Topic: Covid guesses arent Science, This is science
+Anonymous A — 5.3 years ago #57,088
+rawto !!FlUsj3H9q1 — 5.3 years ago, 14 hours later[T] [B] #595,841
YOU ARE A FUCKIN MORON LOL !
+Anonymous C — 5.3 years ago, 47 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,845
Fake as fuck. That faggot is wearing the same Boston Bruins jersey 2 cocksucking years later in his transformation photo? This photo reeks of lies. Just like our fucking government!
+Anonymous D — 5.3 years ago, 41 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,849
> guesses
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.3 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,850
Yes, Guesses.
·Anonymous D — 5.3 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,851
@previous (A)
Scientific evidence isn't guesswork, bud.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,853
@previous (D)
All the
Follow the science blabber has been pseudo science.
If they would have spent 1/4 of the resources that have spent thus far on isolating people 65 and older, then the death count would be 3/4 less.
And that's the solution I was talking about last march.
Yep.
·Anonymous D — 5.3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,854
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,856
@previous (D)
Reading comprehension. How does an idiot hear what is not said and not hear what is said?
I didn't say anything about number being misrepresented.
I stated the death count would be 2/3 lower
if they (Fauci Fags aka The Science Boys) had followed a simpler but more effective game plan on preventing spread.
·Anonymous D — 5.3 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,858
@previous (A)
So you believe in the virus yet you don't believe in the sources that told you about said virus?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 5.3 years ago, 34 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,861
@previous (D)
I did not type it the way I thought. My bad.
How about this.
If the main strategy from the beginning would have been a focus on isolating people 65 and older,
instead of the way they have managed it, then the death count would be 3/4 less, for about 1/4 the cost.
And no shutdowns and mass unemployment would have occurred.
The so called experts have fucked the country and it could have mostly averted with a plan to isolate 60 or 65 and older.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
·Anonymous D — 5.3 years ago, 43 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #595,864
@previous (A)
Do you have sources to back up this theory? You're throwing around a lot of definitive statements as if they were actually researched and proven, which is why I ask.
I do somewhat agree, though. The US experts fucked up when shit hit the fan. I just didn't like the way you were discrediting the very legitimate science that goes into it nowadays, but I see now it was mostly aimed at the shit they did at the start of it.
I was primed to believe you were an all-out COVID denier, so that's my bad.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.