Topic: Youre next TG

+Anonymous A — 7.7 years ago #51,721

Just kill yourself and get it over with. This catholic priest took the easy way out, you should too.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/french-priest-commits-suicide-in-church-after-assault-claim/ar-BBNziJq

+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 7 minutes later[T] [B] #553,108

It says he was "accused" of sexual assault, not that it was proven or even investigated. It's also amusing to me how readily you believe that this was suicide and not something more sinister. You're really quite gullible aren't you? Baseless hysterical witch hunts against priests are very popular nowadays.

This man will have been murdered by an ignorant mob and the local authorities have covered it up by manufacturing a sexual assault allegation out of nowhere. No true Catholic would ever commit suicide, because it is the gravest of all sins.

+Anonymous C — 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,109

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> It says he was "accused" of sexual assault, not that it was proven or even investigated.

... Weren't you also accused? No one's proven anything against you either. That doesn't mean OP's point is invalid lol. Doesn't change the fact you've been accused of pedophilia/sexual assault.

+Anonymous D — 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,110

@previous (C)
> > It says he was "accused" of sexual assault, not that it was proven or even investigated.
>
> ... Weren't you also accused? No one's proven anything against you either. That doesn't mean OP's point is invalid lol. Doesn't change the fact you've been accused of pedophilia/sexual assault.

You're a pedophile.

There I've accused you. Now read through your post again and see how that works.

·Anonymous C — 7.7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 32 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,111

@previous (D)
Well see, you're just trying to get under my skin. You're simply trolling. From what I've seen, Merrin has been seriously accused of these things. But I get your point. My point is that no one holds merit in this post. Not even Merrin.

·Anonymous D — 7.7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,112

@previous (C)
> From what I've seen, Merrin has been seriously accused of these things.

Just so I'm understanding you correctly, what's the difference between a "serious" accusation that has no proof and a non-serious accusation that has no proof? If we take the concept of evidence out of the criteria then at what point does a flippant accusation become a "serious" one? Is it how many times a person repeats it?

·Anonymous C — 7.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 56 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #553,113

@previous (D)
> what's the difference between a "serious" accusation that has no proof and a non-serious accusation that has no proof?

The answer's in the question. Neither hold merit. But one was brought on with serious concern, whereas the other was in jest. I'm not trying to fabricate tricks here. No riddles or anything. Literally just calling how I see it.

·Anonymous D — 7.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #553,114

@previous (C)
> > what's the difference between a "serious" accusation that has no proof and a non-serious accusation that has no proof?
>
> The answer's in the question. Neither hold merit. But one was brought on with serious concern, whereas the other was in jest.

Why would someone accuse another person with "serious concern" if they have no evidence to justify that serious concern? Why not just take life easier and downgrade it to a flippant accusation, since there is no material difference between the two?

·Anonymous C — 7.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #553,115

@previous (D)
I can't justify what other people do. I don't control everyone here lmao. Why are you grilling me so hard? All I did was call out Merrin for thinking he had more legitimacy than OP (which neither did). Sorry if I struck a chord there, buddy. No ill intent towards you.

·Anonymous D — 7.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #553,116

@previous (C)
> All I did was call out Merrin for thinking he had more legitimacy than OP (which neither did).

OP's point was that Merrin should kill himself because OP thinks he's a pedo. Merrin's point was that accusations without evidence are meaningless. You came in and said that Merrin's point "doesn't mean that OP's point is invalid lol" and that both positions are "without merit". In other words you think telling someone to kill themselves over an accusation that has no proof is as equally "without merit" as someone saying proof matters. I just find your position dumb is all but whatever, no need for you to get hot under the collar. Peace bud.

·Anonymous C — 7.7 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #553,117

@previous (D)

I mean, over analyzing me with a paragraph doesn't necessarily send a "no biggie, peace bud" vibe. I don't think I'm the one getting hot and heavy. But you're entitled to your own opinion.

+Syntax — 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,120

@553,108 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/

IN AN extraordinary communique to the world’s 1.2 billion Catholics, Pope Francis on Monday acknowledged the “atrocities” committed by pedophile priests and the church hierarchy that systematically covered up their crimes, recognized the inadequacy of efforts “to beg pardon” and admitted that the victims’ “wounds never go away.”...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/04/pope-francis-church-law-paedophile-priests-catholic-bishops

'''
Pope Francis reveals new church law to deal with paedophile priests

Move to remove Catholic bishops from office if they fail to sack known child abusers is response to demand by victims

Of course the problem is the Church's policy is to cover up and shred documents to make it difficult to locate the Pedophile offending Priest Bishops etc including Pedophile Popes (This includes all past Popes that helped with the cover ups)

And to how Suicide is supposed to be worse than Pedophilia? Totally Idiots The Catholic Church is

(Edited 54 seconds later.)

+Anonymous F — 7.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,126

@553,110 (D)
@553,112 (D)
@553,114 (D)
@553,116 (D)
You really went above and beyond to defend a pedophile, there. Must really make you think.

·Anonymous D — 7.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,129

@previous (F)
> You really went above and beyond to defend the principle of having evidence before accusing someone of a serious crime .

Thanks.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,130

@553,120 (Syntax)

And now for the coup de grace - walk us through what any of your senile rambling has to do with the story in the OP's link and the conclusion he drew from it?

And to this:

> how Suicide is supposed to be worse than Pedophilia

Suicide in Catholicism is connected with the sin of pride (the so-called 'unpardonable sin'). It is a sin against the Holy Spirit. Pedophilia is not. You should probably read a little about the subjects you waffle on about, that way you won't so often make an embarrassing fool of yourself. I bless you.

·Syntax — 7.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,140

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> It is a sin against the Holy Spirit. Pedophilia is not.

So you are saying Pedophilia is NOT A Sin against Jesus.

So you agree that Jesus approves of Pedophilia.

Oh and Pope Francis reveals new church law to deal with paedophile priests

That of course is because the Catholic Church has NO LAWS AGAINST PEDOPHILES

The Catholic Church has always helped Pedophiles remain Pedophiles and has promoted Pedophilia

That will be all!

(Edited 1 minute later.)

+Anonymous G — 7.7 years ago, 15 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,142

@553,129 (D)
Nice word-salad'ing, Merrin.

·Syntax — 7.7 years ago, 40 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,143

@previous (G)

Based on Pedophile TGComix reply I did some quick research - Turns out Pedophilia is not only approved by the Church and just a simple confession allows a Priest or Pope to Rape 1000 children - In fact only one confession is required by Church rules and all is forgiven

However IF any person says God/Jesus is a wanker - That cannot be pardoned - Just spitting on the sidewalk and saying God does not exist is much much much more worse than committing 1000 acts of Pedophilia.

Catholics Crazy as All Fuck

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,163

@553,140 (Syntax)
> > It is a sin against the Holy Spirit. Pedophilia is not.
>
> So you are saying Pedophilia is NOT A Sin against Jesus.

Dear Lord, you don't ever know what the Holy Spirit and the doctrine of the Trinity is do you?

Syntax, how many times do people need to point out that you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about before you start to realize you're a shockingly uneducated person? Hurriedly Googling and posting links that you only half-understand is not data and research. If you had gone to college you would know this.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,164

@553,143 (Syntax)
> I did some quick research - Turns out Pedophilia is not only approved by the Church...

See what I mean? You have absolutely no understanding of the things you read. It's genuinely saddenly watching an old man effectively soil himself in public like this and have no idea that people are laughing at his imbecility.

·Syntax — 7.7 years ago, 32 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #553,165

@553,163 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Holy Trinity = Father son and Holy Ghost

"The Christian doctrine of the Trinity holds that God is one God, but three coeternal consubstantial persons or hypostases—the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit—as "one God in three Divine Persons". The three Persons are distinct, yet are one "substance, essence or nature".

You said
"> It is a sin against the Holy Spirit. Pedophilia is not."

Logic 101 as learned at UCLA years ago.

You said Pedophilia is not a sin in the eyes of the Holy Spirit

I fully expect that when you Rape children, they soil themselves and you consider that a fringe benefit and probably beat more shit out of them in revenge

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,166

@previous (Syntax)
> Holy Trinity = Father son and Holy Ghost

And they are distinct from one other. Great Britain is England, Scotland and Wales. It does not follow that England is therefore Wales, and that the laws and customs of one apply to the other.

> Logic 101 as learned at UCLA years ago.

You should ask for a refund from UCLA because you have absolutely no clue how logic works.

I'm being totally honest with you now, I genuinely feel bad embarassing a senile old man like this. I can assure you I take no pleasure from it, but I say again - you are a shockingly stupid person. It's almost beyond belief how ignorant you are, and your constant running to Google to search for things you don't even understand and then posting them here is heart-breaking to see.

·Syntax — 7.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,168

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> You said
"> It is a sin against the Holy Spirit. Pedophilia is not."

Failure to address that and because you're most happy to Rape young Children in the name of the Holy Spirit

+Dead !Pool..v42s — 7.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,179

+Omen !!WhT+nWEl9 — 7.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,184

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)

Well said

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,189

@previous (Omen !!WhT+nWEl9)
> Well said

You said you had me on ignore Damien! You weren't by any chance lying were you? Because lying would hardly be the behavior of a "military police officer" whose duties involved listening to the testimonies of pedophiles (because that is totally what military police officers do), in between posting pornography to message boards that children are known to use and writing about "niggers"...

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #553,190

@553,168 (Syntax)
> > You said
> "> It is a sin against the Holy Spirit. Pedophilia is not."
>
> Failure to address that and because you're most happy to Rape young Children in the name of the Holy Spirit

There is nothing to 'address' because all facts have already been stated. Suicide is a sin against the Holy Spirit in Catholic teaching. Pedophilia is not (though it is still a horrendous sin). It is nobody's fault but yours if you have no idea what the doctrine of the Trinity is, beyond your hastily Googled half-understood links.

I should also remind you that pedophilia is not even punishable by law in America (child abuse is, but the mental act of lusting after children is not). At least the Catholic Church acknowledges it as a very grave moral sin. Your secular world doesn't even do that.

All of which is very good news for you Syntax, given your proclivity for prepubescent "eye candy". You have yourself a wonderful day now, and God bless!

+Anonymous J — 7.7 years ago, 2 days later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,292

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)

> Pedophilia is not a sin.

> (though it is still a horrendous sin).

Pick one.

(Edited 21 seconds later.)

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 52 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,294

@previous (J)
> > Pedophilia is not a sin against the Holy Spirit.
>
> > (though it is still a horrendous sin).

Which part is confusing you?

Yet another clueless atheist who doesn't understand even the most basic tenets.

(Edited 32 seconds later.)

·Und !9xA/AQJjBg — 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,295

@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Genuinely curious, I'm not looking to start shit. But could you explain how pedophilia isn't a sin against the holy spirit? Isn't the belief that any sin is equal to any sin, and therefore against God?

It's been a while since I looked into philosophy, so I may be remembering incorrectly.

·Analyst II — 7.7 years ago, 19 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,297

@previous (Und !9xA/AQJjBg)
TGComix argues that both Jesus and God are pedophiles. So in his view pedophilia cannot be a sin against the creator.

·Anonymous J — 7.7 years ago, 10 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,299

@previous (Analyst II)
And since the catholics argue that if you confess your sins of pedophilia, you are forgiven. And that explains why TG is catholic... He knows he can molest children and his catholic brothers will cover for him.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,301

@553,295 (Und !9xA/AQJjBg)
> Genuinely curious, I'm not looking to start shit. But could you explain how pedophilia isn't a sin against the holy spirit? Isn't the belief that any sin is equal to any sin, and therefore against God?

This part is key to your understanding of the answer:

"Isn't the belief that any sin is equal to any sin..."

No, it isn't. Sins differ in both degree and kind in Catholic teaching. For example there are so-called 'mortal sins', the gravest kind. Sins are mortal if they are intrinsically evil (murder, rape, perjury, suicide etc) and represent a person forfeiting Heaven and opting for Hell of his own free will. Then there are 'venial' sins, which are less serious (swearing, lust - which covers pedophilia - 'white lies', etc). These are sins that weaken the soul but do not kill the grace within. Venial sins aren’t in themselves deadly to the life of grace, but like minor infections in the body, if casually ignored and left untended, may deteriorate into a more serious condition. There are other gradations, but those examples will serve to illustrate the point.

And so suicide, being the self-willed annihilation of the Holy Spirit that dwells within us, is a mortal sin. Child abuse is a mortal sin. Any act of physical, mental, pyschological or emotional abuse of a child is a mortal sin. But pedophilia in itself is not (some even think pedophilia to be a mental illness, which is distinct from sin. There are certainly signs for example that Syntax is mentally ill, with his revealing fixations on raping and cannibalising children).

That's what I was explaining earlier to Syntax about the difference between Catholicism and secularism. Syntax hates the Catholic Church in part because we say that pedophilia is at least some type of sin. Syntax lusting after prepubescent "eye candy" is a sin to us. But to the secular world (to the US legal system for example) it is not. In a secular world, Syntax is free to keep on lusting after children, provided he doesn't harm them. Catholicism condemns him for it.

(Edited 6 minutes later.)

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,302

@553,297 (Analyst II)
> TGComix argues that both Jesus and God are pedophiles.

No he doesn't, but in any case follow your 'logic' here:

> So in his view pedophilia cannot be a sin against the creator.

Murdering a murderer cannot therefore be murder? Thieving from a thief is not theft?

I've said it before and I'll say it again - atheists are shockingly stupid people.

·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 7.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #553,303

@553,299 (J)
> And since the catholics argue that if you confess your sins of pedophilia, you are forgiven.

No they don't. There is far more to being 'forgiven' of sins than mere 'confession'. Still struggling with the most basic tenets I see.

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan