Notice: Home alone tonight?
Topic: Admin: aka 'On'
+Anonymous A — 7.1 years ago #52,921
Your best course of action would be to consult an attorney..
+Namebro !4xUfreuqD2 — 7.1 years ago, 6 minutes later[T] [B] #561,159
You should too what's his name? Tell me so we can mediate. Unless you're full of shit send me your lawyer in your next reply, pussy.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 7.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #561,160
I have not previously retained an attorney for dispensation of this matter..
But I have documented a pattern of harrassment and pertinent data regarding said malicious libel.
+Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 7.1 years ago, 57 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #561,169
you cant pay for shit
+Paul Johnson — 7.1 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,198
You posted scantily clad little girls, be sure you include that information.
+Anonymous E — 7.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,199
@561,160 (A)
So what you're saying is you aren't suing, you're just screenshotting because you're angry. Got it, thanks.
·Namebro !4xUfreuqD2 — 7.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,225
@561,160 (A)
So you're all talk. Ok as long as we're on the same page.
Don't exactly know how you were going to sue some guy in Hong Kong but I knew you weren't even going to try.
Pussy.
+Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,238
@OP
Why haven't you replied yet? Was it all just a bluff?
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
·Anonymous A (OP) — 7.1 years ago, 49 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,258
@previous (Jim !a9Y4fazouc)
Suck it Jim..
I've seen whose pic you're using...lol..
What do you think he would say if he spent twenty minutes looking at his pic attached to all your interesting posts..
I'd bet the farm HE has a lawyer..
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 2 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,260
@previous (A)
All of my interesting posts are anti-pedophilia, pedoBert.
·Anonymous E — 7.1 years ago, 12 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,263
@561,258 (A)
You seem desperate. You getting hot under the collar there?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 7.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,275
@561,260 (Jim !a9Y4fazouc)
And that is great..
You and he should still have a talk tho..
He demands a substantial feel for a short workshop...I imagine he will be interested in you representing yourself as him for free..
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
·Anonymous A (OP) — 7.1 years ago, 53 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,276
Oh snap..
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,295
@561,275 (A)
@previous (A)
Is this your attempt at scaring me, pedobert?
·Anonymous E — 7.1 years ago, 54 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,297
@561,275 (A)
I actually cringed. It's unbelievably obvious you're trying to divert attention here. You've already fucked your reputation, Bert. Trying to save face by threatening a troll with image usage will only embarrass you further, if that's even possible.
Also, what do you think will happen if the guy hears Jim is using his portrait? It'll either be a shrug, or he'll be angry and unable to do anything. You clearly didn't think that through, did ya?
+Dead !Pool..v42s — 7.1 years ago, 31 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,299
Unless someone on the Internet is literally effecting your income, livelyhood, or your real life reputation, you have no case for libel or slander
·Anonymous E — 7.1 years ago, 25 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #561,300
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
"Oh snap.." Is how PedoBert would react to this if he were to ever acknowledge his own failure. But I don't foresee that happening.
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 3 days later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,485
@561,275 (A)
Still waiting on a follow-through with that "threat" you made against me, Bert. When should I expect results?
·Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 7.1 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,486
@previous (Jim !a9Y4fazouc)
> When should I expect results?
Never. You know he's all talk and a fucking chicken.
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,487
@previous (Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo)
I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up, considering his only goal was to intimidate me somehow. I hope he at least tries. Then we can laugh at his disappointment.
·Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 7.1 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,488
@previous (Jim !a9Y4fazouc)
too bad now it is (y)our dissapointment.
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,493
@previous (Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo)
At least it isn't our humiliation, like poor old Bert here.
·Anonymous D — 7.1 years ago, 7 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,501
@previous (Jim !a9Y4fazouc)
Our humiliation comes from the users who won't stop discussing Bert's lifestyle choices.
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 7.1 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #561,503
@previous (D)
So you're humiliated of On now, too?
+Anonymous H — 7.1 years ago, 1 week later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #562,065
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 6.8 years ago, 3 months later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,098
+Anonymous I — 6.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,099
@561,297 (E)
We shall see about that!
·Anonymous E — 6.8 years ago, 24 minutes later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,100
@previous (I)
This should be interesting. Or not, since you drop threats the second you have to act on them lol
+Anonymous J — 6.8 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,101
Bert doesn't follow through on the fights he starts. So more than likely he won't follow through with this.
·Anonymous E — 6.8 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,102
@previous (J)
It's taken him 3+ months to even make the "threat" again, so I'm certain you're correct.
+Anonymous K — 6.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,105
@OP
FagBert, everyone knows you're all wind and no piss.
+Syntax — 6.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,107
@568,099 (I)
> We shall see about that!
In from a fun Fri evening its 2:13 AM and given you cannot even afford a Wendy;s burger how U going to pay for Legal anything
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 6.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,133
@568,099 (I)
What happened to me not being "important enough", Bert? You just love contradicting your past self, don't you?
I eagerly await results.
+Anonymous M — 6.8 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,134
@previous (Jim !a9Y4fazouc)
Nice projection.
+FailsMostExpectations — 6.8 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,135
+Anonymous O — 6.8 years ago, 7 hours later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,144
lol
no job = no monies for frivolous lawsuits
·Jim !a9Y4fazouc — 6.8 years ago, 9 hours later, 3 months after the original post[T] [B] #568,187
@previous (O)
However reaching out to my namesake IRL is free, and he still has yet to do that.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.