Topic: Let's talk about Father Merrin: is he a boy or a man?
+Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT — 6.6 years ago #53,782
I am wondering if we, as a community, can assess the character of Father Merrin. I have strong suspicions that he is a small boy, shitposting from his parent's house. I say "parent's house" and not "parents'" because it is clear the boy is raised by a single alcoholic mother.
Being a fan of The Exorcist and expert trolling, he decides to assume a role of a corrupt arrogant priest who sees himself as a Teacher in the World. Accused of pedophilia, he finds refuge on TinyChan, lying that he had turned off images, when in reality closely examining each and every one of them and crying himself to sleep, offended by how he is being perceived on the forums. He is especially hurt when CMOB posts pictures of him as a semi-liquid turd.
Eventually, he finds a job as an actual priest and realizes that he is truly a man of God. But cannot help but to come back to TinyChan, knowing in his heart that his destiny is here.
WDYT?
Being a fan of The Exorcist and expert trolling, he decides to assume a role of a corrupt arrogant priest who sees himself as a Teacher in the World. Accused of pedophilia, he finds refuge on TinyChan, lying that he had turned off images, when in reality closely examining each and every one of them and crying himself to sleep, offended by how he is being perceived on the forums. He is especially hurt when CMOB posts pictures of him as a semi-liquid turd.
Eventually, he finds a job as an actual priest and realizes that he is truly a man of God. But cannot help but to come back to TinyChan, knowing in his heart that his destiny is here.
WDYT?
+Dr. Chattanooga !!SlFawOoKvd — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later[T] [B] #569,324
+Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #569,325
@OP
Obsess more.
Obsess more.
+Anonymous D — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,329
You're embarrassing yourself OP.
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,340
@previous (D)
He's upset because I made a mess of him in the 'are you religious?' thread. This hysterical self-owning thread seems to be his way of conceding defeat. I pray that God will assuage his anger.
He's upset because I made a mess of him in the 'are you religious?' thread. This hysterical self-owning thread seems to be his way of conceding defeat. I pray that God will assuage his anger.
+Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,344
+Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,371
@OP
> I have strong suspicions that he is a small boy, shitposting from his parent's house.
More likely he's middle aged to old - his vocab & GK is too good for him to be any younger than about 40.
> I have strong suspicions that he is a small boy, shitposting from his parent's house.
More likely he's middle aged to old - his vocab & GK is too good for him to be any younger than about 40.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,383
@569,340 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
My goal is to make sure my worldview is as close to reality as possible. So, if you convince me of something true, it is a win-win situation for me.
But I understood that you are not serious about the debate and just trolling. I mean, what else should I expect from a trolling forum. But yeah. I decided to pick on you in this thread as a result of your trolling in the religious thread.
You have no arguments to support your belief in a God that you presented. You only had endless tasks for me, to write out things or read the Bible (which I have read, but obviously there is very little I can do to prove it through an anonymous forum), then compile a list of contradictions, yada, yada, yada.
Here's my response. Read The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe book, and you will understand how I think about epistemology. When you have read it, come back to me and I will then have further questions for you, to educate you on skepticism. Be patient. Education requires education.
My goal is to make sure my worldview is as close to reality as possible. So, if you convince me of something true, it is a win-win situation for me.
But I understood that you are not serious about the debate and just trolling. I mean, what else should I expect from a trolling forum. But yeah. I decided to pick on you in this thread as a result of your trolling in the religious thread.
You have no arguments to support your belief in a God that you presented. You only had endless tasks for me, to write out things or read the Bible (which I have read, but obviously there is very little I can do to prove it through an anonymous forum), then compile a list of contradictions, yada, yada, yada.
Here's my response. Read The Skeptics' Guide to the Universe book, and you will understand how I think about epistemology. When you have read it, come back to me and I will then have further questions for you, to educate you on skepticism. Be patient. Education requires education.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 41 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,384
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 49 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,386
@569,371 (G)
> > I have strong suspicions that he is a small boy, shitposting from his parent's house.
> More likely he's middle aged to old - his vocab & GK is too good for him to be any younger than about 40.
Thank you, I suppose, for the roundabout compliment on my vocab and general knowledge, but I am nowhere near 40, and it's a frankly saddening commentary on our generation that the "vocab & GK" I display on here leads you to think it could only have been written by someone over 40. Need I remind you that the 20th century's greatest stylist of the English language (Vladimir Nabokov) published his first novels in his 20s? Christopher Hitchens was eviscerating arguments (as I did to Mr Breakfast up there) when he was barely out of university.
Bless you, my young friend.
> > I have strong suspicions that he is a small boy, shitposting from his parent's house.
> More likely he's middle aged to old - his vocab & GK is too good for him to be any younger than about 40.
Thank you, I suppose, for the roundabout compliment on my vocab and general knowledge, but I am nowhere near 40, and it's a frankly saddening commentary on our generation that the "vocab & GK" I display on here leads you to think it could only have been written by someone over 40. Need I remind you that the 20th century's greatest stylist of the English language (Vladimir Nabokov) published his first novels in his 20s? Christopher Hitchens was eviscerating arguments (as I did to Mr Breakfast up there) when he was barely out of university.
Bless you, my young friend.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,387
@569,383 (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> My goal is to make sure my worldview is as close to reality as possible.
Says the guy who ended up admitting he can't even say for certain his own dog exists :)
> But I understood that you are not serious about the debate and just trolling.
Ah the old "You have destroyed my argument, you must be trolling!" fallback. Hands up who didn't see that one coming!
> I decided to make this thread as a result of being destroyed in the other one and wanted to try and get back some control of the narrative.
We know :)
You have yourself a blessed day, my child. Come back to me anytime in that other thread when you want to continue your education.
> My goal is to make sure my worldview is as close to reality as possible.
Says the guy who ended up admitting he can't even say for certain his own dog exists :)
> But I understood that you are not serious about the debate and just trolling.
Ah the old "You have destroyed my argument, you must be trolling!" fallback. Hands up who didn't see that one coming!
> I decided to make this thread as a result of being destroyed in the other one and wanted to try and get back some control of the narrative.
We know :)
You have yourself a blessed day, my child. Come back to me anytime in that other thread when you want to continue your education.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,390
@569,386 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Nabokov & Hitchens - 2 of the greatest minds in 2 centuries. Nabokov's mastery of the English language (his second) and Hichens' profound knowledge of how the world works in general define an excellent pair of goalposts of achievement.
Nabokov & Hitchens - 2 of the greatest minds in 2 centuries. Nabokov's mastery of the English language (his second) and Hichens' profound knowledge of how the world works in general define an excellent pair of goalposts of achievement.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,465
@previous (G)
> Nabokov's mastery of the English language (his second)
Arguably even his third, since like all aristocratic children in pre-Bolshevik Russia he was taught French as a child and was fluent in it by his teens. A remarkable polyglot he was (one heck of a chess master too!).
> Nabokov's mastery of the English language (his second)
Arguably even his third, since like all aristocratic children in pre-Bolshevik Russia he was taught French as a child and was fluent in it by his teens. A remarkable polyglot he was (one heck of a chess master too!).
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,468
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,469
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 22 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #569,470
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #569,482
@569,387 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Says the guy who ended up admitting he can't even say for certain his own dog exists :)
I said no such thing. Definitely, not in a way you are putting it here.
> Says the guy who ended up admitting he can't even say for certain his own dog exists :)
I said no such thing. Definitely, not in a way you are putting it here.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #569,483
In fact, my dig exists was an example of things I am certain about because I personally checked evidence for them. You then proceeded to ask if I am sure that this is not a hallucination. And I said that yes, I am quite certain.
It is clear to me you and an intelligent and read person. I can see that. But I can also see that you are not serious about our debate. I would not be surprised to learn you are really an atheist who is just having a bit of fun on the Web. I mean, I can't square your intelligence with jabs along the lines you educating me, etc.
It is clear to me you and an intelligent and read person. I can see that. But I can also see that you are not serious about our debate. I would not be surprised to learn you are really an atheist who is just having a bit of fun on the Web. I mean, I can't square your intelligence with jabs along the lines you educating me, etc.
+Anonymous H — 6.6 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #569,493
a eunuch
+Anonymous I — 6.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #569,515
@569,386 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Christopher Hitchens: an anti-theistic atheist who "eviscerated" practically every religious advocate he encountered.
He is sorely missed.
Christopher Hitchens: an anti-theistic atheist who "eviscerated" practically every religious advocate he encountered.
He is sorely missed.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #569,532
I would love to know what Hitch would say about today's situation. It would be brutal!
+Anonymous J — 6.6 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,745
Either way he said he'd leave and got banned multiple times so he's a lying priest in the least. Not really getting into heaven are we?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,756
@569,483 (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> In fact, my dig exists was an example of things I am certain about because I personally checked evidence for them. You then proceeded to ask if I am sure that this is not a hallucination. And I said that yes, I am quite certain.
"Quite certain" isn't "certain". And the point of the exchange was to establish what is fundamentally knowable.
> It is clear to me you and an intelligent and read person. I can see that. But I can also see that you are not serious about our debate.
On the contrary, I was very serious. But when it came to my attention that you were the person who had apparently been posting nasty things about me at Minichan, I saw little reason to extend you much courtesy. Indeed in your OP here you make offensive comments about my parents. Why? This is childish and I see no reason to waste my time on childish people.
> I would not be surprised to learn you are really an atheist who is just having a bit of fun on the Web.
Well then 'surprise' I guess, because I am a priest and I take my faith very seriously.
> I mean, I can't square your intelligence with jabs along the lines you educating me, etc.
How many times do I need to repeat this? YOU came to ME asking for my proof of God's existence.
> In fact, my dig exists was an example of things I am certain about because I personally checked evidence for them. You then proceeded to ask if I am sure that this is not a hallucination. And I said that yes, I am quite certain.
"Quite certain" isn't "certain". And the point of the exchange was to establish what is fundamentally knowable.
> It is clear to me you and an intelligent and read person. I can see that. But I can also see that you are not serious about our debate.
On the contrary, I was very serious. But when it came to my attention that you were the person who had apparently been posting nasty things about me at Minichan, I saw little reason to extend you much courtesy. Indeed in your OP here you make offensive comments about my parents. Why? This is childish and I see no reason to waste my time on childish people.
> I would not be surprised to learn you are really an atheist who is just having a bit of fun on the Web.
Well then 'surprise' I guess, because I am a priest and I take my faith very seriously.
> I mean, I can't square your intelligence with jabs along the lines you educating me, etc.
How many times do I need to repeat this? YOU came to ME asking for my proof of God's existence.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,757
@569,515 (I)
> Christopher Hitchens: an anti-theistic atheist who "eviscerated" practically every religious advocate he encountered.
>
> He is sorely missed.
Indeed, it's a pity he died before his time. He had a world-class mind married to an awe-inspiring command of the English language. I wish I had had the chance to debate him on the existence of God. I would have pointed out to him the flaws in his argument as expressed in his book 'God Is Not Great'.
> Christopher Hitchens: an anti-theistic atheist who "eviscerated" practically every religious advocate he encountered.
>
> He is sorely missed.
Indeed, it's a pity he died before his time. He had a world-class mind married to an awe-inspiring command of the English language. I wish I had had the chance to debate him on the existence of God. I would have pointed out to him the flaws in his argument as expressed in his book 'God Is Not Great'.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,758
@569,745 (J)
> Either way he said he'd leave and got banned multiple times so he's a lying priest in the least. Not really getting into heaven are we?
I said I would leave. I left. I later changed my mind and came back. Many people here do that (when Catherine returns, will Namefag ban him because "he said he was leaving"?).
And to be clear, I was banned twice by Namefag (not On, who doesn't like me, which is fine, but he is a fair moderator). Namefag doesn't like that I subtly mock the pedophiles on here, he feels I'm attacking him. Each time he banned me it had to be pointed out to him that his job here is to enforce the rules of the site, not just make them up whenever someone upsets him. When he turned off the 'mod edit' function and then changed the words of my (and other people's) posts, On had to tell him to knock it off. There is no rule that says a person can't say he is leaving and then decide to return. Once again, see the Catherine example.
Bless you friend.
> Either way he said he'd leave and got banned multiple times so he's a lying priest in the least. Not really getting into heaven are we?
I said I would leave. I left. I later changed my mind and came back. Many people here do that (when Catherine returns, will Namefag ban him because "he said he was leaving"?).
And to be clear, I was banned twice by Namefag (not On, who doesn't like me, which is fine, but he is a fair moderator). Namefag doesn't like that I subtly mock the pedophiles on here, he feels I'm attacking him. Each time he banned me it had to be pointed out to him that his job here is to enforce the rules of the site, not just make them up whenever someone upsets him. When he turned off the 'mod edit' function and then changed the words of my (and other people's) posts, On had to tell him to knock it off. There is no rule that says a person can't say he is leaving and then decide to return. Once again, see the Catherine example.
Bless you friend.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,767
@569,515 (I)
> Christopher Hitchens: an anti-theistic atheist who "eviscerated" practically every religious advocate he encountered.
>
> He is sorely missed.
One other thing about this: one of the final times Hitchens appeared in public was at a book signing (it's on Youtube) where a little girl asks him to recommend things to read. At the end of the exchange he wishes her lots of love and tells her "Don't forget the love part". He looks so frail and unwell and it's just a beautiful epilogue, the most perfect words he could have chosen, to end an extraordinary life and mind.
> Christopher Hitchens: an anti-theistic atheist who "eviscerated" practically every religious advocate he encountered.
>
> He is sorely missed.
One other thing about this: one of the final times Hitchens appeared in public was at a book signing (it's on Youtube) where a little girl asks him to recommend things to read. At the end of the exchange he wishes her lots of love and tells her "Don't forget the love part". He looks so frail and unwell and it's just a beautiful epilogue, the most perfect words he could have chosen, to end an extraordinary life and mind.
+Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT — 6.6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,769
@569,756 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> But when it came to my attention that you were the person who had apparently been posting nasty things about me at Minichan, I saw little reason to extend you much courtesy. Indeed in your OP here you make offensive comments about my parents. Why?
Oh, please. You say you are here to mock the nature of anonymous boards. I don't know your parents. I don't know who you are. So how can I say anything about your parents? Nothing I say about your parents can be of real substance, because I cannot know who they are, or what their character is.
And the reason I posted something offensive was to test if you have really turned off your images.
But it's interesting how through these conversations people's characters begin to shine through. Although it's not impossible to fake people's style and all that, I am definitely recognizing the way you write, and your style of conversation. I have always found it interesting, how mere written words can convey so much.
> But when it came to my attention that you were the person who had apparently been posting nasty things about me at Minichan, I saw little reason to extend you much courtesy. Indeed in your OP here you make offensive comments about my parents. Why?
Oh, please. You say you are here to mock the nature of anonymous boards. I don't know your parents. I don't know who you are. So how can I say anything about your parents? Nothing I say about your parents can be of real substance, because I cannot know who they are, or what their character is.
And the reason I posted something offensive was to test if you have really turned off your images.
But it's interesting how through these conversations people's characters begin to shine through. Although it's not impossible to fake people's style and all that, I am definitely recognizing the way you write, and your style of conversation. I have always found it interesting, how mere written words can convey so much.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,770
@previous (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> And the reason I posted something offensive was to test if you have really turned off your images.
And I have. It was a moderator at Minichan who told me you were posting a nasty image about me.
> And the reason I posted something offensive was to test if you have really turned off your images.
And I have. It was a moderator at Minichan who told me you were posting a nasty image about me.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,771
@569,769 (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> Oh, please. You say you are here to mock the nature of anonymous boards.
And about this. Yes, I do. But I never write cruel and offensive things about people and I never write nasty things about their families. One of the reasons I am vehemently opposed to the Doctor's spamming of Negi's picture is because it's simply cruel and nothing more. Negi doesn't like it, he made a dumb mistake when he released that picture, so Doc should stop posting it. Simple as that (yet Namefag allows him to spam up every thread with it while banning me for "spamming"!). I am also opposed to mockery of Matt's family members for the same reason. You said that posts reveal character. Indeed they do. So which character are you? The controlled and generally respectful person in the religion thread, or the person who wrote this very nasty OP about me in this one and apparently spams an offensive picture about me at Minichan?
> Oh, please. You say you are here to mock the nature of anonymous boards.
And about this. Yes, I do. But I never write cruel and offensive things about people and I never write nasty things about their families. One of the reasons I am vehemently opposed to the Doctor's spamming of Negi's picture is because it's simply cruel and nothing more. Negi doesn't like it, he made a dumb mistake when he released that picture, so Doc should stop posting it. Simple as that (yet Namefag allows him to spam up every thread with it while banning me for "spamming"!). I am also opposed to mockery of Matt's family members for the same reason. You said that posts reveal character. Indeed they do. So which character are you? The controlled and generally respectful person in the religion thread, or the person who wrote this very nasty OP about me in this one and apparently spams an offensive picture about me at Minichan?
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT — 6.6 years ago, 11 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,788
> But I never write cruel and offensive things about people and I never write nasty things about their families.
The problem I see with this statement is that it is set in a wrong context. It is a cheap way to look morally superior. You are on an anonymous board, where people come to shitpost under assumed names and characters, and where a lot of what is posted is not taken seriously.
It's like coming to a night club and telling everyone that you are the only one there trying to concentrate on work. But work is not why people come to such a place! All of the people you see partying might be working really hard, elsewhere. But when they are in a club, they are partying.
Similarly, as I pointed out in the previous reply, if offensiveness is to mean anything, it must come from someone who can somewhat relate to you. If I write "Father Merrin is a fool", it shouldn't be offensive to you, because I have no idea who you are and therefore I cannot possibly have an informed opinion about you. You also don't know who I am, what my mental faculties are and whether you would even care about my opinion of you. The "Father Merrin is a fool" post can be authored by a bot, who simply puts together random user names and words from a dictionary.
Of course, there are ways to relate to people even if you don't particularly know them. You can write something about large portions of humanity, express or joke about expressing views that are widely considered to be evil and/or inappropriate. I, for one, never make any jokes about racism or about someone's sexuality or that kind of thing. I find these views disgusting and I think that playful trolling should have its limits.
> Doc, Negi, Matt
I don't know any of the stories you mention, so I cannot comment on that. If your assessment is true, then it's sad. On the other hand, again - this is a forum where people very clearly don't take shit seriously. For all I know, you could also be the Doc and Negi and Matt and play out this whole drama for your own amusement.
> So which character are you? The controlled and generally respectful person in the religion thread, or the person who wrote this very nasty OP about me in this one and apparently spams an offensive picture about me at Minichan?
I posted nothing nasty about you. I already said, I don't know who you are. How can I post anything about you? The pic in question is a photo of a turd with a sign "This is Father Merrin in real life" or something like that. Is this really offensive to you? Do you really believe that there is any meaning to someone you don't know posting a pic with a turd and pointing to an anonymous character on a shitpost-style BBS?
Now, if this offends you, I apologize and I will stop. I don't want to cause any distress to anyone. And causing any real distress was not my intent. The surprising bit here is that you perceived such intent.
Let's take this thread, for example. Why have I written it? Well, I already told you. I suspected I was being expertly trolled in the religious thread. So I trolled back. You now claim you were serious in that thread. It is a possibility, although I am still not completely convinced. As I said, you could very well be this Negi character, posting "pedofilth" after every post of yours.
But the point is, this thread is not serious. And it was not meant to be. And nobody was stopping you from reacting in a humorous way as well and write an essay about which bedroom I am shitposting from.
So, the strange thing about this conversation is that you emerge as a serious interlocutor from an ocean of non-serious shitposting and constant trolling. And this is fine, it's fine to try to make a forum a better place, I think I am trying to do this as well, by posting non-offensive stuff, science news items, etc. But I don't come out at people and accuse them of moral inferiority because up till now they were behaving as shitposters. If you are telling me - hey dude, let's have a nice conversation and I am actually a person who has put out some real things about themselves here, I am actually a priest and I also take shitposts about me seriously - I mean, that's another story then.
But you have to be aware of your surroundings. When on a forum largely dedicated to trolling you tell people "Be blessed, my son", you can't expect people to take you seriously.
The problem I see with this statement is that it is set in a wrong context. It is a cheap way to look morally superior. You are on an anonymous board, where people come to shitpost under assumed names and characters, and where a lot of what is posted is not taken seriously.
It's like coming to a night club and telling everyone that you are the only one there trying to concentrate on work. But work is not why people come to such a place! All of the people you see partying might be working really hard, elsewhere. But when they are in a club, they are partying.
Similarly, as I pointed out in the previous reply, if offensiveness is to mean anything, it must come from someone who can somewhat relate to you. If I write "Father Merrin is a fool", it shouldn't be offensive to you, because I have no idea who you are and therefore I cannot possibly have an informed opinion about you. You also don't know who I am, what my mental faculties are and whether you would even care about my opinion of you. The "Father Merrin is a fool" post can be authored by a bot, who simply puts together random user names and words from a dictionary.
Of course, there are ways to relate to people even if you don't particularly know them. You can write something about large portions of humanity, express or joke about expressing views that are widely considered to be evil and/or inappropriate. I, for one, never make any jokes about racism or about someone's sexuality or that kind of thing. I find these views disgusting and I think that playful trolling should have its limits.
> Doc, Negi, Matt
I don't know any of the stories you mention, so I cannot comment on that. If your assessment is true, then it's sad. On the other hand, again - this is a forum where people very clearly don't take shit seriously. For all I know, you could also be the Doc and Negi and Matt and play out this whole drama for your own amusement.
> So which character are you? The controlled and generally respectful person in the religion thread, or the person who wrote this very nasty OP about me in this one and apparently spams an offensive picture about me at Minichan?
I posted nothing nasty about you. I already said, I don't know who you are. How can I post anything about you? The pic in question is a photo of a turd with a sign "This is Father Merrin in real life" or something like that. Is this really offensive to you? Do you really believe that there is any meaning to someone you don't know posting a pic with a turd and pointing to an anonymous character on a shitpost-style BBS?
Now, if this offends you, I apologize and I will stop. I don't want to cause any distress to anyone. And causing any real distress was not my intent. The surprising bit here is that you perceived such intent.
Let's take this thread, for example. Why have I written it? Well, I already told you. I suspected I was being expertly trolled in the religious thread. So I trolled back. You now claim you were serious in that thread. It is a possibility, although I am still not completely convinced. As I said, you could very well be this Negi character, posting "pedofilth" after every post of yours.
But the point is, this thread is not serious. And it was not meant to be. And nobody was stopping you from reacting in a humorous way as well and write an essay about which bedroom I am shitposting from.
So, the strange thing about this conversation is that you emerge as a serious interlocutor from an ocean of non-serious shitposting and constant trolling. And this is fine, it's fine to try to make a forum a better place, I think I am trying to do this as well, by posting non-offensive stuff, science news items, etc. But I don't come out at people and accuse them of moral inferiority because up till now they were behaving as shitposters. If you are telling me - hey dude, let's have a nice conversation and I am actually a person who has put out some real things about themselves here, I am actually a priest and I also take shitposts about me seriously - I mean, that's another story then.
But you have to be aware of your surroundings. When on a forum largely dedicated to trolling you tell people "Be blessed, my son", you can't expect people to take you seriously.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT — 6.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,789
And at the very least, you should have thicker skin.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,799
@569,771 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> it's simply cruel and nothing more
It's also funny.
> Negi doesn't like it
Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> he made a dumb mistake
Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> so Doc should stop posting it
Again, why do you think it's only Doc who posts it? Also, no, why should he stop?
> Namefag allows him to spam up every thread with it while banning me for "spamming"!
It might be spam if it were one person doing it. Also, your spam was photoshopped and not created by the person you were targeting. On the other hand, Negi has only himself to blame for the existence of his image.
> it's simply cruel and nothing more
It's also funny.
> Negi doesn't like it
Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> he made a dumb mistake
Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> so Doc should stop posting it
Again, why do you think it's only Doc who posts it? Also, no, why should he stop?
> Namefag allows him to spam up every thread with it while banning me for "spamming"!
It might be spam if it were one person doing it. Also, your spam was photoshopped and not created by the person you were targeting. On the other hand, Negi has only himself to blame for the existence of his image.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,833
@569,788 (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> > But I never write cruel and offensive things about people and I never write nasty things about their families.
>
> The problem I see with this statement is that it is set in a wrong context. It is a cheap way to look morally superior. You are on an anonymous board, where people come to shitpost under assumed names and characters, and where a lot of what is posted is not taken seriously.
>
> It's like coming to a night club and telling everyone that you are the only one there trying to concentrate on work. But work is not why people come to such a place! All of the people you see partying might be working really hard, elsewhere. But when they are in a club, they are partying.
>
> Similarly, as I pointed out in the previous reply, if offensiveness is to mean anything, it must come from someone who can somewhat relate to you. If I write "Father Merrin is a fool", it shouldn't be offensive to you, because I have no idea who you are and therefore I cannot possibly have an informed opinion about you. You also don't know who I am, what my mental faculties are and whether you would even care about my opinion of you. The "Father Merrin is a fool" post can be authored by a bot, who simply puts together random user names and words from a dictionary.
>
> Of course, there are ways to relate to people even if you don't particularly know them. You can write something about large portions of humanity, express or joke about expressing views that are widely considered to be evil and/or inappropriate. I, for one, never make any jokes about racism or about someone's sexuality or that kind of thing. I find these views disgusting and I think that playful trolling should have its limits.
>
> > Doc, Negi, Matt
>
> I don't know any of the stories you mention, so I cannot comment on that. If your assessment is true, then it's sad. On the other hand, again - this is a forum where people very clearly don't take shit seriously. For all I know, you could also be the Doc and Negi and Matt and play out this whole drama for your own amusement.
>
> > So which character are you? The controlled and generally respectful person in the religion thread, or the person who wrote this very nasty OP about me in this one and apparently spams an offensive picture about me at Minichan?
>
> I posted nothing nasty about you. I already said, I don't know who you are. How can I post anything about you? The pic in question is a photo of a turd with a sign "This is Father Merrin in real life" or something like that. Is this really offensive to you? Do you really believe that there is any meaning to someone you don't know posting a pic with a turd and pointing to an anonymous character on a shitpost-style BBS?
>
> Now, if this offends you, I apologize and I will stop. I don't want to cause any distress to anyone. And causing any real distress was not my intent. The surprising bit here is that you perceived such intent.
>
> Let's take this thread, for example. Why have I written it? Well, I already told you. I suspected I was being expertly trolled in the religious thread. So I trolled back. You now claim you were serious in that thread. It is a possibility, although I am still not completely convinced. As I said, you could very well be this Negi character, posting "pedofilth" after every post of yours.
>
> But the point is, this thread is not serious. And it was not meant to be. And nobody was stopping you from reacting in a humorous way as well and write an essay about which bedroom I am shitposting from.
>
> So, the strange thing about this conversation is that you emerge as a serious interlocutor from an ocean of non-serious shitposting and constant trolling. And this is fine, it's fine to try to make a forum a better place, I think I am trying to do this as well, by posting non-offensive stuff, science news items, etc. But I don't come out at people and accuse them of moral inferiority because up till now they were behaving as shitposters. If you are telling me - hey dude, let's have a nice conversation and I am actually a person who has put out some real things about themselves here, I am actually a priest and I also take shitposts about me seriously - I mean, that's another story then.
>
> But you have to be aware of your surroundings. When on a forum largely dedicated to trolling you tell people "Be blessed, my son", you can't expect people to take you seriously.
Nothing says "Relax, this is just a place to troll people" like a Proustian wall of text.
> > But I never write cruel and offensive things about people and I never write nasty things about their families.
>
> The problem I see with this statement is that it is set in a wrong context. It is a cheap way to look morally superior. You are on an anonymous board, where people come to shitpost under assumed names and characters, and where a lot of what is posted is not taken seriously.
>
> It's like coming to a night club and telling everyone that you are the only one there trying to concentrate on work. But work is not why people come to such a place! All of the people you see partying might be working really hard, elsewhere. But when they are in a club, they are partying.
>
> Similarly, as I pointed out in the previous reply, if offensiveness is to mean anything, it must come from someone who can somewhat relate to you. If I write "Father Merrin is a fool", it shouldn't be offensive to you, because I have no idea who you are and therefore I cannot possibly have an informed opinion about you. You also don't know who I am, what my mental faculties are and whether you would even care about my opinion of you. The "Father Merrin is a fool" post can be authored by a bot, who simply puts together random user names and words from a dictionary.
>
> Of course, there are ways to relate to people even if you don't particularly know them. You can write something about large portions of humanity, express or joke about expressing views that are widely considered to be evil and/or inappropriate. I, for one, never make any jokes about racism or about someone's sexuality or that kind of thing. I find these views disgusting and I think that playful trolling should have its limits.
>
> > Doc, Negi, Matt
>
> I don't know any of the stories you mention, so I cannot comment on that. If your assessment is true, then it's sad. On the other hand, again - this is a forum where people very clearly don't take shit seriously. For all I know, you could also be the Doc and Negi and Matt and play out this whole drama for your own amusement.
>
> > So which character are you? The controlled and generally respectful person in the religion thread, or the person who wrote this very nasty OP about me in this one and apparently spams an offensive picture about me at Minichan?
>
> I posted nothing nasty about you. I already said, I don't know who you are. How can I post anything about you? The pic in question is a photo of a turd with a sign "This is Father Merrin in real life" or something like that. Is this really offensive to you? Do you really believe that there is any meaning to someone you don't know posting a pic with a turd and pointing to an anonymous character on a shitpost-style BBS?
>
> Now, if this offends you, I apologize and I will stop. I don't want to cause any distress to anyone. And causing any real distress was not my intent. The surprising bit here is that you perceived such intent.
>
> Let's take this thread, for example. Why have I written it? Well, I already told you. I suspected I was being expertly trolled in the religious thread. So I trolled back. You now claim you were serious in that thread. It is a possibility, although I am still not completely convinced. As I said, you could very well be this Negi character, posting "pedofilth" after every post of yours.
>
> But the point is, this thread is not serious. And it was not meant to be. And nobody was stopping you from reacting in a humorous way as well and write an essay about which bedroom I am shitposting from.
>
> So, the strange thing about this conversation is that you emerge as a serious interlocutor from an ocean of non-serious shitposting and constant trolling. And this is fine, it's fine to try to make a forum a better place, I think I am trying to do this as well, by posting non-offensive stuff, science news items, etc. But I don't come out at people and accuse them of moral inferiority because up till now they were behaving as shitposters. If you are telling me - hey dude, let's have a nice conversation and I am actually a person who has put out some real things about themselves here, I am actually a priest and I also take shitposts about me seriously - I mean, that's another story then.
>
> But you have to be aware of your surroundings. When on a forum largely dedicated to trolling you tell people "Be blessed, my son", you can't expect people to take you seriously.
Nothing says "Relax, this is just a place to troll people" like a Proustian wall of text.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,834
@569,799 (G)
> > it's simply cruel and nothing more
> It's also funny.
Some life you have.
> > Negi doesn't like it
> Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
> > he made a dumb mistake
> Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
> > so Doc should stop posting it
> why should he stop?
Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
> > it's simply cruel and nothing more
> It's also funny.
Some life you have.
> > Negi doesn't like it
> Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
> > he made a dumb mistake
> Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
> > so Doc should stop posting it
> why should he stop?
Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
+Sundar Pichai — 6.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,866
A faggot who should go to 900000 years in jail.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,872
@569,833 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Nothing says "Relax, this is just a place to troll people" like a Proustian wall of text.
Not the essence of my message. Rather, it can be summarized like this: if you want this to be a respectable forum, I get it, and I would even support you, but then you have to make it clear, not just expect people to read your mind.
I sympathize with you being concerned with other people's feelings. And if there is actual drama behind some recurring photos, I did not know that and this is useful to know. And, also part of my message was a promise to not write nasty messages about you, and that I did not mean it to offend you.
I did not apologize. Let me do it now: I am sorry if I offended you. I really did not mean to say anything nasty about you or your family. I was addressing your avatar on the BBS, not you as an individual behind the avatar.
> Nothing says "Relax, this is just a place to troll people" like a Proustian wall of text.
Not the essence of my message. Rather, it can be summarized like this: if you want this to be a respectable forum, I get it, and I would even support you, but then you have to make it clear, not just expect people to read your mind.
I sympathize with you being concerned with other people's feelings. And if there is actual drama behind some recurring photos, I did not know that and this is useful to know. And, also part of my message was a promise to not write nasty messages about you, and that I did not mean it to offend you.
I did not apologize. Let me do it now: I am sorry if I offended you. I really did not mean to say anything nasty about you or your family. I was addressing your avatar on the BBS, not you as an individual behind the avatar.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 16 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,899
@569,834 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > It's also funny.
> Some life you have.
Not sure what you're driving at. I have a great life, mostly because I have managed to maintain my sense of humour, despite various major difficulties.
> > > Negi doesn't like it
> > Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
What was the content of the post? There must have been a good reason why it was deleted, for example if it revealed personal information which he himself had not shared.
> > > he made a dumb mistake
> > Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
He's quite a sucker for punishment if he keeps coming back here, not that I think he does much... unless that's him spamming "nice madpost" or "yeah but". Anyway, nobody is holding a gun to his head to visit this place. And if you're about to argue about how that's really unfair and this should be a safe space, then boo hoo. Too fucking bad. He ruined that chance for himself.
> > > so Doc should stop posting it
> > why should he stop?
> Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
> > It's also funny.
> Some life you have.
Not sure what you're driving at. I have a great life, mostly because I have managed to maintain my sense of humour, despite various major difficulties.
> > > Negi doesn't like it
> > Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
What was the content of the post? There must have been a good reason why it was deleted, for example if it revealed personal information which he himself had not shared.
> > > he made a dumb mistake
> > Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
He's quite a sucker for punishment if he keeps coming back here, not that I think he does much... unless that's him spamming "nice madpost" or "yeah but". Anyway, nobody is holding a gun to his head to visit this place. And if you're about to argue about how that's really unfair and this should be a safe space, then boo hoo. Too fucking bad. He ruined that chance for himself.
> > > so Doc should stop posting it
> > why should he stop?
> Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,915
@previous (G)
> > > It's also funny.
> > Some life you have.
> Not sure what you're driving at. I have a great life, mostly because I have managed to maintain my sense of humour, despite various major difficulties.
>
> > > > Negi doesn't like it
> > > Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> > I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
> What was the content of the post? There must have been a good reason why it was deleted, for example if it revealed personal information which he himself had not shared.
>
> > > > he made a dumb mistake
> > > Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> > Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
> He's quite a sucker for punishment if he keeps coming back here, not that I think he does much... unless that's him spamming "nice madpost" or "yeah but". Anyway, nobody is holding a gun to his head to visit this place. And if you're about to argue about how that's really unfair and this should be a safe space, then boo hoo. Too fucking bad. He ruined that chance for himself.
>
> > > > so Doc should stop posting it
> > > why should he stop?
> > Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
> Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
Do you have any idea what a sad fucking loser you are? Ranting about "the entire millennial generation" while explaining why you like looking at a dick picture every day.
> > > It's also funny.
> > Some life you have.
> Not sure what you're driving at. I have a great life, mostly because I have managed to maintain my sense of humour, despite various major difficulties.
>
> > > > Negi doesn't like it
> > > Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> > I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
> What was the content of the post? There must have been a good reason why it was deleted, for example if it revealed personal information which he himself had not shared.
>
> > > > he made a dumb mistake
> > > Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> > Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
> He's quite a sucker for punishment if he keeps coming back here, not that I think he does much... unless that's him spamming "nice madpost" or "yeah but". Anyway, nobody is holding a gun to his head to visit this place. And if you're about to argue about how that's really unfair and this should be a safe space, then boo hoo. Too fucking bad. He ruined that chance for himself.
>
> > > > so Doc should stop posting it
> > > why should he stop?
> > Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
> Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
Do you have any idea what a sad fucking loser you are? Ranting about "the entire millennial generation" while explaining why you like looking at a dick picture every day.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,924
@569,899 (G)
> > > It's also funny.
> > Some life you have.
> Not sure what you're driving at. I have a great life, mostly because I have managed to maintain my sense of humour, despite various major difficulties.
If your idea of a "sense of humour" is logging on to an obscure forum every day to see a picture of someone's penis, you're probably not very bright.
> > > > Negi doesn't like it
> > > Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> > I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
> What was the content of the post? There must have been a good reason why it was deleted, for example if it revealed personal information which he himself had not shared.
There was no picture. It was 3 words: "lol Salford nonce". It got deleted. By contrast, Doc's "lol pedofilth" always stays up. Earlier you said that pictures of Doc get deleted because they're photoshopped and he didn't post them. Really? Then explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt's grandmother than are allowed on here. Look buddy, you can bend over backwards trying to rationalize it all you like but it won't change the simple fact that The Doctor is protected on here, for reasons I suspect I know.
> > > > he made a dumb mistake
> > > Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> > Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
> He's quite a sucker for punishment if he keeps coming back here, not that I think he does much... unless that's him spamming "nice madpost" or "yeah but". Anyway, nobody is holding a gun to his head to visit this place. And if you're about to argue about how that's really unfair and this should be a safe space, then boo hoo. Too fucking bad. He ruined that chance for himself.
Again, I'd take this argument more seriously if this place didn't operate as a safe space for The Doctor.
> > > > so Doc should stop posting it
> > > why should he stop?
> > Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
> Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
This was genuinely embarrassing to read. I can't imagine what it was like to write. Years from now you are going to re-read that paragraph and cringe so hard you'll need a toilet plunger to get your face back into alignment.
> > > It's also funny.
> > Some life you have.
> Not sure what you're driving at. I have a great life, mostly because I have managed to maintain my sense of humour, despite various major difficulties.
If your idea of a "sense of humour" is logging on to an obscure forum every day to see a picture of someone's penis, you're probably not very bright.
> > > > Negi doesn't like it
> > > Poor Negi. Life's hard, isn't it?
> > I'd take this argument more seriously if yet another post about the Doctor hadn't just been deleted to protect his delicate feelings.
> What was the content of the post? There must have been a good reason why it was deleted, for example if it revealed personal information which he himself had not shared.
There was no picture. It was 3 words: "lol Salford nonce". It got deleted. By contrast, Doc's "lol pedofilth" always stays up. Earlier you said that pictures of Doc get deleted because they're photoshopped and he didn't post them. Really? Then explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt's grandmother than are allowed on here. Look buddy, you can bend over backwards trying to rationalize it all you like but it won't change the simple fact that The Doctor is protected on here, for reasons I suspect I know.
> > > > he made a dumb mistake
> > > Haven't we all. This is how we learn and grow and experience life.
> > Only to have someone spend a decade of their lives reminding you of it every day.
> He's quite a sucker for punishment if he keeps coming back here, not that I think he does much... unless that's him spamming "nice madpost" or "yeah but". Anyway, nobody is holding a gun to his head to visit this place. And if you're about to argue about how that's really unfair and this should be a safe space, then boo hoo. Too fucking bad. He ruined that chance for himself.
Again, I'd take this argument more seriously if this place didn't operate as a safe space for The Doctor.
> > > > so Doc should stop posting it
> > > why should he stop?
> > Out of basic respect for Negi, who doesn't like to see it posted.
> Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
This was genuinely embarrassing to read. I can't imagine what it was like to write. Years from now you are going to re-read that paragraph and cringe so hard you'll need a toilet plunger to get your face back into alignment.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 14 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,983
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> If your idea of a "sense of humour" is logging on to an obscure forum every day to see a picture of someone's penis, you're probably not very bright.
If -> then, maybe, but that's not what I do. I guess I'm a little bright after all.
> There was no picture. It was 3 words: "lol Salford nonce". It got deleted.
OK, I have no idea why it got deleted then. There are many other instances of the phrase and references to the infamous nonce from Salford, so I imagine it was only deleted to annoy you (which seems to have worked).
> By contrast, Doc's "lol pedofilth" always stays up.
Life is so unfair, isn't it?
> explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt's grandmother than are allowed on here.
I don't think they are allowed - it was those types of pictures which I was referring to.
> Look buddy, you can bend over backwards trying to rationalize it all you like
I'm not trying that hard to rationalize anything, to be honest. You are the one who seems upset here.
> but it won't change the simple fact that The Doctor is protected on here, for reasons I suspect I know.
Don't cry about it.
> > Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
> This was genuinely embarrassing to read. I can't imagine what it was like to write. Years from now you are going to re-read that paragraph and cringe so hard you'll need a toilet plunger to get your face back into alignment.
I don't feel in the slightest bit embarrassed about it, nor will I "years from now". Please explain what was so embarrassing and cringey. Use small words, because I'm clearly not as bright as you.
> If your idea of a "sense of humour" is logging on to an obscure forum every day to see a picture of someone's penis, you're probably not very bright.
If -> then, maybe, but that's not what I do. I guess I'm a little bright after all.
> There was no picture. It was 3 words: "lol Salford nonce". It got deleted.
OK, I have no idea why it got deleted then. There are many other instances of the phrase and references to the infamous nonce from Salford, so I imagine it was only deleted to annoy you (which seems to have worked).
> By contrast, Doc's "lol pedofilth" always stays up.
Life is so unfair, isn't it?
> explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt's grandmother than are allowed on here.
I don't think they are allowed - it was those types of pictures which I was referring to.
> Look buddy, you can bend over backwards trying to rationalize it all you like
I'm not trying that hard to rationalize anything, to be honest. You are the one who seems upset here.
> but it won't change the simple fact that The Doctor is protected on here, for reasons I suspect I know.
Don't cry about it.
> > Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
> This was genuinely embarrassing to read. I can't imagine what it was like to write. Years from now you are going to re-read that paragraph and cringe so hard you'll need a toilet plunger to get your face back into alignment.
I don't feel in the slightest bit embarrassed about it, nor will I "years from now". Please explain what was so embarrassing and cringey. Use small words, because I'm clearly not as bright as you.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #569,984
@569,915 (C)
> Do you have any idea what a sad fucking loser you are?
Well, I make a really good salary which allows me to live quite comfortably for one thing, so no, I guess I don't have any idea.
> explaining why you like looking at a dick picture every day.
Clearly you misread or have poor comprehension skills. I think you'll find I made no such explanation, nor do I like performing said daily activity.
Nice madpost by the way.
> Do you have any idea what a sad fucking loser you are?
Well, I make a really good salary which allows me to live quite comfortably for one thing, so no, I guess I don't have any idea.
> explaining why you like looking at a dick picture every day.
Clearly you misread or have poor comprehension skills. I think you'll find I made no such explanation, nor do I like performing said daily activity.
Nice madpost by the way.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,016
@569,983 (G)
> > If your idea of a "sense of humour" is logging on to an obscure forum every day to see a picture of someone's penis, you're probably not very bright.
> If -> then, maybe, but that's not what I do. I guess I'm a little bright after all.
>
> > There was no picture. It was 3 words: "lol Salford nonce". It got deleted.
> OK, I have no idea why it got deleted then. There are many other instances of the phrase and references to the infamous nonce from Salford, so I imagine it was only deleted to annoy you (which seems to have worked).
>
> > By contrast, Doc's "lol pedofilth" always stays up.
> Life is so unfair, isn't it?
>
> > explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt's grandmother than are allowed on here.
> I don't think they are allowed - it was those types of pictures which I was referring to.
>
> > Look buddy, you can bend over backwards trying to rationalize it all you like
> I'm not trying that hard to rationalize anything, to be honest. You are the one who seems upset here.
>
> > but it won't change the simple fact that The Doctor is protected on here, for reasons I suspect I know.
> Don't cry about it.
>
> > > Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
> > This was genuinely embarrassing to read. I can't imagine what it was like to write. Years from now you are going to re-read that paragraph and cringe so hard you'll need a toilet plunger to get your face back into alignment.
> I don't feel in the slightest bit embarrassed about it, nor will I "years from now". Please explain what was so embarrassing and cringey. Use small words, because I'm clearly not as bright as you.
Nothing says "Everybody calm down" like a hysterical and bizarrely random rant against "the entire millenial generation" :)
> > If your idea of a "sense of humour" is logging on to an obscure forum every day to see a picture of someone's penis, you're probably not very bright.
> If -> then, maybe, but that's not what I do. I guess I'm a little bright after all.
>
> > There was no picture. It was 3 words: "lol Salford nonce". It got deleted.
> OK, I have no idea why it got deleted then. There are many other instances of the phrase and references to the infamous nonce from Salford, so I imagine it was only deleted to annoy you (which seems to have worked).
>
> > By contrast, Doc's "lol pedofilth" always stays up.
> Life is so unfair, isn't it?
>
> > explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt's grandmother than are allowed on here.
> I don't think they are allowed - it was those types of pictures which I was referring to.
>
> > Look buddy, you can bend over backwards trying to rationalize it all you like
> I'm not trying that hard to rationalize anything, to be honest. You are the one who seems upset here.
>
> > but it won't change the simple fact that The Doctor is protected on here, for reasons I suspect I know.
> Don't cry about it.
>
> > > Cry me a river. Respect is not automatically owed, it is earned - something that the entire millennial generation doesn't understand. The main reason he got trolled so much was because of his arrogance. He wanted this place to be his personal internet playground, and then got angry when that didn't work out so well for him. If he'd shown a little humility then perhaps people would have forgotten about it.
> > This was genuinely embarrassing to read. I can't imagine what it was like to write. Years from now you are going to re-read that paragraph and cringe so hard you'll need a toilet plunger to get your face back into alignment.
> I don't feel in the slightest bit embarrassed about it, nor will I "years from now". Please explain what was so embarrassing and cringey. Use small words, because I'm clearly not as bright as you.
Nothing says "Everybody calm down" like a hysterical and bizarrely random rant against "the entire millenial generation" :)
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,017
I suggest for everyone to stop bringing this topic up. Let it die.
Also, Father, you said you were offended by my initial thread. So, let it die. We can discuss the limits of friendly trolling in a new topic.
Also, Father, you said you were offended by my initial thread. So, let it die. We can discuss the limits of friendly trolling in a new topic.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,021
@previous (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> I suggest for everyone to stop bringing this topic up. Let it die.
Why?
> Also, Father, you said you were offended by my initial thread.
No I didn't.
> So, let it die.
Why?
> We can discuss the limits of friendly trolling in a new topic.
That topic doesn't interest me.
> I suggest for everyone to stop bringing this topic up. Let it die.
Why?
> Also, Father, you said you were offended by my initial thread.
No I didn't.
> So, let it die.
Why?
> We can discuss the limits of friendly trolling in a new topic.
That topic doesn't interest me.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,022
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,045
@570,016 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Nothing says "Everybody calm down" like a hysterical and bizarrely random rant against "the entire millenial generation" :)
Oh, OK then. I see I've backed you into your default corner, where instead of actually answering any questions you sit there and continue to lash out at strangers because it somehow makes you feel tall. Thanks, that'll be all then.
> Nothing says "Everybody calm down" like a hysterical and bizarrely random rant against "the entire millenial generation" :)
Oh, OK then. I see I've backed you into your default corner, where instead of actually answering any questions you sit there and continue to lash out at strangers because it somehow makes you feel tall. Thanks, that'll be all then.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,058
@previous (G)
> > Nothing says "Everybody calm down" like a hysterical and bizarrely random rant against "the entire millenial generation" :)
> Oh, OK then. I see I've backed you into your default corner, where instead of actually answering any questions you sit there and continue to lash out at strangers because it somehow makes you feel tall. Thanks, that'll be all then.
Calm down buddy, you're letting those feckless millennials upset you again.
> > Nothing says "Everybody calm down" like a hysterical and bizarrely random rant against "the entire millenial generation" :)
> Oh, OK then. I see I've backed you into your default corner, where instead of actually answering any questions you sit there and continue to lash out at strangers because it somehow makes you feel tall. Thanks, that'll be all then.
Calm down buddy, you're letting those feckless millennials upset you again.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,059
@570,022 (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> What interests you in this topic, then?
Currently? Anon G's hilarious posting on an obscure internet forum about a) his salary and b) the problem with "the entire millennial generation".
> What interests you in this topic, then?
Currently? Anon G's hilarious posting on an obscure internet forum about a) his salary and b) the problem with "the entire millennial generation".
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,061
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I see. You seem to care about things and get into deep discussions, and then it turns out it means nothing to you, and you now care about something completely different. Nice play. You trolled be twice. Won't happen again.
I see. You seem to care about things and get into deep discussions, and then it turns out it means nothing to you, and you now care about something completely different. Nice play. You trolled be twice. Won't happen again.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,062
@previous (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> I see. You seem to care about things and get into deep discussions, and then it turns out it means nothing to you
Why do you think it means nothing to me. I say what I have to say and then move on. If there's something you feel I left unfinished in our discussion, let me know.
> and you now care about something completely different.
As a man of God I care about many, many things.
> I see. You seem to care about things and get into deep discussions, and then it turns out it means nothing to you
Why do you think it means nothing to me. I say what I have to say and then move on. If there's something you feel I left unfinished in our discussion, let me know.
> and you now care about something completely different.
As a man of God I care about many, many things.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 7 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,104
@570,058 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Calm down buddy, you're letting those feckless millennials upset you again.
Lol, you're the one who got all flustered, emotional and embarrassed on my behalf (or something).
@570,059 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > What interests you in this topic, then?
> Currently? Anon G's hilarious posting on an obscure internet forum about a) his salary and b) the problem with "the entire millennial generation".
See, all riled up and excited. Oh well, glad I've provided you with some entertainment. Thanks for playing.
> Calm down buddy, you're letting those feckless millennials upset you again.
Lol, you're the one who got all flustered, emotional and embarrassed on my behalf (or something).
@570,059 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > What interests you in this topic, then?
> Currently? Anon G's hilarious posting on an obscure internet forum about a) his salary and b) the problem with "the entire millennial generation".
See, all riled up and excited. Oh well, glad I've provided you with some entertainment. Thanks for playing.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,105
@570,061 (Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT)
> I see. You seem to care about things and get into deep discussions, and then it turns out it means nothing to you, and you now care about something completely different. Nice play. You trolled be twice. Won't happen again.
You should never expect to have any kind of meaningful conversation with this clown. He thinks he's some kind of uber troll, but doesn't get how pathetic it makes him look.
> I see. You seem to care about things and get into deep discussions, and then it turns out it means nothing to you, and you now care about something completely different. Nice play. You trolled be twice. Won't happen again.
You should never expect to have any kind of meaningful conversation with this clown. He thinks he's some kind of uber troll, but doesn't get how pathetic it makes him look.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,117
@previous (G)
> doesn't get how pathetic it makes him look.
Write more about your salary on an anonymous message board.
> doesn't get how pathetic it makes him look.
Write more about your salary on an anonymous message board.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,127
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,137
@previous (G)
> > Write more about your salary on an anonymous message board.
> Gullible much?
Pathetic loser much?
> > Write more about your salary on an anonymous message board.
> Gullible much?
Pathetic loser much?
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,145
@570,127 (G)
Oh it looks like you've just outed yourself as one of the autistic madpost spammers. Awesome life you have there buddy.
Oh it looks like you've just outed yourself as one of the autistic madpost spammers. Awesome life you have there buddy.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,165
@570,137 (C)
@previous (C)
So full of rage.
> Oh it looks like you've just outed yourself
Oh it looks like you're samefagging, Father Merrin.
@previous (C)
So full of rage.
> Oh it looks like you've just outed yourself
Oh it looks like you're samefagging, Father Merrin.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,176
@previous (G)
Fuck me it really is you who's doing that. You've just bumped them all again at the exact moment you posted here. You sad, sad loser.
Fuck me it really is you who's doing that. You've just bumped them all again at the exact moment you posted here. You sad, sad loser.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 51 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,178
@previous (C)
Fuck me it really is you, a random anonymous stranger who gets upset really quickly and then projects all his failings onto other random anonymous strangers!
Fuck me it really is you, a random anonymous stranger who gets upset really quickly and then projects all his failings onto other random anonymous strangers!
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,179
@previous (G)
> You've just bumped them all again at the exact moment.
Gee, proof. You do know that this page exists, right: https://tinychan.org/folks
Currently there are 9 people online, all at the same time - coincidence?! I don't think so. I wonder, could they all be you + me + 7 of my sockpuppets / "yeah but" reply-bots?
> You've just bumped them all again at the exact moment.
Gee, proof. You do know that this page exists, right: https://tinychan.org/folks
Currently there are 9 people online, all at the same time - coincidence?! I don't think so. I wonder, could they all be you + me + 7 of my sockpuppets / "yeah but" reply-bots?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,182
@570,145 (C)
> Oh it looks like you've just outed yourself as one of the autistic madpost spammers. Awesome life you have there buddy.
LOL!!!! So Madaboutmillennials is the autistic madspammer, why am I not surprised? Bless you Mr Awesome Life And Salary if you read this! :))
> Oh it looks like you've just outed yourself as one of the autistic madpost spammers. Awesome life you have there buddy.
LOL!!!! So Madaboutmillennials is the autistic madspammer, why am I not surprised? Bless you Mr Awesome Life And Salary if you read this! :))
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,183
@570,104 (G)
> Oh well, glad I've provided you with some entertainment.
More than you will ever know :) Hey, when you have a couple of free minutes in between autistically bumping threads can you tell us all more about 1) the awesome life your salary affords you and 2) your beef with "the entire millennial generation"? :))
> Oh well, glad I've provided you with some entertainment.
More than you will ever know :) Hey, when you have a couple of free minutes in between autistically bumping threads can you tell us all more about 1) the awesome life your salary affords you and 2) your beef with "the entire millennial generation"? :))
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,184
@570,179 (G)
> > You've just bumped them all again at the exact moment.
> Gee, proof. You do know that this page exists, right: https://tinychan.org/folks
> Currently there are 9 people online, all at the same time - coincidence?! I don't think so. I wonder, could they all be you + me + 7 of my sockpuppets / "yeah but" reply-bots?
I believe the claim is that twice in a row you've responded in here right in the middle of the autistic madspamming in the other threads. The odds of it being one of those other 8 'users' (lol most of them are bots) are outlandish given the lack of activity on here.
It's endearing you're now trying to figure out a way to dig yourself out of this but you've been caught red-handed buddy :)
> > You've just bumped them all again at the exact moment.
> Gee, proof. You do know that this page exists, right: https://tinychan.org/folks
> Currently there are 9 people online, all at the same time - coincidence?! I don't think so. I wonder, could they all be you + me + 7 of my sockpuppets / "yeah but" reply-bots?
I believe the claim is that twice in a row you've responded in here right in the middle of the autistic madspamming in the other threads. The odds of it being one of those other 8 'users' (lol most of them are bots) are outlandish given the lack of activity on here.
It's endearing you're now trying to figure out a way to dig yourself out of this but you've been caught red-handed buddy :)
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,189
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> LOL!!!! So Madaboutmillennials is the autistic madspammer
> (lol most of them are bots)
Hmm, looks like you and your boyfriend Anon C (who I suspect is Negi - has the right amount of rage) have two theories:
1) You are correct and I am your "autistic madspammer".
2) Your sneaking, maddening suspicion that you are replying to a robot is correct.
You seem so certain of both of these so I guess the third option - it's not me - will go down with you in the same way as "I'm actually a priest" goes down with the rest of the human TC denizens. It would be a waste of my precious time to spam so prolifically, so...
Not that I have done this (because it's a ban-worthy offence I assume) but if I were to implement a reply-bot on here, I would go about it like this:
- Java is probably the easiest language
- Make a HttpsURLConnection
- Set user agent to Mozilla/5.0 or something common
- Set expected cookies: "SID=x; UID=x; password=x; last_bump=x; last_topic="
- Send the GET request
- Use a BufferedReader to read the InputStream line by line
- Parse the lines and check to see if a reply is needed
- Extract from the reply form the required POST URL, CSRF_token, start_time and reply ID
- Construct the POST data, which should be enctype="multipart/form-data"
- Pause a random number of seconds (at least 10) then send the POST request, also using HttpsURLConnection
- Cloudflare also has some expected __utm cookies, so I'd also have to be careful about sending those correctly.
> LOL!!!! So Madaboutmillennials is the autistic madspammer
> (lol most of them are bots)
Hmm, looks like you and your boyfriend Anon C (who I suspect is Negi - has the right amount of rage) have two theories:
1) You are correct and I am your "autistic madspammer".
2) Your sneaking, maddening suspicion that you are replying to a robot is correct.
You seem so certain of both of these so I guess the third option - it's not me - will go down with you in the same way as "I'm actually a priest" goes down with the rest of the human TC denizens. It would be a waste of my precious time to spam so prolifically, so...
Not that I have done this (because it's a ban-worthy offence I assume) but if I were to implement a reply-bot on here, I would go about it like this:
- Java is probably the easiest language
- Make a HttpsURLConnection
- Set user agent to Mozilla/5.0 or something common
- Set expected cookies: "SID=x; UID=x; password=x; last_bump=x; last_topic="
- Send the GET request
- Use a BufferedReader to read the InputStream line by line
- Parse the lines and check to see if a reply is needed
- Extract from the reply form the required POST URL, CSRF_token, start_time and reply ID
- Construct the POST data, which should be enctype="multipart/form-data"
- Pause a random number of seconds (at least 10) then send the POST request, also using HttpsURLConnection
- Cloudflare also has some expected __utm cookies, so I'd also have to be careful about sending those correctly.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,190
@previous (G)
> > LOL!!!! So Madaboutmillennials is the autistic madspammer
> 1) You are correct and I am your "autistic madspammer".
We know, it's been obvious for a while already. After all if it weren't you you'd write a huge wall of text seeking to find a way to dig yourself out of the hole you created ;)
Now go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary, my friend. Don't let those damned millennials grind you down!
> > LOL!!!! So Madaboutmillennials is the autistic madspammer
> 1) You are correct and I am your "autistic madspammer".
We know, it's been obvious for a while already. After all if it weren't you you'd write a huge wall of text seeking to find a way to dig yourself out of the hole you created ;)
Now go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary, my friend. Don't let those damned millennials grind you down!
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,192
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> We know, it's been obvious for a while already. After all if it weren't you you'd write a huge wall of text seeking to find a way to dig yourself out of the hole you created ;)
You can think what you like, I really don't care. It just amuses me that it's more obvious somebody has written a simple string search bot. Or perhaps two people and the bots are replying to each other.
> Now go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary, my friend. Don't let those damned millennials grind you down!
I will! Enjoy your awesome priestly duties, and try not to gloat at your parishioners when they give their confessions to you.
> We know, it's been obvious for a while already. After all if it weren't you you'd write a huge wall of text seeking to find a way to dig yourself out of the hole you created ;)
You can think what you like, I really don't care. It just amuses me that it's more obvious somebody has written a simple string search bot. Or perhaps two people and the bots are replying to each other.
> Now go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary, my friend. Don't let those damned millennials grind you down!
I will! Enjoy your awesome priestly duties, and try not to gloat at your parishioners when they give their confessions to you.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 47 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,199
@570,189 (G)
Nice try genius. Only problem with this obvious horseshit: those threads have only been bumped at the same time you've been raging in here. Are you suggesting someone else programmed a bot to bump them only when you also happen to be posting here?
But by all means keep on embarrassing yourself even further, it's hilarious.
Nice try genius. Only problem with this obvious horseshit: those threads have only been bumped at the same time you've been raging in here. Are you suggesting someone else programmed a bot to bump them only when you also happen to be posting here?
But by all means keep on embarrassing yourself even further, it's hilarious.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #570,200
@570,192 (G)
> It just amuses me that it's more obvious somebody has written a simple string search bot.
That magically only ever seemed to start working when you were posting in this thread at the exact same time.
> It just amuses me that it's more obvious somebody has written a simple string search bot.
That magically only ever seemed to start working when you were posting in this thread at the exact same time.
·Cook My Own Breakfast (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,202
But which photo is Negi? Is it the older gentleman that the Doctor keeps posting?
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,208
@570,199 (C)
> Nice try genius. Only problem with this obvious horseshit: those threads have only been bumped at the same time you've been raging in here.
Okay, Negi. I guess that is ultimate proof for somebody of your level of intelligence.
> Are you suggesting someone else programmed a bot to bump them only when you also happen to be posting here?
No, I'm suggesting that somebody programmed a bot to bump them at random times of the day. It also coincides with when YOU rage. Did you write the bot? Oh wait, what am I saying, you are far too fucking stupid to be able to make something like that.
> it's hilarious.
For me, yes, observing the kind of delusional world you live in.
> Nice try genius. Only problem with this obvious horseshit: those threads have only been bumped at the same time you've been raging in here.
Okay, Negi. I guess that is ultimate proof for somebody of your level of intelligence.
> Are you suggesting someone else programmed a bot to bump them only when you also happen to be posting here?
No, I'm suggesting that somebody programmed a bot to bump them at random times of the day. It also coincides with when YOU rage. Did you write the bot? Oh wait, what am I saying, you are far too fucking stupid to be able to make something like that.
> it's hilarious.
For me, yes, observing the kind of delusional world you live in.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,209
@570,200 (C)
> That magically only ever seemed to start working when you were posting in this thread at the exact same time.
Looks like it's been running for several days now... usually when I'm asleep. Gee, I wonder how that's possible? Yeah, must be magic.
> That magically only ever seemed to start working when you were posting in this thread at the exact same time.
Looks like it's been running for several days now... usually when I'm asleep. Gee, I wonder how that's possible? Yeah, must be magic.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,211
@570,202 (Cook My Own Breakfast)
> But which photo is Negi? Is it the older gentleman that the Doctor keeps posting?
Negi (aka Travis) is the hypertelorist taking a selfie in the bathroom mirror with his microdick poking out.
> But which photo is Negi? Is it the older gentleman that the Doctor keeps posting?
Negi (aka Travis) is the hypertelorist taking a selfie in the bathroom mirror with his microdick poking out.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,223
@570,192 (G)
> > We know, it's been obvious for a while already. After all if it weren't you you'd write a huge wall of text seeking to find a way to dig yourself out of the hole you created ;)
> You can think what you like, I really don't care.
Nothing says "I really don't care what people think about me" like rage posting about your salary, your 'wonderful life' and those pesky indolent millennials on an obscure forum :)
> > We know, it's been obvious for a while already. After all if it weren't you you'd write a huge wall of text seeking to find a way to dig yourself out of the hole you created ;)
> You can think what you like, I really don't care.
Nothing says "I really don't care what people think about me" like rage posting about your salary, your 'wonderful life' and those pesky indolent millennials on an obscure forum :)
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,241
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Nothing says "I really don't care what people think about me" like rage posting about your salary, your 'wonderful life' and those pesky indolent millennials on an obscure forum :)
Oh Father Merrin, you are too easy. All I had to do was sound like a boomer and you started frothing at the mouth. I can't believe you fell for this so hard. Well, actually I can. You aren't as smart as you think you are and twice as arrogant. And it's always your downfall.
> Nothing says "I really don't care what people think about me" like rage posting about your salary, your 'wonderful life' and those pesky indolent millennials on an obscure forum :)
Oh Father Merrin, you are too easy. All I had to do was sound like a boomer and you started frothing at the mouth. I can't believe you fell for this so hard. Well, actually I can. You aren't as smart as you think you are and twice as arrogant. And it's always your downfall.
+Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,242
@previous (G)
Sorry, but Merrin is an obvious troll and he successfully baited you. He is precisely as smart as he thinks, thanks to your effort here. Good job feeding a cancer of this board, you fucking retard.
Sorry, but Merrin is an obvious troll and he successfully baited you. He is precisely as smart as he thinks, thanks to your effort here. Good job feeding a cancer of this board, you fucking retard.
+Anonymous N — 6.6 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,244
@previous (M)
disagree. the topic headline questions Merrin's manhood, which looks like bait swallowed
disagree. the topic headline questions Merrin's manhood, which looks like bait swallowed
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,245
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,259
It's not like trolls distract us form the important conversations on this board
·Anonymous H — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,265
The conversations on this board are very important and must be taken seriously.
·Anonymous N — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,272
@570,245 (M)
only if you then proceed to take him seriously. When the reply count gets this high on a thread that was apparently made for the sole purpose of mocking him, you make him lose credit
only if you then proceed to take him seriously. When the reply count gets this high on a thread that was apparently made for the sole purpose of mocking him, you make him lose credit
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,279
@570,242 (M)
> Sorry, but Merrin is an obvious troll and he successfully baited you.
Lol, an obvious troll is an unsuccessful one, you mong.
@previous (N)
> When the reply count gets this high on a thread that was apparently made for the sole purpose of mocking him, you make him lose credit
This.
> Sorry, but Merrin is an obvious troll and he successfully baited you.
Lol, an obvious troll is an unsuccessful one, you mong.
@previous (N)
> When the reply count gets this high on a thread that was apparently made for the sole purpose of mocking him, you make him lose credit
This.
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,284
But, going back to the OP. Is he a boy or a man? Discuss.
+Anonymous O — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,288
neither
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,294
@570,241 (G)
> > Nothing says "I really don't care what people think about me" like rage posting about your salary, your 'wonderful life' and those pesky indolent millennials on an obscure forum :)
> Oh Father Merrin, you are too easy. All I had to do was sound like a boomer and you started frothing at the mouth. I can't believe you fell for this so hard. Well, actually I can. You aren't as smart as you think you are and twice as arrogant. And it's always your downfall.
Nothing says "No really, I don't care what people think!" like CONTINUING to rage about this bizarre 'boomer' and 'millennial' fixation that has you riled up :)
> > Nothing says "I really don't care what people think about me" like rage posting about your salary, your 'wonderful life' and those pesky indolent millennials on an obscure forum :)
> Oh Father Merrin, you are too easy. All I had to do was sound like a boomer and you started frothing at the mouth. I can't believe you fell for this so hard. Well, actually I can. You aren't as smart as you think you are and twice as arrogant. And it's always your downfall.
Nothing says "No really, I don't care what people think!" like CONTINUING to rage about this bizarre 'boomer' and 'millennial' fixation that has you riled up :)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,298
@570,279 (G)
> > Sorry, but Merrin is an obvious troll and he successfully baited you.
> Lol, an obvious troll is an unsuccessful one, you mong.
"Mong" LOL!!! Congrats on pinpointing for us your age, region and (lack of) education :)
And oh dear, I see you're starting to lash out at yet more people! Why has he upset you so much, do you think he's one of those nefarious millennials?
My friend, calm yourself and go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary that you (hysterically) told us all about on this backwater message board :)
> > Sorry, but Merrin is an obvious troll and he successfully baited you.
> Lol, an obvious troll is an unsuccessful one, you mong.
"Mong" LOL!!! Congrats on pinpointing for us your age, region and (lack of) education :)
And oh dear, I see you're starting to lash out at yet more people! Why has he upset you so much, do you think he's one of those nefarious millennials?
My friend, calm yourself and go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary that you (hysterically) told us all about on this backwater message board :)
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,304
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,340
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,355
@570,294 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Nothing says "No really, I don't care what people think!" like CONTINUING to rage about this bizarre 'boomer' and 'millennial' fixation that has you riled up :)
Very irate now using capital letters and triple exclamation marks, I see. Excellent. Let the rage flow over you.
@570,298 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> "Mong" LOL!!! Congrats on pinpointing for us your age, region and (lack of) education :)
And again. This is fun. Go on, let's see if you got it right - where am I from and how old am I? I wonder what other words will trigger you, yer twat-faced knob.
> And oh dear, I see you're starting to lash out at yet more people! Why has he upset you so much, do you think he's one of those nefarious millennials?
Who, what?
> My friend, calm yourself and go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary that you (hysterically) told us all about on this backwater message board :)
Already said I will definitely do that. You are the one who keeps coming back for more banter, which you hilariously think is you being a giant troll. As I also said, you are not half as smart as you think you are, and twice as arrogant. This is why it's so easy to make you rage-spurge like this.
By the way, I laughed my head off when you said you wish you could have an argument with Christopher Hitchens - as if you possess one iota of his intellect.
> Nothing says "No really, I don't care what people think!" like CONTINUING to rage about this bizarre 'boomer' and 'millennial' fixation that has you riled up :)
Very irate now using capital letters and triple exclamation marks, I see. Excellent. Let the rage flow over you.
@570,298 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> "Mong" LOL!!! Congrats on pinpointing for us your age, region and (lack of) education :)
And again. This is fun. Go on, let's see if you got it right - where am I from and how old am I? I wonder what other words will trigger you, yer twat-faced knob.
> And oh dear, I see you're starting to lash out at yet more people! Why has he upset you so much, do you think he's one of those nefarious millennials?
Who, what?
> My friend, calm yourself and go enjoy your awesome life with your big salary that you (hysterically) told us all about on this backwater message board :)
Already said I will definitely do that. You are the one who keeps coming back for more banter, which you hilariously think is you being a giant troll. As I also said, you are not half as smart as you think you are, and twice as arrogant. This is why it's so easy to make you rage-spurge like this.
By the way, I laughed my head off when you said you wish you could have an argument with Christopher Hitchens - as if you possess one iota of his intellect.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,358
@570,340 (M)
> Have fun giving him what he wants, losers.
In the end, nobody, not even PedoMerrin here, wants to be made a fool of. The longer I can keep on wasting his time replying to me the better.
> Have fun giving him what he wants, losers.
In the end, nobody, not even PedoMerrin here, wants to be made a fool of. The longer I can keep on wasting his time replying to me the better.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,359
@570,355 (G)
Oh look, Anon G is posting again at the exact same time the madposts are getting bumped. That 'bot' of his is really in synch with him.
Oh look, Anon G is posting again at the exact same time the madposts are getting bumped. That 'bot' of his is really in synch with him.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,361
@570,358 (G)
> > Have fun giving him what he wants, losers.
> The longer I can keep on wasting his time replying to me the better.
You're writing walls of text. He's laughing at you. Now re-read your post.
> > Have fun giving him what he wants, losers.
> The longer I can keep on wasting his time replying to me the better.
You're writing walls of text. He's laughing at you. Now re-read your post.
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,366
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,367
@570,359 (C)
> Oh look, Anon G is posting again at the exact same time the madposts are getting bumped. That 'bot' of his is really in synch with him.
hahaha, I waited til it kicked in this time, just to make you rage again, Negi.
> Oh look, Anon G is posting again at the exact same time the madposts are getting bumped. That 'bot' of his is really in synch with him.
hahaha, I waited til it kicked in this time, just to make you rage again, Negi.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,375
@570,361 (C)
> You're writing walls of text.
With very little effort. And I know he'll read all of it very carefully because he's an obsessed fuckface, constant looking for and edge to try and "troll" me, and therefore always falling into my traps.
He's laughing at you.
Oh, are you in the room with him, Negi? Wouldn't surprise me.
> Now re-read your post.
Why would I do that? They are all a load of shit.
> You're writing walls of text.
With very little effort. And I know he'll read all of it very carefully because he's an obsessed fuckface, constant looking for and edge to try and "troll" me, and therefore always falling into my traps.
He's laughing at you.
Oh, are you in the room with him, Negi? Wouldn't surprise me.
> Now re-read your post.
Why would I do that? They are all a load of shit.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,376
@570,367 (G)
> > Oh look, Anon G is posting again at the exact same time the madposts are getting bumped. That 'bot' of his is really in synch with him.
> hahaha, I waited til it kicked in this time, just to make you rage again, Negi.
Now you want us to believe you spent all day refreshing this forum so you could post at the exact moment your non-existent 'bot' kicked in?
It's actually embarrassing watching you destroy yourself like this.
> > Oh look, Anon G is posting again at the exact same time the madposts are getting bumped. That 'bot' of his is really in synch with him.
> hahaha, I waited til it kicked in this time, just to make you rage again, Negi.
Now you want us to believe you spent all day refreshing this forum so you could post at the exact moment your non-existent 'bot' kicked in?
It's actually embarrassing watching you destroy yourself like this.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,377
@570,375 (G)
> > You're writing walls of text.
> With very little effort. And I know he'll read all of it very carefully because he's an obsessed fuckface, constant looking for and edge to try and "troll" me, and therefore always falling into my traps.
>
> He's laughing at you.
> Oh, are you in the room with him, Negi? Wouldn't surprise me.
>
> > Now re-read your post.
> Why would I do that? They are all a load of shit.
Rage more, madspammer.
> > You're writing walls of text.
> With very little effort. And I know he'll read all of it very carefully because he's an obsessed fuckface, constant looking for and edge to try and "troll" me, and therefore always falling into my traps.
>
> He's laughing at you.
> Oh, are you in the room with him, Negi? Wouldn't surprise me.
>
> > Now re-read your post.
> Why would I do that? They are all a load of shit.
Rage more, madspammer.
+Anonymous P — 6.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,379
Someone needs to stage an intervention for Anonymous G. This self-own of his is starting to get uncomfortable.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,380
@previous (P)
> Someone needs to stage an intervention for Anonymous G. This self-own of his is starting to get uncomfortable.
How many more UIDs is it going to be, Anon C & M?
> Someone needs to stage an intervention for Anonymous G. This self-own of his is starting to get uncomfortable.
How many more UIDs is it going to be, Anon C & M?
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,381
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,384
@570,376 (C)
> > hahaha, I waited til it kicked in this time, just to make you rage again, Negi.
>
> Now you want us to believe you spent all day refreshing this forum so you could post at the exact moment your non-existent 'bot' kicked in?
This is his "awesome life" now. It's all he has left.
> It's actually embarrassing watching you destroy yourself like this.
At first it was funny but now it's becoming genuinely sad. To write some elaborate "bot" scenario was bad enough. To now claim he's spending his days waiting for it to start working so he can post in this thread...that's something a very lonely person does. All joking aside I literally feel bad for helping him humiliate himself like this.
> > hahaha, I waited til it kicked in this time, just to make you rage again, Negi.
>
> Now you want us to believe you spent all day refreshing this forum so you could post at the exact moment your non-existent 'bot' kicked in?
This is his "awesome life" now. It's all he has left.
> It's actually embarrassing watching you destroy yourself like this.
At first it was funny but now it's becoming genuinely sad. To write some elaborate "bot" scenario was bad enough. To now claim he's spending his days waiting for it to start working so he can post in this thread...that's something a very lonely person does. All joking aside I literally feel bad for helping him humiliate himself like this.
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,387
100th reply suck my dick I got it not you jabronis
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,388
@570,380 (G)
> accusing me of being Anon C
Lol. Or you're just angry that two people agree that you're feeding a troll. If he didn't have mad replies to reply to, he'd fall into obscurity. It concerns me that you haven't grasped that concept on your own yet.
> accusing me of being Anon C
Lol. Or you're just angry that two people agree that you're feeding a troll. If he didn't have mad replies to reply to, he'd fall into obscurity. It concerns me that you haven't grasped that concept on your own yet.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,404
@previous (M)
> Lol. Or you're just amused that two sockpuppets agree that they are angry about being trolled. If I didn't have mad replies to make, I'd fall into obscurity. It concerns me that I haven't grasped that concept on my own yet.
Yeah, absolutely.
@570,387 (M)
> 100th reply suck my dick I got it not you jabronis
Mission accomplished!
> Lol. Or you're just amused that two sockpuppets agree that they are angry about being trolled. If I didn't have mad replies to make, I'd fall into obscurity. It concerns me that I haven't grasped that concept on my own yet.
Yeah, absolutely.
@570,387 (M)
> 100th reply suck my dick I got it not you jabronis
Mission accomplished!
·Anonymous H — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,455
y'all're mongs
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,458
@570,404 (G)
Your quote rewrites are equivalent to Merrin's spergspasms. You have officially descended to his level. Congratulations!
Your quote rewrites are equivalent to Merrin's spergspasms. You have officially descended to his level. Congratulations!
·Father Merrin !!A7LRn5oiFA (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,655
I am now officially a man. I have denounced religion and my immature behavior. I apologize for all the grief I have caused.
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,667
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,687
@570,655 (Father Merrin !!A7LRn5oiFA)
Up to your antics again, Mr Breakfast? Did you forget you're the OP of this thread?
Up to your antics again, Mr Breakfast? Did you forget you're the OP of this thread?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,688
@570,375 (G)
> > You're writing walls of text.
> With very little effort. And I know he'll read all of it very carefully because he's an obsessed fuckface, constant looking for and edge to try and "troll" me, and therefore always falling into my traps.
>
> He's laughing at you.
> Oh, are you in the room with him, Negi? Wouldn't surprise me.
>
> > Now re-read your post.
> Why would I do that? They are all a load of shit.
It's pretty fascinating how the two people who really seem to rile you up, Mr Madspammer, is Negi and myself. May I copy here my post from another thread? Why thank you...
Amazing how this 'bot' of yours began sentient life in this thread ranting about Negi and myself in the exact same text voice you use...
https://tinychan.org/topic/53145#reply_563675
...before miraculously morphing into what you are now trying to claim is a 'bot'
Even more amazing how this 'bot' of yours started this thread (as the OP no less!), again using your text voice, talking about the 'Salford Nonce'...
>>>53647
...before changing into what you want us to believe is a 'bot'.
Would you care to explain how a 'bot' began life in multiple threads, sometimes as the OP, using the same 'British' spelling as you ('humour', etc), the same types of language as you, the exact same text voice as you, and obsessing over the same 2 people as you...before becoming the madspamming 'bot'?
It's been said before and it'll be said again: you have made an absolute mess of yourself :)) Keep on madspammin', Awesome Life Dude!
(mod edit: internal link)
> > You're writing walls of text.
> With very little effort. And I know he'll read all of it very carefully because he's an obsessed fuckface, constant looking for and edge to try and "troll" me, and therefore always falling into my traps.
>
> He's laughing at you.
> Oh, are you in the room with him, Negi? Wouldn't surprise me.
>
> > Now re-read your post.
> Why would I do that? They are all a load of shit.
It's pretty fascinating how the two people who really seem to rile you up, Mr Madspammer, is Negi and myself. May I copy here my post from another thread? Why thank you...
Amazing how this 'bot' of yours began sentient life in this thread ranting about Negi and myself in the exact same text voice you use...
https://tinychan.org/topic/53145#reply_563675
...before miraculously morphing into what you are now trying to claim is a 'bot'
Even more amazing how this 'bot' of yours started this thread (as the OP no less!), again using your text voice, talking about the 'Salford Nonce'...
>>>53647
...before changing into what you want us to believe is a 'bot'.
Would you care to explain how a 'bot' began life in multiple threads, sometimes as the OP, using the same 'British' spelling as you ('humour', etc), the same types of language as you, the exact same text voice as you, and obsessing over the same 2 people as you...before becoming the madspamming 'bot'?
It's been said before and it'll be said again: you have made an absolute mess of yourself :)) Keep on madspammin', Awesome Life Dude!
(mod edit: internal link)
(Edited 5.9 years later by a moderator.)
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,691
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
lol
Nice madpost.
How long did you spend digging through the archives for all this "evidence" and scrupulously analyzing subtle differences in the text voice of "nice madpost" and/or "yeah but it isn't"? Well done, Columbo!
lol
Nice madpost.
How long did you spend digging through the archives for all this "evidence" and scrupulously analyzing subtle differences in the text voice of "nice madpost" and/or "yeah but it isn't"? Well done, Columbo!
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,694
@previous (G)
> I have no response and accept I've been exposed as the madspammer.
Thanks, that'll be all :)
Ah, except for this final self-own of yours, because it's absolutely hysterical:
https://tinychan.org/topic/53872#reply_570693
I'll let you get back to your madspamming now :)
> I have no response and accept I've been exposed as the madspammer.
Thanks, that'll be all :)
Ah, except for this final self-own of yours, because it's absolutely hysterical:
https://tinychan.org/topic/53872#reply_570693
I'll let you get back to your madspamming now :)
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,695
+Anonymous Q — 6.6 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,697
Is anon G that guy who keeps getting baited by TG into arguing about God on Minichan?
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,698
@570,695 (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
Anon G falling back into his autistic dick pics. Someone bump his spam threads, keep him enraged.
Anon G falling back into his autistic dick pics. Someone bump his spam threads, keep him enraged.
+Father Merrin !!A7LRn5oiFA — 6.6 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,705
@570,687 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Up to your antics again, Mr Breakfast? Did you forget you're the OP of this thread?
Wait, so you mean you were actually impersonating Mr Breakfast there? The nerve!
> Up to your antics again, Mr Breakfast? Did you forget you're the OP of this thread?
Wait, so you mean you were actually impersonating Mr Breakfast there? The nerve!
·Cookie Breakfast !!A7LRn5oiFA — 6.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,706
For me the question remains - is Father Merrin a boy or a man?
·Cook My Own Breakfast !!IpftyHSqdT (OP) — 6.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,708
I would like to officially confirm: I am not Father Merrin.
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,717
LOL Cook My Own Breakfast confirmed as TG.
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,720
@570,698 (C)
> Someone bump his spam threads
And lo and behold they were bumped almost immediately. Oh no, have you just outed yourself there?
> Someone bump his spam threads
And lo and behold they were bumped almost immediately. Oh no, have you just outed yourself there?
·Anonymous C — 6.6 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,734
@previous (G)
> > Someone bump his spam threads
> And lo and behold they were bumped almost immediately.
Good boy, you follow orders well.
> > Someone bump his spam threads
> And lo and behold they were bumped almost immediately.
Good boy, you follow orders well.
·Anonymous M — 6.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,936
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #570,942
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,044
@569,899 (G)
> > explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt
> I don't think they are allowed - it was those types of pictures which I was referring to.
You remember that discussion we were having where you were hilariously claiming there isn't one rule for the doctor and one rule for everyone else when it comes to which pictures get removed on here? I've been informed you may want to take a look at this:
https://tinychan.org/topic/53941#reply_571005
Thank you and God bless.
> > explain the photoshopped pictures of Matt
> I don't think they are allowed - it was those types of pictures which I was referring to.
You remember that discussion we were having where you were hilariously claiming there isn't one rule for the doctor and one rule for everyone else when it comes to which pictures get removed on here? I've been informed you may want to take a look at this:
https://tinychan.org/topic/53941#reply_571005
Thank you and God bless.
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,047
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,056
@571,044 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> You remember that discussion we were having
Oh this again... vaguely. You are a strange fellow. Why are you so very concerned about proving something to a random stranger on the internet? The truth is I really couldn't care less about all this. I am amused that on the other hand you apparently care so deeply about how others on here perceive you.
> where you were hilariously
My pleasure that I am able to provide such great comedy for you.
> claiming there isn't one rule for the doctor and one rule for everyone else when it comes to which pictures get removed on here?
There isn't.
> I've been informed you may want to take a look at this:
Good choice of words - got to maintain the line you can't see pictures, except that it implies you have a sidekick who regularly reports to you.
> Thank you and God bless.
You are most welcome. God bless you too.
> You remember that discussion we were having
Oh this again... vaguely. You are a strange fellow. Why are you so very concerned about proving something to a random stranger on the internet? The truth is I really couldn't care less about all this. I am amused that on the other hand you apparently care so deeply about how others on here perceive you.
> where you were hilariously
My pleasure that I am able to provide such great comedy for you.
> claiming there isn't one rule for the doctor and one rule for everyone else when it comes to which pictures get removed on here?
There isn't.
> I've been informed you may want to take a look at this:
Good choice of words - got to maintain the line you can't see pictures, except that it implies you have a sidekick who regularly reports to you.
> Thank you and God bless.
You are most welcome. God bless you too.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,059
@previous (G)
> The truth is I really couldn't care less about all this.
Nothing says "I couldn't care less" like writing walls of text explaining why photoshopped pictures get deleted on here, only to then start crying when evidence wrecks your argument.
Now go enjoy your day my child, and for heaven's sake don't let those millennials grind you down!
> The truth is I really couldn't care less about all this.
Nothing says "I couldn't care less" like writing walls of text explaining why photoshopped pictures get deleted on here, only to then start crying when evidence wrecks your argument.
Now go enjoy your day my child, and for heaven's sake don't let those millennials grind you down!
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,060
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,061
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,062
@previous (G)
> still trying to have the last word
How silly of you! Go outside and enjoy your Awesome Life ;)
> still trying to have the last word
How silly of you! Go outside and enjoy your Awesome Life ;)
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,063
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,068
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,070
+Anonymous S — 6.6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,072
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,078
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,084
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,085
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,089
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,093
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,096
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,097
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,116
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 6.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,117
·Anonymous S — 6.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,118
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> - Locate Merrin Anon OCD reply button
> - Push
> - Results
> Indeed :)
I agree too!
> - Locate Merrin Anon OCD reply button
> - Push
> - Results
> Indeed :)
I agree too!
·Anonymous N — 6.6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,119
·Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 6.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,124
·Anonymous G — 6.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,131
+ConferenceBoy !OK40KMXgt2 — 6.6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,237
But is he a boy or a man?
·Anonymous S — 6.6 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #571,240
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.