Topic: What are your opinions on peaceful protesting?
+Anonymous A — 9.1 years ago #48,214
+Syntax — 9.1 years ago, 30 minutes later[T] [B] #523,216
There is one protester who should have spend a couple3 years in gym prior to that protesting.Now just wait for that Homo Anon who gets a hissy fit when I post a quality image of a gal who might not be fully clothed.
+Anonymous C — 9.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #523,217
+Anonymous D — 9.1 years ago, 7 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #523,218
·Anonymous C — 9.1 years ago, 52 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #523,219
·Syntax — 9.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #523,220
@previous (C)The only thing you have left in Ur faggot life is hanging around waiting for anyone to post the image of a woman without a full Hijab.
You may now return to chowing down on your boyfriends asshole.
·Anonymous C — 9.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #523,221
@previous (Syntax)
> chowing down on your boyfriends asshole
But I already have a wife, so no need for that. And before you mention it (because you're obsessed with trannies for some reason) she's not a tranny.
So what woman do you yourself have, Syntax? A man who projects gayness onto others surely has a good history with women, right?
But no, your wife divorced you and took your money + daughter, you only show up in cringeworthy pictures dancing with women who could be old enough to be your grand daughter, and you spend most of your time chatting with young men.
Sad to say, but unfortunately there no longer will be a woman in your life if you just sit here in an obscure forum projecting gayness onto others and posting nude pictures of women. It's fine when kids or middle aged men do that, but for someone who is 74 years old, it's quite sad.
Toodles
> chowing down on your boyfriends asshole
But I already have a wife, so no need for that. And before you mention it (because you're obsessed with trannies for some reason) she's not a tranny.
So what woman do you yourself have, Syntax? A man who projects gayness onto others surely has a good history with women, right?
But no, your wife divorced you and took your money + daughter, you only show up in cringeworthy pictures dancing with women who could be old enough to be your grand daughter, and you spend most of your time chatting with young men.
Sad to say, but unfortunately there no longer will be a woman in your life if you just sit here in an obscure forum projecting gayness onto others and posting nude pictures of women. It's fine when kids or middle aged men do that, but for someone who is 74 years old, it's quite sad.
Toodles
(Edited 1 minute later.)
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.1 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #523,224
@523,218 (D)
> calls someone a fag
> posts a minion gif complete with memecenter watermark
Seems you didn't think this plan through as well as you thought you did.
@523,216 (Syntax)
> There is one protester who should have spend a couple3 years in gym prior to that protesting.
I disagree.
> calls someone a fag
> posts a minion gif complete with memecenter watermark
Seems you didn't think this plan through as well as you thought you did.
@523,216 (Syntax)
> There is one protester who should have spend a couple3 years in gym prior to that protesting.
I disagree.
+Anonymous F — 9.1 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #523,225
Protected by the first amendment. You don't support America, OP?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 9.1 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #523,265
+Anonymous G — 9.1 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #523,266
+Anonymous H — 9.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #523,268
@OP
> This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on nudity or sexual content.
Lewd.
RE: Pacifism as Pathology
Nonviolence is by nature counterrevolutionary and thus not useful for militant revolutionary tinychanians.
RE: RE: Radical flank effect
Radicals, including armed radicals, make moderate tinycomrades appear more moderate and less batshit crazy. This can be a net+ for the tinychan revolutionary movement, but radicals are neither 100% good or bad for the TC [revolutionary] Front.
Nonviolent protest has a place, but it's not the most useful form of direct action. To state the obvious the use of nuclear armaments is the best form of direct action.
TL;DR Nukes are the best tool for civil resistance.
> This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on nudity or sexual content.
Lewd.
RE: Pacifism as Pathology
Nonviolence is by nature counterrevolutionary and thus not useful for militant revolutionary tinychanians.
RE: RE: Radical flank effect
Radicals, including armed radicals, make moderate tinycomrades appear more moderate and less batshit crazy. This can be a net+ for the tinychan revolutionary movement, but radicals are neither 100% good or bad for the TC [revolutionary] Front.
Nonviolent protest has a place, but it's not the most useful form of direct action. To state the obvious the use of nuclear armaments is the best form of direct action.
TL;DR Nukes are the best tool for civil resistance.
·Anonymous B — 9.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #523,270
@previous (H)
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802002?hl=en
A video that contains nudity or other sexual content may be allowed if the primary purpose is educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic, and it isn’t gratuitously graphic. For example, a documentary on breast cancer would be appropriate, but posting clips out of context from the same documentary might not be. Remember that providing context in the title and description will help us and your viewers determine the primary purpose of the video.
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802002?hl=en
A video that contains nudity or other sexual content may be allowed if the primary purpose is educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic, and it isn’t gratuitously graphic. For example, a documentary on breast cancer would be appropriate, but posting clips out of context from the same documentary might not be. Remember that providing context in the title and description will help us and your viewers determine the primary purpose of the video.
·Anonymous H — 9.1 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #523,276
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.