Topic: Attention: Father Merrin

+Anonymous A — 5.1 years ago #57,803

Whom do you consider the worse pedophile, Fatfuck or FagBert?

+Father Merrin !Ep8pui8Vw2 — 5.1 years ago, 4 hours later[T] [B] #601,582

I don't know who either of these two characters are.

+Blimey John Digger III !!EnbU+gDnQ2 — 5.1 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,584

@previous (Father Merrin !Ep8pui8Vw2)
> I don't know who either of these two characters are.

I am sorry, but you are a bad person

+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.1 years ago, 12 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,605

I've never had any indication Bert is a pedophile. Matt however gives off that impression. So Matt.

+Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,606

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Didn't Bert post borderline CP on here a couple years back? (it was children in swimsuits all posed provocatively or something) Or am I misremembering that?

+Anonymous F — 5.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,607

Father Merrin has some sugar in his tank.
I heard he likes to wear panties.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,609

@601,606 (E)
> Didn't Bert post borderline CP on here a couple years back? (it was children in swimsuits all posed provocatively or something) Or am I misremembering that?

Not really, I mean that's how it was spun but I'm actually on his side with that one. It was kids modelling swimsuits that he'd got from a Google search (the kind of image you can see in any clothes catalogue or children's section in a clothing store), and I'm one of those who tends to think that if you see a kid in a swimsuit and think "pornography", it speaks volumes about you, not about the image. The same if you think they are "posing provocatively". Anyone thinking that has the very issues they're projecting onto others.

·Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,624

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> and I'm one of those who tends to think that if you see a kid in a swimsuit and think "pornography", it speaks volumes about you, not about the image. The same if you think they are "posing provocatively". Anyone thinking that has the very issues they're projecting onto others.

... Or they could just be worried someone who thinks like that will take advantage of the image. Not sure why you so readily shout "PROJECTION" in such cases. Of course, your troll shtick could just be that you like to bait in this way. In which case, carry on. Just sharing my 2 logical cents.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 5.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,625

@previous (E)
> > and I'm one of those who tends to think that if you see a kid in a swimsuit and think "pornography", it speaks volumes about you, not about the image. The same if you think they are "posing provocatively". Anyone thinking that has the very issues they're projecting onto others.
>
> ... Or they could just be worried someone who thinks like that will take advantage of the image. Not sure why you so readily shout "PROJECTION" in such cases. Of course, your troll shtick could just be that you like to bait in this way. In which case, carry on. Just sharing my 2 logical cents.

Fuck me you never take a single day off do you?

Anyway, OP, I've answered your question, I'll leave it now because this guy is gearing up for his usual coronary. Peace all.

·Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,629

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Sorry, do you think I'm OP or something? That's a bit paranoid, don't you think?

+Anonymous G — 5.1 years ago, 31 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,641

@previous (E)
The first paragraph is clearly directed at you while the second paragraph is clearly directed at OP. Don't be obtuse.

·Anonymous E — 5.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #601,643

@previous (G)
That's fine. But implications can go either way in this case. Try not to lose a gasket over it next time.

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan