Topic: So now we find out moral degenerate Charlie Sheen sodomized 13-year-old boys
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago #49,443
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5062721/Charlie-Sheen-sodomized-Corey-Haim-13-set-Lucas.html
Living with porn 'stars'. Alcohol and drugs. Shamelessly flaunting his promiscuous lifestyle. And now it turns out he's also a sodomizer of young boys. What a filthy life that man has lived, shame on him. I pray he turns to the Lord for forgiveness and salvation.
Living with porn 'stars'. Alcohol and drugs. Shamelessly flaunting his promiscuous lifestyle. And now it turns out he's also a sodomizer of young boys. What a filthy life that man has lived, shame on him. I pray he turns to the Lord for forgiveness and salvation.
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
+Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 5 hours later[T] [B] #534,679
We all know you envy this man, TG. You don't have to rub it in our faces.
+Anonymous C — 8.6 years ago, 18 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,680
+Anonymous D — 8.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,681
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,683
@534,679 (Beebs !gINgerDI62)Why did a story about sodomizing children make you think of "envy", Beebs?
·Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,684
@534,680 (C)
@534,681 (D)
Butthurt is correct, however I was the one who took the picture. That's me ~4-5 years ago. I (for whatever dumb reason) thought it'd be funny to make reaction faces of my own face to reply to people on TC. I have no explanation lol.
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Because you're a pedo. Short and simple.
@534,681 (D)
Butthurt is correct, however I was the one who took the picture. That's me ~4-5 years ago. I (for whatever dumb reason) thought it'd be funny to make reaction faces of my own face to reply to people on TC. I have no explanation lol.
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Because you're a pedo. Short and simple.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,686
@previous (Beebs !gINgerDI62)Nice evasion of the question, nonce. The question was: who decided you're a pedophile and wrote that word on your picture (and by the way there are plenty more if you Google it)? Why are you being so skittish about addressing that?
+Anonymous E — 8.6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,688
·Anonymous E — 8.6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,689
@534,686 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)You've already admitted to being a pedo. Why are you trying to get others involved in your disgusting habit?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous D — 8.6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,690
+Anonymous F — 8.6 years ago, 25 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,694
+Anonymous G — 8.6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,695
hasn't corey feldman been saying this for years? how convenient that all these allegations start coming out the moment one of the big jews gets exposed.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,696
·Anonymous E — 8.6 years ago, 42 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,697
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Quit molesting children and answer this question.
Why are you trying to get others involved in your disgusting habit?
Quit molesting children and answer this question.
Why are you trying to get others involved in your disgusting habit?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.6 years ago, 23 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,700
@previous (E)> Why are you trying to get others involved in your disgusting habit?
Nice self-awareness question, Beebs. What's your answer to it?
·Anonymous D — 8.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,716
@534,696 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)> Socially frustrated "everyone is beebs" post.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+Anonymous H — 8.6 years ago, 40 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,720
It's old news. Charlie may not have been named before, but the story about Haim getting buttfucked on set has been around for a while, and everybody knew it was Charlie.
Can't really blame him. Sometimes you have a sexual emergency and there's no ready poontang around so you have to make do. Haim loved it enough to come back for seconds.
Can't really blame him. Sometimes you have a sexual emergency and there's no ready poontang around so you have to make do. Haim loved it enough to come back for seconds.
·Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[T] [B] #534,722
@534,700 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I think you're in a close second (behind quack) in terms of how mad you are.
I think you're in a close second (behind quack) in terms of how mad you are.
·Anonymous C — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,723
@previous (Beebs !gINgerDI62)
Can you answer the question though? Interested in it myself. There's some stuff on Google about you being a pedophile, who started it and why?
Can you answer the question though? Interested in it myself. There's some stuff on Google about you being a pedophile, who started it and why?
+Anonymous I — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,726
Haim is a faggot..
·Dante — 8.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,729
·Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,730
@534,723 (C)
Lolwut, the only thing I've seen implying I was a pedo was that picture. They made one of Morbid too. I'm assuming just to ruffle our feathers. But no. To answer the question, I don't remember specifically when it came about, nor have I ever seriously been accused of pedophilia. Not to my face, at least.
Lolwut, the only thing I've seen implying I was a pedo was that picture. They made one of Morbid too. I'm assuming just to ruffle our feathers. But no. To answer the question, I don't remember specifically when it came about, nor have I ever seriously been accused of pedophilia. Not to my face, at least.
·Anonymous E — 8.6 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,731
+Anonymous J — 8.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,738
@534,730 (Beebs !gINgerDI62)
I don't have a dog in this hunt dude, but there were some rumors about you back in the day. Apparently you'd posted some stuff you didn't mean to and a mod deleted it but shared it behind the scenes. Don't know if it's true but I think that's why there's stuff out there about you being a pedophile.
I don't have a dog in this hunt dude, but there were some rumors about you back in the day. Apparently you'd posted some stuff you didn't mean to and a mod deleted it but shared it behind the scenes. Don't know if it's true but I think that's why there's stuff out there about you being a pedophile.
+Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,742
@previous (J)
If the mod shared it behind the scenes, that would make him a pedophile too, along with everyone he shred it with.
If the mod shared it behind the scenes, that would make him a pedophile too, along with everyone he shred it with.
·Kinno Elms — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,745
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,753
·Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,755
@534,738 (J)
Lol you mean when I insulted Frank and they got butthurt? Because that's the only time I've had a post deleted.
Lol you mean when I insulted Frank and they got butthurt? Because that's the only time I've had a post deleted.
·Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #534,756
@534,738 (J)
Thread I posted in response to my insults being deleted: https://tinychan.org/topic/44750
Not trying to be skiddish or anything. But I mean, the proof is still on the site. Might as well provide it.
Thread I posted in response to my insults being deleted: https://tinychan.org/topic/44750
Not trying to be skiddish or anything. But I mean, the proof is still on the site. Might as well provide it.
+Syntax — 8.6 years ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,766
@previous (Beebs !gINgerDI62)
Thanks for the link - Was a good read of past tymes and how fucked up Cathy got
Thanks for the link - Was a good read of past tymes and how fucked up Cathy got
·Beebs !gINgerDI62 — 8.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,767
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,777
@OP
If child-molesting sodomites are forgiven by your lord, should they also be forgiven by society, their victims and the legal system?
If child-molesting sodomites are forgiven by your lord, should they also be forgiven by society, their victims and the legal system?
·Anonymous D — 8.6 years ago, 57 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,780
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,783
·Anonymous D — 8.6 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,786
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,788
@previous (D)
I agree with you. However, I'd like to hear what Merrin has to say on this issue. If his god forgives rapists, murderers and child molesters, should our court systems extend the same leniency?
I agree with you. However, I'd like to hear what Merrin has to say on this issue. If his god forgives rapists, murderers and child molesters, should our court systems extend the same leniency?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,828
@previous (K)
> I agree with you. However, I'd like to hear what Merrin has to say on this issue. If his god forgives rapists, murderers and child molesters, should our court systems extend the same leniency?
The function of a court is not to decide issues of salvation, absolution, redemption, and so on. Courts deal in legal and illegal. The question of absolution of sins is not something they concern themselves with. It's frankly disturbing you don't know this.
Therefore your question has no sense. If God does X, then should the courts do it also? Errr....not necessarily? Seems like such an obvious answer but it looks like you needed it spelling out for you. A court can condemn a man, even to the point of sentencing him to death, yet that man can still be forgiven by God/Christ if he truly repents on a spiritual level.
> I agree with you. However, I'd like to hear what Merrin has to say on this issue. If his god forgives rapists, murderers and child molesters, should our court systems extend the same leniency?
The function of a court is not to decide issues of salvation, absolution, redemption, and so on. Courts deal in legal and illegal. The question of absolution of sins is not something they concern themselves with. It's frankly disturbing you don't know this.
Therefore your question has no sense. If God does X, then should the courts do it also? Errr....not necessarily? Seems like such an obvious answer but it looks like you needed it spelling out for you. A court can condemn a man, even to the point of sentencing him to death, yet that man can still be forgiven by God/Christ if he truly repents on a spiritual level.
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,858
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
If you weren't frothing with buttrage, you might've noticed the operant word "should". I wasn't asking how the court functions, I was asking if you think that the court should follow god's example by forgiving every criminal who repents of their sins. It's unfortunate that I have to explain such a simple concept to you, but I'm willing to make allowances for both your lower intelligence and shrieking asspain.
So, once again: if child-molesting sodomites are forgiven by your lord, should they also be forgiven by society, their victims and the legal system?
If you weren't frothing with buttrage, you might've noticed the operant word "should". I wasn't asking how the court functions, I was asking if you think that the court should follow god's example by forgiving every criminal who repents of their sins. It's unfortunate that I have to explain such a simple concept to you, but I'm willing to make allowances for both your lower intelligence and shrieking asspain.
So, once again: if child-molesting sodomites are forgiven by your lord, should they also be forgiven by society, their victims and the legal system?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,862
@previous (K)
> I was asking if you think that the court should follow god's example by forgiving every criminal who repents of their sins.
Nice goal-post moving, but no you weren't. You asked if the courts "should" (I used your own word, why are you getting so bent out of shape here??) extend the same "leniency" (NOT the same as "forgiveness", the word you are now using) as God. And my answer was: not necessarily.
Oh, and this is a classic, even for you: . "I wasn't asking how the court functions, I was asking if you think that the court should follow god's example by forgiving every criminal who repents of their sins"
LOL!!! "I wasn't asking about court function, I was asking about the function of the court!" Cretin :))
But ok, to be as clear as possible for your uniquely dumb ass: if pedos are forgiven by God, should they be forgiven by society? Not necessarily. Because they have broken a social contract and therefore they should answer for that contract.
This is very basic political philosophy, you can read this in the work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. It's surprising your education level is so low that you're even asking these childish questions.
> I was asking if you think that the court should follow god's example by forgiving every criminal who repents of their sins.
Nice goal-post moving, but no you weren't. You asked if the courts "should" (I used your own word, why are you getting so bent out of shape here??) extend the same "leniency" (NOT the same as "forgiveness", the word you are now using) as God. And my answer was: not necessarily.
Oh, and this is a classic, even for you: . "I wasn't asking how the court functions, I was asking if you think that the court should follow god's example by forgiving every criminal who repents of their sins"
LOL!!! "I wasn't asking about court function, I was asking about the function of the court!" Cretin :))
But ok, to be as clear as possible for your uniquely dumb ass: if pedos are forgiven by God, should they be forgiven by society? Not necessarily. Because they have broken a social contract and therefore they should answer for that contract.
This is very basic political philosophy, you can read this in the work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. It's surprising your education level is so low that you're even asking these childish questions.
·Anonymous F — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,872
Thank Satan that man's law supersedes the law of any fairy tale character.
·Anonymous C — 8.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,873
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,877
@534,862 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> "I wasn't asking about court function, I was asking about the function of the court!"
Splitting hairs.
> "leniency" (NOT the same as "forgiveness")
Again, splitting hairs.
> Cretin
Pot calling the kettle black.
> if pedos are forgiven by God, should they be forgiven by society? Not necessarily. Because they have broken a social contract and therefore they should answer for that contract.
Why doesn't the covenant between god and humanity overrule the laws of man? Is the will of god inferior to the judgment of the court, you salivating inbreed?
> "I wasn't asking about court function, I was asking about the function of the court!"
Splitting hairs.
> "leniency" (NOT the same as "forgiveness")
Again, splitting hairs.
> Cretin
Pot calling the kettle black.
> if pedos are forgiven by God, should they be forgiven by society? Not necessarily. Because they have broken a social contract and therefore they should answer for that contract.
Why doesn't the covenant between god and humanity overrule the laws of man? Is the will of god inferior to the judgment of the court, you salivating inbreed?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,882
@previous (K)
> Why doesn't the covenant between god and humanity overrule the laws of man?
Because we live in a secular society, dipshit. You may have heard of a little thing called separation of church and state? Part of that whole granting man freedom of will concept?
I've met some dim people on here in my time but you take the cake, sir.
> Why doesn't the covenant between god and humanity overrule the laws of man?
Because we live in a secular society, dipshit. You may have heard of a little thing called separation of church and state? Part of that whole granting man freedom of will concept?
I've met some dim people on here in my time but you take the cake, sir.
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,908
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
So, the will of god is inferior to the judgment of the court, you revolting, vomitous mass?
So, the will of god is inferior to the judgment of the court, you revolting, vomitous mass?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,909
@previous (K)
> So, the will of god is inferior to the judgment of the court
In a secular society? Yup.
Phew! It took a while but we got you there in the end, didn't we? :)))
> So, the will of god is inferior to the judgment of the court
In a secular society? Yup.
Phew! It took a while but we got you there in the end, didn't we? :)))
·Anonymous K — 8.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,910
+Dead !Pool..v42s — 8.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,911
@534,882 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> Because we live in a secular society, dipshit. You may have heard of a little thing called separation of church and state?
Did you know there is prayer before the house of representatives meeting?
And also in the usa money has "in god we trust" on it? And that god is in the pledge of allegiance? What secular society are you talking about?
> Because we live in a secular society, dipshit. You may have heard of a little thing called separation of church and state?
Did you know there is prayer before the house of representatives meeting?
And also in the usa money has "in god we trust" on it? And that god is in the pledge of allegiance? What secular society are you talking about?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,912
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> Did you know there is prayer before the house of representatives meeting?
Yes.
> And also in the usa money has "in god we trust" on it? And that god is in the pledge of allegiance?
Yes.
> What secular society are you talking about?
The USA.
I'm going to save everyone some time and go out on a limb here - like Anon K, you have absolutely no idea what "secular state" means, do you? Or what is codified or required by US law at both a state and federal level?
> Did you know there is prayer before the house of representatives meeting?
Yes.
> And also in the usa money has "in god we trust" on it? And that god is in the pledge of allegiance?
Yes.
> What secular society are you talking about?
The USA.
I'm going to save everyone some time and go out on a limb here - like Anon K, you have absolutely no idea what "secular state" means, do you? Or what is codified or required by US law at both a state and federal level?
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
·Dead !Pool..v42s — 8.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,913
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
I'm going to save everyone some time and go out on a limb here - like Anon K, you have absolutely no idea what "secular state" means, do you? Or what is codified or required by US law at both a state and federal level?
Well, it means religion doesn't reign and people don't have to be religious [bit it seems to be important]
What do you mean codified and required by state law, in this context?
I'm going to save everyone some time and go out on a limb here - like Anon K, you have absolutely no idea what "secular state" means, do you? Or what is codified or required by US law at both a state and federal level?
Well, it means religion doesn't reign and people don't have to be religious [bit it seems to be important]
What do you mean codified and required by state law, in this context?
·Anonymous C — 8.6 years ago, 35 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,914
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> What do you mean codified and required by state law, in this context?
The religious observations and pageantry you mentioned aren't required by law. Hence the US is secular.
> What do you mean codified and required by state law, in this context?
The religious observations and pageantry you mentioned aren't required by law. Hence the US is secular.
·Dead !Pool..v42s — 8.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #534,920
+Anonymous N — 8.6 years ago, 2 days later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #535,016
@534,680 (C)
> What's the story behind that pedo pic of you?
Quack made it. He (for some reason) made that pic and a similar one for morbid to discredit them.
> What's the story behind that pedo pic of you?
Quack made it. He (for some reason) made that pic and a similar one for morbid to discredit them.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #535,090
Bumping, because it's hilarious how Dead didn't know what a secular society is :))))))
·Anonymous D — 8.6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #535,095
·Anonymous E — 8.1 years ago, 6 months later, 6 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,625
Bump
+On !Uvm54ORbmo — 8.1 years ago, 12 hours later, 6 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,655
@OP
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5062721/Charlie-Sheen-sodomized-Corey-Haim-13-set-Lucas.html
>
> Living with porn 'stars'. Alcohol and drugs. Shamelessly flaunting his promiscuous lifestyle. And now it turns out he's also a sodomizer of young boys. What a filthy life that man has lived, shame on him. I pray he turns to the Lord for forgiveness and salvation.
OP writes about child sexual abuse
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5062721/Charlie-Sheen-sodomized-Corey-Haim-13-set-Lucas.html
>
> Living with porn 'stars'. Alcohol and drugs. Shamelessly flaunting his promiscuous lifestyle. And now it turns out he's also a sodomizer of young boys. What a filthy life that man has lived, shame on him. I pray he turns to the Lord for forgiveness and salvation.
OP writes about child sexual abuse
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,658
·Teller of Truths !VOUplUn3fo — 8.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,666
·On !Uvm54ORbmo — 8 years ago, 9 hours later, 7 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,679
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8 years ago, 10 hours later, 7 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,687
+Anonymous Q — 8 years ago, 9 hours later, 7 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,702
@OP
It's all of Hollywood. If they're not persecuted for being conservative like Kevin Sorbo has been, they're a homo pedo.
I wonder if Sheen gave the boy his HIV that he got from gay sex.
It's all of Hollywood. If they're not persecuted for being conservative like Kevin Sorbo has been, they're a homo pedo.
I wonder if Sheen gave the boy his HIV that he got from gay sex.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·On !Uvm54ORbmo — 8 years ago, 5 hours later, 7 months after the original post[T] [B] #546,716
@546,687 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > > obsession
> >
> > thanks for confirmation
>
> :)
shameless
> > > obsession
> >
> > thanks for confirmation
>
> :)
shameless
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.