Topic: Today is my 666th day here, since TC phoenixed.
+Anonymous A — 8.2 years ago #50,274
Gloire à Satan.
+Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 5 minutes later[T] [B] #542,345
Same, hail satan
+Anonymous C — 8.2 years ago, 33 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #542,346
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #542,347
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #542,349
@OP
@542,345 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
@542,346 (C)
Christ defeated Satan in the desert, when the Adversary unsuccessfully tempted Him with the unholy trinity of lusts (lust of the eyes, lust of the body, and lust of life). You are quite literally hailing a loser.
@542,345 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
@542,346 (C)
Christ defeated Satan in the desert, when the Adversary unsuccessfully tempted Him with the unholy trinity of lusts (lust of the eyes, lust of the body, and lust of life). You are quite literally hailing a loser.
·Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #542,351
+Anonymous E — 8.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #542,353
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,355
+🙈🙉🙊 !TGirlYJKXM — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,359
In respect to your religion, this one is for you!
🖕 Hail Satan! 👺
🖕 Hail Satan! 👺
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,362
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,363
@542,353 (E)
> Everybody loves an underdog.
An underdog is one who stands a chance of winning a forthcoming confrontation. Satan lost already in the Judean desert. That is not an underdog. That is a beaten loser.
> Everybody loves an underdog.
An underdog is one who stands a chance of winning a forthcoming confrontation. Satan lost already in the Judean desert. That is not an underdog. That is a beaten loser.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,365
@542,359 (🙈🙉🙊 !TGirlYJKXM)
> religion
Did Satan use that word? I had no idea he was being so serious.
> religion
Did Satan use that word? I had no idea he was being so serious.
+Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 8.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,366
@542,349 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Christ defeated Satan in the desert, when the Adversary unsuccessfully tempted Him with the unholy trinity of lusts (lust of the eyes, lust of the body, and lust of life). You are quite literally hailing a loser.
cool story
HAIL SATAN
> Christ defeated Satan in the desert, when the Adversary unsuccessfully tempted Him with the unholy trinity of lusts (lust of the eyes, lust of the body, and lust of life). You are quite literally hailing a loser.
cool story
HAIL SATAN
·Syntax — 8.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,367
@542,363 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Eye don't sea your Jewish Jesus' second cumming coming, so he must not be winning so much so much.
Eye don't sea your Jewish Jesus' second cumming coming, so he must not be winning so much so much.
·Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,369
@542,362 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
If there was no Lucifer, there would be no need for living God's way.
If there was no Lucifer, there would be no need for living God's way.
+Syntax — 8.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,370
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 10 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,381
@542,369 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
> If there was no Lucifer, there would be no need for living God's way.
Who said anything about Lucifer? Lucifer and Satan are not the same entity, dumbass.
Lol you don't even know what you're hailing. Whoever would have thought angsty 'Satanists' would turn out to be clueless dipshits...? :))
> If there was no Lucifer, there would be no need for living God's way.
Who said anything about Lucifer? Lucifer and Satan are not the same entity, dumbass.
Lol you don't even know what you're hailing. Whoever would have thought angsty 'Satanists' would turn out to be clueless dipshits...? :))
·Anonymous C — 8.2 years ago, 48 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,383
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Achktually:
> That's not canon! =͟͟͞͞( •̀д•́)))
> Mary~kun did NAWHT fornicate with Yahweh~senpai! (‡▼益▼)
> Jesus~chan wasn't nailed to the cross for being a bad carpenter, baka! (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
> It's not gay if the penis is feminine! UwU
You're like a broken record.
> Achktually:
> That's not canon! =͟͟͞͞( •̀д•́)))
> Mary~kun did NAWHT fornicate with Yahweh~senpai! (‡▼益▼)
> Jesus~chan wasn't nailed to the cross for being a bad carpenter, baka! (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
> It's not gay if the penis is feminine! UwU
You're like a broken record.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,384
@previous (C)
That's a lot of effort, but then I guess you have a lot of anger that needs to come out.
That's a lot of effort, but then I guess you have a lot of anger that needs to come out.
·Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,390
@542,381 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Well ok, then,
If there was no Satan, there would be no need for living God's way.
Well ok, then,
If there was no Satan, there would be no need for living God's way.
+Anonymous I — 8.2 years ago, 45 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,391
·Anonymous I — 8.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,392
did you touch my spaget?
> 88
> 88
·Anonymous I — 8.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,393
·Anonymous I — 8.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #542,394
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,397
@542,390 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
> Well ok, then,
>
> If there was no Satan, there would be no need for living God's way.
Oh this will be good. Ok, Mr "I Thought Satan And Lucifer Were The Same Thing" Sage (ironic name for a dumbass by the way) - why would there be "no need for living God's way" if there were no Satan? Come on Aquinas, dazzle me with your grasp of Christian theology. Why is "Satan" required for the 'necessity' of "living God's way"?
> Well ok, then,
>
> If there was no Satan, there would be no need for living God's way.
Oh this will be good. Ok, Mr "I Thought Satan And Lucifer Were The Same Thing" Sage (ironic name for a dumbass by the way) - why would there be "no need for living God's way" if there were no Satan? Come on Aquinas, dazzle me with your grasp of Christian theology. Why is "Satan" required for the 'necessity' of "living God's way"?
·Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 47 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,400
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)If there is only God's way, there would be no free will. You are so fond of throwing free will at atheists.
Describe the difference between Satan and Lucifer.
·Anonymous I — 8.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,401
·Anonymous C — 8.2 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,402
@542,400 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
Basically 'Lucifer' only made it's way into mainstream Western consciousness thanks to a mistranslation and the general consensus is it was most likely alluding to a king. Young Christians perpetuated the misnomer and it was adopted into the mainstream and has since become synonymous with the grate Satan thanks to the efforts of people like St. Jerome.
So merry Merrin's pedantry isn't entirely baseless... except that Lucifer is still used as a symbolic figure by multiple branches of Satanism (LaVeyan, Setian, etc), Christianity, and even sneaks it's way into other fringe faiths. For better or ill there's not enough pedantry in the world to keep language from evolving and mutating.
Basically 'Lucifer' only made it's way into mainstream Western consciousness thanks to a mistranslation and the general consensus is it was most likely alluding to a king. Young Christians perpetuated the misnomer and it was adopted into the mainstream and has since become synonymous with the grate Satan thanks to the efforts of people like St. Jerome.
So merry Merrin's pedantry isn't entirely baseless... except that Lucifer is still used as a symbolic figure by multiple branches of Satanism (LaVeyan, Setian, etc), Christianity, and even sneaks it's way into other fringe faiths. For better or ill there's not enough pedantry in the world to keep language from evolving and mutating.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,403
@542,400 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
> If there is only God's way, there would be no free will. You are so fond of throwing free will at atheists.
Dear Lord, you're all over the map here. Firstly, this is where your lack of understanding of who "Satan" is makes you unprepared to discuss this theme, because why do you think that if we remove Satan then there is "only God's way"?
And secondly, there was "only God's way" in the Garden. Did that hinder Adam and Eve's exerising of their free will? You seem to be using the term "only God's way" as some kind of synonym for "being unable to choose to go against God's will", and if you had even the remotest understanding of the Bible or Christian theology, you would realize why you are an idiot to think that. Or rather, shockingly uninformed about the things you're talking about.
> Describe the difference between Satan and Lucifer.
Anon C has given you a start. Begin with his or her post and then ask me if you're still confused by anything.
> If there is only God's way, there would be no free will. You are so fond of throwing free will at atheists.
Dear Lord, you're all over the map here. Firstly, this is where your lack of understanding of who "Satan" is makes you unprepared to discuss this theme, because why do you think that if we remove Satan then there is "only God's way"?
And secondly, there was "only God's way" in the Garden. Did that hinder Adam and Eve's exerising of their free will? You seem to be using the term "only God's way" as some kind of synonym for "being unable to choose to go against God's will", and if you had even the remotest understanding of the Bible or Christian theology, you would realize why you are an idiot to think that. Or rather, shockingly uninformed about the things you're talking about.
> Describe the difference between Satan and Lucifer.
Anon C has given you a start. Begin with his or her post and then ask me if you're still confused by anything.
+Anonymous J — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,404
Do satanists believe it is OK to have sex with children
·Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,405
@542,403 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
So god told them to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge? Or was it not God's intention, but Satan's.
> not answering much of the question, insulting comprehension of the asker, asking questions in the explaination
So god told them to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge? Or was it not God's intention, but Satan's.
> not answering much of the question, insulting comprehension of the asker, asking questions in the explaination
+Anonymous K — 8.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,406
@previous (Sage !Pool..v42s)
> So god told them to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge? Or was it not God's intention, but Satan's.
Why are those the only 2 options?
> So god told them to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge? Or was it not God's intention, but Satan's.
Why are those the only 2 options?
·Anonymous C — 8.2 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,408
@542,404 (J)
No, you're thinking of Catholics. See LaVey's 'The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth', #9.
No, you're thinking of Catholics. See LaVey's 'The Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth', #9.
·Sage !Pool..v42s — 8.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,415
·Anonymous K — 8.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,416
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.2 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,431
@542,405 (Sage !Pool..v42s)
> So god told them to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge? Or was it not God's intention, but Satan's.
Neither. But since this is something like the 17th time you've struggled to recognise and much less comprehend the concept of "free will" then I'm doubtful an 18th explanation will serve much use at this point.
> > not answering much of the question, insulting comprehension of the asker, asking questions in the explaination
When you claim to "hail" Satan, and then immediately show that you have absolutely no idea what "Satan" is, don't be surprised if people laugh at you for being a clueless retard. And when your questions make about as much sense as "If cheese is interesting, then what is the colour of anxiety?", also don't be surprised if you receive questions back to you.
> So god told them to eat the fruit from the tree of knowledge? Or was it not God's intention, but Satan's.
Neither. But since this is something like the 17th time you've struggled to recognise and much less comprehend the concept of "free will" then I'm doubtful an 18th explanation will serve much use at this point.
> > not answering much of the question, insulting comprehension of the asker, asking questions in the explaination
When you claim to "hail" Satan, and then immediately show that you have absolutely no idea what "Satan" is, don't be surprised if people laugh at you for being a clueless retard. And when your questions make about as much sense as "If cheese is interesting, then what is the colour of anxiety?", also don't be surprised if you receive questions back to you.
+Anonymous L — 8.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #542,432
eh I don't think this whole god business thing is even real
+Anonymous M — 8.2 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #542,488
itt:wade gets rekt
·Anonymous E — 8.2 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #542,495
+Anonymous N — 8.2 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #542,543
@OPenis
Newfag.
Newfag.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.