Topic: Hillary might challenge election results
+Syntax — 9.6 years ago #45,984
+ducky !MwWb.dJjRc — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later[T] [B] #500,509
Kill the bitch
+Nega !34Kas0OdzM — 9.6 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #500,510
But why.
+Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #500,517
> Kill the bitch
+Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 — 9.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #500,518
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #500,527
@500,510 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
Read the article
Con man Donald Trump and his dumb as fuck supporters rigged the election.
Read the article
Con man Donald Trump and his dumb as fuck supporters rigged the election.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 14 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #500,540
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 29 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #500,544
@previous (Syntax)
lololol
Are you sure she doesn't need that money to study the harmful effects of wifi on cognitive development?
lololol
Are you sure she doesn't need that money to study the harmful effects of wifi on cognitive development?
+Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #500,545
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #500,548
+Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #500,562
clones of my resume interested in the past and present and future policy changes to the right direction
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #500,580
Looks like Jill raised 4 million.
https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount
https://jillstein.nationbuilder.com/recount
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #500,582
+Anonymous H — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #500,589
·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #500,592
@previous (H)
Trump tower is the only place that has a lot of great value for money to pay and display. I have a great time ahead of me myself and I
will send you the details
toodles
Trump tower is the only place that has a lot of great value for money to pay and display. I have a great time ahead of me myself and I
will send you the details
toodles
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,596
@500,589 (H)
Citation needed.
@previous (Syntax)
Not opening another one of your emails. You've sent me enough dick pics for one lifetime.
Citation needed.
@previous (Syntax)
Not opening another one of your emails. You've sent me enough dick pics for one lifetime.
·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,608
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,611
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,613
Challenged in Wisconsin
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9A5xO6q0nT0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9A5xO6q0nT0
·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,614
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,620
@500,611 (Syntax)
You know I can't accept that source as being reliable, (((Syntax))).
@500,613 (Syntax)
Hippies;dw.
You know I can't accept that source as being reliable, (((Syntax))).
@500,613 (Syntax)
Hippies;dw.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,622
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,623
+Anonymous I — 9.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,626
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,631
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 14 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,643
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 24 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,644
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,648
@previous (D)
Do you prefer breitbart http://www.breitbart.com/news/hillary-clintons-campaign-to-take-part-in-election-recount/ instead?
Do you prefer breitbart http://www.breitbart.com/news/hillary-clintons-campaign-to-take-part-in-election-recount/ instead?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,649
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,650
@previous (D)Nobody cares about your opinion either - point is con man trump and his dumb as rocks supporters will get what's coming to them
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,654
·The Detector !3yzc29zx8c — 9.6 years ago, 6 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,657
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 30 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,660
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,664
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,666
+Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 28 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,669
Trust me bitches: both parties cheat.
The bipartisan system is a joke, whoever created the electoral college should be shot and replaced with an algorithm that takes congressional districts into account for fair representation of voters.
Most importantly
Donald Trump and Bill Clinton hung out at Jeff Epstein's pedophile parties in the 90's, hereby nulling all other points of debate for the election.
Good nighty.
The bipartisan system is a joke, whoever created the electoral college should be shot and replaced with an algorithm that takes congressional districts into account for fair representation of voters.
Most importantly
Donald Trump and Bill Clinton hung out at Jeff Epstein's pedophile parties in the 90's, hereby nulling all other points of debate for the election.
Good nighty.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,670
·Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #500,672
@previous (Syntax)
Yeah but if she knew about his child rape hobby and didn't say anything then she is complicit, or too ignorant to be president.
Either way she's a hypocrite for trying to get julian assange arrested for fake pedophilia charges she fabricated...
Yeah but if she knew about his child rape hobby and didn't say anything then she is complicit, or too ignorant to be president.
Either way she's a hypocrite for trying to get julian assange arrested for fake pedophilia charges she fabricated...
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 3 days later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,110
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/11/29/judge-rejects-steins-request-hand-recount-wis/94644538/Seems like all 3 states are rejecting, but apparently she will sue them all.
·Syntax — 9.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,130
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,146
@501,110 (Syntax)
I'll save you some suspense. She'll keep up appearances about pursuing the recount, nothing will happen, and the green party will just pocket most of the money. Solid con, 10/10.
I'll save you some suspense. She'll keep up appearances about pursuing the recount, nothing will happen, and the green party will just pocket most of the money. Solid con, 10/10.
·Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,149
@previous (D)
Hahaha yeah because when your platform is about ending wall street money, you want to play along with the wall street system...
Have you heard any of Stein's speeches about wall street and capitalistic corruption?
She's not perfect, but I'm pretty sure choosing a life of hatred toward capital isn't going to make you suddenly love the evils you've exposed.
(If you're talking about Johnson's "party" then yeah haha he's going to take all your money.)
Hahaha yeah because when your platform is about ending wall street money, you want to play along with the wall street system...
Have you heard any of Stein's speeches about wall street and capitalistic corruption?
She's not perfect, but I'm pretty sure choosing a life of hatred toward capital isn't going to make you suddenly love the evils you've exposed.
(If you're talking about Johnson's "party" then yeah haha he's going to take all your money.)
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 50 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,154
@501,146 (D)
Actually, the recount in Wisconsin is still underway.
I said it before and I'll say it again - if con man trump loses wisconsin then it'll put doubt over all his wins
Actually, the recount in Wisconsin is still underway.
I said it before and I'll say it again - if con man trump loses wisconsin then it'll put doubt over all his wins
·Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,155
@previous (Syntax)
Both parties have been caught rigging poll booths and fudging results, there hasn't been a right choice for over 100 years
Both parties have been caught rigging poll booths and fudging results, there hasn't been a right choice for over 100 years
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 34 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,156
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,158
·Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,159
@501,156 (Syntax)
Dude you should be old enough to remember Nixon, and every democrat has votes from the dead.
I don't even need to mention the GOP's 50 year scheme to suppress minority voters:
"This will be the first presidential election in 50 years without the protections of the Voting Rights Act, which the conservative majority of the Supreme Court (including three members who voted to give the election to George W. Bush in 2000, and two more who worked on the recount on the behalf of the GOP)"
Dude you should be old enough to remember Nixon, and every democrat has votes from the dead.
I don't even need to mention the GOP's 50 year scheme to suppress minority voters:
"This will be the first presidential election in 50 years without the protections of the Voting Rights Act, which the conservative majority of the Supreme Court (including three members who voted to give the election to George W. Bush in 2000, and two more who worked on the recount on the behalf of the GOP)"
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 23 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,202
Michigan attorney files to have stop it
Might still proceed anyway:
Meanwhile in Wisconsin, Hillary got a vote while Trump lost more http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193374-report/
@previous (Namefag !CQywTu1T9w)
> Dude you should be old enough to remember Nixon, and every democrat has votes from the dead.
Nixon isn't running for president in the 2016 elections - so it's irrelevant
there's not one proof hillary is caught rigging the 2016 elections - NOT ONE
Michigan's attorney general announced Friday he would file suit to stop a recount requested by Green Party candidate Dr. Jill Stein.
"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter.
"Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request," Bill Schuette, a Republican, wrote on Twitter.
Might still proceed anyway:
Two Republicans voted Friday to prevent the recount, while two Democrats said it should proceed. A state spokesman says the statewide recount requested by Green Party candidate Jill Stein will begin Tuesday or Wednesday barring a court order.
Meanwhile in Wisconsin, Hillary got a vote while Trump lost more http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2193374-report/
@previous (Namefag !CQywTu1T9w)
> Dude you should be old enough to remember Nixon, and every democrat has votes from the dead.
Nixon isn't running for president in the 2016 elections - so it's irrelevant
there's not one proof hillary is caught rigging the 2016 elections - NOT ONE
·Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,208
@previous (Syntax)
My point was about the bipartisan system in general, you're arguing another topic.
Hillary's ties to wall street should be evidence enough: When you treat regular citizens one way and then turn around and act an entirely different way to rich bankers behind closed doors for 100,000$ a speech, you're not playing fucking fair and you don't represent the people.
My point was about the bipartisan system in general, you're arguing another topic.
Hillary's ties to wall street should be evidence enough: When you treat regular citizens one way and then turn around and act an entirely different way to rich bankers behind closed doors for 100,000$ a speech, you're not playing fucking fair and you don't represent the people.
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,212
@501,202 (Syntax)
> "Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request,"
<Republicans win initial count
<no don't recount it's expensive!
yeah, it's totally about the money
> "Today I am filing suit to stop @DrJillStein's frivolous, expensive recount request,"
<Republicans win initial count
<no don't recount it's expensive!
yeah, it's totally about the money
·Namefag !CQywTu1T9w — 9.6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,213
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Anyone bitching about taxpayer money in the US for the last 100 years doesn't understand what the Federal Reserve is or how much we spend on military and foriegn aid.
Anyone bitching about taxpayer money in the US for the last 100 years doesn't understand what the Federal Reserve is or how much we spend on military and foriegn aid.
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,238
@501,149 (Namefag !CQywTu1T9w)
Missed this comment yesterday, but deeds are grater than words, bud. Can't say I have much faith in Stein, but more faith than HRC or Trump, which isn't saying much.
Everyone under my roof voted 3rd party except for the cat because the polls are speciest.
Missed this comment yesterday, but deeds are grater than words, bud. Can't say I have much faith in Stein, but more faith than HRC or Trump, which isn't saying much.
Everyone under my roof voted 3rd party except for the cat because the polls are speciest.
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,260
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,263
Stein Website Claims Observer Found Evidence of Tampered Seals on Recount Machines
Five of the nine machines being used in the recount have tampered seals. Photos of two are attached. Photo of seal, followed by photo of serial number.
Five of the nine machines being used in the recount have tampered seals. Photos of two are attached. Photo of seal, followed by photo of serial number.
https://twitter.com/AlbertoLuperon/status/805088250708758528/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,264
@previous (Syntax)
How could this possibly be faked! Smoking gun! WEEWOOWEEWOOWEEWOORRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
How could this possibly be faked! Smoking gun! WEEWOOWEEWOOWEEWOORRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,357
Judge orders Michigan presidential recount to begin at noon Monday
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2016/12/04/judge-holds-sunday-hearing-michigan-recount-suit/94952646/
An update on Pennsylvania
Jill Stein says she'll 'escalate' Pennsylvania recount case after earlier plans to drop it
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/12/03/politics/jill-stein-drops-pennsylvania-recount/
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,427
Absentee votes are overwhelmingly for Hillary.·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,429
First Republican 'faithless elector' announces intent to vote against Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/05/faithless-electors-republican-electoral-college-trump
Christopher Suprun vowed to break ranks with Texas electoral college members out of ‘constitutional duty’, joining seven others in growing protest attempt.
A Republican presidential elector has become the first to announce that he intends to defect from Donald Trump when he casts his vote as part of the electoral college, vowing to try and block the president-elect from reaching the White House.
A Republican presidential elector has become the first to announce that he intends to defect from Donald Trump when he casts his vote as part of the electoral college, vowing to try and block the president-elect from reaching the White House.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/05/faithless-electors-republican-electoral-college-trump
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,519
Half of Detroit votes may be ineligible for recount
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/05/recount-unrecountable/95007392/
Michigan appeals court rejects Jill Stein's recount as unlawful
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/06/trump-schuette-michigan-recount-election/95048550/
Meanwhile in Nevada
http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/05/recount-unrecountable/95007392/
Michigan appeals court rejects Jill Stein's recount as unlawful
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/12/06/trump-schuette-michigan-recount-election/95048550/
Meanwhile in Nevada
A recount of a sample of ballots has begun in Nevada, at the request of De La Fuente. Clinton won in Nevada, and De La Fuente finished last. But De La Fuente requested and paid about $14,000 last week for the recount, which he called a counterbalance to the review sought by Stein in Wisconsin.
Nevada Secretary of State spokeswoman Gail Anderson said late last week that the recount of ballots from Carson City and Douglas, Mineral, Nye and Clark counties should be completed by Friday. If the sample shows a discrepancy of at least 1% for De La Fuente or Clinton, a full recount will be launched in all 17 Nevada counties. Clinton won the state by 27,202 votes over Trump, out of 1.1 million votes cast.
Nevada Secretary of State spokeswoman Gail Anderson said late last week that the recount of ballots from Carson City and Douglas, Mineral, Nye and Clark counties should be completed by Friday. If the sample shows a discrepancy of at least 1% for De La Fuente or Clinton, a full recount will be launched in all 17 Nevada counties. Clinton won the state by 27,202 votes over Trump, out of 1.1 million votes cast.
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,520
@previous (Syntax)
> which he called a counterbalance to the review sought by Stein in Wisconsin.
why?
> which he called a counterbalance to the review sought by Stein in Wisconsin.
why?
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,521
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Nevada was won by Hillary so he filed a recount against here - they won't find anything
Nevada was won by Hillary so he filed a recount against here - they won't find anything
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #501,522
@previous (Syntax)
right, so why pay another $14k for "counterbalance" recount when he obviously isn't going to win and it has very little chance of tipping the state the other way?
right, so why pay another $14k for "counterbalance" recount when he obviously isn't going to win and it has very little chance of tipping the state the other way?
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,533
TL;DR Jill Stein conned a lot of people out of their hard-earned monies.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,534
@previous (D)
Wisconsin already STARTED on the recount - the other two are up in air
All it needs is one state lost to put doubt on his presidency. That is certain
@501,522 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Most likely got help from republican donors
Wisconsin already STARTED on the recount - the other two are up in air
All it needs is one state lost to put doubt on his presidency. That is certain
@501,522 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Most likely got help from republican donors
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,535
@previous (Syntax)
gratelulz
Jill Stein's racket is incredible: Step 1: Cost the Dem the Election Step 2: wait for Trump panic Step 3: Bilk millions for recount.
gratelulz
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,536
@previous (D)
Except if you read the previous posts youll see that they still went on to sue the states to get the recount through.
Your article is outdated and is proven wrong by the events that came after
Except if you read the previous posts youll see that they still went on to sue the states to get the recount through.
Your article is outdated and is proven wrong by the events that came after
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,557
@previous (Syntax)
How's the recount going in Pennsylvania?
She'll do the minimum and pocket the rest, bud. So she got 7 million of the 2.5 she originally requested? damlol. Not a bad haul. Hope you didn't invest much into her shenanigans. :)
How's the recount going in Pennsylvania?
She'll do the minimum and pocket the rest, bud. So she got 7 million of the 2.5 she originally requested? damlol. Not a bad haul. Hope you didn't invest much into her shenanigans. :)
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,576
@previous (D)
A federal judge in Pennsylvania Tuesday afternoon granted Green Party presidential election candidate Jill Stein’s request for a hearing to decide whether a ballot recount is needed in the state, the Associated Press reported. The hearing was scheduled for Friday and marks the latest update in Stein's quest to challenge the 2016 election results.
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
·Anonymous D — 9.6 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,577
@previous (Syntax)
I'm sure she'll get it in by the 13th. Maybe it'll have shocking results like:
> The recount is more than 70 percent complete in Wisconsin, and Clinton has gained just 82 votes on Trump, who won the state by more than 22,000 votes. The Wisconsin Elections Commission reported Wednesday that 34 of 72 counties had completed their work and that the others are on track to finish by next week's deadline. More than 2.1 million votes out of the nearly 3 million cast have been recounted.
I'm sure she'll get it in by the 13th. Maybe it'll have shocking results like:
> The recount is more than 70 percent complete in Wisconsin, and Clinton has gained just 82 votes on Trump, who won the state by more than 22,000 votes. The Wisconsin Elections Commission reported Wednesday that 34 of 72 counties had completed their work and that the others are on track to finish by next week's deadline. More than 2.1 million votes out of the nearly 3 million cast have been recounted.
+Anonymous K — 9.6 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,605
As of right now, her recount has been called off in Michigan and she has to appeal the decision by the state supreme court to continue the recount. At this rate though, Wisconsin will be finished on time and it won't matter anyway.
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,622
Over in Michigan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/07/us/politics/michigan-recount-jill-stein.html
Hearing is in progress for PENNSYLVANIA on Friday.
@previous (K)
> As of right now, her recount has been called off in Michigan and she has to appeal the decision by the state supreme court to continue the recount.
Yep
The judge, Mark A. Goldsmith, who had ordered the new count to begin on Monday as part of a temporary restraining order focused on timing, removed his order late Wednesday. But the legal maneuvering appeared far from over. Representatives for Jill Stein, the Green Party’s presidential nominee, who has called for recounts in three states, said they intended to pursue other legal avenues in Michigan.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/07/us/politics/michigan-recount-jill-stein.html
Hearing is in progress for PENNSYLVANIA on Friday.
@previous (K)
> As of right now, her recount has been called off in Michigan and she has to appeal the decision by the state supreme court to continue the recount.
Yep
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 1 day later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,718
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,719
@501,557 (D)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jill-stein-recount-honesty_us_5849d5a5e4b0e05aded3094e
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jill-stein-recount-honesty_us_5849d5a5e4b0e05aded3094e
·Syntax (OP) — 9.6 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,771
Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House
The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.
The CIA has concluded in a secret assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win the presidency, rather than just to undermine confidence in the U.S. electoral system, according to officials briefed on the matter.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/obama-orders-review-of-russian-hacking-during-presidential-campaign/2016/12/09/31d6b300-be2a-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.ebad7e91d49a
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 9.6 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 weeks after the original post[T] [B] #501,785
@previous (Syntax)
> Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House
And here I thought the CIA was supposed to better at keeping secrets than the the general public.
> Secret CIA assessment says Russia was trying to help Trump win White House
And here I thought the CIA was supposed to better at keeping secrets than the the general public.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.