Topic: Watch out for this sex offender
+Anonymous A — 12.1 years ago #36,664
Lock up your children+Anonymous B — 12.1 years ago, 17 minutes later[T] [B] #414,326
Had sex with a girl of 17. wow
+Anonymous C — 12.1 years ago, 8 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #414,327
18yo that molested a 17yo. He must have truly sick mind to find a 17yo attractive.
+Anonymous D — 12.1 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[T] [B] #414,328
CASTRATE THIS MONSTER
+Detective — 12.1 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,339
Several Fredrick Jay Horton's registered as sex offenders. All Black.811 PENCIL BOX WAY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462
+The Detective !3yzc29zx8c — 12.1 years ago, 35 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,340
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 12.1 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,341
But seriously, sex offender laws are stupid shit. It's 2014 and we still don't have a fucking clause for teenagers? Having sex with someone one year younger than you should not be grounds for sex offender registration. What if the girl gets pregnant? If she's a christian and refuses to abort then this guy will have a kid he can't legally meet and she'll have to either raise the kid herself (which she probably would, being christian) as a single mother or put it up for adoption. How are lawmakers seriously this retarded?
·Anonymous A (OP) — 12.1 years ago, 32 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,343
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Don't defend him, he's a dirty fucking nonce that ruined some girls life because he wanted a young girl. I hope he kills himself
Don't defend him, he's a dirty fucking nonce that ruined some girls life because he wanted a young girl. I hope he kills himself
·Syntax — 12.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,347
@previous (A)Hold on a few nanoseconds OP
Did you perchance pull up that image and details off of
http://www.keepbusy.net/ You are aware people at random pull up a mugshot with details of arrest and then photoshop in some one they do not like and make fun of them.
Your post with details of address does Google to a black dude arrested for possession of pot. Give it a try for self. 811 PENCIL BOX WAY, VIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462
Mugshots.com ID: 20117311
Booking No: 0520447
Current Location: Released
Arrest Date: 5/31/2005
Release Date: 6/14/2005
Complaint Number: N/A
Citation Number: N/A
Total Bond: $0.00
Charges:
Charge Statute Bond Amount
VOLUSIA COSO FL W#2020990 FORS
Count: 1 Total: $0.00
As The Detective said - Google brings up several Black's with same name and I am not going to Google all of them and see if any were arrested for sex offense - You go do that but a quick Google shows me only one person at that address Arrested and he no white guy at that Address with a mug shot
Me thinks you got pawned from a humor web site but hey that is just me and perhaps you can check double check web to verify wot I located in a few seconds
+Anonymous G — 12.1 years ago, 37 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,353
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/local/wp/2014/07/09/in-sexting-case-manassas-city-police-want-to-photograph-teen-in-sexually-explicit-manner-lawyers-say/" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/local/wp/2014/07/09/in-sexting-case-manassas-city-police-want-to-photograph-teen-in-sexually-explicit-manner-lawyers-say/]</a>
The laws are fucked when it comes to this, it's a seriously flawed aspect of our justice system. Still it's not the same as an adult preying on teens or kids, regardless of how OP2TG would like to make it look.</a>
The laws are fucked when it comes to this, it's a seriously flawed aspect of our justice system. Still it's not the same as an adult preying on teens or kids, regardless of how OP2TG would like to make it look.</a>
·Syntax — 12.1 years ago, 12 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,354
@previous (G)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/local/wp/2014/07/09/in-sexting-case-manassas-city-police-want-to-photograph-teen-in-sexually-explicit-manner-lawyers-say
You had that ] at the end which screwed up the link - Damn "Taking him down to the hospital so he can get an erection in front of all those cops, that’s traumatizing.”
Thanks for the link - The texting of Peni and Vaginas has now put money in2 my own wallet which is strange indeed.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/local/wp/2014/07/09/in-sexting-case-manassas-city-police-want-to-photograph-teen-in-sexually-explicit-manner-lawyers-say
You had that ] at the end which screwed up the link - Damn "Taking him down to the hospital so he can get an erection in front of all those cops, that’s traumatizing.”
Thanks for the link - The texting of Peni and Vaginas has now put money in2 my own wallet which is strange indeed.
·Anonymous G — 12.1 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,358
@previous (Syntax )
> Thanks for the link - The texting of Peni and Vaginas has now put money in2 my own wallet which is strange indeed.
I'm not sure I want to know how you managed to profit off this farce.
> Thanks for the link - The texting of Peni and Vaginas has now put money in2 my own wallet which is strange indeed.
I'm not sure I want to know how you managed to profit off this farce.
·Syntax — 12.1 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,359
@previous (G)
I have a lot of stock in Verizon - Sprint and T-mobile Vodaphone - most gifted to me as they are clients who often need to off load paper and expect me to bill them less for consulting.
And one hell of a lot of stock in Qualcomm - So texting of course puts money in my wallet. Its even done in jokes when companies throw banquets for guests and they hire a local comic to spend 5 mins telling a bunch of new ones - often with images on a big screen but of course never that explicit
I have a lot of stock in Verizon - Sprint and T-mobile Vodaphone - most gifted to me as they are clients who often need to off load paper and expect me to bill them less for consulting.
And one hell of a lot of stock in Qualcomm - So texting of course puts money in my wallet. Its even done in jokes when companies throw banquets for guests and they hire a local comic to spend 5 mins telling a bunch of new ones - often with images on a big screen but of course never that explicit
+Anonymous H — 12.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,364
Syntax is a tweeker
·Syntax — 12.1 years ago, 22 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,367
+Anonymous I — 12.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,379
@414,341 (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
> But seriously, sex offender laws are stupid shit. It's 2014 and we still don't have a fucking clause for teenagers? Having sex with someone one year younger than you should not be grounds for sex offender registration. What if the girl gets pregnant? If she's a christian and refuses to abort then this guy will have a kid he can't legally meet and she'll have to either raise the kid herself (which she probably would, being christian) as a single mother or put it up for adoption. How are lawmakers seriously this retarded?
Oh you BASTARD!! You motherfucking bastard! You know a small part of me loves you dude, but you fucking cunt, WHY couldn't you have posted this anon??? He would have totally torn you to pieces for writing this, it would have been epic watching him squirm out of it when he realized you wrote it. You fucking dick, we so nearly had him. In future, post stuff like this ANON!!!!
> But seriously, sex offender laws are stupid shit. It's 2014 and we still don't have a fucking clause for teenagers? Having sex with someone one year younger than you should not be grounds for sex offender registration. What if the girl gets pregnant? If she's a christian and refuses to abort then this guy will have a kid he can't legally meet and she'll have to either raise the kid herself (which she probably would, being christian) as a single mother or put it up for adoption. How are lawmakers seriously this retarded?
Oh you BASTARD!! You motherfucking bastard! You know a small part of me loves you dude, but you fucking cunt, WHY couldn't you have posted this anon??? He would have totally torn you to pieces for writing this, it would have been epic watching him squirm out of it when he realized you wrote it. You fucking dick, we so nearly had him. In future, post stuff like this ANON!!!!
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 12.1 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,387
@414,354 (Syntax )
> Carlos Flores Laboy, appointed the teen’s guardian ad litem in the case, said he thought it was just as illegal for the Manassas City police to create their own child pornography as to investigate the teen for it. “They’re using a statute that was designed to protect children from being exploited in a sexual manner,” Flores Laboy said, “to take a picture of this young man in a sexually explicit manner. The irony is incredible.”
lol
> Carlos Flores Laboy, appointed the teen’s guardian ad litem in the case, said he thought it was just as illegal for the Manassas City police to create their own child pornography as to investigate the teen for it. “They’re using a statute that was designed to protect children from being exploited in a sexual manner,” Flores Laboy said, “to take a picture of this young man in a sexually explicit manner. The irony is incredible.”
lol
·Syntax — 12.1 years ago, 6 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,392
@previous (FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI)
Who thing is fucking ridiculous
> the case began when the teen’s 15-year-old girlfriend sent photos of herself to the 17-year-old, who in turn sent her the video in question. The girl has not been charged, and her mother filed a complaint about the boy’s video
She started it yet remains scot free - as she should be- just imagine if the courts demanded she go to a hospital get juiced up somehow so a pic can be taken for all to see in court.
Who thing is fucking ridiculous
> the case began when the teen’s 15-year-old girlfriend sent photos of herself to the 17-year-old, who in turn sent her the video in question. The girl has not been charged, and her mother filed a complaint about the boy’s video
She started it yet remains scot free - as she should be- just imagine if the courts demanded she go to a hospital get juiced up somehow so a pic can be taken for all to see in court.
·FuckAlms !vX8K53rFBI — 12.1 years ago, 50 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[T] [B] #414,412
@previous (Syntax )
Well, we don't actually know if she sent nude photos, the article doesn't specify. From the current legal perspective, instigating doesn't count. If she was miming a blowjob while clothed, that's technically no different than a photo of her in a full snowsuit.
Well, we don't actually know if she sent nude photos, the article doesn't specify. From the current legal perspective, instigating doesn't count. If she was miming a blowjob while clothed, that's technically no different than a photo of her in a full snowsuit.
Start a new topic to continue this conversation.
Or browse the latest topics.