Topic: There are people out there that legitimately feel bad for Christine Weston Chandler?

+キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM — 9.2 years ago #47,966

Besides this guy that is.

https://youtu.be/t8BeX4DsRAA

+Anonymous B — 9.2 years ago, 34 minutes later[T] [B] #520,681

Stopped reading at the mention of CWC.

And it's not Christine, it's Christian. Hes not a woman, and never will he be.

·キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM (OP) — 9.2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #520,686

@previous (B)

Rude.

+Anonymous C — 9.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #520,688

@previous (キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM)
Why don't you hook up with CWC. You have so much in common.

+Anonymous D — 9.2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #520,698

·キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM (OP) — 9.2 years ago, 15 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,821

@520,688 (C)
No thanks, maybe you can change her.

+Anonymous E — 9.2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,822

@previous (キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM)

> No thanks, maybe you can change her

HER? Fuck what? Her? That ugly son of a bitch is almost too ugly to be a him.

+Anonymous F — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,823

@previous (E)
Nice try, bigot

+Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,824

@previous (F)
I suppose it is ok with you to call this fruit an apple.

·Anonymous F — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,825

@previous (G)
I'd look into that cookie problem, bigot. It says you just joined this thread.

·Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,826

@previous (F)
I did just join this thread. Can you not see the + sign?

+Anonymous H — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,827

@520,825 (F)
Notice you could not think of a reply to Anon G question.

·Anonymous B — 9.2 years ago, 2 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,828

+Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,829

@previous (B)

·Anonymous F — 9.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,830

@520,825 (F)
My apologies, mistook you for E.

@520,827 (H)
I don't debate bigoted old fossils, thanks.

·Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,831

@previous (F)
You are the bigot here. A man is a man. A women is a women. A fire hydrant is a fire hydrant. Calling a fire hydrant a women, just does not make any sense. Put a dress on the fire hydrant and lip stick on the valve, changes nothing.

·キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM (OP) — 9.2 years ago, 3 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,844

@520,824 (G)

You know at one point in the history of English, all fruits were referred to as æppels. Bananas were once called æppels of paradise. The french name for an Orange, pomme de l'orenge, meant æppel of the orange tree.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn7ZaT3AgoU

So technically, that fruit *IS* an apple.

http://www.livescience.com/33991-difference-fruits-vegetables.html

@520,822 (E)
It seems I riled you up a bit.

(Edited 38 seconds later.)

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 56 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,858

@previous (キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM)
@520,831 (G)
> A fire hydrant is a fire hydrant. Calling a fire hydrant a women, just does not make any sense. Put a dress on the fire hydrant and lip stick on the valve, changes nothing.

So like Anon G's point

What you say to that one

·キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM (OP) — 9.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,860

@previous (Syntax)

I was commenting on Anon G's question specifically relating to fruit. Using words as a defense to defend the status quo is actually pretty weak when words change over the course of time. Like your picture, it cease being a fire hydrant and started becoming "The Homer Simpson Fire Hydrant".

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,867

@previous (キャサリン🗾 !TGirlYJKXM)

So back to Fruit I asked Google - Fruit related to gay's

By the 1930s both fruit and fruitcake terms are seen as not only negative but also to mean male homosexual, although probably not universally. It should be noted that LGBT people were widely diagnosed as diseased with the potential for being cured, thus were regularly "treated" with castration, lobotomies, pudic nerve surgery, and electroshock treatment. so transferring the meaning of fruitcake, nutty, to someone who is deemed insane, or crazy, may have seemed rational at the time and many apparently believed that LGBT people were mentally unsound. In the United States, psychiatric institutions ("mental hospitals") where many of these procedures were carried out were called fruitcake factories while in 1960s Australia they were called fruit factories.

I doubt Anon G was even thinking about Fruit as it relates to LGBT stuff

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #520,870

Oh and regarding the term Fruitcake - Remove the sex conation which I had no clue existed and it does describe CWC

+Anonymous J — 9.2 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #520,921

if cwc went on a killing spree to murder and rape all his trolls
id be ok with it
so i dont know if i feel sorry for him
but i think id be ok with him taking revenge

+Anonymous K — 9.2 years ago, 22 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,028

@520,681 (B)
@520,688 (C)
@520,822 (E)
@520,824 (G)
@520,827 (H)
@520,829 (I)
@520,858 (Syntax)
Same-fucking-fag. Mods should ban you for shitting up all these threads with your countless samefag shit posts.

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,030

@previous (K)
Yo

U credit Thee Thy or I for far2much

U paranoid and while we are at it please go to doc and have them roids treated.

·Anonymous K — 9.2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,031

@previous (Syntax)
Shut the FUCK up, retard....
Any one with a brain can see you posted at LEAST 4 times in this thread, and you know if you ask the MODS to back you up, you'd get exposed for your bullshit.

·The Asshole !j8WdfRT3xY — 9.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,034

@previous (K)
I bet you a hundred bucks, you'd be wrong, cause I'm anon B.

So Mods don't have to check. You are delusional.

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,035

@521,031 (K)

> if you ask the MODS to back you up, you'd get exposed for your bullshit

You dare to challenge Thee Thy or I?

I AGAIN Looked at the threads. And you are full of shit.

Now in all fairness to Thee. On occasion I see a post someone attributes to Thee. And I say ya I did that and then discover it was not Thy

Even a clone that got it so rite on I dared not even waste tyme doing a Clone post

Now SURE SURE SURE On occasion I will do a couple or even more Anon posts in a thread. IF U dare suggest that it wood be good to limit Freedom of Speak - I do not care for Commies

Oh and this one
https://tinychan.org/topic/47966#reply_520858

R U 100% Sure that reply was by eye?

·Anonymous K — 9.2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,040

@521,034 (The Asshole !j8WdfRT3xY)
> at LEAST 4 times
If he wasn't B, then at least 4 of the rest are him. I'm 100% sure.

@previous (Syntax)
> You dare to challenge Thee Thy or I?
Yes, I dare to challenge thee. You are full of shit, and you've been samefaging in this thread.

> R U 100% Sure that reply was by eye?
Yes.

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,043

@previous (K)

> I'm 100% sure.

U R 100%

+Anonymous L — 9.2 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,140

@previous (Syntax)
> Yes I dare to challenge thee
And syntax suddenly goes quiet...

·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #521,152

@previous (L)

You need glasses

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan