Notice: Welcome to
TinyChan, an account has automatically been created and assigned to you, you don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have
set a memorable name and password. Alternatively, you can
restore your ID. The use of this site requires cookies to be enabled; please cease browsing this site if you don't consent.
Topic: Which of these heterosexual sexual scenarios do you find more appealing?
+Anonymous A — 11.8 years ago #38,966
1. Brave New World Scenario: everybody has sex, but natural childbirth is virtually unknown. Aphrodisiacs and experience-enhancing drugs available to everybody.
2. 1984 Scenario: Sex is for reproduction, and only with a state-approved partner. Sex beyond those parameters is a crime against the state.
3. Present day scenario: sexual imagery downloadable from the web. Sex for reproduction, pleasure or revenge. Heterosexual marriage promoted by the state. Extramarital sex both legal and commonplace.
| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
| Brave New World Scenario | - | 0% | |
| 1984 Scenario | - | 0% | |
| Present Day Scenario | - | 0% | |
+Anonymous B — 11.8 years ago, 4 hours later[T] [B] #431,445
What does Brave New World entail? Test tube babies?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.8 years ago, 54 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #431,451
@previous (B)
In a sense. Embryos were cultivated in artificial wombs via a technique called the Bokanovsy Process. It might be compared to cloning, though it entailed more the mass production of human beings through an assembly line.
+Triptych !!mbygV1aTC — 11.8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #431,452
I like the present-day scenario (only here there's less promotion of heterosexual marriage).
+ducky — 11.8 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #431,453
@previous (Triptych !!mbygV1aTC)
They are not many good marriage folk in french canada
·Anonymous A (OP) — 11.8 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #431,454
@431,452 (Triptych !!mbygV1aTC)
I mean in the sense that most Churches and governments are highly resistant to homosexual marriage, and common law ("defacto") marriages are - for the most part - legally valid as long as the partners are straight.
·Triptych !!mbygV1aTC — 11.8 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #431,455
@previous (A)
Not here! Gay marriage's been legal since 2005. And common law marriage only requires two adults to live together for 12 months in a relationship like a marriage.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.