Topic: God's not...
+Anonymous A — 8.9 years ago #48,693
God's not dead real
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
+Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.9 years ago, 7 minutes later[T] [B] #527,848
Can you prove this?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.9 years ago, 20 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #527,849
+Anonymous C — 8.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,851
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.9 years ago, 28 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,852
@previous (C)
I don't have to prove anything, the continued lack of "God's" presence should be proof enough.
I don't have to prove anything, the continued lack of "God's" presence should be proof enough.
+Anonymous D — 8.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,853
Agnosticism is a wonderful thing. No need to prove for or otherwise, and you don't have to deal with dicks making non-provable arguments. Fuck all y'all believers/non-believers.
+Anonymous E — 8.9 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,855
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.9 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,856
·Anonymous D — 8.9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,858
@previous (A)
Think about it. There's no solid proof for or against the existence of any deity. There's only "evidence" but it doesn't serve as actual, irrefutable proof. Why dwell on it when both sides rely on faith or the lack thereof as their whole backing? Not gonna participate in that bullsheit. If I see actual proof for either side, I'll happily give in. Until then, I'm focusing on things in my immediate environment.
Out of every single religious argument, there is only one *certain* thing. And that is that we can't be certain of anything.
Think about it. There's no solid proof for or against the existence of any deity. There's only "evidence" but it doesn't serve as actual, irrefutable proof. Why dwell on it when both sides rely on faith or the lack thereof as their whole backing? Not gonna participate in that bullsheit. If I see actual proof for either side, I'll happily give in. Until then, I'm focusing on things in my immediate environment.
Out of every single religious argument, there is only one *certain* thing. And that is that we can't be certain of anything.
(Edited 48 seconds later.)
+Syntax — 8.9 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,860
> Think about it. There's no solid proof for or against the existence of any deityPeople keep missing the fact that the Romans n Greeks n India Indians and American Indians had a slew of Gods/Goddesses
Then cum along dem Jews who wrapped them all up in one neet package and called it all just one God.
Few consider how this hurts economy because not so many people make replicas of anything but a bobble headed Jesus
·Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U — 8.9 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,862
@527,852 (A)
> I don't have to prove anything, the continued lack of "God's" presence should be proof enough.
Actually, you do have to prove it, since you are making the claim. Otherwise you look like an idiot who gets terribly defensive when people question your beliefs.
> I don't have to prove anything, the continued lack of "God's" presence should be proof enough.
Actually, you do have to prove it, since you are making the claim. Otherwise you look like an idiot who gets terribly defensive when people question your beliefs.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.9 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,864
·Anonymous D — 8.9 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,866
+Anonymous G — 8.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,871
maybe the atheist should be called christophobes..
the are secreted wanting to follow and worship christ..
source: my understanding of what the term homophobe is supposed to mean...according to the homos..
the are secreted wanting to follow and worship christ..
source: my understanding of what the term homophobe is supposed to mean...according to the homos..
·Anonymous C — 8.9 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,872
OP is way too edgy for me. I'm out.
·Anonymous A (OP) — 8.9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,874
+Anonymous H — 8.9 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,878
@527,871 (G)
You're the expert on what a homosexual is. You're also the expert on abandoning the navy.
You're the expert on what a homosexual is. You're also the expert on abandoning the navy.
·Anonymous D — 8.9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,879
+Anonymous I — 8.9 years ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[T] [B] #527,891
@527,860 (Syntax)
> People [...] had a slew of gods/goddesses
> (((who))) wrapped them all up in one NEET package and called it all just one reverse dog.
> Few consider how this hurt$ economy
Exactly right, introducing a monotheistic god actually created a power vacuum and I think we all know what filled it.
> People [...] had a slew of gods/goddesses
> (((who))) wrapped them all up in one NEET package and called it all just one reverse dog.
> Few consider how this hurt$ economy
Exactly right, introducing a monotheistic god actually created a power vacuum and I think we all know what filled it.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.