Topic: If Kim hits California with a nuke...
+Anonymous A — 9.2 years ago #47,825
...am I bad for hoping it hits Cardiff By The Sea?
+Anonymous B — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later[T] [B] #519,154
lol same
+Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #519,158
Once in Space the minimal energy path from North Korea to Pacific Coast USA is Seattle area.
·Anonymous B — 9.2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #519,159
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #519,160
@previous (B)
Betting WDC wood be Kim Dumb 1st choice. Or NYC WTC
For sure a major population center. 4Sure this is not my area of expertise Other Than a look at point2point shot from North Korea to USA.
I remember looking at Ocean current flows and wood Cardiff by the Sea get hit with Nuke crap from Japan. Oregon and Washington State beaches ended up getting that refuse.
Betting WDC wood be Kim Dumb 1st choice. Or NYC WTC
For sure a major population center. 4Sure this is not my area of expertise Other Than a look at point2point shot from North Korea to USA.
I remember looking at Ocean current flows and wood Cardiff by the Sea get hit with Nuke crap from Japan. Oregon and Washington State beaches ended up getting that refuse.
·Anonymous B — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 29 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #519,161
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #519,162
http://www.iflscience.com/environment/harmless-levels-fukushima-radiation-detected-california-coast/
WHOI states that the Fukushima radiation found near California exists in levels lower than 2 Becquerels per cubic meter. The EPA has deemed that levels as high as 7400 becquerels per cubic meter are perfectly safe for drinking water. Even if someone spent considerable time in the water for a year, the radiation dosage is 1000 times lower compared to getting a regular x-ray at the dentist. These levels are deemed much too low to to cause immediate adverse effects in humans who might swim in the water or marine animals who live in it.
Over time, however, the radiation levels could build up in larger fish who regularly consume smaller fish. Fish caught for human consumption in the Pacific have shown increased levels of radiation following Fukushima’s meltdown, but are still nowhere near the levels that should be cause for concern
WHOI states that the Fukushima radiation found near California exists in levels lower than 2 Becquerels per cubic meter. The EPA has deemed that levels as high as 7400 becquerels per cubic meter are perfectly safe for drinking water. Even if someone spent considerable time in the water for a year, the radiation dosage is 1000 times lower compared to getting a regular x-ray at the dentist. These levels are deemed much too low to to cause immediate adverse effects in humans who might swim in the water or marine animals who live in it.
Over time, however, the radiation levels could build up in larger fish who regularly consume smaller fish. Fish caught for human consumption in the Pacific have shown increased levels of radiation following Fukushima’s meltdown, but are still nowhere near the levels that should be cause for concern
+Anonymous D — 9.2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #519,164
Yes, you are. We'll need Syntax to fight the DPRK.
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.2 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #519,173
You're a bad person for wasting the wish on killing syntax rather than having the thing explode shortly after takeoff resulting in KJU taking himself out.
+Anonymous F — 9.2 years ago, 26 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,174
> You're a bad person for wasting the wish on killing syntax rather than having the thing explode shortly after takeoff resulting in KJU taking himself out.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
+Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,182
@519,164 (D)P.S. Unfortunately I'd be on the wrong beach.
@519,162 (Syntax)
How many Chernobyl incidents until we have mutant sharks?
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,190
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,191
·Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,192
@519,190 (Syntax)Attacks are pretty rare and they taste pretty grate, so I wouldn't say bad.
Maybe the m mutant sharks will develop a taste for human flesh... and scare people away from the beaches again. That'd be nice, even if we couldn't eat shark anymore. I'm willing to give that up.
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Not my initial thought, but I'd be okay with that.
Hopefully we'll see a bunch of sharks swimming around with slavshit rifles soon, sorta like Red Dawn x Sharktopus. Not sure that there's any downside to communist shark super soldiers.
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,193
@previous (G)
Usually the great whites take one very damaging bite and move on. Guess is they have not tried human flesh as tacos
Usually the great whites take one very damaging bite and move on. Guess is they have not tried human flesh as tacos
+Anonymous H — 9.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #519,209
·Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #519,557
@519,193 (Syntax)
We need to feed human tacos to grate whites kept in captivity. Then we can release them into the wild, but by 'the wild' I mean water parks.
We need to feed human tacos to grate whites kept in captivity. Then we can release them into the wild, but by 'the wild' I mean water parks.
+Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,599
sharks will not bother you unless you bother them..
+Dr. Sheldon Cooper !j8WdfRT3xY — 9.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,600
·Whale Biologist !CiiXdkMBx6 — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,601
·Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,602
@519,600 (Dr. Sheldon Cooper !j8WdfRT3xY)
I bet you love that show...don't you..
Your boy Sheldon is going to marry a dude...maybe you should send flowers to the wedding..
I bet you love that show...don't you..
Your boy Sheldon is going to marry a dude...maybe you should send flowers to the wedding..
·Whale Biologist !CiiXdkMBx6 — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,603
·Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,604
·Whale Biologist !CiiXdkMBx6 — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,605
·Dr. Sheldon Cooper !j8WdfRT3xY — 9.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,606
@previous (Whale Biologist !CiiXdkMBx6)
But Bert knows how everyone thinks and feels. He is, after all, an expert on everything.
But Bert knows how everyone thinks and feels. He is, after all, an expert on everything.
·Whale Biologist !CiiXdkMBx6 — 9.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,608
@previous (Dr. Sheldon Cooper !j8WdfRT3xY)
Well then, everyone put their hands together for, Bert! The filthy, homeless slob, who thinks he's better than all of you!
Well then, everyone put their hands together for, Bert! The filthy, homeless slob, who thinks he's better than all of you!
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
+Anonymous K — 9.2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,609
@519,606 (Dr. Sheldon Cooper !j8WdfRT3xY)
I don't know everything...But you find out quite a bunch of stuff in fifty years...about twice as much as some have by twenty five..
I don't know everything...But you find out quite a bunch of stuff in fifty years...about twice as much as some have by twenty five..
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous G — 9.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,611
·Anonymous J — 9.2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,615
@519,609 (K)
Where did you get your info on sharks don't attack unless you mess with them?
There's been quite a few cases where sharks attack when no one's bothering them.
Dumbass
Where did you get your info on sharks don't attack unless you mess with them?
There's been quite a few cases where sharks attack when no one's bothering them.
Dumbass
·Anonymous F — 9.2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,618
@previous (J)
There are beaches that are notorious for man-eating sharks, but bert only cares about USAmerica. The country that's been trying to shaft him for the past few weeks.
There are beaches that are notorious for man-eating sharks, but bert only cares about USAmerica. The country that's been trying to shaft him for the past few weeks.
+Anonymous L — 9.2 years ago, 56 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,622
@previous (F)
More like hes been shafting the USA. Living off the governments and handouts, and not paying his court payments.
More like hes been shafting the USA. Living off the governments and handouts, and not paying his court payments.
·Anonymous K — 9.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,628
@519,615 (J)
The ocean is a shark's turf..
Shark's...like gangs...could be protective of their turf..
why would a gang have a beef with you for being on/in their turf if you were not on/in it (bothering them)
The ocean is a shark's turf..
Shark's...like gangs...could be protective of their turf..
why would a gang have a beef with you for being on/in their turf if you were not on/in it (bothering them)
+chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 9.2 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,631
·Anonymous F — 9.2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,632
@previous (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)
Yep, and a certain percentage attack humans directly. Usually Tiger Sharks are the main offender.
Yep, and a certain percentage attack humans directly. Usually Tiger Sharks are the main offender.
+Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 9.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,633
@519,631 (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)
> usually when they mistake humans for something that's actually in their diet, no?
there's no mistake, humans are part of their diet.
> usually when they mistake humans for something that's actually in their diet, no?
there's no mistake, humans are part of their diet.
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,634
@previous (Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo)
Most cases I have looked at including a local gal who lost her arm to a great white a few years ago. One bite and the shark did not even eat her arm after tearing it off.
Most cases I have looked at including a local gal who lost her arm to a great white a few years ago. One bite and the shark did not even eat her arm after tearing it off.
·Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 9.2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,635
·chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 9.2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,636
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,640
@previous (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)
We all thought it was our black wet suites but tests of other colors in lab tests. Zebra like stripes have been tried but they worked only on one variety of shark which is not really know for any problems.
Around here we have so many Porpoises and for sure they wood go on the run quickly if Sharks were around
We all thought it was our black wet suites but tests of other colors in lab tests. Zebra like stripes have been tried but they worked only on one variety of shark which is not really know for any problems.
Around here we have so many Porpoises and for sure they wood go on the run quickly if Sharks were around
·chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 9.2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,642
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,644
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,652
@519,642 (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)
> do sharks have very good colour perception
http://www.sharks.org/blogs/science-blog/do-sharks-see-color
Each shark species was found to have only a single rod photoreceptor that captured a single wavelength of light, and no shark had more than a single cone photoreceptor. In fact, in 10 of the 17 shark species they were unable to find any cones at all! This means that that these shark species have little or no ability to discriminate colors. A complete lack of color vision is rare in terrestrial animals, which typically have two or three different cones and at least some degree of color vision. It may be common in the marine environment, however, as whales and dolphins are also thought to be color blind.
> do sharks have very good colour perception
http://www.sharks.org/blogs/science-blog/do-sharks-see-color
Each shark species was found to have only a single rod photoreceptor that captured a single wavelength of light, and no shark had more than a single cone photoreceptor. In fact, in 10 of the 17 shark species they were unable to find any cones at all! This means that that these shark species have little or no ability to discriminate colors. A complete lack of color vision is rare in terrestrial animals, which typically have two or three different cones and at least some degree of color vision. It may be common in the marine environment, however, as whales and dolphins are also thought to be color blind.
·Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,660
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,661
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,662
@519,652 (Syntax)
Sharks are known for having a keen sense of smell, so they probably don't need good vision.
Sharks are known for having a keen sense of smell, so they probably don't need good vision.
·Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 5 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,663
·chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i — 9.2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,664
·Syntax — 9.2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,665
@previous (chili dog !!heHjtrQ7i)The best theory so far but so far after several years not much proof are these designs
·Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,666
·Anonymous I — 9.2 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #519,668
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.