Topic: Why has no presidential candidate ever supported forced euthanasia?
+Anonymous A — 10.8 years ago #43,401
In before The Doctor.
+kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 10.8 years ago, 34 minutes later[T] [B] #473,830
because they're all pussies
+Anonymous C — 10.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,844
@OP
Good question, but I think Kook's answer is satisfactory. The glory days of systemic eugenics, righteous genocide, forced sterilization, and forced euthanasia appear to be largely behind us... and no candidate to date has had the cahoneys to pick up the torch and make the Earth grate again.
Good question, but I think Kook's answer is satisfactory. The glory days of systemic eugenics, righteous genocide, forced sterilization, and forced euthanasia appear to be largely behind us... and no candidate to date has had the cahoneys to pick up the torch and make the Earth grate again.
+RedCream — 10.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,851
I suppoart aboartion out to the 75th trimester. I admit my roal in that, although I am thankfully beyond the 75th trimester myself. I can not be aboarted, legally oar illegally.Who among you dares to admit membership in the Church of Euthanasia? I am fishing foar you to admit that roal if indeed it applies to you as specified.
+Dr.G Louie Ph.D !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.8 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,861
> because they're all pussies
+Anonymous F — 10.8 years ago, 28 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,862
@473,851 (RedCream )
> I can not be aboarted, legally oar illegally.
Let's meet face to face and I will prove that untrue.
> I can not be aboarted, legally oar illegally.
Let's meet face to face and I will prove that untrue.
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 10.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,874
+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 10.8 years ago, 9 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,878
If I had to venture a guess, I say it's because they're, well, politicians. They car not for the grater good, but solely for the lining of their own pockets.
+The Robot — 10.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,883
Beep bop boop
+Anonymous J — 10.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,891
@473,878 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)At the very minimum all politicians need this. Euthanasia of any type is counter productive.
·RedCream — 10.8 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,921
@473,862 (F)
> Let's meet face to face and I will prove that untrue.
I strongly suspect that yoar roal in that meeting would be to seek hoamoasexual activity.
REQUEST DENIED
> Let's meet face to face and I will prove that untrue.
I strongly suspect that yoar roal in that meeting would be to seek hoamoasexual activity.
REQUEST DENIED
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 10.8 years ago, 10 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,924
·Anonymous C — 10.8 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[T] [B] #473,929
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
I think what they were trying to say is that politicians need votes and that supporting euthanasia could be counterproductive to that end.
I think what they were trying to say is that politicians need votes and that supporting euthanasia could be counterproductive to that end.
·Anonymous F — 10.8 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #474,259
@473,921 (RedCream )
As a person suffering from autism and latent homosexual fantasies, homocream thinks that "abort" means "impregnate".
As a person suffering from autism and latent homosexual fantasies, homocream thinks that "abort" means "impregnate".
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10.8 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #474,263
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.