Topic: ATTN: Thelema, Sethians, Satanists, and occult practitioners of high grade and virtue
+Anonymous A — 10.9 years ago #43,056
Due to errors in Crowleyanity resulting from the Catholic doctrine, the dogma or hypothesis that the adept necessarily loses anything of the soul relating to the Nemesh or lower spheres is decreed to be false for purpose of dogma... there is a certain amount 'given' of an adept which naturally cycles, but the sorrow of Jesus is the image by which the idea's foundation is based - thus we are reinforcing Christian dogma and must emphatically endorse the idea that our own postulate, publically stated, will reduce the effect to some degree. As we use theory and hypothesis and account of visionary experience instead of dogma, this is a realization based on the experience of two adepts thought to be reincarnated who have similar issues.
Netzach, Hod, Yesod, etc. or whatever is part of the Nemesh or physical body but is also spiritual is still meant to be present, and no entity attempting to enforce either the Crowley doctrine or the image of the death of Christ should endeavor to continue the doctrine based on those statements alone. Religion being often a powerful and irrational force, this is a contribution to our religion(s) and to a certain extent (perhaps 100%) all religions capable of being governed by science rather than the passions of death. We hold certain truths in our individual minds and collective of opinion that we do not wish to suffer for charity, but rather see charity exist both where it is most needful and from where there is most abundance.
Dogma and the Word are Christian in thought and the system by which dogma is graded is not fully known, but is partially based on grade of the adept judging - Jesus is very real to some people, it may be based on his own attempt to escape the Bible as a sort of accessory to a black magic ritual.... Hmm...
In any way, by way of metaphor therein and mysterious forces, or in realization that it may account for actual reality, we must emphasize that our doctrine that the whole of the Self or soul forms some level of personal private property over it's own faculties and the degree to which they are spread or cloned depends much on an evolving Osirian/Horan/Thelemic idea of "Christ Undying" - or the merging of the Nazarene and Mohammed in the face of the idea that it is the injustice of his death which pollutes the religion, and thus lead to the other prophet - who may be the same individual or perhaps St. John.
In this fashion I need remind you that this is pro-temp equal or greater in authority to the 'chewing up theory' of Choronzon of the Nemesh etc. and we want to emphasize a certain correctness while avoiding all fault of Catholic-related dogma.
The reborn, emphatically, do have rights, whether after assassination or natural death and return. And the sorrow of Buddha may yet turn to joy.
Netzach, Hod, Yesod, etc. or whatever is part of the Nemesh or physical body but is also spiritual is still meant to be present, and no entity attempting to enforce either the Crowley doctrine or the image of the death of Christ should endeavor to continue the doctrine based on those statements alone. Religion being often a powerful and irrational force, this is a contribution to our religion(s) and to a certain extent (perhaps 100%) all religions capable of being governed by science rather than the passions of death. We hold certain truths in our individual minds and collective of opinion that we do not wish to suffer for charity, but rather see charity exist both where it is most needful and from where there is most abundance.
Dogma and the Word are Christian in thought and the system by which dogma is graded is not fully known, but is partially based on grade of the adept judging - Jesus is very real to some people, it may be based on his own attempt to escape the Bible as a sort of accessory to a black magic ritual.... Hmm...
In any way, by way of metaphor therein and mysterious forces, or in realization that it may account for actual reality, we must emphasize that our doctrine that the whole of the Self or soul forms some level of personal private property over it's own faculties and the degree to which they are spread or cloned depends much on an evolving Osirian/Horan/Thelemic idea of "Christ Undying" - or the merging of the Nazarene and Mohammed in the face of the idea that it is the injustice of his death which pollutes the religion, and thus lead to the other prophet - who may be the same individual or perhaps St. John.
In this fashion I need remind you that this is pro-temp equal or greater in authority to the 'chewing up theory' of Choronzon of the Nemesh etc. and we want to emphasize a certain correctness while avoiding all fault of Catholic-related dogma.
The reborn, emphatically, do have rights, whether after assassination or natural death and return. And the sorrow of Buddha may yet turn to joy.
+Negi Springfield !!fR1IwgdiF — 10.9 years ago, 1 hour later[T] [B] #468,994
tl;dr+Dr.G Louie PhD. !uSk4BCgU1. — 10.9 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #468,995
@OP@previous (Negi Springfield !!fR1IwgdiF)
You heathens, I wouldn't want to be you when 4/20 rolls around.
+The Robot — 10.9 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #468,996
Beep bop boop
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 10.9 years ago, 47 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #469,006
+Anonymous F — 10.9 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #469,042
@OP
> In any way, by way of metaphor therein and mysterious forces, or in realization that it may account for actual reality, we must emphasize that our doctrine that the whole of the Self or soul forms some level of personal private property over it's own faculties and the degree to which they are spread or cloned depends much on an evolving Osirian/Horan/Thelemic idea of "Christ Undying" - or the merging of the Nazarene and Mohammed in the face of the idea that it is the injustice of his death which pollutes the religion, and thus lead to the other prophet - who may be the same individual or perhaps St. John.
I would like to share the near-death experience that I had while trying to read that run-on-sentence.
Is... is there a main verb in that?
More to the point, where was this going? I didn't see an actual premise in this other than "those other guys are probably wrong."
> In any way, by way of metaphor therein and mysterious forces, or in realization that it may account for actual reality, we must emphasize that our doctrine that the whole of the Self or soul forms some level of personal private property over it's own faculties and the degree to which they are spread or cloned depends much on an evolving Osirian/Horan/Thelemic idea of "Christ Undying" - or the merging of the Nazarene and Mohammed in the face of the idea that it is the injustice of his death which pollutes the religion, and thus lead to the other prophet - who may be the same individual or perhaps St. John.
I would like to share the near-death experience that I had while trying to read that run-on-sentence.
Is... is there a main verb in that?
More to the point, where was this going? I didn't see an actual premise in this other than "those other guys are probably wrong."
·Anonymous A (OP) — 10.9 years ago, 19 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #469,045
@previous (F)
Nemesh = netzach, hod, yesod, "inner";
These "decay' - but the origin of the vision is questionable. It might be better to reconsider the idea as only a postulate.
Nemesh = netzach, hod, yesod, "inner";
These "decay' - but the origin of the vision is questionable. It might be better to reconsider the idea as only a postulate.
·Anonymous F — 10.9 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #469,047
+Anonymous G — 10.9 years ago, 38 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #469,051
know
won
vehicles
won
vehicles
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.