Topic: news for ducks: US court rules dreadlock ban during hire process is legal

+Syntax — 9.6 years ago #46,196

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled against a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Catastrophe Management Solutions, effectively ruling that refusing to hire someone because of their dreadlocks is legal.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/u-s-court-rules-dreadlock-ban-during-hiring-process-legal-n652211

+Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 2 hours later[T] [B] #502,916

+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 9.6 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,918

That's racist

+Nugget Syntaxroll !Uvm54ORbmo — 9.6 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,919

@previous (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)
hair style is not a race

·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,920

@502,918 (ducky !MwWb.dJjRc)

That ruling my not stand the test of tyme. Case could go to US Super court one day

Employers in USA have a lot of latitude re what employee can n cannot wear.

Wood anyone want a girl like this serving you up Sharma

+Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug — 9.6 years ago, 11 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,926

@OP

Ducky still lives in Canada, markup symtax.

·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,927

@previous (Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug)
DIDNT say otherwise

·Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug — 9.6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,930

@previous (Syntax)

Actions speak louder than words, ma'am.
By implying this news affects Ducky, you're also insinuating that Ducky is affected by US law.

·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 34 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[T] [B] #502,932

@previous (Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug)
not SAYING that either - just saying news 4 ducky becoz ducky has dreads

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan