
Disagree!
Not past 18
Planet is polluted enough as it is and with global warming, everyone in future is going to drown or burn anyway.
Why do you say "Discuss" and you don't give a single argument? At least give us something. Why not past 40?
Why shouldn't humans live forever, if we invent immortality?
Maybe humanity should give more power to young people (through laws, for example), but it's retarded to just kill anyone past 30.
Imagine all the scientists doing their jobs. Most of their work is being done AFTER 30. The same is for doctors - you pretty much cannot even be a good doctor or any type (exluding some talented exceptions) in your twenties. Until you finish ALL education, and then work for several years, and then you start becoming a good doctor. Why would you kill that doctor, who would now be using his experienced skills for society?
How about any other profession, for that matter?
But aside from your job, I don't understand why. Is it because young people are the ones pushing new trends and future, and old people are just reacting to it? And age of 30 is the magical year when you are not anymore up with the times?
I disagree, anyway.
I personally have so many goals in life I'm thinking of acomplishing, I even need way more than 100 years to do it. More like 10,000 years.
@previous (B)
> Planet is polluted enough as it is and with global warming, everyone in future is going to drown or burn anyway.
I doubt. I think the biggest enemy is the shadow government, and very powerful/rich people trying to shit on society through lobbying, companies, NGOs...for global warming, some people will die, some countries and cities will be underwater, but humanity will live on I think.
If global warming actually starts getting more serious, you will see everyone shitting their pants WAY more than they do now. Like, you can get the entire Netherlands underwater. I'm sure humanity will do something about it in near future if it gets to that. It's not like everyone will just wait until we all die.