Topic: Fuck Fags, Feminists, and Ethnic Minorities
+Eco — 8.2 years ago #50,578
Anyone who challenges feminist, pro-diversity, or radical LGBQT thinking is automatically labeled a racist, misogynist, or homophobe.
The Social Justice Warriors (SJW's) dominate the universities, liberal media, and even parts of the corporate sector.
If you even make a joke about one of these minority groups, you could lose your job, face a massive scandal or lawsuit, and be branded a hate-monger for life.
It's time we take back free speech and fight against political correctness
The Social Justice Warriors (SJW's) dominate the universities, liberal media, and even parts of the corporate sector.
If you even make a joke about one of these minority groups, you could lose your job, face a massive scandal or lawsuit, and be branded a hate-monger for life.
It's time we take back free speech and fight against political correctness
·Eco (OP) — 8.2 years ago, 8 minutes later[T] [B] #543,814
And fuck their designated 'safe spaces', 'equal opportunity hiring' (I.e. Preferential hiring practices), and lobby associations.
Until I see groups that fight for the rights of straight, white males, I will have no sympathy.
Call me a bigoted, queer-bashing MRA... I don't really give a fuck, you can quote me on that.
Until I see groups that fight for the rights of straight, white males, I will have no sympathy.
Call me a bigoted, queer-bashing MRA... I don't really give a fuck, you can quote me on that.
·Eco (OP) — 8.2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #543,815
+chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 8.2 years ago, 23 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #543,889
+Anonymous C — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #543,895
·chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 8.2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #543,896
·Eco (OP) — 8.2 years ago, 45 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #543,898
@previous (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)
Well we ought to have unconditional free speech and hiring practices should be based on merits rather than skin color or sexual orientation
Well we ought to have unconditional free speech and hiring practices should be based on merits rather than skin color or sexual orientation
+Anonymous D — 8.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #543,899
@543,896 (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)
It's ok for niggers to call white people racial slurs, but let a white guy call a nigger a nigger, then all hell breaks loose.
And they says niggers can't be racist.
It's ok for niggers to call white people racial slurs, but let a white guy call a nigger a nigger, then all hell breaks loose.
And they says niggers can't be racist.
+Anonymous E — 8.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #543,900
Cry some moar, whiteboi.
·chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #543,905
@543,898 (Eco)
I agree
You do realise that between two identical CVs, one with a white sounding name and one with a non white sounding name, the white sounding one gets hella more call backs for interviews? There have been a million studies on this
end affirmative action for white people
I agree
You do realise that between two identical CVs, one with a white sounding name and one with a non white sounding name, the white sounding one gets hella more call backs for interviews? There have been a million studies on this
end affirmative action for white people
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.