Topic: I can no longer call myself a Catholic.
+Anonymous A — 7.3 years ago #52,566
Too many pedophiles.
If God honestly allowed this to go on for this long then maybe he's not worth worshipping.
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 15 minutes later[T] [B] #558,186
@OP
> Too many pedophiles.
Implying that for you there is an "acceptable number of pedophiles". Seek help. I shall pray for you.
> If God honestly allowed this to go on for this long then maybe he's not worth worshipping.
In all your years as a Catholic you never came across the concept of free will? Deary me what an impoverished education you had! I shall pray for you twice.
+Anonymous C — 7.3 years ago, 24 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #558,188
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You're a pedophile. You just don't care for the competition or you trade the children you abuse with the other priests.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #558,189
@previous (C)
> You're a pedophile.
Nice projection!
> You just don't care for the competition or you trade the children you abuse with the other priests.
Why is it that every time I return to this forum I seem to unleash a barrage of disgusting pent-up child rape fantasies within some of the users here? It's almost like you guys need me to be here to discguise your kiddie sex fiction as moral outrage!
·Anonymous A (OP) — 7.3 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #558,193
@558,186 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Kill yourself, pedophile.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #558,194
@previous (A)
> Kill yourself
No :)
> pedophile.
Nice projection!
+Anonymous D — 7.3 years ago, 58 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,198
@558,186 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Implying for you there is an acceptable number of pedophiles
Yes there is, that number is zero.
A much larger number: the millions of dollars the Catholic church spends actively defending child rapists.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,204
@previous (D)
> A much larger number: the millions of dollars the Catholic church spends actively defending child rapists.
Is there a particular number of times you're planning to repeat this claim before finally posting evidence for it, or are you going to just keep on demonstrating that you have no idea what you're talking about?
·Anonymous D — 7.3 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,211
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Let it be known from here forward that "Father Merrin" is a pedo-protecting shitposter who can't even do the simplest of google search:
https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130474&page=1 +Anonymous E — 7.3 years ago, 41 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,213
@previous (D)
The Catholic church went through great lengths to protect a Boston priest who was repeatedly accused of molesting children over a period of 30 years, according to recently released court documents.
"Even as he was repeatedly accused of molesting children over a period of 30 years, former Catholic priest John Geoghan was treated leniently and sympathetically by the highest officials in the Boston Archdiocese, who continually re-assigned him as a parish priest, the internal church documents said.
Although they were aware of complaints and allegations that he was sexually abusing and exploiting young boys at his churches for years, archdiocese officials, including two cardinals, did not remove the priest from posts where he had close contact with young children."
TG-Merrin will blather some crap about how that priest confessed his sins to some other priest and was absolved of his sins by the church.
Merrin believes a pedophile is one of Gods greatest creations. (He just will not admit that here)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 7 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,222
@558,211 (D)
> Let it be known from here forward that "Father Merrin" is a pedo-protecting shitposter who can't even do the simplest of google search:
>
> https://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=130474&page=1
Let it be known from here forward that "Anonymous D" has now passed the 1000 posts mark in which he has yet again failed to provide evidence of his claim that the Catholic church spends "millions of dollars actively defending child rapists". Despite having his trusty 'Google search' at his disposal :)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,223
@558,213 (E)
> The Catholic church went through great lengths to protect a Boston priest who was repeatedly accused of molesting children over a period of 30 years, according to recently released court documents.
>
> "Even as he was repeatedly accused of molesting children over a period of 30 years, former Catholic priest John Geoghan was treated leniently and sympathetically by the highest officials in the Boston Archdiocese, who continually re-assigned him as a parish priest, the internal church documents said.
>
> Although they were aware of complaints and allegations that he was sexually abusing and exploiting young boys at his churches for years, archdiocese officials, including two cardinals, did not remove the priest from posts where he had close contact with young children."
Thank you for copying the text of Anon D's Google search result and showing him the idiocy of his ways. Bless you my friend!
·Namebro !4xUfreuqD2 — 7.3 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,225
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Post objective proof of ONE of the MANy times the Catholic Church protected pedophiles
"I still don't see it so you're an idiot lol"
You have now proven yourself not only a pedophile but a spammer.
Do not continue to spam this board with your pro-pedophilic rhetoric.
+Anonymous F — 7.3 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #558,229
@558,222 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Let it be known from here forward that "Anonymous D" has now passed the 1000 posts mark
Can you prove this?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 52 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,233
@558,225 (Namebro !4xUfreuqD2)
> > Post objective proof of ONE of the MANy times the Catholic Church protected pedophiles
And which makes no mention of "millions of dollars" spent "actively defending child rapists".
> "I still don't see it so you're an idiot lol"
Yep, you've got it. Well done. Try posting articles that contain your claims in future.
> You have now proven yourself not only a pedophile but a spammer.
It's been killing you to stay anon this long hasn't it? Being made a fool of like this without being able to pull out your trusty "I will ban you if you keep laughing at my stupidity" card.
And so right on cue you switch to your mod name and start up the all-too-familiar namefag process of calling anyone who makes you look an idiot "a pedophile" and a "spammer" as a precursor to banning them.
> Do not continue to spam this board with your pro-pedophilic rhetoric.
Two things here:
1) I will continue to post on this board whenever I want. The only time I will stop is when either I decide to go back to Minichan, or you ban me for 'breaking the rules' (which, as everyone knows, in your case means "Inventing some rules and then claiming they were broken". So either ban me or else stop being a tedious drama queen.
2) Mix us your use of the very odd and rare adjective "pedophilic". It's making it so much easier to tell which of the anon accounts are yours. Use the more usual "pedophiliac" sometimes, just to cover your tracks better.
You have yourself a blessed day, my child :)
·Namebro !4xUfreuqD2 — 7.3 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,248
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Pedo Ragepost so large it extends past a single screen
And my work here is done! Already starting to feel like old times, eh bud?
+Anonymous G — 7.3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,254
@558,225 (Namebro !4xUfreuqD2)
Uh oh. Entitled preteen is gonna get angry and pull out his banhammer! Careful, that thing is the size of his ego!
·Namebro !4xUfreuqD2 — 7.3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,257
@previous (G)
And yet still I haven't pulled that
THANG out for anyone but the spambot...
·Anonymous G — 7.3 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,258
@previous (Namebro !4xUfreuqD2)
We're all just waiting to see you fail again, kid.
·Namebro !4xUfreuqD2 — 7.3 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,261
@previous (G)
Is it you who is waiting? =3
·Anonymous G — 7.3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,262
@previous (Namebro !4xUfreuqD2)
You tell me. How many IP's/UID's have spoken against you? You'd know better than me. All I know is at least one other person hates you. Whether or not it's multiple people is for you to know and for me to be happy with either way ;)
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.3 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #558,268
@558,248 (Namebro !4xUfreuqD2)
> > Pedo Ragepost so large it extends past a single screen
Says the raging pedophile currently operating Lord knows how many anon accounts right now and writing reams of text from each of them.
Nice attempt though to make it appear you're not obsessed - going anon was certainly a wily tactic! Just a pity you were too dumb to get away with it by not mixing up your use of the odd word "pedophilic" under multiple anon accounts, thus revealing how seriously you take this stuff :)
You have yourself a sweet and blessed evening my child. And for heaven's sake stop being a pedophile!
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.