Topic: Hey On; can we make a new rule
+Anonymous A — 6.7 years ago #53,884
...that anyone who claims to be leaving the site will be permbanned if they try to return?
+Anonymous B — 6.7 years ago, 9 hours later[T] [B] #570,967
rather have less of these "hey on" and bert threads
+Anonymous C — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,968
TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
+Anonymous D — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,970
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 51 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,972
@570,967 (B)
> rather have less of these "hey on" and bert threads
Seconded. "Hey On" guy is extremely tedious, it's embarrassing how he relies on On to validate his opinions.
> rather have less of these "hey on" and bert threads
Seconded. "Hey On" guy is extremely tedious, it's embarrassing how he relies on On to validate his opinions.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,973
@570,968 (C)
> TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
> TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
+Anonymous F — 6.7 years ago, 50 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,974
@570,967 (B)
> rather have less of these "hey on" and bert threads
This. OP is such a pathetic cunt.
> rather have less of these "hey on" and bert threads
This. OP is such a pathetic cunt.
+Donald Q Trump — 6.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,979
Permaban everyone by pulling the plug and formatting the disk
·Anonymous D — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #570,994
·Anonymous A (OP) — 6.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #571,006
@570,973 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
Hence the words "make a new rule". You're really not very bright, are you?
> There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
Hence the words "make a new rule". You're really not very bright, are you?
+Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #571,007
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,043
@571,006 (A)
> > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
>
> Hence the words "make a new rule". You're really not very bright, are you?
I was responding to Anon C's post, not yours. Nice outing of your sockpuppet account by the way. Not too bright are you? ;)
> > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
>
> Hence the words "make a new rule". You're really not very bright, are you?
I was responding to Anon C's post, not yours. Nice outing of your sockpuppet account by the way. Not too bright are you? ;)
+Anonymous I — 6.7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,045
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
What's that big yellow stain on your cassock, father? Have you been eating peepee again?
What's that big yellow stain on your cassock, father? Have you been eating peepee again?
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,046
+Syntax — 6.7 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,053
@570,973 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
>
> There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC. Of course because you're not a priest and you're a Pedophile, no one here can expect you to have any HONOR.
> > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
>
> There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC. Of course because you're not a priest and you're a Pedophile, no one here can expect you to have any HONOR.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,055
@previous (Syntax)
> > > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
> >
> > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
>
> You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC.
Indeed I did. And then you came along and used your 27 UIDs to spam the poll, thus making the result null and void. We went over this at the time old man.
> > > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
> >
> > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
>
> You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC.
Indeed I did. And then you came along and used your 27 UIDs to spam the poll, thus making the result null and void. We went over this at the time old man.
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,057
+Anonymous K — 6.7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,058
Well done on deleting that fucking garbage. Could we ban anyone that insults Cody Lachey? He is a well revered gangster from Manchester that is working to reform the criminal justice system. He is truly a noble man with a noble cause. I feel that we as a community should support him wherever possible and subscribe to his YouTube channel, which offers a fascinating insight into crime and justice. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnWKBd1B2U9XAYbEJkUf33w
·Syntax — 6.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,099
@571,055 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > > > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
> > >
> > > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
> >
> > You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC.
>
> Indeed I did. And then you came along and used your 27 UIDs to spam the poll, thus making the result null and void. We went over this at the time old man.
Pedophile Liar Pants on Fire. Years ago one could vote multiple times - Not with the guts of r04r Software. I could for instance pick up one of 10,000 Smarphones at Qualcomm and attempt to vote multiple times - Just aint going to work for multiple votes - Or go to the Library and try to vote from there - Nope not going to work.
Not that I don't know a way to do it but IF one were2 The Sys Admin that takes care of nuts n bolts of this site could easily see if the poll was fucked with.
Try being a new user who has just joined this site - They Cannot Vote - Go to your pretend Bishops office and try and vote on the computer he uses for Kiddie Porn and C if you can Vote - You can't.
I going to post one last post on MC and you can go back to Jacking Off for Jesus and please stop molesting little boys.
Now you will want to pull the Pedophile Matt "eye candy" routine - You might look up Webster definition of Eye Candy.
> > > > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
> > >
> > > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
> >
> > You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC.
>
> Indeed I did. And then you came along and used your 27 UIDs to spam the poll, thus making the result null and void. We went over this at the time old man.
Pedophile Liar Pants on Fire. Years ago one could vote multiple times - Not with the guts of r04r Software. I could for instance pick up one of 10,000 Smarphones at Qualcomm and attempt to vote multiple times - Just aint going to work for multiple votes - Or go to the Library and try to vote from there - Nope not going to work.
Not that I don't know a way to do it but IF one were2 The Sys Admin that takes care of nuts n bolts of this site could easily see if the poll was fucked with.
Try being a new user who has just joined this site - They Cannot Vote - Go to your pretend Bishops office and try and vote on the computer he uses for Kiddie Porn and C if you can Vote - You can't.
I going to post one last post on MC and you can go back to Jacking Off for Jesus and please stop molesting little boys.
Now you will want to pull the Pedophile Matt "eye candy" routine - You might look up Webster definition of Eye Candy.
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
+Anonymous L — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,107
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,110
@571,099 (Syntax)
> > > > > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
> > > >
> > > > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
> > >
> > > You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC.
> >
> > Indeed I did. And then you came along and used your 27 UIDs to spam the poll, thus making the result null and void. We went over this at the time old man.
>
> Pedophile Liar Pants on Fire. Years ago one could vote multiple times - Not with the guts of r04r Software. I could for instance pick up one of 10,000 Smarphones at Qualcomm and attempt to vote multiple times - Just aint going to work for multiple votes - Or go to the Library and try to vote from there - Nope not going to work.
>
> Not that I don't know a way to do it but IF one were2 The Sys Admin that takes care of nuts n bolts of this site could easily see if the poll was fucked with.
>
> Try being a new user who has just joined this site - They Cannot Vote - Go to your pretend Bishops office and try and vote on the computer he uses for Kiddie Porn and C if you can Vote - You can't.
It is staggering how little you know about this topic. It is perfectly possible to spam polls on here, as you were proven to have done.
> molesting little boys.
Please try and rein in your disgusting fantasies old man.
> Now you will want to pull the "eye candy" routine - You might look up Webster definition of Eye Candy.
I looked it up: "Eye candy is what elderly pedophiles lust over from the window of their old folks' home". Congratulations, you just incriminated yourself.
By the way somebody recently shared with me a VERY interesting document about you from the 80s re: a conviction you had. When the time is right we shall return to this "eye candy" dictionary defence of yours because it seems that it didn't work for you 30 years ago :)
I have lots more to say but I have an urgent meeting to get to. Zoooooom!
> > > > > TG/Merrin should be banned for not following through on leaving when he lost multiple polls about him leaving.
> > > >
> > > > There is nothing in the rules about deciding to leave and then changing one's mind.
> > >
> > > You said you wood honor the judgement of the people of TC.
> >
> > Indeed I did. And then you came along and used your 27 UIDs to spam the poll, thus making the result null and void. We went over this at the time old man.
>
> Pedophile Liar Pants on Fire. Years ago one could vote multiple times - Not with the guts of r04r Software. I could for instance pick up one of 10,000 Smarphones at Qualcomm and attempt to vote multiple times - Just aint going to work for multiple votes - Or go to the Library and try to vote from there - Nope not going to work.
>
> Not that I don't know a way to do it but IF one were2 The Sys Admin that takes care of nuts n bolts of this site could easily see if the poll was fucked with.
>
> Try being a new user who has just joined this site - They Cannot Vote - Go to your pretend Bishops office and try and vote on the computer he uses for Kiddie Porn and C if you can Vote - You can't.
It is staggering how little you know about this topic. It is perfectly possible to spam polls on here, as you were proven to have done.
> molesting little boys.
Please try and rein in your disgusting fantasies old man.
> Now you will want to pull the "eye candy" routine - You might look up Webster definition of Eye Candy.
I looked it up: "Eye candy is what elderly pedophiles lust over from the window of their old folks' home". Congratulations, you just incriminated yourself.
By the way somebody recently shared with me a VERY interesting document about you from the 80s re: a conviction you had. When the time is right we shall return to this "eye candy" dictionary defence of yours because it seems that it didn't work for you 30 years ago :)
I have lots more to say but I have an urgent meeting to get to. Zoooooom!
+Anonymous M — 6.7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,111
·Anonymous A (OP) — 6.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,123
@571,043 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Makes no difference who you were responding to; you were posting in my thread and apparently didn't understand the title. I'm quite happy to correct your misunderstandings, so feel free to demonstrate your ignorance as often as you wish.
@571,110 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I looked it up: "Eye candy is what elderly pedophiles lust over from the window of their old folks' home".
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary gives the following definition:
You really aren't very bright at all, are you?
Makes no difference who you were responding to; you were posting in my thread and apparently didn't understand the title. I'm quite happy to correct your misunderstandings, so feel free to demonstrate your ignorance as often as you wish.
@571,110 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> I looked it up: "Eye candy is what elderly pedophiles lust over from the window of their old folks' home".
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary gives the following definition:
something superficially attractive to look at
You really aren't very bright at all, are you?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #571,127
·Anonymous D — 6.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,133
@571,123 (A)
> feel free to demonstrate your ignorance as often as you wish.
He does this often enough without encouragement.
> feel free to demonstrate your ignorance as often as you wish.
He does this often enough without encouragement.
·Anonymous F — 6.7 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,134
·Syntax — 6.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,138
@571,123 (A)
It's just part of his BULL Shit Shtick.
Will ask this of Others Anyone else ask what kind of Priest speaks like he does. With his Shit talking and doing the opposite of bible passages.
When I have some spare time I will gather some passages and pass them along to those that may enjoy a view of a cough cough Priest online representing the Catholic Church. That Church does have Crooks Criminals and of course Pedophiles among it's lower/higher levels of clergy
It's just part of his BULL Shit Shtick.
Will ask this of Others Anyone else ask what kind of Priest speaks like he does. With his Shit talking and doing the opposite of bible passages.
When I have some spare time I will gather some passages and pass them along to those that may enjoy a view of a cough cough Priest online representing the Catholic Church. That Church does have Crooks Criminals and of course Pedophiles among it's lower/higher levels of clergy
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,139
@571,123 (A)
> Makes no difference who you were responding to
It does. It's how conversations work. One day you'll have one and see for yourself.
> you were posting in my thread and apparently didn't understand the title.
I understood it. You were crying to On and begging him to protect you from things you don't like. He ignored you. Lol :)
You have yourself a blessed day my child!
> Makes no difference who you were responding to
It does. It's how conversations work. One day you'll have one and see for yourself.
> you were posting in my thread and apparently didn't understand the title.
I understood it. You were crying to On and begging him to protect you from things you don't like. He ignored you. Lol :)
You have yourself a blessed day my child!
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 51 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,140
@571,133 (D)
> > feel free to demonstrate your ignorance as often as you wish.
> He does this often enough without encouragement.
Madaboutmillennials!! How are you this fine day?
> > feel free to demonstrate your ignorance as often as you wish.
> He does this often enough without encouragement.
Madaboutmillennials!! How are you this fine day?
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.7 years ago, 9 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,141
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,142
@571,138 (Syntax)
Stay away from that eye candy, old man. Neither God nor the Catholic Church will look kindly upon your disgusting habits.
Stay away from that eye candy, old man. Neither God nor the Catholic Church will look kindly upon your disgusting habits.
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,150
·Anonymous D — 6.7 years ago, 27 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #571,167
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.