Topic: Why are you not using the BEST Nordic News Web site on the entire fucking planet?
+Anonymous A — 11.7 years ago #39,750
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Boners. | - | 0% | |
| Sprite. | - | 0% |
+Anonymous B — 11.7 years ago, 2 minutes later[T] [B] #436,668
...because I'm not a Swedish neo-nazi?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #436,669
+Syntax — 11.7 years ago, 25 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #436,670
Quick sample of 3 of his links. Looks like Kimmo has turned full on faggot.
https://www.document.no/2014/12/ideologi-og-faglighet/
Ideology and professionalism
Christian Skaug
01.12.2014 kl. 17.07
After reporting from the NHA has Fylkeslegen Troms decided to open a supervision against two health workers providing young advice sex and relationships on a Christian site. Accusing point is that they discourage homosexual practices.
Fylkeslegen recognized a potential role conflict:
- The two sitting of the National Council use their professional titles as a basis for decisions which advice given. There are role clarification which is very important before we can draw clean final conclusion in this matter, he says to NRK.
Gay Movement spokesman Bård Nylund believes business is professionally irresponsible:
- I am very critical of this website. It can be harmful to young people who come there. A number of responses given does not correspond with the health professional standards we have in Norway.
The delicate the case is undoubtedly that it lies at the intersection between science and politics.
For healthcare professionals, it is naturally essential for advice they provide is healthy or harmful. But very often it is awful hard to know for sure what is healthiest. This applies to something so materially that diet's area and undoubtedly at least as much on a greater degree of psychological area of sexuality. There are rarely empirical data that allows one to conclude for sure, and the medical profession is as much an art as a science.
In the absence of mathematical security has nevertheless standards, Nylund is built on. Some of them are scientifically speaking fairly secure. The doctor who had to find to recommend smoking, would obviously get formidable explanation problems.
Other relies more on judgment and consensus, thus they are less secure, and increasingly colored by the zeitgeist. Among doctors there will nevertheless be shared beliefs about what is best, and you can probably find the whole spectrum between strict chastity and full licentiousness, although the public is dominated by those who believe that abstinence is unhygienic and that sex should be practiced almost five times a day .
The anti-Christian lobby will also be equally convinced that "the science is settled" what sexuality and health concerns, such as climate panel is about the relationship between temperature rise and human emissions of carbon dioxide, albeit on less solid foundation.
It should not Fylkeslegen be, and therefore should matter quickly leave his table - unless he gives politics and ideology take precedence over the academic. He gives in to the NHA, he appears neither particularly human or very ethical.
NRK Northern New: Authorities investigating Christian health workers discourages young homosexuality
https://www.document.no/2014/12/ideologi-og-faglighet/
Ideology and professionalism
Christian Skaug
01.12.2014 kl. 17.07
After reporting from the NHA has Fylkeslegen Troms decided to open a supervision against two health workers providing young advice sex and relationships on a Christian site. Accusing point is that they discourage homosexual practices.
Fylkeslegen recognized a potential role conflict:
- The two sitting of the National Council use their professional titles as a basis for decisions which advice given. There are role clarification which is very important before we can draw clean final conclusion in this matter, he says to NRK.
Gay Movement spokesman Bård Nylund believes business is professionally irresponsible:
- I am very critical of this website. It can be harmful to young people who come there. A number of responses given does not correspond with the health professional standards we have in Norway.
The delicate the case is undoubtedly that it lies at the intersection between science and politics.
For healthcare professionals, it is naturally essential for advice they provide is healthy or harmful. But very often it is awful hard to know for sure what is healthiest. This applies to something so materially that diet's area and undoubtedly at least as much on a greater degree of psychological area of sexuality. There are rarely empirical data that allows one to conclude for sure, and the medical profession is as much an art as a science.
In the absence of mathematical security has nevertheless standards, Nylund is built on. Some of them are scientifically speaking fairly secure. The doctor who had to find to recommend smoking, would obviously get formidable explanation problems.
Other relies more on judgment and consensus, thus they are less secure, and increasingly colored by the zeitgeist. Among doctors there will nevertheless be shared beliefs about what is best, and you can probably find the whole spectrum between strict chastity and full licentiousness, although the public is dominated by those who believe that abstinence is unhygienic and that sex should be practiced almost five times a day .
The anti-Christian lobby will also be equally convinced that "the science is settled" what sexuality and health concerns, such as climate panel is about the relationship between temperature rise and human emissions of carbon dioxide, albeit on less solid foundation.
It should not Fylkeslegen be, and therefore should matter quickly leave his table - unless he gives politics and ideology take precedence over the academic. He gives in to the NHA, he appears neither particularly human or very ethical.
NRK Northern New: Authorities investigating Christian health workers discourages young homosexuality
+Chef Excellence — 11.7 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #436,680
+On !Uvm54ORbmo — 11.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #436,681
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.7 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[T] [B] #436,682
+Anonymous F — 11.7 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,697
·Syntax — 11.7 years ago, 40 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,703
·Anonymous D — 11.7 years ago, 8 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,728
+autist — 11.7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,731
·autist — 11.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,732
·autist — 11.7 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,733
·autist — 11.7 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[T] [B] #436,734
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.