Topic: Would WWIII help the Forced Euthanasia Lobby's cause?
+Anonymous A — 10.7 years ago #44,025
It would devastate several world nations while leaving several of them intact for New Eden.
In b4 "The Doctor".
In b4 "The Doctor".
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 10.7 years ago, 10 hours later[T] [B] #482,280
@OPOP doesn't get to "inb4". Also, keep your tired, stale, repetitive, played-out, edgy, lame, boring shtick in one thread. Thanks.
+Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,281
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,286
+Anonymous D — 10.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,296
The answer is yes, of course. Although on the grater global scale more deaths to births are required for this to have a net positive impact on the movement. Forced sterilization should probably be the overt goal of FEL until the world is ready for the forced euthanasia project.
+Anonymous E — 10.7 years ago, 11 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,297
@previous (D)
I concur. Start by bringing back eugenics to get people used to the idea, and then move on to the larger scale once they are ready.
I concur. Start by bringing back eugenics to get people used to the idea, and then move on to the larger scale once they are ready.
·Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.7 years ago, 16 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,301
·Anonymous D — 10.7 years ago, 22 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,303
@482,297 (E)
We need a new word for "eugenics", too many negative associations there.
@previous (Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1.)
Precisely the idea, it'll ultimately be forced euthanasia by brainwashing, but we don't want 'them' to know that. If enough people accept euthanasia voluntarily, the forced bit will come in with those few fools that are still opposed to the idea. This is all contingent on a well orchestrated propaganda campaign.
We need a new word for "eugenics", too many negative associations there.
@previous (Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1.)
Precisely the idea, it'll ultimately be forced euthanasia by brainwashing, but we don't want 'them' to know that. If enough people accept euthanasia voluntarily, the forced bit will come in with those few fools that are still opposed to the idea. This is all contingent on a well orchestrated propaganda campaign.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 10.7 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,304
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 10.7 years ago, 13 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,308
·Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,310
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 10.7 years ago, 45 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,318
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)·Anonymous D — 10.7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,324
@OP
I'm very disappointed in you for pretending to be me or vice versa.
@482,310 (Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1.)
So here's the divide, do we go forth unabashed as the Forced Euthanasia Lobby... or do we go for the long con and convince people they want to be euthanized?
If we continue to use terminology like 'forcing'/'forced'... eventually we'll come across an outpouring of misguided 3rd wave feminists and tumblreinas who'll be trying to derail our true and honest campaign to save the Earth from ecocide because of 'force', 'muh patriarchy', 'rape culture', etc. Actually, wait, no, that's a grate idea. Garnering hate from feminists and SJWs is a grate way to get the word out about the movement.
Although we'll either have to tone it down or possibly amp up some things to get the appropriate reaction methinks. A jewtube channel and a/rousing speeches on our goals may be a better outlet when combined with other social media to encourage the proper sort of vitriolic responses to raise awareness about the cause.
Unfortunately 'The Council' seems to have dwindled and I'm not sure how many dedicated FEL members we have left at our disposal.
It's back to the drawing board about how best to move forward with plans for the future incarnation of TC4FEL.
I'm very disappointed in you for pretending to be me or vice versa.
@482,310 (Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1.)
So here's the divide, do we go forth unabashed as the Forced Euthanasia Lobby... or do we go for the long con and convince people they want to be euthanized?
If we continue to use terminology like 'forcing'/'forced'... eventually we'll come across an outpouring of misguided 3rd wave feminists and tumblreinas who'll be trying to derail our true and honest campaign to save the Earth from ecocide because of 'force', 'muh patriarchy', 'rape culture', etc. Actually, wait, no, that's a grate idea. Garnering hate from feminists and SJWs is a grate way to get the word out about the movement.
Although we'll either have to tone it down or possibly amp up some things to get the appropriate reaction methinks. A jewtube channel and a/rousing speeches on our goals may be a better outlet when combined with other social media to encourage the proper sort of vitriolic responses to raise awareness about the cause.
Unfortunately 'The Council' seems to have dwindled and I'm not sure how many dedicated FEL members we have left at our disposal.
It's back to the drawing board about how best to move forward with plans for the future incarnation of TC4FEL.
·Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,326
·Anonymous E — 10.7 years ago, 57 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,331
·Anonymous D — 10.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,338
@482,326 (Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1.)
Sorry, I forgot that form was only valid after a hashtag on twatter.
I meant TCfFEL or just TCFEL.
@previous (E)
An excellent point, E. Some strategic planning aside, on the surface there's no real reason FEL can't unabashedly push for forced euthanasia while stillmanipulating offering well reasoned arguments that may or may not convince people to commit suicide engage in voluntary euthanasia in accordance with the law. Now when it comes to being open about manipulating weak willed persons arguing for becoming an hero the peaceful cessation of life, the only problem isn't how the euthanasia enthusiasts sees it, but how the public sees us, so it may behoove us to move diplomatically about this to avoid lawsuits people misunderstanding what FEL is really about.
Sorry, I forgot that form was only valid after a hashtag on twatter.
I meant TCfFEL or just TCFEL.
@previous (E)
An excellent point, E. Some strategic planning aside, on the surface there's no real reason FEL can't unabashedly push for forced euthanasia while still
·Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.7 years ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,340
·Anonymous D — 10.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[T] [B] #482,342
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.