Topic: ATBBS2/TCBBS release.

+Anonymous A — 15.7 years ago #3,698

When is it going to be released? We were told half January, but nearing the end of it, I still haven't seen any sources. I guess this is vaporware.

+²DeRauqS !NANNANNANA — 15.7 years ago, 1 minute later[T] [B] #46,989

This is relevant to my interests...

+ltamake !3vZ7A06glM — 15.7 years ago, 5 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #47,056

Finishing it up.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 15.7 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #47,917

@previous (ltamake !3vZ7A06glM)
Can't wait.

+Anonymous D — 15.7 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #47,918

@47,056 (ltamake !3vZ7A06glM)
WELL HURRY UP! :3

+Anonymous E — 15.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #47,921

AWESOME

+Anonymous F — 15.7 years ago, 11 hours later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,095

This topic need a ltamake answer.

+Anonymous G — 15.7 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,102

@previous (F)

trollin hard or hardly trollin?

+Anonymous H — 15.7 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,104

WHEN will it be released, what is the ETA? ATBBS2 is needed for the launch of FatNiggerCock BBS.

·ltamake !3vZ7A06glM — 15.7 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,106

@previous (H)
Finishing up the chat system and finalising the entire software (bug checks and the like).

+Anonymous I — 15.7 years ago, 45 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,107

@previous (ltamake !3vZ7A06glM)
We don't need no chat system.

·Anonymous G — 15.7 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,108

@48,106 (ltamake !3vZ7A06glM)

> chat system

how far into beta is it? i assume that's why it's not on the site currently, yeah?

·Anonymous E — 15.7 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,109

@48,106 (ltamake !3vZ7A06glM)
Why not use a mature open source product instead of rolling your own?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 15.7 years ago, 10 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,309

@previous (E)
Like?

·Anonymous H — 15.7 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,338

@previous (A)
phpBB

+Nega !34Kas0OdzM — 15.7 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,340

Needs threaded PMs.
Also, PMs with trips, like the one that the TinyBBS fork using Stal's layout has.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 15.7 years ago, 21 hours later, 3 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,743

@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
Which one is that?

·Nega !34Kas0OdzM — 15.7 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,751

@previous (A)
The one at tiny.nfshost.com

+dnalnif !iZX9l9xKP6 — 15.7 years ago, 8 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,828

@48,338 (H)
you be trollin'

·sןǝǝ !pwXlx86ASM — 15.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,909

@48,309 (A)
I was thinking like IRC. Why would anyone reinvent the chat network?

+Anonymous L — 15.7 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[T] [B] #48,918

@previous (sןǝǝ !pwXlx86ASM)
Because science.

·Anonymous A (OP) — 15.7 years ago, 9 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,051

@48,909 (sןǝǝ !pwXlx86ASM)
There is no proper purpose build chan-bbs software that can deal with the abuse that comes with hosting a site like this.

+FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 15.7 years ago, 6 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,076

when I get some help

+Anonymous N — 15.7 years ago, 9 hours later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,277

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
At your service, baby.

·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 15.7 years ago, 35 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,291

@previous (N)
see if you can make the board check for URLs in posts and force them to preview to make sure the URL didn't break because of problem characters. embed this function into the post form below the [preview] and [post] buttons so people can generate URLs that won't break.

·Anonymous N — 15.7 years ago, 15 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,452

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Message me on IRC and I'll help you out. :P

·Anonymous A (OP) — 15.7 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,457

@49,291 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
That's not TCBBS/ATBBS2.

·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 15.7 years ago, 8 hours later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,629

@previous (A)
the two are different projects. TCBBS is developed for TC by link, with a few other contributions like anon's tripcode algorithm. ATBBS2 is a collaborative effort that anyone can actively participate in.

·ltamake !3vZ7A06glM — 15.7 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[T] [B] #49,640

@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Well put.

+Anonymous O — 15.7 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #49,700

@49,629 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
So you are saying that link hass ATBBS2, but not TCBBS?

·Anonymous A (OP) — 15.7 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #49,712

When is something going to be released?

+Anonymous P — 15.7 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #49,769

@previous (A)
It will be released when it's released.

+Anonymous Q — 15.7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #49,774

But will it have threaded discussions?

·ltamake !3vZ7A06glM — 15.7 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #49,790

@previous (Q)
There will be an option, yes.

·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 15.7 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[T] [B] #49,795

@49,774 (Q)
not on mine. too messy on the screen.

@49,712 (A)
TCBBS: whenever link feels it's secure enough for distribution.
ATBBS2: all I'm really waiting for on 1.6s is someone who will proofread and make sure I have CSRF checks wherever they are necessary. dynamic names/tripcodes may or may not be in it, depending on whether I can get them implemented alongside VIP names.

@49,700 (O)
the other way around

@49,452 (N)
I was planning to do that today, but it looks like I'll be unnecessarily spending 4 hours in a car without internet.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.

TinyChan