who is not me, just by the way) opposes both the idea of vaccines and a second 21st C protocol (which we've established is supposed to be quarantining) in order to combat covid.
Is the false equivalence at the heart of your ridiculous, muddle-headed argument beginning to dawn on you yet?
Sigh, you poor simple fool. Let's break it down, shall we:
You said: "So the other protocol that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose is what they used to eradicate the virus."
By the "other protocol", you meant quarantining, which you admitted here: "The "other protocol" that they used to help eradicate the plague would be quarantining, as is clearly stated above."
By the phrase "that you likely heavily (and immaturely) oppose" you are implying that the OP (who is not me, just by the way) opposes both the idea of vaccines and a second 21st C protocol (which we've established is supposed to be quarantining) in order to combat covid.
Is the false equivalence at the heart of your ridiculous, muddle-headed argument beginning to dawn on you yet?
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,095
@previous (D)
> By the phrase [...] you are implying that the OP opposes both the idea of vaccines and a second 21st C protocol in order to combat covid.
I've never argued against this point. What the fuck are you even trying to say now? Are you really this retarded? Can you honestly not grasp anything in this thread or are you trolling?
I'm legit asking now. How is anyone as stupid as you've proven yourself to be in this thread?
> By the phrase [...] you are implying that the OP opposes both the idea of vaccines and a second 21st C protocol in order to combat covid.
I've never argued against this point. What the fuck are you even trying to say now? Are you really this retarded? Can you honestly not grasp anything in this thread or are you trolling?
I'm legit asking now. How is anyone as stupid as you've proven yourself to be in this thread?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,098
@previous (B)
> I'm legit asking now. How is anyone as stupid as you've proven yourself to be in this thread?
> > typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary
Calm down, nitwit. You should have realized by now I'm just toying with you. It's been fun. Thanks! :)
> I'm legit asking now. How is anyone as stupid as you've proven yourself to be in this thread?
> > typically remain in their homes and only leave when it was necessary
Calm down, nitwit. You should have realized by now I'm just toying with you. It's been fun. Thanks! :)
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,101
@previous (D)
Thanks for performing the hail mary that is "I'm only trolling lol!" in order to exit a losing argument.
It's been fun humiliating you in this thread. :)
Thanks for performing the hail mary that is "I'm only trolling lol!" in order to exit a losing argument.
It's been fun humiliating you in this thread. :)
·Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,102
·Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #603,103
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.