Notice: Home alone tonight?
Topic: news for ducks: US court rules dreadlock ban during hire process is legal
+Syntax — 9.6 years ago #46,196
The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled against a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Catastrophe Management Solutions, effectively ruling that refusing to hire someone because of their dreadlocks is legal.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/u-s-court-rules-dreadlock-ban-during-hiring-process-legal-n652211+Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 2 hours later[T] [B] #502,916
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 9.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,918
That's racist
+Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 9.6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,919
@previous (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
hair style is not a race
·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,920
@502,918 (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
That ruling my not stand the test of tyme. Case could go to US Super court one day
Employers in USA have a lot of latitude re what employee can n cannot wear.
Wood anyone want a girl like this serving you up Sharma
+Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug — 9.6 years ago, 11 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,926
@OP
Ducky still lives in Canada, markup symtax.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,927
@previous (Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug)
DIDNT say otherwise
·Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug — 9.6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,930
@previous (Syntax)
Actions speak louder than words, ma'am.
By implying this news affects Ducky, you're also insinuating that Ducky is affected by US law.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,932
@previous (Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug)
not SAYING that either - just saying news 4 ducky becoz ducky has dreads
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.