Topic: 'Scientists' actually believe this garbage...
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.7 years ago #49,322
Check this out:
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41640256
Among other gems in that article, we have the following:
"The outburst took place in a galaxy roughly a thousand billion, billion km away"
"Such remnants are incredible dense - a teaspoonful would weigh a billion tonnes"
Notice how wonderfully round all these figures are.
It's hilarious how many sheep just blindly believe this nonsense (a teaspoonful of matter weighing a billion tonnes, LOL!!!), because "a scientists said it, so it must be true!", yet they laugh at the historical fact of Christ's existence, and pooh-pooh religious faith because "there's no evidence for it!!!" Ask these same morons if they personally understand the first thing about the 'science' in that article, they of course won't, yet they accept it as fact because "it's science!". Again, sheep.
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-41640256
Among other gems in that article, we have the following:
"The outburst took place in a galaxy roughly a thousand billion, billion km away"
"Such remnants are incredible dense - a teaspoonful would weigh a billion tonnes"
Notice how wonderfully round all these figures are.
It's hilarious how many sheep just blindly believe this nonsense (a teaspoonful of matter weighing a billion tonnes, LOL!!!), because "a scientists said it, so it must be true!", yet they laugh at the historical fact of Christ's existence, and pooh-pooh religious faith because "there's no evidence for it!!!" Ask these same morons if they personally understand the first thing about the 'science' in that article, they of course won't, yet they accept it as fact because "it's science!". Again, sheep.
+Kimmo — 8.7 years ago, 31 minutes later[T] [B] #533,511
> are incredible dense> a scientists
+Anonymous C — 8.7 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,572
What can you expect from (((Christ-deficient degenerates)))?
You know who is behind these servants of Satan parading as "scientists", right?
Pastor Anderson can help shed some light if not.
You know who is behind these servants of Satan parading as "scientists", right?
Pastor Anderson can help shed some light if not.
+Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 8.7 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,607
Science is just our way of understanding our creator. Why do you refuse to believe that God gave us brains if we were never supposed to use them?
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,609
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> Why do you refuse to believe that God gave us brains if we were never supposed to use them?
Why do you suppose God gave you a penis if you're just going to cut it off?
> Why do you refuse to believe that God gave us brains if we were never supposed to use them?
Why do you suppose God gave you a penis if you're just going to cut it off?
·Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 8.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,610
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
Can either of us understand God's logic? Absolutely not, because we are not on the same plain as he is.
Can either of us understand God's logic? Absolutely not, because we are not on the same plain as he is.
+Anonymous E — 8.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,611
@533,609 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Silly faggots, dicks are for chicks.
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Silly faggots, dicks are for chicks.
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,613
@533,610 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> Can either of us understand God's logic? Absolutely not, because we are not on the same plain as he is.
So your question about why he gave us brains was rhetorical then? Ok thanks, that'll be all.
> Can either of us understand God's logic? Absolutely not, because we are not on the same plain as he is.
So your question about why he gave us brains was rhetorical then? Ok thanks, that'll be all.
·Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 8.7 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,614
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,618
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
Let me walk you through it slowly:
You asked why God gave us brains if not to use them.
I said: ok, and so what about that penis you want to cut off?
You said: who can understand God's logic?
I said: then why did you suggest God wouldn't give us something (a brain) if he doesn't want us to use it?
Do you understand, my boy? Or are you still struggling with this basic argument? I know you're not very bright ;)
Let me walk you through it slowly:
You asked why God gave us brains if not to use them.
I said: ok, and so what about that penis you want to cut off?
You said: who can understand God's logic?
I said: then why did you suggest God wouldn't give us something (a brain) if he doesn't want us to use it?
Do you understand, my boy? Or are you still struggling with this basic argument? I know you're not very bright ;)
·Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 8.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,619
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
It is futile to try and comprehend God's logic, but we can try through scientific pursuits. Reasons like why God would make someone female on the inside yet male on the outside remains a mystery. This includes why God makes pedophiles and other deviants too. God's reasons are unknown to us, but we can try to understand his methods. Also, you're getting a little testy.
It is futile to try and comprehend God's logic, but we can try through scientific pursuits. Reasons like why God would make someone female on the inside yet male on the outside remains a mystery. This includes why God makes pedophiles and other deviants too. God's reasons are unknown to us, but we can try to understand his methods. Also, you're getting a little testy.
+Anonymous F — 8.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,620
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U (OP) — 8.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,621
@533,619 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> It is futile to try and comprehend God's logic, but we can try through scientific pursuits.
Why, if it's "futile"?
> God's reasons are unknown to us, but we can try to understand his methods.
Why, if it's "futile"?
It looks like you don't understand the words you're using, my boy :))
> It is futile to try and comprehend God's logic, but we can try through scientific pursuits.
Why, if it's "futile"?
> God's reasons are unknown to us, but we can try to understand his methods.
Why, if it's "futile"?
It looks like you don't understand the words you're using, my boy :))
·Catherine !TGirlYJKXM — 8.7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,624
@previous (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
You're starting to get defensive again.
@533,620 (F)
Just trying to have a theological discussion, but Father Merrin clearly subscribes to too much dogma.
You're starting to get defensive again.
@533,620 (F)
Just trying to have a theological discussion, but Father Merrin clearly subscribes to too much dogma.
·Anonymous F — 8.7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #533,627
@previous (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
He's actually showing valid flaws in your statements in my opinion but whatever.
He's actually showing valid flaws in your statements in my opinion but whatever.
+Anonymous G — 8.7 years ago, 20 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #533,668
@533,619 (Catherine !TGirlYJKXM)
> It is futile to try and comprehend God's logic, but we can try through scientific pursuits.
Huh??
> It is futile to try and comprehend God's logic, but we can try through scientific pursuits.
Huh??
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.