Topic: I Endorse Brett Kavanaugh For Supreme Court Judge
+Eco — 7.7 years ago #51,824
Every time I turn on the news, there's another Witch Hunt of a poor, innocent man having sexual misconduct accusations levied towards him.
Nowadays, if you even slap a girl's ass in the workplace, playfully, that constitutes sexual assault. If you whistle at a chick walking down the street, it could be construed as sexual harassment. Certainly not the same standard that was applied back in my Grandfather's Day.
Stop trying to demonize all men as being sexual deviants or predators!
Nowadays, if you even slap a girl's ass in the workplace, playfully, that constitutes sexual assault. If you whistle at a chick walking down the street, it could be construed as sexual harassment. Certainly not the same standard that was applied back in my Grandfather's Day.
Stop trying to demonize all men as being sexual deviants or predators!
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later[T] [B] #553,645
@OP
> Every time I turn on the news, there's another Witch Hunt of a poor, innocent man having sexual misconduct accusations levied towards him.
Amen, brother! Amen. You should try being a Catholic priest in this day and age, there is literally no more wrongfully persecuted group on earth right now. False allegations and a hysterical witch hunt are nothing new to us.
> Every time I turn on the news, there's another Witch Hunt of a poor, innocent man having sexual misconduct accusations levied towards him.
Amen, brother! Amen. You should try being a Catholic priest in this day and age, there is literally no more wrongfully persecuted group on earth right now. False allegations and a hysterical witch hunt are nothing new to us.
+Anonymous C — 7.7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,646
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> You should try being a Catholic priest in this day and age,
Nine out of ten Catholic priests are pedophiles. People should pour buckets of gasoline on them and set them on fire and send them straight to hell.
> You should try being a Catholic priest in this day and age,
Nine out of ten Catholic priests are pedophiles. People should pour buckets of gasoline on them and set them on fire and send them straight to hell.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,647
@previous (C)
> > You should try being a Catholic priest in this day and age,
>
> Nine out of ten Catholic priests are pedophiles.
Post proof of this statement.
> > You should try being a Catholic priest in this day and age,
>
> Nine out of ten Catholic priests are pedophiles.
Post proof of this statement.
+Anonymous D — 7.7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,652
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
1.Catholic priests are more likely to be pedophiles than other groups of men.
2.The celibate state of priests leads to homosexuality and pedophilia.
3.The Catholic hierarchy has done nothing to address pedophilia.
4.The Catholic hierarchy hides and shreds documents to protect pedophilias.
5.Every Cardinal and Bishop has protected pedophile priests and moved them from parish to parish to molest children.
6.Catholic journalists have virtually ignored the pedophile problem.
7.Requiring celibacy limits the number of men as candidates for the priesthood, resulting in a high number of sexually unbalanced priests.
1.Catholic priests are more likely to be pedophiles than other groups of men.
2.The celibate state of priests leads to homosexuality and pedophilia.
3.The Catholic hierarchy has done nothing to address pedophilia.
4.The Catholic hierarchy hides and shreds documents to protect pedophilias.
5.Every Cardinal and Bishop has protected pedophile priests and moved them from parish to parish to molest children.
6.Catholic journalists have virtually ignored the pedophile problem.
7.Requiring celibacy limits the number of men as candidates for the priesthood, resulting in a high number of sexually unbalanced priests.
+Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 26 seconds later, 47 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,653
Well now we know without a doubt @OP is just a troll. When you start defending a very known abusive fuck, it's a little too obvious you're just trying to offend people. Go more subtle. I expected better from you, Eco! Just go back to rapping.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #553,657
@553,652 (D)
> 1.Catholic priests are more likely to be pedophiles than other groups of men.
>
> 2.The celibate state of priests leads to homosexuality and pedophilia.
>
> 3.The Catholic hierarchy has done nothing to address pedophilia.
>
> 4.The Catholic hierarchy hides and shreds documents to protect pedophilias.
>
> 5.Every Cardinal and Bishop has protected pedophile priests and moved them from parish to parish to molest children.
>
> 6.Catholic journalists have virtually ignored the pedophile problem.
>
> 7.Requiring celibacy limits the number of men as candidates for the priesthood, resulting in a high number of sexually unbalanced priests.
Post proof of those statements.
> 1.Catholic priests are more likely to be pedophiles than other groups of men.
>
> 2.The celibate state of priests leads to homosexuality and pedophilia.
>
> 3.The Catholic hierarchy has done nothing to address pedophilia.
>
> 4.The Catholic hierarchy hides and shreds documents to protect pedophilias.
>
> 5.Every Cardinal and Bishop has protected pedophile priests and moved them from parish to parish to molest children.
>
> 6.Catholic journalists have virtually ignored the pedophile problem.
>
> 7.Requiring celibacy limits the number of men as candidates for the priesthood, resulting in a high number of sexually unbalanced priests.
Post proof of those statements.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #553,658
@553,653 (E)
> you're just trying to offend people.
Settle down snowflake, he's expressing his opinion. Here's a radical thought for you to entertain: not every opinion that is counter to your own is from someone trying to "offend" you.
> you're just trying to offend people.
Settle down snowflake, he's expressing his opinion. Here's a radical thought for you to entertain: not every opinion that is counter to your own is from someone trying to "offend" you.
·Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,663
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
But I'm not offended. I'm giving him advice. You seem rather upset that I'd butt heads though. You okay, buddy?
But I'm not offended. I'm giving him advice. You seem rather upset that I'd butt heads though. You okay, buddy?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,665
·Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,666
+Dead !Pool..v42s — 7.7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,667
@553,657 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You can do your own research instead of turning a blind eye. Recently, there was a HUGE scandal in Pennsylvania involving multiple Catholic churches in the state. A bishop interviewed assured the viewers that during his tenure there was no assistance given to child abusers, and no cover-up had happened under his watch at least.
But when they dug through paperwork in the last 100 years, they found cases of priests that had been transferred after abuse allegations, to as far away as Las Vegas, cases of inmates released )after serving their time for sexual abuse charges) receiving monthly stipends, all from that single church.
You can do simple searching and find this information online.
You can do your own research instead of turning a blind eye. Recently, there was a HUGE scandal in Pennsylvania involving multiple Catholic churches in the state. A bishop interviewed assured the viewers that during his tenure there was no assistance given to child abusers, and no cover-up had happened under his watch at least.
But when they dug through paperwork in the last 100 years, they found cases of priests that had been transferred after abuse allegations, to as far away as Las Vegas, cases of inmates released )after serving their time for sexual abuse charges) receiving monthly stipends, all from that single church.
You can do simple searching and find this information online.
·Dead !Pool..v42s — 7.7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,668
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
The proof was in their own god damn paperwork.
Recent news article about the Pennsylvania horrors.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna900906
The proof was in their own god damn paperwork.
Recent news article about the Pennsylvania horrors.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna900906
·Dead !Pool..v42s — 7.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,669
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
What was the priest's punishment for that and the other rapes and molestations to which he admitted? Bishop Ronald Gainer of Harrisburg, in submitting the case to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, stated: “I believe the scandal caused by his admission of the sexual abuse of minor girls has been sufficiently repaired by acceptance of the penal precept.” In other words, Gainer did not want the priest defrocked and so, as punishment, The Congregation for the Doctrine of the faith decided, after reviewing his file, that the priest in question should lead a life of prayer and penance.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,670
@553,667 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> You can do your own research instead of turning a blind eye. Recently, there was a HUGE scandal in Pennsylvania involving multiple Catholic churches in the state. A bishop interviewed assured the viewers that during his tenure there was no assistance given to child abusers, and no cover-up had happened under his watch at least.
>
> But when they dug through paperwork in the last 100 years, they found cases of priests that had been transferred after abuse allegations, to as far away as Las Vegas, cases of inmates released )after serving their time for sexual abuse charges) receiving monthly stipends, all from that single church.
>
> You can do simple searching and find this information online.
Let's shoot for a bonus prize shall we? Special giveaway this week for illiterate dimwits and now it's your turn. You ready? Here goes: what part of anything you've just written proves any of the claims in the post I cited?
> You can do your own research instead of turning a blind eye. Recently, there was a HUGE scandal in Pennsylvania involving multiple Catholic churches in the state. A bishop interviewed assured the viewers that during his tenure there was no assistance given to child abusers, and no cover-up had happened under his watch at least.
>
> But when they dug through paperwork in the last 100 years, they found cases of priests that had been transferred after abuse allegations, to as far away as Las Vegas, cases of inmates released )after serving their time for sexual abuse charges) receiving monthly stipends, all from that single church.
>
> You can do simple searching and find this information online.
Let's shoot for a bonus prize shall we? Special giveaway this week for illiterate dimwits and now it's your turn. You ready? Here goes: what part of anything you've just written proves any of the claims in the post I cited?
+Anonymous G — 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,671
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
Shut your pole you pedophile
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,672
·Dead !Pool..v42s — 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,673
@553,670 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Literally nothing. I was explaining that you could do research, explained an event of recent occurance, and an opinion article about the subject so you would know what the basis of the charges were.
This here, tinychan, is not a place where I have a burden of proof. If you want to dance around my comments typing "proof proof, I need proof" well you're not in charge of anything here, just like I am not demanding proof that there is no sexual misconduct in the Catholic church. You are misdirecting the discussion and it is very obvious. Continue to post about how I am illiterate and dimwitted though, you must need something to do.
Literally nothing. I was explaining that you could do research, explained an event of recent occurance, and an opinion article about the subject so you would know what the basis of the charges were.
This here, tinychan, is not a place where I have a burden of proof. If you want to dance around my comments typing "proof proof, I need proof" well you're not in charge of anything here, just like I am not demanding proof that there is no sexual misconduct in the Catholic church. You are misdirecting the discussion and it is very obvious. Continue to post about how I am illiterate and dimwitted though, you must need something to do.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,682
+Anonymous H — 7.7 years ago, 55 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,683
·Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 30 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,684
@previous (H)
Nah, it's evolution as usual. He's just a failing kind who hasn't been eliminated yet from his shortcomings. He'll get his, don't you worry.
Nah, it's evolution as usual. He's just a failing kind who hasn't been eliminated yet from his shortcomings. He'll get his, don't you worry.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,687
·Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,690
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,693
·Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,694
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,695
·Anonymous E — 7.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,724
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.