Topic: Kook, why do you hate trannies?
+Anonymous A — 11.1 years ago #42,328
How did this all start for you?
+Anonymous B — 11.1 years ago, 2 hours later[T] [B] #462,224
Kook hates attention whores.
+The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 11.1 years ago, 42 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,226
Kook hates women.+kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,227
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 41 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,228
For one thing I hate people who cry out against violence, but then use violence language to silence enemies.
·The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY — 11.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,235
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,238
+Anonymous E — 11.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,240
+Borg !!uShuoNeCJ — 11.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,255
kook's cool in my book.
+Anonymous G — 11.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,256
@previous (Borg !!uShuoNeCJ)
I've been doing a lot of meditating and praying lately, and this has helped me collect my thoughts and organize them into the letter you're about to read. The bulk of this letter is a critique of Borg 's lethargic put-downs. The reason I refer to them as “lethargic” is that ever since Borg decided to palliate and excuse the atrocities of his proxies, his consistent, unvarying line has been that he's a saintly figure---philanthropic, noble, and wise. I mean, really.
Borg likes ultimata that spit on sacred icons. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that many people who follow his publications have come to the erroneous conclusion that it is costive to question his modes of thought. The stark truth of the matter is that Borg insists that the peak of fashion is to doctor evidence and classification systems and make tartarean generalizations to support indelicate, preconceived views. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject.
Borg claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to build a totalitarian death machine. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Borg's drones. The truth is that Borg may fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation right after he reads this letter. Let him. Before you know it, I will put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. Let me try to put this in perspective: If you ever ask him to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. I fully intend to provide a trenchant analysis of Borg's tricks. That's the path that I have chosen. It's unquestionably not an easy path, but then again, Borg wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice his most loyal disciples if it made it even slightly easier for him to make it nearly impossible to disturb his obstinate gravy train. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that Borg's ruminations can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that our battle with Borg is a battle between spiritualism and pharisaism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that Borg pretends to be supportive of my plan to prevent the production of a new crop of disorganized, blockish sapheads. Don't trust him, though; he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, he'll promote a form of government in which religious freedom, racial equality, and individual liberty are severely at risk. Not only that, but Borg claims that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his pranks. Then again, in Borg's hariolations, hooliganism is witting and unremitting, querimonious and neo-contemptible. He revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to detach people from their morally established systems of belief.
Of course, it's common to hear pestilential, bloodthirsty chowderheads conflate two basic arguments when trying to make a point about neocolonialism. The first argument, with which I strongly disagree, is that Borg should be allowed to sound the standard “they're out to get us” call and rally his helots to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. The second argument, which I enjoy but which Borg and company are sure to find offensive, is that Borg makes a living out of hoodlumism. I call this tactic of his “entrepreneurial hoodlumism”. Borg and his encomiasts have undoubtedly raised entrepreneurial hoodlumism to a fine art by using it to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest.
I've been doing a lot of meditating and praying lately, and this has helped me collect my thoughts and organize them into the letter you're about to read. The bulk of this letter is a critique of Borg 's lethargic put-downs. The reason I refer to them as “lethargic” is that ever since Borg decided to palliate and excuse the atrocities of his proxies, his consistent, unvarying line has been that he's a saintly figure---philanthropic, noble, and wise. I mean, really.
Borg likes ultimata that spit on sacred icons. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that many people who follow his publications have come to the erroneous conclusion that it is costive to question his modes of thought. The stark truth of the matter is that Borg insists that the peak of fashion is to doctor evidence and classification systems and make tartarean generalizations to support indelicate, preconceived views. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject.
Borg claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to build a totalitarian death machine. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by Borg's drones. The truth is that Borg may fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation right after he reads this letter. Let him. Before you know it, I will put to rest the animosities that have kept various groups of people from enjoying anything other than superficial unity. Let me try to put this in perspective: If you ever ask him to do something, you can bet that your request will get lost in the shuffle, unaddressed, ignored, and rebuffed. I fully intend to provide a trenchant analysis of Borg's tricks. That's the path that I have chosen. It's unquestionably not an easy path, but then again, Borg wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice his most loyal disciples if it made it even slightly easier for him to make it nearly impossible to disturb his obstinate gravy train. That should serve as the final, ultimate, irrefutable proof that Borg's ruminations can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that our battle with Borg is a battle between spiritualism and pharisaism, between tradition and subversion, between the defenders of Western civilization and its enemies. With the battle lines drawn as such, it is abundantly clear that Borg pretends to be supportive of my plan to prevent the production of a new crop of disorganized, blockish sapheads. Don't trust him, though; he's a wolf in sheep's clothing. Before you know it, he'll promote a form of government in which religious freedom, racial equality, and individual liberty are severely at risk. Not only that, but Borg claims that he is the ultimate authority on what's right and what's wrong. That claim illustrates a serious reasoning fallacy, one that is pandemic in his pranks. Then again, in Borg's hariolations, hooliganism is witting and unremitting, querimonious and neo-contemptible. He revels in it, rolls in it, and uses it to detach people from their morally established systems of belief.
Of course, it's common to hear pestilential, bloodthirsty chowderheads conflate two basic arguments when trying to make a point about neocolonialism. The first argument, with which I strongly disagree, is that Borg should be allowed to sound the standard “they're out to get us” call and rally his helots to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. The second argument, which I enjoy but which Borg and company are sure to find offensive, is that Borg makes a living out of hoodlumism. I call this tactic of his “entrepreneurial hoodlumism”. Borg and his encomiasts have undoubtedly raised entrepreneurial hoodlumism to a fine art by using it to stonewall on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest.
·Anonymous G — 11.1 years ago, 31 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,257
@462,255 (Borg !!uShuoNeCJ)
I have some advice for Borg. He should keep his mouth shut until he stops being such a malign egotist and starts being at least one of informative, agreeable, creative, or entertaining. If I seem a bit saturnine, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with him on his own level. Borg is good at one thing, and that's keeping his ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of his claque know that Borg is planning to evade responsibility. Even fewer of these initiates know that Borg periodically puts up a façade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual.
The key to placing blame where it belongs-in the hands of Borg and his inarticulate coadjutors-lies in uniting civil rights and civil liberties leaders, scholars, journalists, and public intellectuals from across the political and ideological spectrum on behalf of individual rights, due process, freedom of expression, and rights of conscience. A brief study of sociology will show one inescapable fact: Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Borg had learned anything from history, he'd know that in a recent tell-all, a former member of his club writes that “when Borg is gone, all that will be left from his legacy of hate is the hate itself”. Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that we've all heard Borg yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear. Just the other day, some of Borg's flippant plenipotentiaries forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described Borg's blueprint for a world in which hard-core, indecent drongos are free to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that the longer Borg wears the mask of voyeurism, the harder it is to remove. I can reword my point as follows: I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to Borg how his crew is an open-door asylum for the worst types of vilipensive racketeers there are. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Borg will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response.
In legal terminology, Borg is guilty ofsuppressio veri or “concealment of truth”. That's probably obvious to a blind man on a galloping horse. Nevertheless, I suspect that few people reading this letter are aware that among the many challenges in promoting Borg to an elevated status in history as an archdemon of presenteeism is a bottom-line unawareness of how Borg's votaries tend to fall into the mistaken belief that it's disruptive to summon up the courage to shatter the illusion that serfdom and slavery do not represent oppression unless the serfs or the slaves themselves “articulate” that oppression, mainly because they live inside a Borg-generated illusion world and talk only with each other.
I have some advice for Borg. He should keep his mouth shut until he stops being such a malign egotist and starts being at least one of informative, agreeable, creative, or entertaining. If I seem a bit saturnine, it's only because I'm trying to communicate with him on his own level. Borg is good at one thing, and that's keeping his ulterior motives secret. Only a few initiates in the inner sanctum of his claque know that Borg is planning to evade responsibility. Even fewer of these initiates know that Borg periodically puts up a façade of reform. However, underneath the pretty surface, it's always business as usual.
The key to placing blame where it belongs
In legal terminology, Borg is guilty ofsuppressio veri or “concealment of truth”. That's probably obvious to a blind man on a galloping horse. Nevertheless, I suspect that few people reading this letter are aware that among the many challenges in promoting Borg to an elevated status in history as an archdemon of presenteeism is a bottom-line unawareness of how Borg's votaries tend to fall into the mistaken belief that it's disruptive to summon up the courage to shatter the illusion that serfdom and slavery do not represent oppression unless the serfs or the slaves themselves “articulate” that oppression, mainly because they live inside a Borg-generated illusion world and talk only with each other.
·Anonymous G — 11.1 years ago, 41 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,258
@462,255 (Borg !!uShuoNeCJ)
No amount of opinion or innuendo nor any string of unrelated nostrums can change the fact that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that you may have noticed that in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many otherwise intelligent people continue to believe, thanks to Borg, that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Borg's precepts raise a number of brow-furrowing questions. I'm referring to questions such as, “Why does Borg associate with dirty, inane fence-sitters who are bent on bombarding me with insults?” It's questions like that that unequivocally get people thinking about how Borg preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his flock. Their first assignment usually involves placing our freedoms under more sustained and subtle attack than at any time in recorded history. The lesson to draw from this is that Borg says that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools.
If Borg's apocrisiaries had even an ounce of integrity they would denounce Borg's dissertations. One might conclude that Borg's contrivances are directly responsible for world poverty. Alternatively, one might conclude that this is a transparent attempt to snuff out the last embers of courageousness burning within us. In either case, Borg's diegeses are designed to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. If Borg continues to supplant national heroes with pesky sewer rats, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.
Now, I'm no fan of Borg's, but still, Borg keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to hinder economic growth and job creation. He deeply believes-and wants us to believe as well-that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, Borg has not increased our safety, security, or happiness by hornswoggling people into voting against their own self interests. All he's increased by doing that is the girth of his bloated ego. Whatever else may be the case, it is certain that I have no intention to cut and run even if he were to make people weak and dependent. Rather, I will stand my ground and free people from the spell of Marxism that he has cast over them. Whether or not I'm successful, I am truly at a loss for words when Borg asserts that his initiatives are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. He can't possibly be serious. I suspect that the real story here is that I once had a nightmare in which Borg was free to unleash horrific levels of violence. When I awoke, I realized that this nightmare was frighteningly close to reality. For instance, it is the case both in my nightmare and in reality that I have a message for Borg. My message is that, for the good of us all, he should never keep us hypnotized so we don't show pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror. He should never even try to do such a querulous thing. To make myself perfectly clear, by “never” I don't mean “maybe”, “sometimes”, or “it depends”. I mean only that Borg secretly has been scheming to muddy the word “indistinguishability”. This is exactly the sort of scandal that most people understand and appreciate. It's what opens people's eyes to the reality that there are some troubling issues here, even putting aside the basic question of whether or not Borg's degeneracy has permeated the whole stratum of society. For instance, I frequently talk about how he's always willing to sacrifice somebody else's life, just not his own. I would drop the subject except that by peddling the snake oil of laughable incendiarism, Borg has erected a monument to priggism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been “created”. “Excreted”, “belched”, “spewed”, and “spat out” are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, the earth presents a wonderful example of variety in all classes of the animal and vegetable kingdoms. People, beasts, and plants belonging to distinct classes all exhibit special qualities and peculiarities. Unfortunately, Borg's special quality is that he coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his crotchets sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. All right; I think I've now said everything I wanted to say in this letter. Perhaps my next letter should be entitled, “ Borg is incapable of handling an adult emotion or a universal concept without first reducing it to something fickle, furacious, squalid, and probably goofy.” That's a provocative title, perhaps, but it's unfortunately an accurate one, too.
No amount of opinion or innuendo nor any string of unrelated nostrums can change the fact that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that you may have noticed that in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, many otherwise intelligent people continue to believe, thanks to Borg, that the average working-class person can't see through his chicanery. But you don't know the half of it. For starters, Borg's precepts raise a number of brow-furrowing questions. I'm referring to questions such as, “Why does Borg associate with dirty, inane fence-sitters who are bent on bombarding me with insults?” It's questions like that that unequivocally get people thinking about how Borg preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his flock. Their first assignment usually involves placing our freedoms under more sustained and subtle attack than at any time in recorded history. The lesson to draw from this is that Borg says that ethical responsibility is merely a trammel of earthbound mortals and should not be required of a demigod like him. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools.
If Borg's apocrisiaries had even an ounce of integrity they would denounce Borg's dissertations. One might conclude that Borg's contrivances are directly responsible for world poverty. Alternatively, one might conclude that this is a transparent attempt to snuff out the last embers of courageousness burning within us. In either case, Borg's diegeses are designed to reap a whirlwind of destroyed marriages, damaged children, and, quite possibly, a globe-wide expression of incurable sexually transmitted diseases. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. If Borg continues to supplant national heroes with pesky sewer rats, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.
Now, I'm no fan of Borg's, but still, Borg keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to hinder economic growth and job creation. He deeply believes
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.1 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,259
@462,235 (The Doctor !7MHPahvoGY)
The Doctor is actually right this time around.
Violent actions is not equal to violent language.
The Doctor is actually right this time around.
Violent actions is not equal to violent language.
+Anonymous H — 11.1 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,262
+Anonymous I — 11.1 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,263
because doc is fag
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,270
·Anonymous G — 11.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #462,271
·Borg !!uShuoNeCJ — 11.1 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #462,335
·☆nigger☆ — 11.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #462,343
+Anonymous J — 11.1 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #462,346
isn't borg Scandinavian slang for cocksucker?
+Anonymous K — 11.1 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[T] [B] #462,347
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.1 years ago, 20 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,414
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,417
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.1 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,535
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 53 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,538
+Anonymous L — 11.1 years ago, 54 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,539
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.1 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,540
·Anonymous L — 11.1 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,541
@previous (A)
I taught she was just an activist for inter species marriage equality. Either way, I don't think she was born with a wang.
I taught she was just an activist for inter species marriage equality. Either way, I don't think she was born with a wang.
·kook !!u4KQvs2JM — 11.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,544
+Anonymous M — 11.1 years ago, 2 days later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #462,784
why do you desperately want to suck a cock in satin panties @OP ?
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.