Topic: Attention FuckAlms /On - Back when I said I "NEW" something re New Win 10 - But SEC tied my hands
+Syntax — 9.6 years ago #46,066
http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-to-pc-makers-lets-make-some-windows-10-arm-based-pcs/?loc=newsletter_large_thumb_featured&ftag=TRE17cfd61&bhid=23443430212404053870662049276296And skim this
http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-on-qualcomm-is-microsofts-attempt-to-drag-the-pc-into-the-21st-century/
My hands are still tied re saying more than what is published, nor do I want to end up like Martha Stewart did - I can say it really really sucks that Microshit + Intel took 4ever to try ARM (RISC)
Does not count that MShit did try once in crappy way using the wrong brand of RISC/ARM chip with failed Windows RT
Reduced Instruction Set Computing - Bottom line is - Less transistors for {the same computing power} So longer batter life & if say its desk top with AC power? Then you can end up with more computer power because less transistors also means you can increase the transistor counts for even more computing power - If you try that with Intel/Microshit X86 you need massive liquid cooling systems - With RISC you can get for gaming the same computing power with much less heat -
I should point out that RISC is The most often used CPU world wide - FAR exceeds Intel/MS X-86 - RISC CPU count is just over 60 Billion Chips world wide X-86 sales continue to decrease. Intel recently bought a company so they could learn how2
Excerpt from what as of today is on line - I can say there is one hell of a lot more to be said about this but I AM NOT FUCKING ALLOWED2 without ending up in Prison
Microsoft will bring a natively compiled version of Windows 10 to Qualcomm's ARM processors next year, plus an x86 emulation layer, designed to run on a new class of Windows 10 mobile PCs.
Microsoft is bringing Windows 10 desktop to Qualcomm's ARM processors, setting the stage for a new class of cellular-connected, Windows 10 mobile PCs.
And the icing on the cake: Microsoft will add an emulation layer to this version of Windows 10 for ARM that will enable x86/Win32 apps to run.
on December 8. At that conference for Microsoft's OEM partners, Microsoft demonstrated a version of Windows 10 running on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820 processor.
Microsoft is bringing Windows 10 desktop to Qualcomm's ARM processors, setting the stage for a new class of cellular-connected, Windows 10 mobile PCs.
And the icing on the cake: Microsoft will add an emulation layer to this version of Windows 10 for ARM that will enable x86/Win32 apps to run.
on December 8. At that conference for Microsoft's OEM partners, Microsoft demonstrated a version of Windows 10 running on Qualcomm's Snapdragon 820 processor.
The coming version of Windows 10 for Qualcomm is not Windows RT. It is a version of Microsoft's full Windows 10 desktop that's compiled natively to run on the Qualcomm CPU. It can run Universal Windows Platform apps. But it also will allow Win32 apps to run via emulation. According to Microsoft, existing peripherals and enterprise features that are currently supported in Windows 10 for Intel PCs will work on Windows 10 on Qualcomm devices.
When Windows 10 for Qualcomm be available? Microsoft officials are only saying in 2017. But my tipsters said the Cobalt emulation technology will be a Redstone 3 feature, which means Fall 2017. I'm assuming that means Fall 2017 for Windows 10 on Qualcomm, too.
"The concept to retail shelf timeline is normally two years," said Terry Myerson, the head of Microsoft's Windows and Devices Group, when I asked him earlier this week about timing. (It's not clear right now when the "concept" phase of this officially began.)
Another big question: Is this the official end of Wintel? The non-click-bait answer is no.
The general-purpose Windows 10 PCs in market today are all Intel-based. Microsoft is still working with Intel on extended reality/virtual reality, high-end gaming PCs, and new initiatives like "Project Evo," which Microsoft and Intel announced today at WinHEC.
Evo is a broad-reaching project that encompasses "all-new ways for devices to light up with the latest in advanced security, artificial intelligence and Cortana, mixed reality and gaming." One of the areas Evo addresses is "far-field speech communications" - the kind of technology needed for some kind of device or experience similar to Amazon Echo/Google Home - which will allow users to ask Cortana questions or make requests from across the room. (Hello, Home Hub?)
Microsoft is walking the Intel-ARM tightrope, by trying to make it clear that Windows 10 on ARM is meant for a specific class of devices, namely mobile PCs of the greater than 6-inch screen variety.
Microsoft will be offering Windows 10 on Qualcomm to OEMs across a variety of categories, including 6-, 10-, and 14-inch categories, [/border
When Windows 10 for Qualcomm be available? Microsoft officials are only saying in 2017. But my tipsters said the Cobalt emulation technology will be a Redstone 3 feature, which means Fall 2017. I'm assuming that means Fall 2017 for Windows 10 on Qualcomm, too.
"The concept to retail shelf timeline is normally two years," said Terry Myerson, the head of Microsoft's Windows and Devices Group, when I asked him earlier this week about timing. (It's not clear right now when the "concept" phase of this officially began.)
Another big question: Is this the official end of Wintel? The non-click-bait answer is no.
The general-purpose Windows 10 PCs in market today are all Intel-based. Microsoft is still working with Intel on extended reality/virtual reality, high-end gaming PCs, and new initiatives like "Project Evo," which Microsoft and Intel announced today at WinHEC.
Evo is a broad-reaching project that encompasses "all-new ways for devices to light up with the latest in advanced security, artificial intelligence and Cortana, mixed reality and gaming." One of the areas Evo addresses is "far-field speech communications" - the kind of technology needed for some kind of device or experience similar to Amazon Echo/Google Home - which will allow users to ask Cortana questions or make requests from across the room. (Hello, Home Hub?)
Microsoft is walking the Intel-ARM tightrope, by trying to make it clear that Windows 10 on ARM is meant for a specific class of devices, namely mobile PCs of the greater than 6-inch screen variety.
Microsoft will be offering Windows 10 on Qualcomm to OEMs across a variety of categories, including 6-, 10-, and 14-inch categories, [/border
While Windows 10 Mobile remains Microsoft's version of Windows 10 for anyone interested in building a Windows 10 phone, Myerson did tell me that "we're not drawing a sharp distinction between phone and desktop" when it comes to which version of Windows 10 device maker opts to use.
That said, the aforementioned emulation layer included in Windows 10 for Qualcomm is not currently designed to work on Windows phones[/border
And skim this
http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-on-qualcomm-is-microsofts-attempt-to-drag-the-pc-into-the-21st-century/
That said, the aforementioned emulation layer included in Windows 10 for Qualcomm is not currently designed to work on Windows phones[/border
And skim this
http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-on-qualcomm-is-microsofts-attempt-to-drag-the-pc-into-the-21st-century/
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
+Anonymous B — 9.6 years ago, 3 hours later[T] [B] #501,647
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,650
@previous (B)
How is that I've been posting this image here for years, but then as soon as I use it once or twice on minichan, suddenly other people will start using it over here?
How is that I've been posting this image here for years, but then as soon as I use it once or twice on minichan, suddenly other people will start using it over here?
+Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,651
@OPNice electrical engineer madpasta.
C̼̳i͙̯̹̻ao̱͇̦,̰ ̣̲T̲̜̤̘h̘͎̭͚͉e̺͕̜̣̲̺ͅ D̯͓͈̻ͅo̠c̰t͕̟͙̥͎̟̞o̮̭̙r̭ͅ.̰̱
+Anonymous E — 9.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,659
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,670
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 23 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,671
·Anonymous B — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,673
+Anonymous F — 9.6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,678
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 47 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,693
+Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug — 9.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,716
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #501,724
@previous (Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug)
Yes, but if you had gotten it from here, the filename would have matched the physical name. However, this filename is much higher than the physical name, indicating it was obtained elsewhere, and since the only places I've ever posted it are here and MC, this poster must have gotten it from MC.
Yes, but if you had gotten it from here, the filename would have matched the physical name. However, this filename is much higher than the physical name, indicating it was obtained elsewhere, and since the only places I've ever posted it are here and MC, this poster must have gotten it from MC.
·Bat Nugget is !GrateABlug — 9.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #501,753
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Sounds logical, not saying you're wrong. Just saying, I don't remember seeing it here.
Sounds logical, not saying you're wrong. Just saying, I don't remember seeing it here.
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #501,755
+Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #501,759
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)Yo I am in a super rush to get to a meeting but please review a PM conversation And if you can spare a few minutes jot me a PM re comment about why you could not spare a few seconds yesterday when you had a few minutes to spend in the thread.
OUT Of here for now
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #501,761
Ooooops for others Yes the prior Syntax is this SyntaxSo many Syntax's these days n I still get a few Syntax errors when doing my UNIX - But not often
ZoooOOOoooOOOOOOOOooooM
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #502,074
@501,671 (Syntax)See:
@501,647 (B)
C̺̗̯i̗̱͈̫̼̤ḁ͓̲͕͍o͉͚̼͖,̮̹͇̯̜ͅ ͈̲̲̖͇T̯̳̳̺̫ẖ̰e ̱̜͉̮̼̙̼D̠̗͕͕͇̻̝o͈͎͈c̻͙̞͕to̻͖͍̲̱̘̦r.̗͈
·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #502,078
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #502,163
@previous (Syntax)> being this obsessed with looking at integrated circuits
C̳̜̺̤̘͎̭i̱͈͈̤͎a̮o̟,̲̮̣͙͇ ̟̱T̰͎̗̥̹h͓̟e ͈̮D̝͔̺o̳̫̝̻͇̞c͓̼̟̤ṭ̰̜͇̼͇o̮̪̲r͍̲.̭̝̣̭̖͕̭
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.