Notice: Home alone tonight?
Topic: this
+Anonymous A — 5.1 years ago #57,933

any advanced mathemathics that can be used to draw directly like this?
especially defining objects in a certain angle/focal length based on its size and form profiling...
+Anonymous B — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later[T] [B] #602,400
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #602,401
@previous (B)
yes. da way to predict sizes and curves....
so far theres only mathemathics to define basic stuff like that... or is there any other
+Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #602,403
I dont find this all that interesting at all.
Let's talk about chicks and rock n roll.
I get turned on by girls in their mid to late 30's and rock like AC/DC and Ratt.
I miss cocaine and Oxy's bit booze is ok.
The 80s were the last decent decade and if I could get some acid I would feel like it was the best Christmas ever.
Old people are a drag but millenial fags are worse. I just want my dick sicked while the chick also sicks on my neck, I go crazy for that.
What's up?
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,423
@previous (C)
those are all not my thing. why do you even take it up on me
·Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,425
@previous (A)
Lock my balls for two hours. I'll tell you when you can stop.
+Anonymous D — 5.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,427
@602,403 (C)
@previous (C)
You are derailing his excellent topic. A violation of tc rules.
·Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,428
@previous (D)
This topic is SHIT.
Deal with it, nerd.
+Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,430
@previous (C)
Reported for derailing. Tick tock.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,435
@602,428 (C)
lol shut it
@previous (E)
meanwhile thank you
+Anonymous F — 5.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,436
·Anonymous C — 5.1 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,438
Goodnight folks.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,446
@602,436 (F)
i use 3 lines if that helps
but they look obtusely ugly so...
·Anonymous F — 5.1 years ago, 15 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,448
@previous (A)
Are you familiar with the Golden Ratio?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,449
@previous (F)
yes, very. but i dont understand how
·Anonymous F — 5.1 years ago, 14 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,450
@previous (A)
I'd suggest looking at a few paintings using the ratio as their compositional basis, then see if you can adapt the formula to your own work.
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 5.1 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,453
@602,438 (C)
gnight honey
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,456
@602,450 (F)
that i did.. but the case of the image is usually about, how to define curves like this, given the object and its property and the view's property
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,459
+Anonymous H — 5.1 years ago, 5 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,466
ugh
+Syntax — 5.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,481
@602,459 (A)
Math is not exactly the solution for works of Art. Math like Fractals may apply for some but for sure NOT for the Artist that made your Picture. Topology as it relates to Physics has a place because it can be used to define nano - micro and larger areas. So you are left with a branch of Math that can be used to define Mathematically any work of art
Differential Calculus. So it wood give you one hell of a lot of Calculus equations - However I cannot imagine what use they wood be. For sure you could not use them to create a new and similar work of art but you could try.
“If I could say it in words there would be no reason to paint.” Edward Hopper
So this can be extrapolated to be
If I could say it in Mathematics, there wood be no reason to paint.
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
+Anonymous J — 5.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,482
@previous (Syntax)
Werd salad
·Syntax — 5.1 years ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #602,483
@previous (J)
I make my living using one hell of lot of math. I ask Google for a list of Mathematics
Abstract algebra, algebraic geometry, algebraic topology, applied mathematics, calculus of variations, category theory, coding theory, combinatorics, complex analysis, complexity theory, computability theory, computer science, control theory, convex geometry, cryptography, differential geometry, dynamical systems, field theory, functional analysis, Galois theory, game theory, graph theory, group theory, harmonic analysis, homological algebra, information theory, K-theory, knot theory, Lie theory, linear algebra, mathematical biology, mathematical finance, mathematical logic, mathematical physics, matrix theory, measure theory, model theory, number theory, numerical analysis, operations research, operator theory, optimization, ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, probability, proof theory, real analysis, representation theory, ring theory, set theory, statistics, stochastic processes, topology.
Yet even that list in incomplete because one of my hobbies is to get some degree of skill with Quantum theory and the math required. IF one is going to design a Time Machine one needs this form of Math.
Weird salad is a cool take on Word Salad. So I defer to this famous person in history
The Rules of Grammar
"I am almost sure by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules
-knew them by heart, word for word, though not their meanings-and I still know one of them: the one which says---but never mind, it will come back to me presently."
"Great books are weighed and measured by their style and matter, and not the trimmings and shadings of their grammar."
"The Queen's English"
"There is no such thing as the Queen's English. The property has gone into the hands of a joint stock company and we own the bulk of the shares."
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #602,507
@602,481 (Syntax) try writing the solution in differential calculus then. please?
@602,482 (J) yummy
@previous (Syntax) i kinda get you but maybe a single function is enough or a way to affirm that those subjects above doesnt have what i need is enough
·Syntax — 5.1 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #602,511
@previous (A)
Yikes - One wood have to divide that picture up into 10,000 to 100,000 sections and analyze one at a time - The job for a large computer to do this with optical recognition. The partial differential calculus for each piece. Years ago I worked with a hell of a lot of engineers/scientists to use Imaging Radar to look at say area 51 and produce an optical return that looked like a photograph - Advantage is you can look in fog and rain and see inside as if we were using an X-Ray to penetrate. My area of expertise was Analog and others used Digital. If you looked at the processing you wood see a zillions of ones and zeros of course -
Anyway a single function No way no how - Complex structure requires Volumes and a Library of solutions - Look at this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_equation
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_differential_geometry_topics
Your bottom line is something like this
https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/when-computers-make-art·Anonymous J — 5.1 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #602,517
@previous (Syntax)
> Years ago
Years ago you wernt shriveled up with wrinkly skin and almost bald with thin frazzled white hair and barely able to do much of anything besides stalk on the interwebs, lol.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.1 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #602,519
@602,511 (Syntax)
wow looks fancy... like glitch art... maybe tone it down abit?
the subjects i deal with are mostly real ones... i think o have bunch dealth woth like motorbikes from a certain angles and propelllers but then the same solution dont apply to different things so it's kinda frustating...
wondering if mathemathics or graphic engineering can generalize them like vertice and so on...
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.