Notice: Home alone tonight?
Topic: Sniffy Joe to give live speech momentarily
+Anonymous A — 5.2 years ago #57,547
Hope the teleprompter doesnt Jam up.
LIVE-
https://youtu.be/ZtQ-goeYY8s·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later[T] [B] #599,239
Here he is lololol
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,240
Fake bullshit lol He said "I carry a card in my pocket that states the amount of Covid deaths."
He talks about how hard it is for people to tell their families they lost their jobs in this pandemic!
JOE YOU GOT 30,OOO+ PEOPLE FIRED ON YOUR SECOND DAY IN OFFICE YOU PIECE OF SHIT!!!!
Wow.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,241
He said 'The Government' is 'us'.
LMAO.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,242
I had to turn that idiot off, before I vomited.
+Anonymous B — 5.2 years ago, 20 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,243

Given you are a Commie-Socialist, you will bend over and take Joe's $$$$$
Not one of your Senators and Congressman voted for the bill. Until then enjoy this
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 17 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,244
Biden is hideous.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,245
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,246
+Anonymous C — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,247
@599,244 (A)
You would lick his dirty asshole just to get your welfare check.
Oh and can you imagine the smile on your cancer ridden dads face now. Bet Dead he looks better than you do.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,248
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,249
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,250
Never has a speech prepared by a writer and delivered by a Politician sounded more ridiculous.
+Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,251
@OP
https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016
I bet it sucks to be on the losing side, Bert. I wouldn't know, but I see you're handling it about as well as expected.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,253
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,254
· !wYUuBm6d7Q — 5.2 years ago, 14 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,255
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #599,256
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #599,257
+Anonymous E — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #599,258
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,262
@599,253 (A)
What do abortion rates have to do with the very real statistics that show how worse of crooks the right are than the left?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 9 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,276

Who is Vice President Harrison?
lmao
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,277
@599,255 (!wYUuBm6d7Q)
Concerning Rantt.com
"These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy."
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,278
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,279
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 38 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,280
+Anonymous F — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,281
@previous (A)
Suddenly you're concerned with presidential decorum? Your cult leader Trump was mocking invalids on the campaign trail.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,282
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 20 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,283
+ !wYUuBm6d7Q — 5.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,284
@599,277 (A)
> Concerning Rantt.com
>
> "These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy."
Does Not change the fact that
Republican Administration-HAD-38-TIMES MORE CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS -than-democrats-1961-2016
https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016
https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016
https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016
https://rantt.com/gop-admins-had-38-times-more-criminal-convictions-than-democrats-1961-2016·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,288
·Syntax — 5.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,291
@previous (D)
Thank you for ur service - Clearly anything that joins that Crooked Party is just looking to be caught and locked up.
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,295
@previous (Syntax)
I doubt he'll ever see reason. But might as well shove the facts against him down his throat. It's fun elevating his blood pressure.
·Syntax — 5.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,298
@previous (D)
Paul "Junior" History with convicted Felonies - OK I can only prove One Felony and he fully admits to jail terms from Criminal acts. So it did come as a surprise to me that Republicans have such a Horrid History of Criminal Convictions, compared to Democrats. Who new that the 38-1 ended up as a Small number compared to the 91 Times.
·lol (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,302
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,305
·lol (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 32 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,306
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,307
· !xqlNKJ6FBE — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,308
Republican Presidencies Have 91 Times the Convictions Rate of Democratic Presidencies
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/republican-presidencies-have-91x-the-convictions-rate_b_5a3d5406e4b0df0de8b064e5
Democratic presidencies dating back to 1970 have produced exactly one criminal conviction from investigations into the administration. Republican presidencies have had a total of 91.
It is worth taking a second to let that sink in: three Democratic presidents. Six Republican presidents. Ninety-one convictions to one.
Ninety-one convictions to one.
If you look at criminal indictments, not just convictions, its not a prettier picture: GOP Presidencies had 124 criminal indictments. Democrats had 3. This data comes from a table helpfully shared by PBS.
Yes, you read it correctly: Democrats have less total indictments since 1970 than Donald Trump does since taking office this year. And less convictions: 2-1.
Prison sentences? Also no help: 14 for GOP Presidencies, one for Democratic ones.
Prison sentences? Also no help: 14 for GOP Presidencies, one for Democratic ones.
You can’t make this kind of stuff up. If you heard it in House of Cards, you wouldn’t believe it.
In fact, for GOP Presidents who served two terms, the smallest number of criminal convictions was 16: a tie between Ronald Reagan and George W Bush. Nixon had 55.
Importantly, the two GOP Presidents with low conviction numbers were Gerald Ford – who was only president for 2 years and cleaned up for Watergate – and Bush Sr, who was a one-term President and was Vice President during Reagan’s terms.
In fact, the GOP Presidencies were so scandal-ridden that each President is associated with a known criminal scandal that has lived through history: Nixon for Watergate, Reagan for Iran Contra, and Bush for Iraq, Katrina, and Valarie Plame.
What all of this means is that we have to stop writing articles talking about how the GOP started to become corrupt sometime in 2015. That’s simply not true. Donald Trump is keeping up with a tried and true pattern of Republican presidencies: scandals and convictions. Indeed, in his 55 convictions, Nixon doesn’t even get any points for his worst criminal act: sabotaging Vietnam peace negotiations in 1968 to get himself elected and costing tens of thousands of American lives.
For Republican presidents, the rot runs deep. You have to go back to Eisenhower to find a GOP President not associated with a crime of historic proportions. And, before him, the last Republican presidents were those of the famously corrupt 1920s. Warren Harding anyone?
To truly change, Republicans have to confront this reality. They haven’t ever been the party of true conservative ethics and restraint. And they never can be, unless they accept that and start new.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,311
· !xqlNKJ6FBE — 5.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,314
@previous (A)
The only reason you're against a woman's right to be in control of their body is - You are the result of a failed Abortion. The Coat hanger apparently was in some Hillbillies hands.
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,315
· !dSJ9kJR.ac — 5.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,316
@previous (D)
Democratic presidencies dating back to 1970 have produced exactly one criminal conviction from investigations into the administration. Republican presidencies have had a total of 91.
It is worth taking a second to let that sink in: three Democratic presidents. Six Republican presidents. Ninety-one convictions to one.
Ninety-one convictions to one.
If you look at criminal indictments, not just convictions, its not a prettier picture: GOP Presidencies had 124 criminal indictments. Democrats had 3. This data comes from a table helpfully shared by PBS.
Yes, you read it correctly: Democrats have less total indictments since 1970 than Donald Trump does since taking office this year. And less convictions: 2-1.
Prison sentences? Also no help: 14 for GOP Presidencies, one for Democratic ones.
Prison sentences? Also no help: 14 for GOP Presidencies, one for Democratic ones.
You can’t make this kind of stuff up. If you heard it in House of Cards, you wouldn’t believe it.
In fact, for GOP Presidents who served two terms, the smallest number of criminal convictions was 16: a tie between Ronald Reagan and George W Bush. Nixon had 55.
Importantly, the two GOP Presidents with low conviction numbers were Gerald Ford – who was only president for 2 years and cleaned up for Watergate – and Bush Sr, who was a one-term President and was Vice President during Reagan’s terms.
In fact, the GOP Presidencies were so scandal-ridden that each President is associated with a known criminal scandal that has lived through history: Nixon for Watergate, Reagan for Iran Contra, and Bush for Iraq, Katrina, and Valarie Plame.
What all of this means is that we have to stop writing articles talking about how the GOP started to become corrupt sometime in 2015. That’s simply not true. Donald Trump is keeping up with a tried and true pattern of Republican presidencies: scandals and convictions. Indeed, in his 55 convictions, Nixon doesn’t even get any points for his worst criminal act: sabotaging Vietnam peace negotiations in 1968 to get himself elected and costing tens of thousands of American lives.
For Republican presidents, the rot runs deep. You have to go back to Eisenhower to find a GOP President not associated with a crime of historic proportions. And, before him, the last Republican presidents were those of the famously corrupt 1920s. Warren Harding anyone?
To truly change, Republicans have to confront this reality. They haven’t ever been the party of true conservative ethics and restraint. And they never can be, unless they accept that and start new.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,320
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #599,322
+Anonymous H — 5.2 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,328
@599,316 (!dSJ9kJR.ac)
How many of those convictions were like the two impeachments? I.e. baseless, vindictive and partisan. That says more about the accusers and their political machinations than the accused.
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,331
@previous (H)
Imagine not knowing the (very important) difference between impeachment and conviction, then attempting to corner someone using that misunderstanding.
Really showing your IQ there, bud.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,332
Imagine being the kind of asstard you'd have to be to vote for a Democrat.
lol
+Anonymous I — 5.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,336
@599,331 (D)
Imagine not knowing that both involve a trial.
·Anonymous H — 5.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,337
@previous (I)
Imagine not knowing that both involve an indictment.
· !jM/TIxxEd. — 5.2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,338
@599,332 (A)
> Imagine being the kind of asstard you'd have to be to vote for a Democrat.
>
>
> lol
The very same Democrats who soon will send you your next welfare check. A true Republican would send it back.
You? Go on and tell us how you will thank God for Democrats.
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,344
@599,332 (A)
You aren't even trying at this point.
@599,336 (I)
So? That doesn't make the argument work. They tried to equate convictions to impeachments when it's obvious a conviction is much more final. In other words, comparing the two as a "proof" is retarded.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,346
@previous (D)
I don't need to try. I know the Democrats are a cancer on the US.
Bad is good to them and God is bad to them.
· !dSJ9kJR.ac — 5.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,347
@previous (A)
> I don't need to try. I know the Democrats are a cancer on the US.
> Bad is good to them and God is bad to them.
As Chili said to you - What does that have to do with you wanting to suck Bidens cock, as thanks for him sending you a check.
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,349
@599,346 (A)
So the proven fact that Republican politicians are statistically more criminal than democrat politicians somehow is lost on you?
· !byMEuFolZk — 5.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,350
@previous (D)
You must remember, bert is a convicted Felon. He is in good company with his statistically, more criminal party peeps.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,352
@599,347 (!dSJ9kJR.ac)
How about I bust you in your old ass mouth repeatedly for talking shit about me for years on here. How about that Lynne?
I am very tired of it.
Will it have been worth it to you, asshole? You have had many warnings and many chances to stop.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,353
@599,347 (!dSJ9kJR.ac)
Make your choice...stop or accept the consequences.
·Anonymous H — 5.2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,355
@599,349 (D)
> So the proven fact that Republican politicians are statistically more criminal than democrat politicians somehow is lost on you?
So, the meaninglessness of the "proven" fact that Republican politicians are statistically more criminal ACCORDING TO Democrat politicians somehow is lost on you? Are you that blind? In the words of your guy, "c'mon man".
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,356
@previous (H)
> ACCORDING TO
So you haven't realized all of the facts in that article are verifiable by legitimate recorded history?
Learn to research.
·Anonymous H — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,357
@previous (D)
You are so naive. Poor dumb fool.
·Anonymous D — 5.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,358
@previous (H)
Google it, bud. Form an actual opinion like anyone with a brain would. I promise it'll help you win some.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.2 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #599,360
@599,338 (!jM/TIxxEd.)
What's your response?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 5.2 years ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #599,441
autism intensified
+chill dog !!heHjtrQ7i2 — 5.2 years ago, 12 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #599,511
@599,353 (A)
Just like how you showed up to fight the trucker? Now you're going to go to California? Or are you expecting Syntax to buy you a plane ticket, then you'll bitch that it wasn't first clasd?
+Anonymous L — 5.2 years ago, 10 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #599,515
Have you bent over and thanked big-daddy Biden for your Commie money yet, OP?
·Syntax — 5.2 years ago, 4 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #599,521
@599,511 (chill dog !!heHjtrQ7i2)
> Just like how you showed up to fight the trucker? Now you're going to go to California? Or are you expecting Syntax to buy you a plane ticket, then you'll bitch that it wasn't first clasd?
Actually he sent me email telling me he was buying a ticket to cum to Cardiff by the Sea and now with his Fav Party the Democrats paying his way any momento - I looked up Knoxville Tn to San Diego = Round Trip on United Airlines = $307.76 + $68.24 (taxes) = $376.00
I did not take into account his need to fit his Obese ass into two seats - Alas he now will have no excuse but as with the Trucker who he ran away from I doubt he is Man enough to be taken at his word.
+Anonymous M — 5.2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #599,522
@previous (Syntax)
Think more cheaper. United is about as high as it gets. Airline travel varies great depending on dates also.As much as 75% diff for the same flight on different days for same flight. I'm busy as of late. Just want you to know Id' love to visit sometime and catch up, ol buddy. Trying to figure out lunch plans today. Its warm today and some meals are best served cold and not hot.
·Syntax — 5.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #599,524
@previous (M)
I could have looked for cheaper but in theory the site I used lists flights by lowest price FIRST
Given he lives in Hillbilly Land he could probably get a cheep flight on one of these as where he lives they still grow corn for the corn cobs as toilet paper Hillbillies use.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.